home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Shareware Overload
/
ShartewareOverload.cdr
/
games
/
fireside.zip
/
FORGIVE
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1987-07-09
|
8KB
|
178 lines
FORGIVING THE NEWS
By Michael Finley
As a former newspaper and television editor
and reporter, I am often struck by the
contradictory attitudes many people have
about news coverage, whether on the page or
on the air. We seem to revile it as slant-
ed, or mediocre, or anti-religion, at the
same time we put it high on a pedestal as
chronicler of our lives and times -- some-
how events don't really occur unless they
are covered by the six o'clock news.
And I find myself wishing there were some
way we could take the media down from
that pedestal, and perhaps even forgive
them for their deficiencies.
To begin with, is there even such a thing
as "the media"? The phrase suggests that
print and broadcast journalists reflect a
single monolithic philosophy. To a degree
this is true -- TV news programs are terri-
bly alike, and most newspapers and tabs are
more like one another than different. Re-
porters and news editors are prone to pack
behaviors and true scoops are hard to come
by, since so much effort is given toward
preventing being scooped by someone else.
Journalism too often is a derriere garde
action.
An example is the coverage recently giv-
en, or not given, the Oct. 4 Marathon for
Non-Public Education, followed a week
later by the Twin Cities Marathon. The
first, which involved over 50,000 runners
of all ages, raising money for their
parochial schools, was completely neglec-
ted by print and broadcast media; the
second, featuring a couple of thousand
participants, was featured prominently by
every single medium.
I asked the reader's representative for
one of the two metro papers for a rat-
ionale for the omission. He said that it
is appropriate not to cover events such
as the Marathon for Non Public Education,
on the grounds that "the Twin Cities
Marathon is a legitimate sporting event,
whereas what you're talking about is more
a public relations stunt."
People wishing to raise funds for causes,
no matter how good the causes may be, he
said, need to understand that news re-
quires a "news peg," or timely detail
that makes a story newsworthy. When
Bishop Robert Carlson of the Archdiocese
ran in the Twin Cities Marathon, for
instance, that was a news-peg, and was
covered lavishly.
We need to remember that another rat-
ionale for such omisions is economics.
Newspapers and TV cannot afford to cover
everything -- even reporters don't work
for free. News space, in addition, is
alotted according to the day's "news
hole," which expands and shrinks accor-
ding to the success of the advertising
sales staff on a given day. Obviously,
the Twin Cities Marathon is a major com-
mercial (advertisable) event and the Mara-
thon for Non-Public Education is not.
Just as the news-peg philosophy keeps much
of the so-called "good news" out of the
public eye, so it does it tend to general-
ize or leap to conclusions when "bad news"
may be in the offing. One Twin Cities
television recently teased viewers with a
5-second alarm about the current "priest
shortage" in Minnesota -- the reporter res-
ponsible for this moment of fear leaped at
the prospect of abandoned parishes but, I
am told, resisted attempts to inform him
about parish alternatives, or the healthy
activity of the lay ministry.
The unavoidable inference was that the
story had already formed in the repor-
ter's mind, and new information was not
welcome -- a dynamic commonly known as
prejudice. The irony is that this is the
same sort of "don't bother us with the
facts" mentality constantly ladled upon
the Church in news reports.
News reporters, I believe, are bred not
for empathy but for objectivity. Most
reporters are skilled at relativistic
thinking, at standing outside a situation
to evaluate it. This is a valuable mental
skill, but not one which works well with
issues of faith. Religion is a tough beat.
I think it is also true that reporters
and editors are centrists by nature --
they are pestered on an hourly basis by
passionate inquiries. In the newsroom we
called them "kook calls," and they en-
livened many a lunch conversation. News
people, under this barrage of suspicion
and plain old abuse, have a choice of
growing ever more thick-skinned and dis-
missive, or else angrily defensive at a
world constantly challenging their mo-
tives.
As another relativist, Pilate asked, "What
is truth?" The disillusionment of jour-
nalists goes beyond our disgust when a
worthy program fails because instruments of
the community declined to spread the word.
For them there is never the time or budget
to do a story the way it should be done.
There is even the sense that the greatest
stories are not quite tellable -- life is
too complicated, and news holes too small.
What all this may sound like is your own
work, and the decisions and compromises
you make in your everyday conduct. On
"Lou Grant" the reporters abandon the
ninety-nine to pursue that installment's
special story. That's a luxury most
media can't afford. You probably can't,
either.
It may help to keep in mind that repor-
ters and editors are just people more or
less like yourself, stretching their
budgets and brains to get a job done
which every day changes 100%. When you
or I make a mistake, we aren't exposed
before all the world. When a newspaper
makes a mistake, it seems that's the only
thing people read that day.
Over time, reporters, assignment editors,
managing editors, news editors, headliners,
anchormen and even photographers will
disappoint. It may help to apply the
theological shellac that we apply to our-
selves to them as well. They too are con-
ceived in sin and prone to error. They're
even redeemed, darn 'em.
All we can do is work to keep our voices
heard along with all the others, appre-
ciate the pressures of the newsroom, and
-- hardest of all -- forgive them when
they really blow it.
And don't believe everything you read.
# # #
Michael Finley is former news editor of
the Worthington Daily Globe.