home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- I have documented some of update-inetd's design issues in
-
- http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00611.html
-
- and, with the help of Roger Leigh, made a proposal for a cleaner solution (the
- above url has a second, much simplified version of the original proposal).
-
- However, there has been no consensus on the proposal. In the meantime, I don't
- see a clean way forward for dealing with most of update-inetd's pending bugs.
-
- -- Serafeim Zanikolas Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:29:44 +0100
-
- #24043: do not only look at service name, but also to protocal (tcp/udp)
- #33797: seems to ask for replace instead of add?
- #53396: debconf messages still confusing?
- #64874: improve documentation?
- #168847: improve documentation/add replace?
- #179318: close as debconf is used since some time...
- #207892: merge with #53396?
- #245517: don't act if the conf file doesn't exist
- #322528: investigate issue by reproducing given test case
- #430849: implement hostname/address prefix mgmt
- #161532: implement spawning rate support
- #212540: improve documentation about update-inetd not being a sysadmin tool
- #261711: merge with #53396?
- #307697: merge with #53396?
- #311111: improve documentation about --remove?
- #344139: close as debconf is used since some time...
- #374542: document support for --group combined with --add or --remove?
- #123929: include po4a support for the manpage?
- #45334: merge with #161532?
- #63210: investigate if disabling with one kind of comment and enabling with another would have an acceptable result
- #74339: implement status inquiry
- #82875: merge with #74339?
- #159366: merge with #33797?
- #236917: close as proper debconf support is enabled?
-