home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- ESSAY, Page 88Ice T: Is the Issue Social Responsibility . . .
-
-
- By Michael Kinsley
-
- How did the company that publishes this magazine come to
- produce a record glorifying the murder of police?
-
-
- I got my 12-gauge sawed off
-
- I got my headlights turned off
-
- I'm 'bout to bust some shots off
-
- I'm 'bout to dust some cops off . . .
-
- Die, Die, Die Pig, Die!
-
-
-
- So go the lyrics to Cop Killer by the rapper Ice-T on the
- album Body Count. The album is released by Warner Bros. Records,
- part of the Time Warner media and entertainment conglomerate.
-
- In a Wall Street Journal op-ed piece laying out the
- company's position, Time Warner co-CEO Gerald Levin makes two
- defenses. First, Ice-T's Cop Killer is misunderstood. "It
- doesn't incite or glorify violence . . . It's his fictionalized
- attempt to get inside a character's head . . . Cop Killer is no
- more a call for gunning down the police than Frankie and Johnny
- is a summons for jilted lovers to shoot one another." Instead
- of "finding ways to silence the messenger," we should be
- "heeding the anguished cry contained in his message."
-
- This defense is self-contradictory. Frankie and Johnny
- does not pretend to have a political "message" that must be
- "heeded." If Cop Killer has a message, it is that the murder of
- policemen is a justified response to police brutality. And not
- in self-defense, but in premeditated acts of revenge against
- random cops. ("I know your family's grievin' -- f--- 'em.")
-
- Killing policemen is a good thing -- that is the plain
- meaning of the words, and no "larger understanding" of black
- culture, the rage of the streets or anything else can explain
- it away. This is not Ella Fitzgerald telling a story in song.
- As in much of today's popular music, the line between performer
- and performance is purposely blurred. These are political
- sermonettes clearly intended to endorse the sentiments being
- expressed. Tracy Marrow (Ice-T) himself has said, "I scared the
- police, and they need to be scared.'' That seems clear.
-
- The company's second defense of Cop Killer is the classic
- one of free expression: "We stand for creative freedom. We
- believe that the worth of what an artist or journalist has to
- say does not depend on preapproval from a government official
- or a corporate censor."
-
- Of course Ice-T has the right to say whatever he wants.
- But that doesn't require any company to provide him an outlet.
- And it doesn't relieve a company of responsibility for the
- messages it chooses to promote. Judgment is not "censorship."
- Many an "anguished cry" goes unrecorded. This one was recorded,
- and promoted, because a successful artist under contract wanted
- to record it. Nothing wrong with making money, but a company
- cannot take the money and run from the responsibility.
-
- The founder of Time, Henry Luce, would snort at the notion
- that his company should provide a value-free forum for the
- exchange of ideas. In Luce's system, editors were supposed to
- make value judgments and promote the truth as they saw it. Time
- has moved far from its old Lucean rigidity -- far enough to
- allow for dissenting essays like this one. That evolution is a
- good thing, as long as it's not a handy excuse for abandoning
- all standards.
-
-
- No commercial enterprise need agree with every word that
- appears under its corporate imprimatur. If Time Warner now
- intends to be "a global force for encouraging the confrontation
- of ideas," that's swell. But a policy of allowing diverse
- viewpoints is not a moral free pass. Pro and con on national
- health care is one thing; pro and con on killing policemen is
- another.
-
- A bit of sympathy is in order for Time Warner. It is
- indeed a "global force" with media tentacles around the world.
- If it imposes rigorous standards and values from the top, it
- gets accused of corporate censorship. If it doesn't, it gets
- accused of moral irresponsibility. A dilemma. But someone should
- have thought of that before deciding to become a global force.
-
- And another genuine dilemma. Whatever the actual merits of
- Cop Killer, if Time Warner withdraws the album now the company
- will be perceived as giving in to outside pressure. That is a
- disastrous precedent for a global conglomerate.
-
- The Time-Warner merger of 1989 was supposed to produce
- corporate "synergy": the whole was supposed to be more than the
- sum of the parts. The Cop Killer controversy is an example of
- negative synergy. People get mad at Cop Killer and start
- boycotting the movie Batman Returns. A reviewer praises Cop
- Killer ("Tracy Marrow's poetry takes a switchblade and deftly
- slices life's jugular," etc.), and TIME is accused of corruption
- instead of mere foolishness. Senior Time Warner executives find
- themselves under attack for -- and defending -- products of
- their company they neither honestly care for nor really
- understand, and doubtless weren't even aware of before
- controversy hit.
-
- Anyway, it's absurd to discuss Cop Killer as part of the
- "confrontation of ideas" -- or even as an authentic anguished
- cry of rage from the ghetto. Cop Killer is a cynical commercial
- concoction, designed to titillate its audience with imagery of
- violence. It merely exploits the authentic anguish of the inner
- city for further titillation. Tracy Marrow is in business for
- a buck, just like Time Warner. Cop Killer is an excellent joke
- on the white establishment, of which the company's anguished
- apologia ("Why can't we hear what rap is trying to tell us?")
- is the punch line.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-