home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- THE WEEK, Page 20NATIONStar Wars Under Fire
-
-
- A tough-minded Pentagon puts a damper on Congress's enthusiasm
-
-
- Weapons change purposes these days as easily as people change
- hats. But rumblings from the Pentagon indicate that even the
- latest version of Star Wars is in trouble. The first tremor came
- in a May 15 memo by Assistant Secretary of Defense David Chu
- leaked to the press last week. Haste could make billions of
- dollars in waste, warned Chu. The department's top weapons
- analyst says plans to deploy 100 ground-based interceptors by
- 1997 -- rather than 2002, as he recommends -- to fend off
- small-scale nuclear attacks cannot proceed without major cost
- overruns and performance problems. In the rush to deploy, he
- says, the military will have to design and start buying SDI
- before any of the missiles, radar or communications involved are
- tested. That is hardly a recipe for success: the record of
- earlier ground-interceptor tests has been spotty at best. The
- proposal, says Chu, violates the fly-before-buy principles that
- Pentagon leaders "have labored so hard to put into place." At
- week's end the Pentagon bowed to that logic and announced that
- it was pushing back the SDI plan by at least a year.
-
- What's the rush? Last year Congress ordered speedy
- deployment of the 100-missile complex at Grand Forks, N. Dak.,
- the only strategic-defense site permitted by the 1972
- Antiballistic Missile Treaty. If that agreement can be
- renegotiated with the Russians, congressional SDI-niks hope to
- expand Grand Forks into a $35 billion nationwide network of 700
- interceptors. But a second leak last week could chill those
- plans: a draft Pentagon report now concludes that even the
- proposed national-defense site at Grand Forks would violate the
- ABM treaty. And that, says Federation of American Scientists
- space policy director John Pike, is what all the urgency is
- really about. "They're trying to get rid of the ABM treaty
- before the magic of Desert Storm fades," observes Pike. "They'll
- work out the bugs later. But it's a very expensive form of
- diplomacy."
-
-
-
-
-
-