home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Current Shareware 1994 January
/
SHAR194.ISO
/
articles
/
pim9310.zip
/
ART11
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-10-05
|
3KB
|
34 lines
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ AGGREGATION ║
║ By: Earl Dunovant ║
║ Black Issues Conf. Host (RimeRelayNet) ║
║ ║
║ A West Indian writer once said "Negroes do not understand the ║
║ difference between group segregation and group aggregation. And ║
║ their leaders do not enlighten them, because they too do not ║
║ choose to understand." This is all too true. Fortunately, I'm ║
║ not a leader. I have chosen to understandAnd I have chosen to ║
║ explain the difference, and the difference that difference ║
║ makes. ║
║ ║
║ Segregation and aggregation both refer to a gathering together of ║
║ things according to some shared characteristic. Both imply ║
║ considering that group as a single entity. But just as all other ║
║ things can be constructive or destructive, so can this viewing ║
║ groups of people collectively. Aggregation is the positive side ║
║ of this collective viewing, while segregation is the negative ║
║ side. ║
║ ║
║ What makes segregation negative is that it's something that's ║
║ done *to* you, whereas aggregation is something that is done *by* ║
║ you. Segregation is imposed on you, aggregation is chosen by ║
║ you. When you aggregate, you draw together with people.When you ║
║ segregate, you push people aside. ║
║ ║
║ Aggregation and segregation *are* similar. They can be looked at ║
║ as the same thing when you're not personally involved. Their ║
║ effects can seem the same if you're not involved, too. There is ║
║ a difference though, and we Blacks must keep that difference in ║
║ mind in our collective efforts. ║
╚═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝