home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Who Knows What Madness Lurks in the Heart of a SysOp?
- One SysOp's Opinion
- By Jim Westbrook
- JimNet RBBS
- [512] 837-0953
-
- Why do some folks turn to being a SysOp? There are as many answers as
- there are SysOps, however, it is the objective of this article to
- illustrate one of the less obvious motivations.
-
- Tom Mack, and many others, offer the stated objective of freely
- exchanged information and ideas as the foundation of their bulletin
- board systems. While technically correct, free speech being a tenet of
- this country, this hardly explains why someone would voluntarily commit
- a significant financial investment to the project.
-
- Many other system operators offer the explanation that they "provide a
- service to the community". Although true, again this fails to explain
- the motivation required. The same is true of those want "to do it
- better", citing a level of frustration with the systems currently
- available.
-
- A BBS represents a major investment of time and effort on the part of
- the system operator in addition to the financial aspects of dedicating a
- computer, modem, phone line (with monthly bill), and time allocation for
- the on-going process of system maintenance. Altruism, however sincere,
- only partly explains their actions.
-
- Shakespeare is credited with the line, "...all the world is but a stage,
- and we but players." Therein lies the motivation that seems the most
- likely to permit someone to justify the expense and investment of time
- and effort to the task of becoming and continuing to be a system
- operator. The return on his/her investment is seldom, if ever,
- tangible. However, the intangible returns of pride in one's
- craftsmanship, self-satisfaction in a job well done, and a sense of
- power are all significant factors.
-
- The sense of power is akin to that of a director of a play or film. The
- end product is to some degree dependent upon the performance of others
- (users or actors) although the performance is orchestrated by the
- director or SysOp. The director obtains the desired results by
- instruction of the actors. If the actors repeatedly fail to achieve the
- desired results then they are subject to dismissal from the role. The
- power to control others' actions rests with him. This is paralleled for
- a SysOp, he obtains the desired result through instruction of the users
- in the permissible activities on his system. Those users who fail
- repeatedly to achieve the results (by violating the system rules of
- operation for example) are subject to dismissal (deletion) by the SysOp.
- The sense of power is the result of this control.
-
- The satisfaction derived by the director of a play when it is performed
- to the criteria he established is shared by a SysOp when the users of
- his system make use of it within the framework he has established. In
- the case of the director, his instructions were understood and executed
- as intended. Ditto for the SysOp, the users were able to utilize his
- system based on his instructions and in the manner he intended.
-
- The pride in one's work (craftsmanship) is somewhat more nebulous to
- define than the other areas. This is obviously closely related to the
- success of the project at hand. Without success it is doubtful that
- anyone could sustain a pride in his work. The pride comes from repeated
- success, the director gets good results from several groups of actors.
- The SysOp gets good results accumulatively from more and more users.
-
- The SysOp has, additionally, the impetus of the artist (in this case
- making him like a painter as well). The "screen art" he has created in
- the form of menus, bulletins, welcome messages, and so on, closely
- correlate to other forms of visual art. They are "hung" on the
- electronic gallery walls for the viewing and scrutiny of the public as
- surely as if they were framed watercolors in an art museum. This is not
- just a willingness to submit to public scrutiny on the part of a SysOp,
- it is a genuine desire. A SysOp is both director and actor since he
- actively participates in the discussions on-line. He is the set
- designer, the producer (after all it's his equipment and funding), and
- to some extent the audience as well.
-
- Perhaps the above explains the motivation to be a SysOp, but it is my
- contention that the principle factor is a desire for public recognition
- of his "art". Without this impetus few would ever become a SysOp, and
- even fewer would continue the role. Altruism is socially acceptable
- whereas seeking public recognition is frequently criticized.
-
- -- The Central Texas SysOp Association