home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- BRITAIN, Page 50THE NEW ROYAL WATCH: Waiting for Wills
-
-
- Charles and Diana separate officially, but the announcement
- raises more problems than it solves
-
- By MARTHA DUFFY -- With reporting by Helen Gibson/London
-
-
- Princess Diana broke the news to her sons at Highgrove,
- the hated country house she visited for the last time to remove
- her possessions. Prince Charles sought out the boys at their
- boarding school to reassure them about his separation from
- their mother. Then, last Wednesday, British Prime Minister John
- Major announced the split in the House of Commons in a move
- timed to get the worst of the press coverage over with before
- the little princes' Christmas break.
-
- The Prince and Princess of Wales acted wisely on behalf of
- their sons, because the media coverage was extraordinary. Every
- paper, broadsheet and tabloid was lying in wait with exhaustive
- stories. The next morning, the Sun devoted 26 pages to the
- split. To judge by reaction in the streets, it was a sad day.
- The fairy-tale marriage was finally over after 11 years, and
- people were sorry to see the last gleaming gossamer fade into
- cobweb.
-
- But regret and human sympathy were quickly outdistanced by
- more practical doubts. Exactly what did the separation
- announcement, released by the palace, accomplish? "Their Royal
- Highnesses," it intoned, "would like to stress first and
- foremost that this decision is amicable . . . There have been
- no third parties involved, on either side." Well, fine, but the
- pair have scarcely been able to look at each other, never mind
- speak, in public, and each has been caught in indiscreet
- phonefests with a "confidant."
-
-
- The real boggler was the statement that "there is no
- reason why Her Royal Highness should not become Queen." That
- message caused gasps in Parliament. The reaction reflects in
- part the fact that few believe the Waleses' assurance that they
- have no plans to divorce. Royal credibility is low on such
- matters. When Princess Margaret and Princess Anne ended their
- marriages, the announcements were similar, but divorce followed.
- The Archbishops of Canterbury and York released a joint
- statement that the breakup does not affect Charles' future
- position as head of the Church of England. But that church
- frowns on divorce. As to remarriage, the stricture is so firm
- that Princess Anne went to Scotland last Saturday to wed
- Commander Timothy Laurence.
-
- Tory M.P. John Bowis spoke for many when he said, "It
- would be absurd to think of two royal processions coming from
- different directions to the Abbey for a coronation. If it is not
- possible to have a happy monarch and family, I think we should
- skip a generation and wait for William." The succession issue
- lies at the heart of the monarchy; for the institution to
- survive, it must be stable. If the Waleses pursue other romantic
- interests, as is likely, the Windsors may reel into even
- thornier problems than they faced in 1992.
-
- Even the timing of the separation statement was ridiculed.
- Major canceled a meeting with Jacques Delors, President of the
- European Commission, just before the Edinburgh summit. Says
- London University constitutional expert Peter Hennessy: "Royal
- issues still override all other issues." Anthony Holden, a
- biographer of Prince Charles, remarks of the announcement, "It
- just may be that Major is dumb enough to think that the
- Edinburgh conference would bury it, and the royal family is dumb
- enough to think that Princess Anne's marriage would obscure it."
-
- The notion that this move will give either Charles or
- Diana any more private freedom is strictly wishful thinking. If
- anything, the press will be more relentless. Charles will find
- a national stakeout on himself and his friend Camilla
- Parker-Bowles, and tabloid writers are sure to be bolder.
-
- The separation announcement confirms that the tabs were
- right, a tough fact for the royal family to face. The palace
- clings to the one thing Charles and Diana undoubtedly have in
- their favor: both conduct their public lives energetically and
- responsibly. Now, despite official denials, there will be
- separate "courts" of competing loyal cadres. But it would be a
- mistake to think that the estrangement will turn into another
- Woody-Mia fracas. The couple have great vested interests in
- common: the throne must be secure for their son.
-
- Diana looks to be the victor in the separation
- negotiations. Care of the children will be shared, but Diana
- gets a reported $1.55 million a year, the Kensington Palace
- apartments, a staff that is mostly her own, continuance of her
- status as a senior member of the royal family and a life free
- from Charles' glower. She may have insisted on Major's
- underscoring her right to be Queen. With the clamor in
- Parliament, this may be an unrealistic notion. But Diana should
- not be counted out; her friends say the public has not seen the
- extent of her portfolio. More and more, she moves center-stage.
- Quips Holden: "If she manages to pull down the monarchy by
- mistake, she will be elected the first President of the People's
- Republic of Britain."
-
- No one is pushing Charles' candidacy for this hypothetical
- job. In instant TV polls, he was the clear loser in the blame
- game. He is said to be humiliated by the revelation of the
- raunchy, so-called Camillagate tapes. His whole life has gone
- into preparing to ascend a throne that now seems as remote as
- Camelot.
-
- If the Windsors can weather the next several years, their
- prospects may improve. Charles and Diana are due for a rough
- passage; but as their new lives take shape, the direction of the
- Crown may also become clear. In the meantime, Queen Elizabeth
- II, 66, must hang in there, as she has for 40 years; her family
- has not allowed her an easeful old age. Prince William of Wales
- may be the savior of the monarchy, but he is only 10.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-