home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- In article <199312180049.BAA23304@eunet.ch> mw@eunet.ch writes:
- > > Of course, all this requires you to have a spare SunOS license lying
- > > around. I don't mind borrowing a prgram or two from my sun3 for testing
- >
- > This was not the point. You said you don't rate SunOS compatibility useful
-
- This _is_ the point. Any x can't be considered generally useful unless
- a goodly number of people have access to item y which it requires. :-)
-
- If something like PC-Task requires MS-DOS to run, great, you go buy a
- copy of MS-DOS. SunOS for the Sun3 isn't *nearly* as easy or inexpensive
- to obtain. Probably the easiest way to obtain one would be to buy a
- machine with SunOS -- of course, then what do you run on the Sun? (you
- want me to waste good hardware? :->)
-
- Now, maybe the SunOS license allows the shared libraries and ld.so to be
- run on more than one machine at the same time with only a single license,
- but I doubt it. Most folks don't even have a single license...
-
- > if it can only deal with static binaries. I just told you how to deal
- > with dynamic libraries. Whether you want to spare the disk space to keep
- > SunOS stuff or not, is a totally different thing ;-)
-
- I have the disk space, I have the libraries. I don't have a second
- license. I doubt most NetBSD/Amiga users will even get as far as the
- second.
-
- I'm not complaining, I thnik it's great that we have this feature even
- if only a few people can make use of it right now. What I'm saying is,
- "gee, wouldn't it be nice if we could make this feature work for more
- people?". It doesn't look like it would be very hard to cook up SunOS
- style versions of ld.so and libc.so, which would cover most uses.
- (hmm... we might need libdl too).
-
- --
- Ty Sarna "Oh, I don't know *everything*. I don't
- tsarna@endicor.com even know how fish work." -- Joel, MST3K
-
-