home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Text File | 1992-10-31 | 176.8 KB | 4,384 lines
This forum is supplied for demonstration purposes only and is accessible via the IBM OS/2 BBS system. What you see below is the forum as it existed on 10/30/92. The IBM OS/2 Bulletin Board System (BBS) is IBM's new electronic support offering for OS/2 Version 2.0. With OS/2 BBS you can electronically review OS/2 technical information, submit program defects to IBM, and receive information on how to solve problems. Users of the OS/2 BBS not only include OS/2 customers, but the OS/2 expertise of the entire internal IBM community worldwide. OS2BBS makes all this available via a local or toll free number in most major cities. To request a complete OS/2 BBS Information Package detailing the OS/2 BBS offering and including pricing and registration/access information, please call: 1-800-547-1283. ===== FORBROWS CFORUM created at 15:05:47 on 92/06/29 GMT (by HNDERSON at AUSVM8) IBM INTERNAL USE ONLY Each contributor agrees to the following: By placing material in this file I agree to abide by the rules and grant IBM a license as set forth in the file IBMPC RULES of the IBMPC conference. No Material can be placed in this forum that is considered confidential. The Material you place here can be used freely by anyone who has access to this forum. Forum: FORBROWS FORUM (Customer FORUM) Forum subject: FORBROWS General Questions and Answers. This CFORUM is provided as a conferencing tool for the discussion of issues, question, and problems with the use of FORBROWS tool used with the OS/2 BULLETIN BOARDS that is not covered in one of the other forums provided All subscribers are required to abide at all times by the conference rules described in the Bulletin Board Rules under "News and Announcements" and in the file OS2BBS RULES. All IBM personnel are required to abide at all times by the IBMPC RULES and the IBM Business Conduct Guidelines. IBM personnel will read the CUSTOMER FORUM RULES in IBMPC RULES before contributing. The OS2BBS CFORUM is where you may raise concerns regarding OS2BBS. violations found in this and other CFORUMS. The IBM Owner of this forum is: David T. Slauson Phone number: 1-914-945-2592 Name: OS/2 Software Service and Support Mailing Address: IBM OS/2 Distributed Computing Environment Yorktown, New York IBM Node/Userid: YKTVMZ/SLAUSON ..... 5140 lines pruned at 14:36:35 on 92/10/29 GMT (by SCHWEI at YKTVMV) ..... ..... 1472 lines pruned at 16:27:29 on 92/10/29 GMT (by FOLGER at YKTVMV) ..... ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:39:57 on 92/10/03 GMT (by KENIN at MARTLINK) Subject: " OOLS" Command not found I have been running FORBROWSE for two weeks with no problems, and it was fine all day. Now I get a strange error. The upload doesn't work. The IND$FILE works fine, but the TOOLS part comes out " OOLS" (quotes added by me). What am I doing wrong? Ken Wohlferd - Fortis ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 02:31:12 on 92/10/03 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Subject: " OOLS" Command not found Ref: Append at 01:39:57 on 92/10/03 GMT (by KENIN at MARTLINK) Ken, What speed modem are you running?? We had some problems at one point it beta at 9600. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 04:30:42 on 92/10/03 GMT (by WZ00508 at OS2CUST) ..... FORBROWS CFORUM modified at 02:07:40 on 92/10/07 GMT (by WZ00508 at OS2CUST) Subject: FORBROWS NOT WORKING WITH CM This APPEND was deleted at 22:07:39 on 10/06/92 EST. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:27:14 on 92/10/03 GMT (by IL22590 at HONE82) Subject: SYS3175 Error Ref: Append at 13:49:14 on 92/10/02 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) I've broke something in my Netware forum. Anytime I try to open the Netware from within FORBROWS I receive the following: SYS3175 A program generated an access violation at 0002a6e8. FORBROWS.EXE 0004 I have the other info if needed. BTW this is running under the GRE WIN31 beta, with PMHPO .1.b David Eller Sherrill Furniture Co. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:28:29 on 92/10/03 GMT (by IL22590 at HONE82) Subject: " OOLS" Command not found Ref: Append at 02:31:12 on 92/10/03 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Jack, Do you still have 9600 problems? I use 2400 at work with no problem. At home I was using 9600 and having lots of download problems, after I slowed down to 2400, those problems seem to have went away. Perhaps it's IBMLink? But my download of files from the OS2BBS work fine at high speed. David Eller Sherrill Furniture Co. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:55:19 on 92/10/03 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: FORBROWS NOT WORKING WITH CM Ref: Append at 04:30:42 on 92/10/03 GMT (by WZ00508 at OS2CUST) What kind of computer do you have this sounds like an old problem? If you have lights on your modem, Does the 'transmit light' come on about every three seconds during the download? Joseph. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 00:46:39 on 92/10/04 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Subject: " OOLS" Command not found Ref: Append at 13:28:29 on 92/10/03 GMT (by IL22590 at HONE82) David, I can download files in most cases with no problems, but when I try to use FORADOWN I keep getting the "Unable to Access proper screen" or something along those lines. Have no problems at all at 4800. I have 9600 both at work and at home and have found that during the day when the link is fairly busy I can receive appends at 9600 with little difficulty but once the system gets less busy I have to cut backdown to 4800 or I start having the problem again. It's really weird, during the beta for the longest time nobody else could even duplicate it, then David Slauson had it start happening to him at 2400, but he could run fine at 1200. Think they are still looking at it as a low priority problem. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:42:28 on 92/10/04 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: " OOLS" Command not found Ref: Append at 00:46:39 on 92/10/04 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) I had thought we had found a fix for this. I will talk to Brent on Monday and see if we can send you a new version of PMHPO that has the new Communication link Module in it and see if this fixes the problem. Thanks. Joseph. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 02:06:24 on 92/10/04 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Subject: " OOLS" Command not found Ref: Append at 01:42:28 on 92/10/04 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Joseph, Brent had sent me one module just before PMHPO went public that we thougt had fixed the problem, but as system response time changed so did the results. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 02:26:12 on 92/10/04 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Subject: Canadian Appends. Brent, Just did some checking again today. The Canadians are being discriminated against here. I don't know just how the shadowing of the fora occurs but there is a definent problem with where ever I am downloading from. But I just went out to the BBS and did a find on TORVMC in the OS2MISC forum in the menu only and came up with 44 occurances, when I check my downloaded forum, I find the same thing on 3 times. I really would like to see what these folks have to say. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 03:01:58 on 92/10/04 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: " OOLS" Command not found Ref: Append at 02:06:24 on 92/10/04 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Jack, This is a totaly new CLM for PMHPO. I spent most of last week rewriting this, I am using it right now for testing, the new CLM is alot more stuble and faster. I will not go into how much faster, right now, but faster. Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 03:33:13 on 92/10/04 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84) Subject: " OOLS" Command not found Ref: Append at 03:01:58 on 92/10/04 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Joseph, Then I will look forward to seeing it and giving it a workout. I really would like to not have to change my setup by time of day. I forget to do it from time to time and make myself angry when it goofs up on me. Have to go in and mess around with the foradown files to get the appends it thought it got or just down load a whole forum again. Take care, and you know neither of us should be on here this late at night. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 03:51:23 on 92/10/04 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: " OOLS" Command not found Ref: Append at 03:33:13 on 92/10/04 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84) It is the only time to get any 'foruming' done. Joseph. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 04:17:35 on 92/10/04 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE85) Subject: "Normal" working hours? Ref: Append at 03:51:23 on 92/10/04 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Joseph: And I though I was the only person hanging around here on weekends??? <g> To be honest, I was in a class all day Friday and am taking a quiet evening after watching ST:TNG to catch up on OS2BBS. Wayne "I wouldn't step on a transporter either!" Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 10:48:11 on 92/10/04 GMT (by WZ00801 at OS2CUST) Subject: BUILDDOW.CMD PROGRAM: PROBLEM (no text entered) Sean Camanyag ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 10:53:21 on 92/10/04 GMT (by WZ00801 at OS2CUST) Subject: BUILDDOW.CMD PROGRAM:PROBLEM I don't know what i did wrong, but I just can't get the BUILDDOW program to work so I can use ForBrows. At first I traced it down to my using non- default directories. So I tried using the default directories, yet it didn't work. I tried editing the .CMD file, but with my lack of REXX knowledge , that failed. Could someone please append a BUILDDOW.CMD file which is more flexible, by allo wing the user to specify different directories? I'm using forbrows 3.7, which came to me by mail along with 2 disks of forum fi les. Sean Camanyag ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 12:44:05 on 92/10/05 GMT (by TCSC086 at OS2CUST) Subject: Append problems I am having some difficulty posting my appends to the forum. After creating the appends offline, I use (FORAUP) to send them. Some times this works. Often, I will receive a message with my userid and the message that the "message is spooled" than the system (VM) will HOLD. FORAUP attempts to continue and presents a message about an invalid host screen. It is obvious that it is out of synch, but is this "spooling" correct? Dan Lundy Time Customer Service, Inc. Tampa, Fl ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:40:25 on 92/10/05 GMT (by NABL3MQ at HONE84) Subject: " OOLS" Command not found Ref: Append at 02:31:12 on 92/10/03 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) I am coming in on IBMLINK over a leased line to our office using OS2CM. It is working today. I didn't boot over the weekend, so I don't get it. Ken Wohlferd - Fortis ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:46:19 on 92/10/05 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Append problems Ref: Append at 12:44:05 on 92/10/05 GMT (by TCSC086 at OS2CUST) Well, the "spooling" message (on the host) is normal. When the host IBMLINK system (VM) sends the append to the "master" conferencing system, it is routed to the IBM network via the spool. VM then informs the userid of the event by issuing the spool message. Unfortunately, it is difficult (impossible maybe) for FORAUP to know precisely when the spool message will be sent to the userid, and the message can place the 3270 session into a MORE... or HOLDING state, messing up the processing of programmed operators (like FORAUP). Trying to work around unpredicatable, asynchronous events like this is one of the real joys of EHLLAPI programming ;-(. To reduce the likelihood of this problem occuring, I have just added some code to the subroutine which checks for the main IBMLINK screen. The new code in this subroutine should now do a better job of checking/correcting for the MORE... and HOLDING condition before attempting to verify the main IBMLINK screen. This will be included in the next version of FORBROWS. David Slauson CORE Development IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 19:29:14 on 92/10/05 GMT (by WZ00001 at LINK21) Subject: BUILDDOW.CMD PROGRAM:PROBLEM Ref: Append at 10:53:21 on 92/10/04 GMT (by WZ00801 at OS2CUST) Lines 14 and 16 contain the names of the default directories. You may change them if you wish. Make sure any directories you point to are already created and have data in them... I did not have time to test anything but the default directories. The only file the program creates is one called LASTAPPD.DOW. This is the file Forbrows is looking for to tell how much of each file neeeds to be downloaded. Forbrows will work fine without this file, it will download the entire forum if it can not find a place marker. Paul King ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 19:39:53 on 92/10/05 GMT (by WZ00001 at LINK21) Subject: FORBROWS NOT WORKING WITH CM Ref: Append at 04:30:42 on 92/10/03 GMT (by WZ00508 at OS2CUST) >> Is there any way that I can use Forbrows with CM ACDI? << Do not think so... That is why we have PMHPO. The Comm. MGR. does require Ehllapi. See the Help for 'Forbrowse Installation'. Are you using PMHPO Version 1.1? You should have received it in the mail recently? Paul King ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:28:23 on 92/10/05 GMT (by WZ00801 at OS2CUST) Subject: BUILDDOW.CMD PROGRAM:PROBLEM Ref: Append at 19:29:14 on 92/10/05 GMT (by WZ00001 at LINK21) Ok, thanks. I'll go ahead and edit the cmd file again, as I'd rather not download the whole forum(s).. Sean Camanyag ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 00:51:06 on 92/10/06 GMT (by BCHI052 at HONE81) Subject: New appends not showing up Ref: When I create/update an append, it is not showing up in FORBROWS. I appended to the TESTER CFORUM. When I go to the OS2BBS thru IMBLink via the "OS2BBS" command I see that my appends are in the TESTER CFORUM. I've tried "refresh current forum" in Navigation pulldown, and get the message "The file is up-to-date". The TESTER CFORUM shows as fully viewed in "List registered fora..." What am I doing wrong. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:00:57 on 92/10/06 GMT (by SBRZAYD at HONE81) Subject: Error executing from folder Ref: Append at 21:36:26 on 92/10/01 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Actually David, I thought that the developer's screen was pretty cool! What I was saying was that it's the worst HIDDEN. 8-) 8-) Chris Corry American Management Systems ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:40:13 on 92/10/06 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Subject: New appends not showing up Ref: Append at 00:51:06 on 92/10/06 GMT (by BCHI052 at HONE81) After you post an append to view it you are going to have to go back thru the FORADOWN steps and relist and then redown load the fora inorder to see your new append or any new appends Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 03:30:35 on 92/10/06 GMT (by IL48722 at OS2CUST) Subject: SYS3175 from FORBROWS a n d PMHPO I had all kinds of trouble this evening trying to download fora. I ran into the same SYS3175 that others have reported, but one of the attempts also caused PMHPO to blow its cookies with a SYS3175: A program generated an access violation at 00027012. PMHPO.EXE 0001 P1=00000001 P2=0000000e P3=XXXXXXXX P4=XXXXXXXX EAX=00000000 EBX=00000000 ECX=0000000e EDX=00145602 ESI=00000000 EDI=00000000 DS=0053 DSACC=d0f3 DSLIM=1bffffff ES=0053 ESACC=d0f3 ESLIM=1bffffff FS=150b FSACC=00f3 FSLIM=00000030 GS=adcf GSACC=00f3 GSLIM=00007fff CS:EIP=005b:00027012 CSACC=d0df CSLIM=1bffffff SS:ESP=0053:00287f64 SSACC=d0f3 SSLIM=1bffffff EBP=00287f80 FLG=00012246 This is with the latest (1.1b) version of PMHPO. I looked, but no PMHPO.LOG was produced. Bob Beilstein, Manugistics, Inc. (315) 458-0723 FAX:(315) 458-1003 ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:28:42 on 92/10/06 GMT (by TCSC086 at HONE83) Subject: Append problems Ref: Append at 14:46:19 on 92/10/05 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Thanks for the explanation and the fix. EHLLAPI was a personal nightmare of mine for years. It seemed that if you were a workstation/based (politically correct?!) programmer - everyone assumed that EHLLAPI was the EASY way to talk with an IBM Host. FORBROWS and its components do an admirable job! A small complaint, begin able to USE Multiple Selection, Swipes, or Shift-End to mark ALL the items to upload or download would be a welcome enhancement. Picking each item with the mouse or keys is a bit tedious. Dan Lundy Time Customer Service Tampa Fl ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:37:35 on 92/10/06 GMT (by IL78568 at HONE81) Subject: Append problems Ref: Append at 13:28:42 on 92/10/06 GMT (by TCSC086 at HONE83) Brooks McNeely - Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:38:30 on 92/10/06 GMT (by IL78568 at HONE81) Subject: Download Problems Ref: Append at 21:33:55 on 92/10/01 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) With everyone's help, I've managed to get most of my downloading problems resolved. Thanks to John Schaeffer, David Slauson, and Jack Hiatt for most of the help. David: My problem using CM with FORBROWS WAS, as you indicated, with my using the PMHPO SEND & RECEIVE commands rather than CM's versions. I renamed them, and downloading from CM appears to work. I think this problem warrants a short paragraph in the FORBREAD.ME file. I was able to get PMHPO FORADOWN to work in a fairly dependable fashion at home by changing the communications speed from 9600 to 4800. I had no other downloading problems at 9600, EXCEPT using FORADOWN. I don't know if anything has been changed to allow it, but I downloaded all but six of the fora today by marking all the selected fora and downloading. I'm sure I don't have any special VM or IBMLink privileges, so I can only assume the A-Disk space limitation is not really a problem. Brooks McNeely - Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:53:41 on 92/10/06 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: Download Problems Ref: Append at 21:38:30 on 92/10/06 GMT (by IL78568 at HONE81) What kind of computer are you using, when the problems with PMHPO happen? Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 02:53:19 on 92/10/07 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE81) Subject: FORBROWS and large downloads Ref: Append at 13:35:29 on 92/09/29 GMT (by DENNIS at ATLVM1) Dennis, Consider this my input on the types of download available. I would greatly like to see some tool that would allow compressed downloads of the fora uploads that then decompresses on the receiving end. I only have 2400 baud connection so it HURTS when I've been out of touch for a while (I actually doing this from a hotel room to ease the crunch when I get home). Also, instead of BookMangler (oops, I meant Master), why not IPF so that it is compatible with VIEW that comes with OS/2? Many of us don't have access to BookManager. Also, on that one, you may want to group the books in 1-2 week "chunks" that can be pulled together (at least in VIEW) as desired by the end user. Just some suggestions from an interested user. Lynn Deffenbaugh Computer Task Group/ISI Melbourne, FL ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 02:54:37 on 92/10/07 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE81) Subject: Error executing from folder Ref: Append at 13:55:21 on 92/09/30 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Oh no! Not the dreaded (Windoze) system resources exhausted! On a 32-bit Operating System? Lynn Deffenbaugh (A PM-oriented applications developer) Computer Task Group/ISI Melbourne, FL ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 12:57:09 on 92/10/07 GMT (by DEV2625 at HONE81) Subject: Abend 3175 on DBM fora download Ref: Append at 02:54:37 on 92/10/07 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE81) I have tried on a number of occasions (2) to download the DBM conference file. Each time the FORADOWN blows up with a SYS3175. After which all previously download and viewed forums do not reflect the proper state. Frank V. Castellucci ¢COL Systems| ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:14:02 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Download Problems Ref: Append at 21:38:30 on 92/10/06 GMT (by IL78568 at HONE81) Brooks, thanks very much for the detailed feedback... I'm glad things seem to be working better now. I agree that the doc file should be updated to explain the hazards of running CM with the PMHPO SEND and RECEIVE executables. Perhaps the install program could also try to handle this in some way. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:18:32 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Append problems Ref: Append at 13:28:42 on 92/10/06 GMT (by TCSC086 at HONE83) Re. Multiple selection, etc. I agree that some kind of "mark all items" capability would be handy. It seems there are more folks downloading all of the fora (or practically all) than we anticipated. I'll see what I can do. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:52:32 on 92/10/07 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: FORBROWS and large downloads Ref: Append at 02:53:19 on 92/10/07 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE81) PMHPO does have support compression of text file (fora) as there beening download, but support was left out for the reason of there was not a substantial increase in download speed. When I say substantial I mean at least a 100 CPS increase, and some machines it caused a decrease in download speed. Now for the good news, Yes some, not all of the problems, but some have been fixed and we are testing the new code now. As normal I can not tell you when the code will come out but we are working on making this ASAP. Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:55:50 on 92/10/07 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE86) Subject: Abend 3175 on DBM fora download Ref: Append at 12:57:09 on 92/10/07 GMT (by DEV2625 at HONE81) Frank, Glad to see that you got going, not glad that you are having some problems. I'm having some problems as well, but mostly from being dropped from the Host on the PMHPO side. I have downloaded about 5 Fora and have them setup to work properly. I hope when the Host software gets changed (Oct. 18) and the newer version of ForBrows will clear a lot of things up, but for me PMHPO and the Host seem to be a bigger problem. I have gotten violations with ForBrows but nothing I haven't been able to work around. I just sent some Email to a friend and it is VERY cumbersome to use, searching for a person takes a lot of time (perform a Find, go through the PF8 routine to find the person, etc...). I hope that some future version of ForBrows will handle Email so a list can be stored locally and the message typed offline (please don't beat me up David, I know this has been talked about and that it is not coming soon). I'm happy that IBM is offering better service for IBMLink, PMHPO and ForBrows are a step in the right direction, no doubt. I like the price opposed to Compu$erve. <g> Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:57:11 on 92/10/07 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE86) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 14:18:32 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David, I was wondering why it is that ForBrows takes such a long time to change a Forum but will load the first one quickly ? I assume this is due to information being stored about the Forum ForBrows is leaving from to keep track of the appends of such, just curious why it takes so long. I'm not ragging on you, just curious. I'm getting to like the setup, but I'm still having some problems on getting dropped from the host (downloading files with PMHPO, but Fora with ForBrows). I hope that when the Host software gets updated on Oct. 18 it will work better. I get occasional exception violations with ForBrows, but have watched this Forum and others have that appear to have some type of debug version or something, or do I have a file that will give me that information on my local hard disk ? Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 17:01:45 on 92/10/07 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE86) Subject: Append Notifications Ref: Append at 14:14:02 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David, Is there a way that I can send appends and not get a notification in my Inbasket that it was sent ? When I send an append I seem to get messages that I have to go in and erase manually, a real PITA! Also, I know this is probably not the Fora for this, but is there any plans that you know if to add Auto-Login with PMHPO (preferably to the IBMLink main menu to start using ForBrows) ? Sometimes I don't like to log off, because of the hassle fo logging back on... Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 17:51:55 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 16:57:11 on 92/10/07 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE86) Alan, >I was wondering why it is that ForBrows takes such a long time to >change a Forum but will load the first one quickly ? Forbrows writes a fair amount of data to FORBROWS.INI for registered fora. Normally, this doesn't take too long (except perhaps the first time the fora is registered). However, I've been told that updating .INI files that are stored on a LAN fileserver can be enormously slower (have not verified this myself). The only Trap problems that I am currently aware of within FORBROWS, are: 1) Sometimes when a "registered" forum is being loaded, under some (as yet unknown) set of factors, while trying to find the next append to browse, ForBrows bombs. This does not happen a lot, and can be circumvented by deleting the failing forum from the registered list, and then re-loading the forum from the available fora dialog. 2) Reverse text searches sometimes cause a trap (not always). Both problems are still under investigation. If you come across any other circumstances that result in a trap, please let me know in this forum. Regards, David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 18:52:00 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Append Notifications Ref: Append at 17:01:45 on 92/10/07 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE86) >Is there a way that I can send appends and not get a notification in my >Inbasket that it was sent? Alan, I did some checking and it looks like users can override the mail response by issuing the following on the host session command line: TOOLS RESPONSE * FAIL This command should result in your not getting any notification mail unless there was a failure to post your append. NOTE: that this will only work for users on the HONE8x IBMLINK complex (ie. workstation technical coordinators). Users with WZnnnnnn userids (on the HONE2x complex) do not have a personal A-disk (temp disk space only), and the above solution will not work, since it depends on having a persistent LASTING GLOBALV file. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 18:52:12 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Append Notifications Ref: Append at 17:01:45 on 92/10/07 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE86) I *believe* that the PMHPO developers are hoping to provide auto-login capability in a not-too-distant future release. I am not certain of this however. Perhaps they will append more... David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 19:03:24 on 92/10/07 GMT (by AABB0FC at HONE84) Subject: Append problems Ref: Append at 14:18:32 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David, it would also appear that a "Register All" option is needed, unless I missed something somewhere. This is also a test message since I don't know if your program will proving the proper formating of this message, since it doesn't have carriage returns or line feeds in it. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 19:04:13 on 92/10/07 GMT (by AABB0FC at HONE84) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 17:51:55 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Is there anyway to have forbrows go to the next forum that has unread messages rather than making us select them via a "file open" dialog box or through the "list registered fora..." box (it takes too long to startup, you need an option to keep it on the s creen so I can just click on it and select the next forum I want to read. h:\forbrows\sig.txt ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 19:12:29 on 92/10/07 GMT (by AABB0FC at HONE84) Subject: Creating a new message Ref: Append at 00:00:00 on 01/01/01 GMT (by WHYNOMSG at WONDER) Dave, I've noticed that there is no "create/write a NEW message" menu item, why not? By the way, you also need a "select all" in FORAUP. h:\forbrows\sig.txt ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:20:25 on 92/10/07 GMT (by IL37205 at HONE82) Subject: FORBROWS questions Ref: Append at 16:02:21 on 92/09/23 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE85) David, Is there any way to 'prune' the .CFO files in the OS2BBS directory? I've tried deleting them but then had to download entire forum again. Besides, the paging mechanism failed to work properly (more than one message appeared per page.) What I'd really like to do is backup old messages unto tape and recover the disk space. Thanks for your help. Matt Osborn ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:21:45 on 92/10/07 GMT (by AABB0FC at HONE84) Subject: Creating a new message Ref: Append at 19:12:29 on 92/10/07 GMT (by AABB0FC at HONE84) Also it looks like the signature file isn't working. Larry D. Smith Southern California Edison IBMMAIL(USSCEH72) 76247.1425@compuserve.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:36:10 on 92/10/07 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 16:57:11 on 92/10/07 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE86) Alan: I had problems with very slow changing of forums a while ago as well. The problem ended up being where my FORBROWS.INI file was located. Turns out that there is an OS/2 bug that results in TERRIBLE performance when any writes are done to an INI file on a disk with lots (say more than 30 meg) of freespace. On my machine it was taking over 10 seconds (!) to change fora. I moved the FORBROWS.INI file to a partition with 10 meg of freespace and the switching now takes a second or so. (BTW... this problem is on my "hot list" of things to be fixed in the Service Pack.) Wayne "OS/2 strikes again" Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:36:44 on 92/10/07 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 17:51:55 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David: FYI, I posted a message to Alan describing the INI file performance problem. It turns out that the problem was NOT LAN related, but involved the amount of freespace on a drive. (In our case we had 100+ meg free which resulted in the painfully slow performance I mentioned during the FORBROWS beta.) Wayne "Setting the record straight" Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:39:04 on 92/10/07 GMT (by HNDERSON at AUSVM8) Subject: SYS3175 when viewing forum Ref: Append at 15:00:29 on 92/09/28 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Matt, if you mean prune a forum on your system, Yes you can, use your favorite EDITOR (EPM) mark the lines you want to move and open another window(IHTW) and copy/move the marked area to it. You could then zip that file and remove to backup media of your choice. There are probably a couple of other ways to do this, if you want more ideas just ask. We "prune" the CFORUMs when they reach a certain line count(9000+-) we are working with David Slauson, Brent Allen, (code changes) and will make these "PRUNE" files downloadable as zip files for people who want them. __ __ ___ __ __ _ _ | |_| | / \ | \| | | |./ / Hank Henderson HNDERSON at AUSVM8 | _ | / _~_ \ Sincerely | . < Staff OSS to OS/2 BBS (TEAMOS2) |__| |__| /_/ \_\ |__|\__| |_| \_\ Tie:8-793-8647 Austin, Texas LNK1SM7 @ IBMLINK - OS/2 BBS Please do something..! Lead, follow or get out of the way. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:05:53 on 92/10/07 GMT (by NABL3MQ at HONE85) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 19:04:13 on 92/10/07 GMT (by AABB0FC at HONE84) I like this idea too. I download the updates once or twice a day, and read them all. I would like it to run right thru the updated forums, and not HAVE to select the next one. I am going to read them all, and the order is not that important. Ken Wohlferd - Fortis ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 00:22:07 on 92/10/08 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Subject: Append Notifications Ref: Append at 18:52:00 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David, Thanks for that piece of information. I take it from what you say that this will last session to session? Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 00:22:32 on 92/10/08 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Subject: Append problems Ref: Append at 19:03:24 on 92/10/07 GMT (by AABB0FC at HONE84) FORBROWS doesn't automatically set your margins for you. To get proper formatting you will have to set the margins in whatever editor you are using for appends to 78 or less Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 00:35:40 on 92/10/08 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE84) Subject: Append Notifications Ref: Append at 18:52:12 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David: While you are at it I would like the sun, the moon, and a few stars in FORBROWS. Seriously, You've done a good job on FORBROWS and given the limited resources, there are amazing few problems. I send Paul King some offline utilities I have been using with FORBROWS (base on BUILDDOW), you might want to look at them. For both you and Joseph, it would be nice to have the ability to select a auto logoff when a download is complete. I sometimes like to leave communications running and go to bed (like when download a couple of meg file) J.M.Schaeffer ('John' AIMS Sandy, Utah) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 00:41:18 on 92/10/08 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 23:05:53 on 92/10/07 GMT (by NABL3MQ at HONE85) Ken, There is an option that will bring up the Available Fora List at the end of posts in a given forum, think it would be better if it brought up the registered fora instead though. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 07:31:13 on 92/10/08 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Subject: Append Notifications Ref: Append at 18:52:00 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) >Alan, I did some checking and it looks like users can override the >mail response by issuing the following on the host session command line: > > TOOLS RESPONSE * FAIL I just executed that on the Host, I'll know if it worked after I send these. This is just what the doctor ordered from what I can tell. Thanks for helping me out on that, it was something that was bugging the heck out of me. >unless there was a failure to post your append. NOTE: that this will >only work for users on the HONE8x IBMLINK complex (ie. workstation >technical coordinators). Users with WZnnnnnn userids (on the HONE2x Should take care of me, I get HONE8x when I call and I'm not WZnnnnnn userID. Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 07:32:32 on 92/10/08 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Subject: Append Notifications Ref: Append at 18:52:12 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) =====> I *believe* that the PMHPO developers are hoping to provide auto-login capability in a not-too-distant future release. I am not certain of this however. Perhaps they will append more... <===== Great! I will like that a LOT. Another thing I would like to see is a quote function, where you could copy marked lines to the clipboard and when you paste it, put some type of markers in the append. One way I have gotten around this in a offline mail reader that I was working on was to use markers like I have done above. I just changed them, as they were ">" markers in the front of each line previously. I think you could do this easily, but not sure what type of enhancements you will add. I would like to see this text copied to the clipboard (i.e., with hard <CR> on the end of the quote lines and the text so you can just paste the clipboard into the editor. Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 07:33:41 on 92/10/08 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 20:36:10 on 92/10/07 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) =====> Alan: I had problems with very slow changing of forums a while ago as well. The problem ended up being where my FORBROWS.INI file was located. Turns out that there is an OS/2 bug that results in TERRIBLE performance when any writes are done to an INI file on a disk with lots (say more than 30 meg) of freespace. <===== Oh no!!!! I have it on a partition with about 200megs free. I have one partition with only 4 megs free. Ok, now for the stupid question, how can I change the location of the .ini file ? Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 07:34:48 on 92/10/08 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Subject: FORBROWS questions Ref: Append at 20:20:25 on 92/10/07 GMT (by IL37205 at HONE82) >Is there any way to 'prune' the .CFO files in the OS2BBS directory? Yes, this is something I would like to see also. There needs to be a way to manage the .CFO files. Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 07:35:54 on 92/10/08 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 20:36:44 on 92/10/07 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) =====> David: FYI, I posted a message to Alan describing the INI file performance problem. It turns out that the problem was NOT LAN <===== Yep, I'm not using a LAN at home... Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 07:37:03 on 92/10/08 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Subject: SYS3175 when viewing forum Ref: Append at 22:39:04 on 92/10/07 GMT (by HNDERSON at AUSVM8) =====> We "prune" the CFORUMs when they reach a certain line count(9000+-) we are working with David Slauson, Brent Allen, (code changes) and will make these "PRUNE" files downloadable as zip files for people who want them. <===== Put me on that list of people who would like them. <g> Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:42:19 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Creating a new message Ref: Append at 20:21:45 on 92/10/07 GMT (by AABB0FC at HONE84) There is no signature file, just a signature line. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:47:06 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 20:36:44 on 92/10/07 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) Thanks for the update Wayne. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:51:37 on 92/10/08 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: Append Notifications Ref: Append at 07:32:32 on 92/10/08 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) The PMHPO developers do listen. I can of course not say anything about a future release of PMHPO but I can tell you that we have looked at this and many other things. Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:52:05 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Append Notifications Ref: Append at 07:32:32 on 92/10/08 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Re. Quote function: That's a good idea. I also use the clipboard a lot for "quoting" previous appends. Thanks for the suggestion. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:56:02 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 07:33:41 on 92/10/08 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Question: How can I change the location of the forbrows.ini file ? Under "Options" select "Set registered fora filename" and change the location in the dialog that pops up. Remember to move your existing copy of FORBROWS.INI to the new subdirectory. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:57:16 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Append Notifications Ref: Append at 00:22:07 on 92/10/08 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) According to the doc I read, this setting should last from session to session (hence the need for a persistent LASTING GLOBALV file on the IBMLINK A-disk). David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:08:18 on 92/10/08 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 07:33:41 on 92/10/08 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Alan: I copied the FORBROWS.INI file to my other drive and used the "Options/Set Registered Fora" menu selection to point to the new location. To be on the safe side, I then shutdown FORBROWS and restarted it. Wayne "All right! I got to ANSWER a question" Holmes U S WEST Communications ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:08:48 on 92/10/08 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 13:47:06 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David: You will be HAPPY to know that this problem appears to be fixed in the Service Pack release of OS/2 2.0. (This is on my checklist of things to verify.) Wayne "Good news for once" Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:02:35 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Select all FORADOWN list items - already there. Ref: Many I was in the midst of being a nice guy, implementing the "select all items in the list" feature that many have been asking for. In the process of writing/testing the new feature, I discovered something. It's already there (!), courtesy of PM and CUA. Make sure the list box has the focus, then press Cntrl-/ to select all items, Cntrl-\ to de-select. I found this while looking up the appropriate CUA-ish key definitions for the new function. Apparently it's a PM freebie in standard listboxes... ;-). You learn sump'n new every day. I'll update the FORADOWN/FORAUP help to reflect this capability. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:35:26 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Append Notifications Ref: Append at 07:32:32 on 92/10/08 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) >Another thing I would like to see is a quote function, where you could copy >marked lines to the clipboard and when you paste it, put some type of markers Done. It will be in the next version of ForBrows. The quoted text above was copied to the clipboard using the new feature. It will listed as another menu item underneath "Copy marked text". The accelerator key will be Alt-insert. Thanks again for the suggestion. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:46:58 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Line length override in FORAUP A new feature I'm going to add to FORAUP is to automatically reformat any extremely long lines to no more than 70 characters. There have been too many appends recently from users who are (unknowingly) posting with obscenely long line-lengths. This makes their appends very hard to read. I'm reluctant to mess with user's data in this fashion, but I'm now convinced that it's necessary. I know this'll make Brent happy too, 'cause I hear it gives the host-conferencing software fits. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 02:57:14 on 92/10/09 GMT (by WZ00508 at OS2CUST) Subject: BUILDDOW.CMD PROGRAM:PROBLEM Ref: Append at 19:29:14 on 92/10/05 GMT (by WZ00001 at LINK21) I installed Forbrowse using all default assignments. It seem that it always download the entire file, even in update mode. I saw your comment about the Lastappd.dow file. I did a search and found one in d:\appends\posted\lastap pd.dow but it has a size of 0. How do I get Forbrowse to only download the new items? Thanks Dwight Warak, First Data Resources, Omaha, NE ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 02:57:46 on 92/10/09 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE81) Subject: Line length override in FORAUP Ref: Append at 15:46:58 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) > A new feature I'm going to add to FORAUP is to automatically reformat > any extremely long lines to no more than 70 characters. There have been Thank you, thank you, thank you! I'd LOVE to use Word-wrap and not have to worry about fixing up my own hard-<CR>s. I do enough of that when editing comments in my .C files. Lynn Deffenbaugh, Computer Task Group/ISI, Melbourne, FL ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 03:37:18 on 92/10/09 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE82) Subject: BUILDDOW.CMD PROGRAM:PROBLEM Ref: Append at 02:57:14 on 92/10/09 GMT (by WZ00508 at OS2CUST) Dwight: Not many of us up this time of night. I see you are a 'WZ' user. I believe you received a routine call 'BUILDDOW.CMD' in you start up package. Run that and it will build a LASTAPPD.DOW from the current state of you .CFO files. I you don't have that copy LASTAPPD.NOW to LASTAPPD.DOW and that will start your DOWn file from the last time you did LIST from FORADOWN. I've got no idea why you are getting a 0 length .DOW file. If you can list your circumstances in more detail maybe one of the developers (who always seem to be arround this forum) can help. J.M.Schaeffer ('John' AIMS Sandy, Utah) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 04:02:39 on 92/10/09 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Subject: Line length override in FORAUP Ref: Append at 02:57:46 on 92/10/09 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE81) Lynn, Until David gets the word wrap in set you margins in the editor to 77 and all is cool. I changed the default editor to use the EPM editor and set the margins under OPtions - Preferences to 77 and no more problems. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 05:47:21 on 92/10/09 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 13:56:02 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) <===== Under "Options" select "Set registered fora filename" and change the location in the dialog that pops up. Remember to move your existing copy of FORBROWS.INI to the new subdirectory. =====> Doncha know that I was looking in "Set installation defaults...", go figure, I was just a menu item away...<g> Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 05:48:31 on 92/10/09 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 14:08:18 on 92/10/08 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) =====> Alan: I copied the FORBROWS.INI file to my other drive and used the "Options/Set Registered Fora" menu selection to point to the new location. To be on the safe side, I then shutdown FORBROWS and restarted it. <===== Yep, worked like a charm and you were right Wayne, I can change forums a lot faster now...Nothing like another bug in the OS...<g> Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 05:49:39 on 92/10/09 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Subject: Append Notifications Ref: Append at 15:35:26 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) =====> Done. It will be in the next version of ForBrows. The quoted text above was copied to the clipboard using the new feature. It will listed as another menu item underneath "Copy marked text". The accelerator key will be Alt-insert. Thanks again for the suggestion. <===== Excellent, thanks for the prompt addition! Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 12:46:00 on 92/10/09 GMT (by AYP1Q01 at HONE86) Subject: Developer's screen Ref: Append at 21:36:26 on 92/10/01 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David, It took me a while, but I managed to find the hidden developer's screen Chris referred to. Cool. I took a poll on whether people would like to see more of these, and I think the "eyes" have it. Steve Bassler, Allegheny Power ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 12:46:37 on 92/10/09 GMT (by AYP1Q01 at HONE86) Subject: Search problems Ref: Append at 17:51:55 on 92/10/07 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David, >2) Reverse text searches sometimes cause a trap (not always). I have major problems with the Search function. I am constantly receiving SYS3175 errors when I attempt to perform searches, whether forward or reverse. It seems to happen when the search runs off the end of the forum, i.e. if the text is not found at all or if no more occurrances can be found. However, it doesn't always seem to find text that I know is there. For example, if I bring up the FORBROWS forum, go to the first entry, and try to search for "hidden" - as in the references to the hidden developer's screen - sometimes it will find two occurances before the crash, and sometimes it crashes immediately. In this example, both searches are in the forward direction. Is this a general problem, or have I done something wrong? Or could my forum file be corrupted somehow, so that the end-of-file marker is not recognized (although I have not edited or touched the file in any way, other than responding to a couple of appends, like this). Steve Bassler, Allegheny Power ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:52:58 on 92/10/09 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Search problems Ref: Append at 12:46:37 on 92/10/09 GMT (by AYP1Q01 at HONE86) It's not your problem, but a bug in ForBrows. I'm beginning to wonder if I accidently regressed some code in the 'search' function, since it worked reliably under some previous releases. Anyway, I hope to have some time to work on this problem over the next couple of days. Once I'm satisfied it's fixed (and has been tested to the satisfaction of the BBS owners), I'll probably release the updated ForBrows (v3.71) for downloading from OS2BBS. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:01:53 on 92/10/09 GMT (by NABL3MQ at HONE84) Subject: Loading Fora Ref: Append at 00:41:18 on 92/10/08 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) You are correct, and that is the feature I would like. I don't want to see the available forums, just the ones I have. I now use F11 to bring up the list at the end of each forum, and select the next one to read. What I need is an option to do this automatically. Ken Wohlferd - Fortis ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:50:53 on 92/10/09 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: Line length override in FORAUP Ref: Append at 15:46:58 on 92/10/08 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) >> now convinced that it's necessary. I know this'll make Brent happy too, >> 'cause I hear it gives the host-conferencing software fits. Yea!!!! :-) Our problems with OS2MISC on the host side were caused by those 256 character lines. My "quick fix" was to just hack anything off beyond column 85 and I really don't like doing that too much. Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:13:37 on 92/10/09 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) Subject: Developer's screen Ref: Append at 12:46:00 on 92/10/09 GMT (by AYP1Q01 at HONE86) Steve: Yea... our group wants me to embed a screen like that into our product. We have a "developers screen" that we tell our users how to get to in part of our help system... we even give them a phone number to call and we will add their name to our "thanks" screen. We did this as an experiement to see if anybody is actually reading our help... would you be suprised to know that NOBODY has called us asking for their name to be added? <g> Wayne "I don't read the help either... just ask David S." Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:35:39 on 92/10/09 GMT (by MAAV7IB at HONE83) Subject: SYS3175 when viewing forum I receive SYS3175 when doing "Find Next" (Ctrl+F) in the FORBROW.CFO, OS2MISC.CFO, and OS2PRINT.CFO forums. This gets pretty annoying since I have to start FORBROWS over and over again. The extra messages say "access violation at 0001a7a2." I hope something is being done about this. Kevin Miller, The Capital Group, Inc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:36:03 on 92/10/09 GMT (by MAAV7IB at HONE83) Subject: ACS3EHAP.DLL not found using CM ASCII terminal with FORADOWN I use the Communications Manager's ASCII Terminal support to access IBMLINK from home. When I finally tried to use FORADOWN (and FORBROWS) from home, it couldn't find ACS3EHAP.DLL. I'd prefer not to use PMHPO, since I already have CM configured and working (just like I'd use it at work). What do I need to do to get this to work with the CM ASCII Terminal? Kevin Miller, The Capital Group, Inc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:01:14 on 92/10/09 GMT (by IL78568 at HONE85) Subject: Search problems Ref: Append at 13:52:58 on 92/10/09 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David, One small problem I've had with search, is when I'm doing a reverse (backward) search. If I repeat the search, it always finds the same append it last found. (I'm not explaining this very well) Any search, even a reverse search, seems to leave one positioned AFTER the target string. Then a repeat of the reverse search just returns with the same hit. I must Page-Up before I repeat the reverse search. One further question: What determines the order of the fora listed in the F11 list box (within the major groupings)? Brooks McNeely - Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:52:33 on 92/10/09 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: SYS3175 when viewing forum Ref: Append at 16:35:39 on 92/10/09 GMT (by MAAV7IB at HONE83) Kevin, we've been discussing this problem recently in this forum. The good news is that I've just found (and fixed) the cause of this problem. For those who have been following the 'trap during search' discussion, the following summarizes the cause of the problem: Semi-long summary: ------------------ In forums with very long lines, case-insensitive searches could result in TRAP. Long-lines were not getting null-terminated when copied to a temp string variable for upper-casing before string comparison. Because the long lines were not null-terminated, data overlays resulted in subsequent string operations, eventually resulting in a TRAP. The recent proliferation of appends with *very* long lines has aggravated the problem. Short summary: -------------- 1) a C language 'gotcha' and/or 2) a bonehead mistake for a long-time C-programmer to make This may fix a couple of related TRAP problems, since the search subroutine is used by several different ForBrows functions. I hope we'll be able to release the fixed version of FORBROWS (v3.71) for download next week. David "bonehead" Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:41:41 on 92/10/10 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE83) Subject: SYS3175 when viewing forum Ref: Append at 21:52:33 on 92/10/09 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David: Ah yes... the infamous "since I know the string will never be more than 'X' characters long I can just allocate a character array of 'X' on the stack. <g> Wayne "Oh for varying length character strings in C" Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 12:18:21 on 92/10/10 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Subject: 9600baud Problem Brent/Joseph/David Is anything happening with this problem? Or am I the only one still experiencing it. If so is it possible that an I/O card with the 16550 uart on it would do anything to help solve my problem. I really have gotten to like using the 9600 access to most places. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 19:35:08 on 92/10/10 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE81) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 12:18:21 on 92/10/10 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Jack: Are you referring to unpredictible behavior using PMHPO at 9600 baud? I just got a 9600 baud modem on my home machine and ended up having to step it down to 4800 in order to get reliable communications. If this is you symptom, then rest assured you are not the only person seeing this. If not, then I need to make sure that someone is aware of this problem I'm having. Wayne "Reality check" Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:58:55 on 92/10/11 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 19:35:08 on 92/10/10 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE81) Wayne, Sounds like probably the same problem. Did you have problems downloading? Mine was usually manifested by the "unable to access Host Screen" or whatever that series is. If I watched the PMHPO screen I would see the download get started and suddenly the cursor would drop down to lower right side of screen and no data transfer ever occured. Dropping down to 4800 lets it work like a champ. Jack "I want to run at 9600" Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. "Want to See A Good Service Pack Before I Retire." ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 17:45:43 on 92/10/11 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE81) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 01:58:55 on 92/10/11 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Jack: I am setting my sights a little lower than you. I would just like to see a sevice pack (any) before I retire. J.M.Schaeffer ('John' AIMS Sandy, Utah) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 19:46:35 on 92/10/11 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE81) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 01:58:55 on 92/10/11 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Jack: Yup... that is my symptom exactly. Wayne "You are not alone" Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:38:49 on 92/10/11 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE83) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 17:45:43 on 92/10/11 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE81) John, I would settle for that, was just hoping for the best, and almost willing to take any thing. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:34:52 on 92/10/12 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: ACS3EHAP.DLL not found using CM ASCII terminal with FORADOWN Ref: Append at 16:36:03 on 92/10/09 GMT (by MAAV7IB at HONE83) I'm not a CM expert, but it is my understanding that CM's ASCII emulator does not support HLLAPI. If so, that would explain why the ACS3EHAP.DLL isn't there since that is the HLLAPI support code. Unless I'm wrong, I don't believe that your setup will work with ForBrowse since it needs HLLAPI to interface with the host. Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:41:15 on 92/10/12 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: Search problems Ref: Append at 20:01:14 on 92/10/09 GMT (by IL78568 at HONE85) From what I've seen, the order of forums listed in the Registered Fora window is the reverse order in which the fora were registered. The first forum that was registered would be at the bottom of the list. The most recently registered forum is listed first. Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:52:30 on 92/10/12 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 12:18:21 on 92/10/10 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Jack, We haven't forgotten about it and as you've probably noticed from the other appends you're not the only person experiencing the problem. It certainly could be related to an I/O card or something like that. I personally can run PMHPO at 9600 for hours at a time with absolutely no problems. This is not good since I WANT to see the same errors you're seeing so we can try to pinpoint the problem. We've got some things in the works that might help the situation, but it's hard to say for sure at this point. I'll give you a call and see if we can run some tests or get some better idea of how to address the problem. Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:33:53 on 92/10/12 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 15:52:30 on 92/10/12 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Brent, A couple of questions on your setup, do you know what Uart is in your machine, and which comm drivers are you running? I'm willing to experiment with it. Was planning on swapping out my I/O card this week, will see if I can find one that has the 16550 chip on it. Jack Hiatt MARC-Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 18:14:26 on 92/10/12 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE84) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 16:33:53 on 92/10/12 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Jack and Brent: I do not have a 9600 baud modem only 2400 (if anyone wants to sent me a 9600 please do). Under FORBROWS 1.1, I could not download 2400 on the serial port on my machine (8580-071 serial number 23-7111636); but I could using a multi-protocol adapter. With 1.1a I can use either port. (I am using 1.1b now). The MPA uses an 8551 and and 8273 (SDLC) chips. J.M.Schaeffer ('John' AIMS Sandy, Utah) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 19:58:39 on 92/10/12 GMT (by IL22590 at HONE81) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 16:33:53 on 92/10/12 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Jack, I'm also having the 9600 download problems... File downloads from PMHPO work fine but the ForBrowse downloads do not work well. I get the 'improper host screen' and the cursor is in the lower right hand corner of PMHPO. This occurs on my PS/2 57SLC, 2400 works fine, I'll test it under 4800. David Eller Sherrill Furniture How are you going to do it? OS/2 it! ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:33:24 on 92/10/12 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 19:58:39 on 92/10/12 GMT (by IL22590 at HONE81) David, What type of modem are you running, and what phone number do you dial into? I have a 57SLC here but it runs just fine at 9600. Your machine maybe the closest I can duplicate hardware-wise so the information above would help to see if I can duplicate the problem. Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:43:47 on 92/10/12 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE83) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 16:33:53 on 92/10/12 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Jack: FYI... the machine I'm having trouble with is an IBM PS/2 Model 90 with the 16550 UART. I'm assuming that OS/2 is using the DMA capability of the serial port as well. Don't know how that compares with your config, but thought if enough information gets posted from people having the problem that somebody could see a pattern. Wayne "Grasping for straws - at 4800 baud" Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:44:26 on 92/10/12 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE83) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 21:33:24 on 92/10/12 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Brent: I can't remember the modem type (I'm 'on the road' and using my L40), but I'm calling in to the Seattle number as defined by PMHPO. Wayne "Hoping enough information will show a pattern" Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:38:43 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84) Subject: 9600baud Problem Brent, Updated my I/O card this evening as mentioned this morning. Got a el cheapo card to go with my el cheapo system(hand made with off the shelf parts), found one with the 16550 uarts and downloaded all appends this evening at about 2115 EDT this evening. Had to occurances of the unable to access host screen msg, which is just about a record low for this time of night for me. Also discovered while doing this that my com port wasn't getting set up with speeds and stuff as I thought it was. Must have dropped that during one of my changes. Will check mode settings on system at work tomorrow morning and attempt downloading the new appends at about 0400edt tomorrow and see what happens then. Will keep you posted. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 02:42:20 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL22590 at HONE84) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 21:33:24 on 92/10/12 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Brent, I just downloaded todays messages at 4800 with no problems. I'm running a USR Dual Standard external. I'm in Hickory and the closest number listed is Charlotte (60 miles). When the problem happens, I can go to the PMHPO screen and bang on the keys enough to get back to the Main menu and restart the downloading of messages. David Eller Sherrill Furniture 57SLC, 8Mb, 80 & 320 SCSI, XGA-1, PS/2-TV, 32bit GRE/WIN3.1 beta ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:03:15 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL04688 at HONE86) Subject: How about ... Ref: Append at 16:33:53 on 92/10/12 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) For a developer I'm sure it seems like good deeds never go unpunished. And I'm about to ask the infamous "I love XX, would you please add YY" type of request. When I say "next" on the last append in a forum up pops the conference list box, without my having to push F4. Hooray!! I love it when computers do the grunt work. Now, ... , If the list box would pre-select the current forum so all I had to do was double click the one underneath to begin reading the next forum (as opposed to the current method of always scrolling from the top of the list) ... Thanks for letting me add one to your "wish list". Leo Tornow, Northwest Pipeline, SLC UT ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:21:44 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 02:42:20 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL22590 at HONE84) Brent, Didn't get to start the download as early this morning as I would have liked, it was 0530edt when I got it started here at the office, non 16550 I/O board and found it impossible to run at 9600. Had to drop down to 4800 as in the past. Looks like the buffering of the 16550 does have some effects on the the problem. Jack Hiatt MARC-Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:22:19 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Subject: 9600baud Problem Brent, I will be leaving the office most days at about 1230edt as I am coming in early to do some mainframe work currently. If you want to talk about the problems you could probably reach me in the afternoons, say from 1400-1700edt at 404-944-2846, this is a small business that I am taking care of for a friend in the afternoons. Jack Hiatt MARC-Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:57:10 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL12431 at OS2CUST) Subject: Sharing Forums I'm attempting to setup the forums so that they reside on a LAN-shared disk common to all staf on our ring. Each individual has their own instance of FORABROWSE on their system. Browsing the forums works fine, but whenever I attempt to append (ctrl-A) I get an "Unable to create append for <shared_path>; Probable cause: HOSTSERVER= statement in FORBROWS.CTL is missing for this forum's subdirectory...." I've experimented with various combinations of the HOSTSERVER=, attempting to point to shared path U:\IBM\FOO where the .CFO forums are maintained. It 'does not stand'... What is the appropriate syntax? Is there an additional step I need to take. Dave Scheffer, ARGO Data Resource Corp. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 17:16:50 on 92/10/13 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Sharing Forums Ref: Append at 16:57:10 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL12431 at OS2CUST) >I've experimented with various combinations of the HOSTSERVER=, attempting >to point to shared path U:\IBM\FOO where the .CFO forums are maintained. Try the following: HOSTSERVER=FOO HONE80 OS2 OS2BBS The above example says (in essence) that for the local copy of the the conference FOO, send appends to HONE80 userid OS2, host conference disk OS2BBS. Only the lowest level subdir (in your example, \FOO) is used by FORBROWS in figuring out which conference to append to. After that's done, make sure each user points to U:\IBM\FOO as the "Subdir for downloaded fora files" in Forbrows's "Set installation defaults. Hope this helps. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 18:41:05 on 92/10/13 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 14:22:19 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Thanks Jack. I was wondering why you were so eager to try downloads at 4 in the morning. I don't want you to get TOO addicted to CForums..... <g> Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 19:56:46 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL12431 at OS2CUST) Subject: Sharing Forums Ref: Append at 17:16:50 on 92/10/13 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Works like a champ - thanks, David, for both the pointer and the utility. ForaBrowse is immensely useful to us! Dave Scheffer, ARGO Data Resource Corp. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:54:04 on 92/10/13 GMT (by NANR6GN at HONE82) Subject: How about ... Ref: Append at 14:03:15 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL04688 at HONE86) >When I say "next" on the last append in a forum up pops the >conference list box, without my having to push F4. Hooray!! >I love it when computers do the grunt work. I would love to know how you do that! When I click next on the last append, all I get back is a message "NO MORE APPENDS". Cesar Ventura, Telesector Resources Group ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:54:44 on 92/10/13 GMT (by NANR6GN at HONE82) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 14:21:44 on 92/10/13 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) I am also experiencing the same exact problems that have been described above when running at 9600baud. It runs fine at 2400 and 4800. I am using a ZOOM v32 turbo internal modem. The manual states that it has a 16550 UART. I can't remeber, but I think that one time I got it to work at 9600, with no problems. The System is a 386-33 Clone ISA bus. Have no problems what so ever downloading files at 9600. Only problems with Forbrows. If you would like me to run any special tests let me know. Thanks, Cesar Ventura, Telesector Resources Group ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 02:39:12 on 92/10/14 GMT (by BNYI010 at HONE84) Subject: PMHPO I must say that you made it a little hard to get PMHPO (required for forbrows) In order to download it you need a working RECEIVE command which is one of the things that PMHPO provides. This meant that we had to get on to a machine with access to IBMLINK on which we already had the receive command. We ending up going to a DOS machine to do this and then downloading code and carrying the code over to one of our OS2 machines. For many users this may not even be possible. PMHPO code should be placed on your other bulletin boards that support other transfer protocols such as XMODEM, etc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 03:06:21 on 92/10/14 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Subject: How about ... Ref: Append at 22:54:04 on 92/10/13 GMT (by NANR6GN at HONE82) Cesar, Under options select "New Form On Last Append". Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 03:06:56 on 92/10/14 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Subject: 9600baud Problem Ref: Append at 18:41:05 on 92/10/13 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Brent, Got the package from Paul, and downloaded all appends on my home machine & ID at about 2200edt this evening. Will try from the office tomorrow with the other I/O board. Will try both ways during the day tomorrow to see what happens here. Both pieces look real good to me this evening though. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 12:29:24 on 92/10/14 GMT (by UOFT003 at OS2CUST) Subject: PMHPO.LOG Message HPOTQ0711FT When I select "CONNECT" from the Options pull down, PMHPO terminates leaving this message in the PMHPO.LOG dataset along with what appears to be a thread trace. This only happens the first time PM HPO is executed after the folder is opened. If I re-execute PMHPO it works fine. The full text of the message is: HPOTQ0711FTqsignal error 0 in task 4 Can anyone shed some light on what the problem may be ? Doug Sinnott ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:20:26 on 92/10/14 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: PMHPO.LOG Message HPOTQ0711FT Ref: Append at 12:29:24 on 92/10/14 GMT (by UOFT003 at OS2CUST) What version of PMHPO are you using, what kind of computer are you running PMHPO on, speed of CPU, how much memory? BTW it is a PMHPO internal error. Please append info we will look into it. Thanks. Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:03:48 on 92/10/14 GMT (by IL26761 at OS2CUST) Subject: 9600 Problem Brent, Did the downloads again this morning fairly early from the house and all went well on LNK1, but now I've got me system at work messed up and can't get foradown to start for me. Think I will just zip the whole set from the machine at hom me and start all over on this one. I did notice something unusual last night while working with PMHPO though. As I said I installed a new I/O card with the 16550 Uarts on it, well apparently PMHPO is resetting something, once I run PMHPO the existence of the 16550 is no longer recognized by my system. Jack Hiatt MARC-Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:06:51 on 92/10/14 GMT (by IL26761 at OS2CUST) Subject: 9600 Problem Brent if you want further info call me this afternoon at the same place as yesterday Jack Hiatt MARC-Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:31:28 on 92/10/14 GMT (by NANR6GN at HONE81) Subject: How about ... Ref: Append at 03:06:21 on 92/10/14 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Jack, Thanks! It work just fine. Cesar Ventura, Telesector Resources Group ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:50:41 on 92/10/14 GMT (by UOFT003 at OS2CUST) Subject: PMHPO.LOG Message HPOTQ0711FT Per your request: PMHPO Version: 1.1a Computer&Speed: Gateway 2000 486/33 ISA Memory: 8MB Running OS/2 GA +OS2KRNL, REXX20, PMSPL, VBIOS, VSVGA, and HPFS fixes from OS2BBS. If you desire, I can have my SE forward the PMHPO.LOG file to you over the net. Regards, Doug Sinnott ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:12:40 on 92/10/15 GMT (by ITC1008 at HONE85) Subject: List of forums Did I miss a list of what each Forum available is about. I don't want to download each Forum just to find out it is not one I am interested in. Timothy Springer ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:49:02 on 92/10/15 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Subject: List of forums Ref: Append at 01:12:40 on 92/10/15 GMT (by ITC1008 at HONE85) Tim, There is no full line description of the fora available when using Forbrows, but the short names are fairly accurate to content. If you want the long description(1 Liner) you will have to go the the actual BBS to see that. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 11:18:57 on 92/10/15 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Brent, With the changes you had Paul send me and the 16550Uart in my system I have been downloading for the last 2 evenings with absolutely no problems. I haven't been able to check it on my machine at work which still has the older uarts in it because I managed to screw that machine up somehow and get errors trying to start FORADWN. Will try to get that straightened out and give it a try on that configuration. If I can't get that one working today I will put the older I/O card back in my system here at home and try the downloads on that tonight. Don't know which of the items in Forbrows is different, may have just seen them forthe first time while looking at options a little closer but give my thanks to David. Jack "Doing it at 9600" Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:50:54 on 92/10/15 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: List of forums Ref: Append at 01:12:40 on 92/10/15 GMT (by ITC1008 at HONE85) The end of the FORBREAD.ME text file that I wrote, describing how to use FORBROWS, contains a list of most (about 90%, I think) of the CFORUMS, along with a brief description. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:08:15 on 92/10/15 GMT (by IL26761 at OS2CUST) Subject: List of forums Ref: Append at 13:50:54 on 92/10/15 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David, Sorry about that after all I don't think I've ever gone back and checked what you put into the released package. Maybe I should try that I might learn a little more about this thing. Jack Hiatt MARC-Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:10:43 on 92/10/15 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: PMHPO.LOG Message HPOTQ0711FT Ref: Append at 21:50:41 on 92/10/14 GMT (by UOFT003 at OS2CUST) No, You don't have to send the LOG file there was engouh information from your first and second appends. Thanks. Try to start PMHPO from a command line for the first time and append back here with results. If any one else has had this problem please speak up! Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:12:36 on 92/10/15 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 11:18:57 on 92/10/15 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Jack, Did the problem fix it's self with your system not recognizing the COM port after PMHPO ended? Thanks Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 19:32:43 on 92/10/15 GMT (by X013813 at HONE83) Subject: Pruning Forums Ref: Append at 11:18:57 on 92/10/15 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Is Forbrowse working as designed to prune the downloaded forum after X number lines? Is this number setable? ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:51:46 on 92/10/15 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Pruning Forums Ref: Append at 19:32:43 on 92/10/15 GMT (by X013813 at HONE83) The prune actually takes place on the OS2BBS host, and FORBROWS simply reflects it, when a pruned forum is downloaded. Normally FORBROWS only downloads updates to fora, but when a forum is pruned it causes a major mismatch to occur when FORADOWN requests the forum update; in such a case, the entire forum is downloaded. It's working as designed. The pruned fora are archived on the host, and we hope to provide FORADOWN access to archived fora in the near future. If keeping old fora data is important to you, you may wish to periodically back up your copies of the downloaded fora, to prevent prunes from wiping out the old fora data. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:59:37 on 92/10/15 GMT (by IL77582 at HONE83) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 11:18:57 on 92/10/15 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) I have not be successful in using 9600 baud for downloads (or connects for that matter). I am using PMHPO and trying to connect using a "INPCS-HPO" access telephone number. It works fine at 2400 baud. At 4800 baud I get the signon screens just fine. When I type in my signon there is a LONG wait and then the next screen comes up. No matter what I do, eventually in the first 3 or 4 screens the system will hang up on me. At 9600 baud the signon screen appears after a LONG LONG wait, and then I get signed off. My access number is the same as the INPCS-HPO access number, which supports 1200 - 2400 baud access. I get a successful 9600 baud connect and sometimes part or all of a ungarbled screen so it is connecting at 9600 ok. As others are using PMHPO at 9600, I must be doing something wrong, but I have no idea as to what it is. I would like to resolve this before downloading the service pak, any suggestions. Thanks. Jim Rueschhoff - Packer Plastics, Inc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:46:11 on 92/10/15 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 14:12:36 on 92/10/15 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Joseph, No that part of the situation hasn't changed. It isn't really that it doesn't recognize the com port as much as it is that it doesn't recognize the fact that it has a 16550 Uart in there will play with a couple of things including geting the latest comm drivers. I have applied very few of the fixes to this machine at the house, except for the BLKICON, and one of the early kernel fixes. Will let you know what is happening after I have a chance to play with a few things. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 12:32:18 on 92/10/16 GMT (by UOFT003 at OS2CUST) Subject: PMHPO.LOG Message HPOTQ0711F1 *sigh* This roller coaster ride is getting to me. I think you guessed it. Running PMHPO from a command line works. Running from desktop doesn't. So I restored OS2*.INI and reinstalled PMHPO desktop objects. Now everything works. Believe this may be another symptom of a problem I'm having with NTS/2 installs of desktop objects. (PMHPO was installed with NTS/2 over our network) The adventure continues. Doug Sinnott ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:01:49 on 92/10/16 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 21:59:37 on 92/10/15 GMT (by IL77582 at HONE83) What kind of machine are you on, speed of CPU, amount of memory, what kind of COM port do you have? Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:03:24 on 92/10/16 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 23:46:11 on 92/10/15 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) O.K. I'll be here. Joseph ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:06:22 on 92/10/16 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: PMHPO.LOG Message HPOTQ0711F1 Ref: Append at 12:32:18 on 92/10/16 GMT (by UOFT003 at OS2CUST) Could be, I do not have the NTS/2 on my machine but I can see if we can set up on a test machine and go from there. Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:38:55 on 92/10/16 GMT (by IL26761 at OS2CUST) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 16:03:24 on 92/10/16 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Joseph, What were you doing over on the OS/2 Shareware BBS?? I didn't get a chance to do as much playing around as I wanted to last night, but the 9600 does seem a whole lot more stable, downloaded all of yesterdays appends with no problems what so ever about 1900-2000edt. This moring when I tried to download any appends that had occured overnight I saw 2 instances of the unable to connect to host screen type of msg. On the comm port situation. I rebooted my home system last night when I got there, and did a MODE COMn and I see a setting of BUFFER=AUTO which I would expect with the 16550uarts on the board, I ran several different com apps, PCPlus, PMComm, Prodigy, and then PMHPO. After each of these I did a MODE COMn and saw the BUFFER=AUTO, that is until I ran PMHPO, after that is run I see the BUFFER=N/A. I tried resetting it to AUTO, but apparently the system can no longer see that this is a 16550Uart. Jack Hiatt MARC-Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:27:53 on 92/10/16 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE84) Subject: 9600 baud - more info As reported earlier, I am also having the problem downloading at 9600 baud. Here is my configuration information that can be "merged" with Jack's and see if any patterns emerge. Symptom: 3270 cursor "stuck" in lower right corner of PMHPO screen when do repeated downloads from FORBROWS at 9600 baud. Problem does not occur when step down to 4800 baud. Software levels: OS/2 2.0 + patches for SWAPPER expansion and new mouse driver PM-HPO Version 1.1b FORBROWS Version 3.70 Hardware: IBM PS/2 90 0G9 120 meg harddrive (32 meg is HPFS, rest is FAT) Modem is a U S Robotics Worldport. (9600 baud V.32 with MNP 5 support) Hope this is useful... let me know if you want more information. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 00:53:09 on 92/10/17 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE83) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 23:27:53 on 92/10/16 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE84) Wayne, A quick question, does your system have the 16550Uarts? If so is PMHPO resetting so that appear not to be? i.e. If I do MODE COMn before using PMHPO I see BUFFER=AUTO as I would expect with 16550s, but after PMHPO i see BUFFER=N/A, which to indicates that PMHPO is preventing me from using my hardware to it's full capability as I can't reset with a reboot, and I sure don't want to reboot every time I check in here. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:37:01 on 92/10/17 GMT (by IL77582 at HONE81) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 16:01:49 on 92/10/16 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) I am using a CompuAdd 420s - 486sx 20 Mhz 8 Megs Ram, running PMHPO on COM2. This same modem downloads from other sources at speeds up to 19200 every day including the IBM NSD board. The modem is a Telebit T2500 V.32 V.42 V.42bis MNP5 and PEP capable. Once again: I connect at 9600 with PMHPO, but we have LONG LONG delays and then the other end hangs up. It is almost usable at 4800, but will hang up after 3 or 4 screens are displayed. At 2400 it works perfectly. I am accessing the system through a IL type password now, but the same thing happened using a WZ password. I am running PMHPO 1.1a and forbrows 3.70. I am sure it is something I have set up wrong, but I have not been able to find it. Thanks for you help. Jim Rueschhoff - Packer Plastics, Inc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:56:50 on 92/10/17 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 15:37:01 on 92/10/17 GMT (by IL77582 at HONE81) Jim, Sounds like you should call the IIN folks on your problem. I run at 9600 all the time using PMHPO and before that the INPCS DOS package with out the kind of problems you indicate. Call the help number on the IIN screen they maybe able to help you iron out your problems as it sounds like it with them that the problem lies, not with the Link or OS2BBS. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 17:47:56 on 92/10/17 GMT (by WZ00002 at LINK21) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 16:56:50 on 92/10/17 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Calling IIN won't help in this case. They don't do any PMHPO support at this time. The number to call would be the OS/2 BBS Help Desk at 1-800-847-7211. Jim, Something to try would be to turn off the modem's error correction. I had to do this to get my Viva 9642e to run at 9600. In the HPODIAL.DAT file immediately before the section with: action. message: Dialing %n. I added the lines: action. command: AT &K0 &Q0^M. timeout=continue: 5. 1/2 second pause eaction. No guarantees that will fix it, but perhaps your modem is having a problem talking to the IIN modem and this might help it out a bit. Let us know if that hurts or helps and we'll see what else we can try to correct the problem for you. Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 18:06:08 on 92/10/18 GMT (by ITC1008 at HONE84) Subject: Forum sync I am seeint the following problem and want to know if the system should eventually resync or if I need to completely refresh the forum when this happens. I start a download of updates for a forum, but this fails to actually complete. However the file is posted as downloaded in my appends posted file. An attempt redo the download of course is ignored since the forum is now considered upto date. Timothy Springer Ps: The download's may be failing because my IBMLINK id is in fact being flooded with other ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 18:56:54 on 92/10/18 GMT (by ITC1008 at HONE84) Subject: FORUM SYNC I just had a more severe error during DOWNload. The LASTAPPD.NOW was wiped out I.e empty after a download list requested. Thereafter nothing worked. I finally deleted the lastappd.now and LISt then took. Is there a better way out of this problem. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:30:14 on 92/10/18 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 00:53:09 on 92/10/17 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE83) Jack: I ASSUME the machine has the 16550... since I'm pretty sure IBM has been shipping that UART in all its machines for quite a while. I just jumped out and checed about the BUFFER parm, and sure enough the value is set to BUFFER=N/A. If PMHPO is shutting off the internal buffers in the UART, then that could easily explain why I get failures at high baud rates. Wayne "Sounds like we're getting close" Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 05:49:21 on 92/10/19 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE84) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 20:51:46 on 92/10/15 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David, Another suggestion. Is there a chance that you could add this feature... When I download fora, there is no way to know which ones have new appends in them. Is it possible to get a marking (i.e., and * next to the name in the listbox maybe) to show that a fora has new appends in it ? Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 12:07:27 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 23:30:14 on 92/10/18 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) Wayne, Does your buffer setting return to AUTO after you close out PMHPO. Mine doesnt and that bothers me too as to get good downloads from other sources I have to reboot to be able to reset it, the mode command doesn't seem to have any effect. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 12:16:22 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 05:49:21 on 92/10/19 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE84) Alan, The feature you are asking for is already there. It's in the registered fora list. Those with new appends with sort to the top of list. Then if you chose "Start with Registered" and "New Forum on Last" you will bounce back to that list. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:11:13 on 92/10/19 GMT (by NABL3MQ at HONE84) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 12:16:22 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Start with Registered? Where is that option? Ken Wohlferd - Fortis (&) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:36:20 on 92/10/19 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 14:11:13 on 92/10/19 GMT (by NABL3MQ at HONE84) "Start with registered fora" is a new selection under the "Options" menu in the new release of FORBROWS (v3.71). Jack is beta-testing the new version and probably forgot that not everyone has it yet... David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 18:34:42 on 92/10/19 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 17:47:56 on 92/10/17 GMT (by WZ00002 at LINK21) Sorry I have been away this weekend had some work to. I will agree with that turn off the compress on the modem, this should fix the problem. If not append what happens here. On to the next problems, If anyone can find away to repeat the 'cursor in the lower right hand corner' problem I can spend some more time on it, for now it appears to have to do with the fixes you'll have installed on your systems. We will be trying different fixes on a test bed to see if we can repeat the problem. Is there anyone out there that has had this problem on GA code no fixes added? Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 18:48:01 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 14:11:13 on 92/10/19 GMT (by NABL3MQ at HONE84) Ken, OOPS, I've got a beta release I think! Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 18:48:33 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 14:36:20 on 92/10/19 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David, Sorry about that, but I think folks will like the changes you have made in the "New Forum on Last" option. Have had a bad time this past weekend and answered without thinking. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:00:24 on 92/10/19 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 12:07:27 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Jack, I've been able to change to BUFFER=AUTO using the MODE command. No shutdown was required. I think the trick is that all of the CTS, DSR, etc. parameters have to be set in such a way to support AUTO. I haven't figured out exactly what has to be turned on how, but it CAN be done. Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:40:12 on 92/10/19 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 23:30:14 on 92/10/18 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) No, PMHPO does not change the state of the buffers I have feeling what could be happening I will be testing this today. Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:34:55 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL77582 at HONE86) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 17:47:56 on 92/10/17 GMT (by WZ00002 at LINK21) Thanks for the great suggestion, Brent. Turning off error correction worked like a champ! 9600 baud access with PMHPO is now working great. Thanks again! Jim Rueschhoff - Packer Plastics, Inc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:39:38 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 20:00:24 on 92/10/19 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Brent, Okay think when I logoff this time I will shutdown and bring the system back up, copy down the settings that I have at that point and set me a little mode .cmd file to set them properly. With the latest code set that I'm running I have had very few failures over the last couple of days, and this has been downloading at both busy and non-busy times of day. Think it is getting closer all the time. WIll keep you posted of any problems encountered. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:52:33 on 92/10/19 GMT (by NANR6GN at HONE81) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 17:47:56 on 92/10/17 GMT (by WZ00002 at LINK21) Brent, I saw your append to Jim about adding the &K0 and &Q0 to the the HPODIAL.DAT dataset, and decided to give it a try. Well I'll be it works. Since changing it I have been downloading at 9600 with no problems. I didn't use the &K0 though because my manual says that if you specify &M0 or &Q0 the Modem ignores the &K commands. Thanks for the Insight! Cesar Ventura-Telesector Resources Group ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:37:25 on 92/10/19 GMT (by NABL3MQ at HONE85) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 18:48:01 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Sorry if I got you in trouble. I tend to catch little stuff like that. I remember asking for that feature, and I actually went back and looked to make sure it wasn't there before I asked. Test it out hard for the rest of us! One beta at a time is all I can handle.... Ken Wohlferd - Fortis (&) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:39:08 on 92/10/19 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 21:34:55 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL77582 at HONE86) Wow. That was just a wild guess since your symptoms were very different than what I saw. I'm glad it worked for you. We'll have to remember this one for future reference.... Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:39:16 on 92/10/19 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 22:52:33 on 92/10/19 GMT (by NANR6GN at HONE81) You probably don't need the &K0 anyway. &Q0 is the actual error correction setting. I only had &K0 in my setup because another comm package required that I turn flow control (&K) off and I guess I left it in there when I was trying to figure out what it took to get things to work. Once it worked, I wasn't about to change it! Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:39:33 on 92/10/19 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 22:39:38 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) Jack, Guess what? I actually saw the your 9600 problem last night (once)! I don't know if that's good or bad. Bad: It still isn't 100% fixed. Good: Maybe I can reproduce it now. I don't know, but I'll keep plugging. Perhaps the difference is that, based on another append, I installed the kernel and mouse fixes. I had not installed any fixes prior to that. Hopefully this will get us closer to positively identifying the exact problem. Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:37:56 on 92/10/20 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 23:39:33 on 92/10/19 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Brent, This last week and weekend were bad ones for me as a very close friend passed away, and most of my downloads were late at night and at this point I have had only two occurances of the problem with the latest set of code Paul sent me. Will keep plugging and reporting any problems encountered. I have to try to rebuild my setup at work, somewhere when inserting the latest code I screwed things up and could get it to load at all last week. But was only working mornings and was off every afternoon and didn't really have time to look at what I had done to it. Will try to straighten it out tomorrow so I can try the downloads under load too. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:38:25 on 92/10/20 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 23:37:25 on 92/10/19 GMT (by NABL3MQ at HONE85) Ken, I guess if Brent or David get upset with me about the slip they can always send me some real buggy code to extract revenge with. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 02:49:10 on 92/10/20 GMT (by WZ00002 at LINK21) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 01:38:25 on 92/10/20 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84) Jack, Running test versions of PMHPO and ForBrowse at 4 in the morning is punishment enough. Of course if you like, I'm SURE we can come up with something to make things "interesting" for you ;-) Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 03:07:36 on 92/10/20 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 02:49:10 on 92/10/20 GMT (by WZ00002 at LINK21) Mentioning 4 in the morning just reminded me I have to get up early tomorrow, better go pick on Irv a little bit more and head for bed. Take care have a good evening. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:26:25 on 92/10/20 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 01:38:25 on 92/10/20 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84) Not to worry. As far as I'm concerned, there is nothing "secret" about anything in beta releases of FORBROWS. Jack, I assume the new FORBROWS introduced no new bugs? Relatively quirk-less? If so, I think we should go ahead and put it on IBMLink for downloading. Let me know what you think. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:11:27 on 92/10/20 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE83) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 20:40:12 on 92/10/19 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Joseph: I will leave this in your capable hands... please let me know if you need more info. (Based on what others are saying, I'm going to try the &Q0 setting and see if that does anything for me.) Wayne "Standing by..." Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:49:59 on 92/10/20 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: Warning to Jack Jack, Just a quick warning. The test PMHPO code you have may not run with the Service Pak. Joseph's looking into it. (What was you saying about getting revenge?) To Everyone Else: This is only for the test code I've sent to Jack. PMHPO 1.1B is running Ok. Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:58:59 on 92/10/20 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE81) Subject: Warning to Jack Ref: Append at 15:49:59 on 92/10/20 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Brent + Joseph: The problem I reported the other day was with PMHPO 1.1b and 6.463 a prelimary service pack from last Wendesday. It only occurs on downloads when IBMLINK dies while downloading. Is that you service pack problem? J.M.Schaeffer ('John' AIMS Sandy, Utah) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 17:52:56 on 92/10/20 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: Warning to Jack Ref: Append at 16:58:59 on 92/10/20 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE81) No, the problem that Jack MIGHT have is only on the test code (it dies immediately). I've seen NO differences running 1.1B. Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 18:08:47 on 92/10/20 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: Warning to Jack Ref: Append at 16:58:59 on 92/10/20 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE81) No, We have already identified the problem. Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:17:40 on 92/10/20 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 00:53:09 on 92/10/17 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE83) Jack, This may not be a PMHPO problem after all. APAR PJ04736 is about the MODE command incorrectly showing BUFFER=N/A when it was really in AUTO mode. The fix is included in the Service Pak. I've tried it and confirmed that after running PMHPO, it will now show AUTO. Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:34:30 on 92/10/20 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 13:26:25 on 92/10/20 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David, Haven't seen any signs of any additional bugs being introduced it all appears to be working just fine. As I said I like the mods to the New Forum on Last Append feature. That works great for me. Was wondering it seems you have some redunant options, is in Options you have "Scrolling Across Appends" and in Navigation there is "View One Append at a Time" haven't played around to see which has presidence or if they are really the same as I read them. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:35:04 on 92/10/20 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Subject: Warning to Jack Ref: Append at 15:49:59 on 92/10/20 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Brent, Okay I will redown load the production set as I think I deleted that some time ago as everything seems to be working with this as far as the other problem was concerned. It appears to work both here at home and on the sytem at work. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:35:37 on 92/10/20 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 21:17:40 on 92/10/20 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Brent, You beat me to it. I was going to post that the mode change wasn't restricted to PMHPO after all. Discovered that last night during the discourse on what should happen to Irv. But fell asleep before I remember to post that note. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:41:57 on 92/10/20 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE81) Subject: 9600 Problem Update Ref: Append at 15:37:01 on 92/10/17 GMT (by IL77582 at HONE81) Jim, Try upgrading your PMHPO to 1.1b which is on the OS2BBS. Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:43:07 on 92/10/20 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE81) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 12:16:22 on 92/10/19 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE85) >The feature you are asking for is already there. It's in the registered fora >list. Those with new appends with sort to the top of list. Then if you >chose "Start with Registered" and "New Forum on Last" you will bounce back to >that list. I use that but it works strange, I'm not sure how it determines which way they are listed, seems like size or some type of amount of appends to read or something. Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:44:19 on 92/10/20 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE81) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 20:40:12 on 92/10/19 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Are you the person coding PMHPO ? If so, I have some suggestions. If not, ignore this and I'll try to find out who to send this to. I want to have the ability to at least run some type of scripts to automate PMHPO. To call and get new appends for selected Fora and upload all appends that are waiting. Is this capability possible ? I run a BBS and it calls another hub every morning at 4:30am to exchange mail. I would like to have PMHPO do that for me, and I don't need the timer section as there are programs that do work for that (like Chron), but what IS needed is the ability to tell PMHPO to automatically log on and get all new appends (i.e., update selected Fora) and send all the appends... Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 00:16:01 on 92/10/21 GMT (by NABL3MQ at HONE82) Subject: New BBS I noticed that IBM has a new BBS today. The CICS BBS was announced today. It would be great if you added support to FORBROWSE for this new BBS. Should I add a comment on their BBS to encourage them to help you? They have an OS2 product, and should even be able to test for you. The time difference is a hassle though. I love using this tool, and I really hate to go backwards! Ken Wohlferd - Fortis (&) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:42:03 on 92/10/21 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 23:34:30 on 92/10/20 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE81) Well, those two options aren't really redundant; "View one append at a time" toggles whether the user views the forum as a flat file, or only one append at at time. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:47:56 on 92/10/21 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 23:44:19 on 92/10/20 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE81) >I want to have the ability to at least run some type of scripts to automate >PMHPO. To call and get new appends for selected Fora and upload all appends >that are waiting. I've been hoping to enhance FORADOWN so that it could be invoked periodically from a REXX .CMD program and automatically "List" all the files, mark all or selected files, then download them, and exit. FORADOWN would *not* perform an auto-logon to IIN/IBMLink... that would have to be done before FORADOWN is invoked, possibly by the REXX .CMD program that calls FORADOWN. I'm not yet sure how hard it will be to add these automated download features to FORADOWN. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:51:07 on 92/10/21 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 23:44:19 on 92/10/20 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE81) Yes, I am one of the people coding PMHPO. Your suggestion has been noted, we are looking into this and many other things at this time. Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:54:56 on 92/10/21 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: New BBS Ref: Append at 00:16:01 on 92/10/21 GMT (by NABL3MQ at HONE82) If they can shadow their CICS forum to IBMLink, in the correct format, then the forum would be available IBM-wide, and no changes to FORBROWS would be required in order to view it. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:59:13 on 92/10/21 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 23:44:19 on 92/10/20 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE81) Sorry, pressed send to soon. FORBROWS does this now it's just not done on a timed basis, FORBROWS would also have to be 'scriptable'. If I remember currently FORBROWS uses some mainframe programs to do this. Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 18:20:40 on 92/10/21 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 13:47:56 on 92/10/21 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) I think part of what I want would have to be done from you, and the other part would have to be done with PMHPO. Basically I would want to have the ability to have this software (i.e., PMHPO/ForBrows) to call and get the new appends for me automatically, on a scheduled basis. I have been around this type of *offline* messaging for a while and as traffic gets higher (which it WILL) you need to set time aside to transfer the *NEW* mail). I run PCBoard software which you probably are not familiar with, but it has an event which can be run. I only run one event, and it calls my hub (mine is only about 10 miles away, but a hub would handle an area, my hub handles Calif, Ariz., Nev., Col., Ore., etc...). The greatest thing about this IBMLink to me is the fact that we have this IBM IIN that is our backbone to the network. But we still need a way to automate our transfers with a scheduler so that the appends are updated, both on the host and remote (remote really being just another copy of the Fora wherever they sit, LANs, Hard Disks, Hosts, etc... As a user, I don't care where the software goes. But I had suggested that the PMHPO and the ForBrows were one unit (i.e., Tapcis, Golden Compas). I just want to read and reply to messages, the rest should be transparent to me. The system should handle the fact that appends need to be sent to the host by checking when he is at the host. I use an event and a batch file under DOS for my BBS, I guess what I'm asking for is a mechanism to automate my transfers so I don't have to manually do it myself. What if ForBrows called up PMHPO (with the ability to close him also) ? Actually if the programs stay as seperate entities, some type of IPC will have to be used for the programs to communicate with each other, *IF* you ever wanted to create such a type of automation. Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:07:20 on 92/10/21 GMT (by IL78568 at HONE83) Subject: Marking Fora with new appends ? Ref: Append at 23:43:07 on 92/10/20 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE81) I was told that the forums in the registered forum list (F11) are listed in the order in which they were registered. Brooks McNeely - Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:29:05 on 92/10/21 GMT (by IL78568 at OS2CUST) Subject: Copying Forums I sometimes download Forums at work or at home. What do I need to copy from one system to another to allow me to resynch my forums on both machines (and be able to use FORBROWS to read and respond to appends which were actually downloaded from the other machine). I tried copying FORBROWS.INI, LASTAPPD.*, and all the *.CFO files to the proper subdirectories but the result had some problems. Is some of the information in EA's which I lost using diskettes as intermediate storage (I actually made two *.ZIP files out of the *.CFO files using PKZIP2). TIA for any suggestions. Brooks McNeely - Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:35:01 on 92/10/21 GMT (by IL78568 at OS2CUST) Subject: FORBROWS problems Sometimes (I don't have a good handle on when this happens), the shortcut (accelerator) keys do not work in FORBROWS. The ones in question are the "r" & "R" and "s" & "S" keys. The buttons at the bottom of the screen continue to work. Other keys such as F4, F11, and F3 seem to work fine. Plus occasionally the shortcut keys above work. Has anyone else seen this behavior (and can offer a solution)? Brooks McNeely - Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:56:00 on 92/10/21 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Copying Forums Ref: Append at 20:29:05 on 92/10/21 GMT (by IL78568 at OS2CUST) Forbrows does not use EA's so you are safe from problems in that area. Here's what FORBROWS uses/needs (other than the .EXEs, etc): - Make sure the subdirectory structure for appends and downloaded fora is the same on both machines. FORBROWS.INI points to specific files on specific disks (or net aliases), and when FORBROWS builds appends it cross-references the lowest level subdir (usually \OS2BBS) with an entry in FORBROWS.CTL. In other words, if you store fora on C:\OS2BBS on one machine, store it in C:\OS2BBS on the new machine as well. That way all pointers and cross-references stay preserved. The same applies for the \APPENDS and \APPEND\POSTED subdir. - Copy LASTAPPD.DOW, FORBROWS.INI, FORBROWS.CTL to the new machine. You might also copy LASTAPPD.NOW, but that's optional since FORADOWN "List" will build a new one from the IBMLink host. LASTAPPD.DOW goes into your \APPENDS\POSTED subdir. - OS2.INI points to your copy of FORBROWS.INI... no need to copy OS2.INI to the new machine, simply select "Set registered fora filename" under the "Options" menu in FORBROWS after installing it on the new machine, and point to the FORBROWS.INI that you copied. I think that about covers it. Once things are set up, you should only have to copy LASTAPPD.DOW and FORBROWS.INI when you move between the two machines. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:19:30 on 92/10/21 GMT (by IL78568 at HONE83) Subject: Copying Forums Ref: Append at 20:56:00 on 92/10/21 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David, Thanks for the good information. Please indulge a couple of quick follow on questions. 1. What is the reason for copying the FORBROWS.CTL file? Do I have to be using the same method of connection on both machines (I use CM at work and PMHPO at home)? 2. I have the identical directory structure on both machines, but at work I use partition D: and at home I use partition E:. I bet this causes problems. Right? Brooks McNeely - Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:28:23 on 92/10/21 GMT (by IL78568 at OS2CUST) Subject: New Appends What is the best (easiest) way to submit an append on an entirely new subject using FORBROWS. I tried pretending like I was answering an append, and then editing the Subject Line, etc. But when I tried to upload my new append, I got an error pop-up saying that I didn't have a valid append header (or words to that effect). I've always been kinda a slow learner. Brooks McNeely - Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:40:18 on 92/10/21 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Copying Forums Ref: Append at 21:19:30 on 92/10/21 GMT (by IL78568 at HONE83) >1. What is the reason for copying the FORBROWS.CTL file? Do I have to be > using the same method of connection on both machines (I use CM at work and > PMHPO at home)? FORBROWS.CTL contains "control" information, primarily for interacting with the OS2BBS host system. For most people, they should never have to touch it, and it will be identical in content on their different systems. It will not make any difference whether you use PMHPO or CM, as long as you have the correct EHLLAPI DLLs installed on your respective systems (ACS3EHAP.DLL for CM, and TAPHLL32.DLL for PMHPO). Of course, you also have to set the correct radio button (CM vs PMHPO) in the "Set installation defaults". If you use CM, you need to rename SEND.EXE and RECEIVE.EXE as distributed by PMHPO (but I think you tackled that problem earlier ;-) >2. I have the identical directory structure on both machines, but at work I > use partition D: and at home I use partition E:. I bet this causes > problems. Right? Yep. FORBROWS.INI will contain mis-matching file pointers for the "registered" fora. If you can somehow change to D: at home, things should get healthier... David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:01:07 on 92/10/21 GMT (by CAR2011 at HONE82) Subject: Suggestion - Ability to Download NEWS, ETC Ref: Append at 21:45:29 on 92/08/21 GMT (by WZ00001 at LINK21) I was perusing this forum for a suggestion/(help?) on an item: Does FORBROWS allow one to download other parts of the OS2BBS for off- line browsing, for example: - NEWS and ANNOUNCEMENTS (option 4), or - A List of whats in OS/2 Software Library If not? A suggestion. If so? How? Thanks! Peter Ricciardiello Carrier Corporation - in * * R A I N Y * * Syracuse NY ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 04:42:38 on 92/10/22 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 18:20:40 on 92/10/21 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Alan, Yes, PMHPO and FORBROWS do talk to each other using HLLAPI. We have talked about this and other things we and you'll would like to see added to PMHPO, but I will not send out a PMHPO that is not ready, we are in the middle of locking in the next version of PMHPO down. So at this time we are getting the new things we have added to PMHPO, to work. When we start looking at the next phase of PMHPO, I am sure that some of the things that have been asked for in this forum and others will be looked and considered. Sorry if sound a little HOT, I am not I have to agree with some things said in this forum and others. Joseph Mogavero P.S. When I say 'to work' I mean we are adding the last layer of GUI to it. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 09:04:58 on 92/10/22 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE84) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 04:42:38 on 92/10/22 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Joeseph, =====> Yes, PMHPO and FORBROWS do talk to each other using HLLAPI. We have talked about this and other things we and you'll would like to see added to PMHPO, but I will not send out a PMHPO that is not ready, we are in the middle of locking in the next version of PMHPO down. So at this time we are getting the new things we have added to PMHPO, to work. When we start looking at the next phase of PMHPO, I am sure that some of the things that have been asked for in this forum and others will be looked and considered. Sorry if sound a little HOT, I am not I have to agree with some things said in this forum and others. <===== Just one question. Wouldn't one of the other IPC facilities be more effecient for that. A Named Pipe seems so much more effecient, maybe I'm just mistaken. I understand your position completely, don't think *I'M* harping on you. I'm just making suggestions. I'm not determining if/when you implement these type of features, just pointing out what type of features I would like to see. Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 11:51:20 on 92/10/22 GMT (by NANR6GN at OS2CUST) Subject: Forbrows Help Brent,Jack, Anybody: You people were so helpful in getting my 9600 baud problems resolved, that I was wondering if you could assist me in getting forbrows to work with CM. I put forbrows on my system at work, which does not have PMHPO, only CM connected to a 3174 via 3270 adapter. I know that I have EHLLAPI support, because I use it in some REXX exec's to logon at power-up. Just to be safe I checked for the DLL files mentioned in the the FORBROWS.INF file, and there is one that is not on my system (RNLCHARS.DLL). Do I need this? If so what ES disk is it on? Well I went along and brought up forbrows anyhow, and I selected download forum files. I waited and waited..... Then I got the following. RC=78 From RECEIVE C:\OS2BBS\POSTED\LASTAPPD.NOW. What am I doing wrong? Cesar Ventura-Telesector Resources Group ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:09:40 on 92/10/22 GMT (by SC025203 at AUSVM8) Subject: Forbrows Help Ref: Append at 11:51:20 on 92/10/22 GMT (by NANR6GN at OS2CUST) Cesar, Assuming you are still accessing the OS2BBS through IBMLink, all that you need to do to get FORBROWS working with CM is set the radio button for CM or PMHPO under Installation defaults and rename the RECEIVE.EXE and SEND.EXE that came with PMHPO so that the CM versions are used instead. I believe that's all you need to do. Stephen Poole OS/2 Service and Support - IBM Austin, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:03:27 on 92/10/22 GMT (by AYP1Q01 at HONE83) Subject: FORBROWS problems Ref: Append at 20:35:01 on 92/10/21 GMT (by IL78568 at OS2CUST) Brooks, I've had this problem also, and the solution is ridiculously simple (or maybe I am - I'm never really sure). The "Caps Lock" key seems to disable the shortcut keys. Just unlock it and the problem disappears, at least on my machine. David, Joseph - is this a feature or a bug? Steve Bassler, Allegheny Power ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:04:05 on 92/10/22 GMT (by AYP1Q01 at HONE83) Subject: Forbrows Questions Ref: Append at 11:51:20 on 92/10/22 GMT (by NANR6GN at OS2CUST) I have a few questions: 1) I just started receiving an error at startup. After clicking on the FORABROWS Icon and before anything else displays, I get a box which says "Invalid path FORBROWS.EXE". I click on the OK box and everything continues as normal. This is new - I started receiving it this week after I repartitioned my D: drive into 2 smaller ones, even though I put everything back where I found it (my mother taught me well). This included FORBROWS.EXE and all associated files. Oh yes, the question. How do I get rid of this message? It's just an annoyance, but I don't particularly like being annoyed. 2) What is the little document icon along the left edge of the title bar of FORBROWS for? 3) Is it possible to set up FORADOWN and FORAUP to be executed independently of FORBROWS? I've added them to a folder, but when I try to start them, they come back saying they need a string of parameters, some of which I'm not sure I would be able to hard-code. For example, FORADOWN is expecting a listsubdir, a forasubdir, a VMid, a VMmdisk, a HostType, and a TermType. Are any of these dynamically generated, depending on which HONE system I log onto, or where my A disk is? How cvan I tell my HostType, etc, etc. Thanks for such a great product. I'm looking forward to the next release - drooling in my soup, so to speak. Steve Bassler, Allegheny Power ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:13:34 on 92/10/22 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: 9600 baud - more info Ref: Append at 09:04:58 on 92/10/22 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE84) I do not think so FORBROWS just calls a DLL with a 16 Bit entry point which in turn calls the HLLAPI function directly. 32 bit HLLAPI programs might be faster because there is no 'thunking' involed at all, there is a 32 bit entry in the same DLL as the 16 bit entry points. Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:14:55 on 92/10/22 GMT (by NANR6GN at OS2CUST) Subject: Forbrows Help Ref: Append at 13:09:40 on 92/10/22 GMT (by SC025203 at AUSVM8) Stephen, I don't have PMHPO installed so I don't think that is the problem. I checked under "Set installation defaults", and the radio button that is on is the one for OS/2 Comm Mgr. Could I be experiencing some type of timing problems? I have no problems downloading files from the BBS. Cesar Ventura-Telesector Resources Group ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:48:31 on 92/10/22 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Forbrows Questions Ref: Append at 14:04:05 on 92/10/22 GMT (by AYP1Q01 at HONE83) 1) Not sure. Try checking "Options", "Set installation defaults", and check the editor filespec field. If it says "FORBROWS.EXE", try changing it to point explicitly to d:\subdir\FORBROWS.EXE, where d:\subdir is the the exact drive and path that FORBROWS.EXE resides in. Such a setting tells FORBROWS to use it's own built-in MLE-based editor for creating appends. 2) Its a "Drag" icon, for drag and drop support. While browsing a forum, you can drop on an EPM (ie. enhanced editor) window, for example. However, FORBROWS's drag & drop code does not (yet) use the standard OS/2 DRAG/DROP APIs... that part of FORBROWS was implemented before such calls existed, but we needed the drag&drop function here at Watson Research in order to interact with some other tools that we all run on our LAN. For the curious, it uses the old OS/2 1.x FileManager drag&drop conventions. 3) Yes, it's possible, and will probably be supported in the future. Most of the parms are derived from the ForBrows default settings and from info in FORBROWS.CTL. The Termtype parm is either PMHPO or CM. However, I'm a bit leery of discussing this particular method of operation in detail, since it might cause some users more problems than it would solve. But for the hackers out there, the above info might contain enough hints to make it work. ;-) David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:50:55 on 92/10/22 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: New Appends Ref: Append at 21:28:23 on 92/10/21 GMT (by IL78568 at OS2CUST) Just type over any text after "Subject: ". Be sure the "Append:" line is left untouched. The "Ref:" line can be deleted, or left intact, as needed. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:54:37 on 92/10/22 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: FORBROWS problems Ref: Append at 14:03:27 on 92/10/22 GMT (by AYP1Q01 at HONE83) It's a feechur. Since some of the navigation buttons are defined simply as upper or lower case letters (S, s, R, r) then CapsLock will affect their use. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:57:58 on 92/10/22 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Suggestion - Ability to Download NEWS, ETC Ref: Append at 23:01:07 on 92/10/21 GMT (by CAR2011 at HONE82) So far, only fora downloading is provided by FORADOWN. Many users have expressed interest in having FORADOWN capability extended to other files. The OS2BBS project leaders have also expressed a desire to have such features. Any more than that, I can't say at present. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:04:08 on 92/10/22 GMT (by ITC1008 at HONE85) Subject: Forum sync Ref: Append at 15:34:38 on 92/10/19 GMT (by HOPKINS at AUSVM8) Subject: Forum sync -->Append: OS2 OS2BBS FORBROWS CFORUM 18:06:08 on 92/10/18 MODIFY I am seeing the following problem and want to know if the system should eventually resync or if I need to completely refresh the forum when this happens. I start a download of updates for a forum, but this fails to actually complete. However the file is posted as downloaded in my appends posted file. An attempt redo the download of course is ignored since the forum is now considered upto date. Timothy Springer, Bank of New York Ps: Since I originally asked this question i have failed to properly resync several times, ending up with several appends mising in the middle of the forum. I have eventually been forced to download the entire FORUM instead. Timothy Springer, Bank of New York PSS: I just had a severe problem trying to send this item. I had tried to use the option to modify an append (The append line at that time I have marked with -->). After uploading this item, the upload program followed it with a command that would not fit in the single input line on the IBMLINK main menu causing it to wrap and overlay the front of the command. Therefore that command and the send append failed. Timothy Springer, Bank of New York ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 18:28:55 on 92/10/22 GMT (by SC025203 at AUSVM8) Subject: Forbrows Help Ref: Append at 14:14:55 on 92/10/22 GMT (by NANR6GN at OS2CUST) Cesar, I don't think there is anything else needed. And if you can download other files from the BBS using CM, there is no reason FORADOWN shouldn't work. Did you modify the FORBROWS.CTL file? David, any ideas on this? Stephen Poole OS/2 Service and Support - IBM Austin, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 19:11:35 on 92/10/22 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 ForBrowse version 3.71 is now available for download from the BBS. Along with some minor bug fixes, you'll also find the new features: "Copy and Quote marked text" for quoting text from another append while writing your own. "Start with Registered Fora" to have the Registered Fora window displayed first instead of the Available Fora window. Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:04:52 on 92/10/22 GMT (by IL48672 at HONE81) Subject: No more appends! Ref: Append at 19:11:35 on 92/10/22 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) David, Great job on ForBrows 3.71! Love the "Start with Registered Fora" option! But...:-) I have been noticing an intermittent problem lately. If I view all my registered fora, then hit F11 and select a forum that I have completely viewed something odd happens. It brings up the last item in the forum (correctly), but when I push the "Prev<-" button, I get the "No more appends!" message at the bottom. This doesn't always happen, but often enough that I know that I am not going crazy. What is really curious about this, though, is that if I keep hitting the "Prev<-" button, eventually it does take me to the previous item. I have verified this with 3.70 and 3.71. BTW, I am running this under OS/2 2.0 with 32-bit GRE and Windows 3.1 support is loaded. Sorry to give you another "It's really great, but..." letter. I really am happy with ForBrowse, in general. Chris Breisch NT means Nervous Tension Pritsker Corporation ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:12:58 on 92/10/23 GMT (by KENIN at MARTLINK) Subject: New Release FORADOWN Problem I installed the new Forbrowse tonight. I unziped the package, and copied the files into my Forbrowse directory. I ran the program, and most of it worked fine, however I could not start FORADOWN. I think it must be something I did, but I don't know what. To ensure this doesn't hit someone else, please document the proceedure for installation over an old release. I have it running fine now, and I really like the new registered forum features. I was disapointed that there is no way to quickly mark the 10 fora I want updated. I will hope for that in 3.80. I will let you know if anything else pops up. Ken Wohlferd - Fortis (&) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:19:48 on 92/10/23 GMT (by KENIN at MARTLINK) Subject: OOLS Problem I got that flakey error again with the new release. When the error occurs the IBMLink screen looks as follows: ERROR: Unrecognized fastpath name. Valid names displayed below. Customer Support: 1-8 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | MESSAGE Scrolling is active. Press END to refresh. | MARTLINK MSG NICKNAMES 1 INFOLINK | NOTE NOTELOGLIST NOTES | OPENMAIL ORDERINFO ORDERLINK 2 ORDERLINK | PERSONAL PRESSRELEASE PRICE | PRINTERS PROCESSNOTES PRODUCT 3 SUPPORTLINK | PROFILES PSGIM PSP | PUBS SALESMANUAL SCHEDULES | SENDNOTES SERVICELINK SIS 4 SERVICELINK | SPGUIDE SRCHSUPPORT SRD | SUPPORTLINK SVCGUIDE SVCNEWS 5 USER FUNCTIONS | SWAPPLIC SWCATALOG SWSALESMAN | TECHQA TERMS USERSGUIDE 6 MARTLINK | VPA VPL | | | ===> OOLS SENDTO HONE80 OS2 OS2BBS APPEND FORBROWS FORBROWS CFORUM PF 1=HELP 3=END 4=TOP 7=BACK The error goes by pretty fast, but it looked like TOOLS was entered, and then the cursor wrapped back, and entered a blank at the begining of the line. Last time the error went away on its own. Any ideas? Once it fails, it keeps on failing. I don't remember what I did last time to clear it up. Ken Wohlferd - Fortis (&) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:21:25 on 92/10/23 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE85) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 Ref: Append at 19:11:35 on 92/10/22 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) >"Copy and Quote marked text" for quoting text from another append while >writing your own. Brent: Hey... that "Copy and Quote marked text" is pretty neat! Thanks to all involved for some nice improvements to a good program. Now, about those OTHER things I wanted in FORBROWS! <g> Wayne "This user is NEVER satisfied... but of course you have ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 02:36:56 on 92/10/23 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 Ref: Append at 01:21:25 on 92/10/23 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE85) Wayne, Now what were those other requests? EMail Notices etc etc etc etc etc Jack "Waiting to see Wayne Happy" Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 03:43:54 on 92/10/23 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE81) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 Ref: Append at 02:36:56 on 92/10/23 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) Jack: Wayne happy? I'm not sure IBM can pull off that miracle <g>. I too am looking for the list to be implemented with Notices and E-mail at the top of the list. Make FORBROWS a complete interface to OS2BBS and I would be happy. J.M.Schaeffer ('John' AIMS, Sandy Utah) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 03:50:26 on 92/10/23 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE83) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 Ref: Append at 03:43:54 on 92/10/23 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE81) John, Maybe just a big smile then. I agree though, I like FORBROWS and would be real happy to not have to go to the BBS at all, but to do everything thru it. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. GO BRAVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 04:02:51 on 92/10/23 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE81) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 Ref: Append at 03:50:26 on 92/10/23 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE83) Jack: Looks like we are talking in two different fora at the same time. I got a dog and pony show scheduled tomorrow morning with a group from Austin. I'll definitely bring some of this up with them. By the way, do you ever sleep. It's tomorrow their by my clock and you start to work at 5AM ??????? J.M.Schaeffer ('John' AIMS, Sandy Utah) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 04:58:28 on 92/10/23 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 Ref: Append at 02:36:56 on 92/10/23 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE82) >Jack "Waiting to see Wayne Happy" Hiatt Jack: I think my long suffering SE has conclusion that the most he can do is keep me mildly contented. <g> Hey... I got a call from some marketeer from Microsoft today. Seems they wanted to know what word processor (Describe 32-bit version), and spreadsheet (Excel for PM) I was using. We had a very nice conversation once I made it perfectly clear that I WAS NOT interested in a copy of NT, since I already had an OS that ran all my DOS and Windows apps. She seemed genuinely interested in how I felt about OS/2. After gushing with praise for OS/2 for about 5 minutes, I convinced her to submit a request to development for an OS/2 native version of Excel. (Lots of emphasis on multithreading, etc...) I used Describe as an example of what a good OS/2 app could do... and it seems my point got across. (At least I hope so.) Wayne "Publically committed to OS/2, but more than willing to keep IBMs feet in the fire on OS2BBS :-)" Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 10:20:59 on 92/10/23 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE83) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 Ref: Append at 04:02:51 on 92/10/23 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE81) John, I had just finished watching the game and grabbed one last set of downloads. Then it was off for my forty winks. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 10:21:26 on 92/10/23 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE83) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 Ref: Append at 04:58:28 on 92/10/23 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) Wayne, I don't think it will be long before Billy Boy brings out his OS/2 versions. There's money to be made here and I'm sure he's not going to miss his chance at any of it. Keep pushing those feet towards the fire. Want to to see this OS working and fulfilling the promise that is there. Jack Hiatt Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:45:45 on 92/10/23 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: No more appends! Ref: Append at 22:04:52 on 92/10/22 GMT (by IL48672 at HONE81) What you're seeing happens because of the way in which FORBROWS loads fora. Many forum files are quite large, so to improve "perceived" responsiveness, FORBROWS loads a forum in 2 stages. The forums are loaded by a secondary thread; it first (stage 1) tries to locate the next append, and load enough of the forum to display it and a few subsequent appends. The 2nd thread then tells the main thread that it can now display the append, and the main thread will then do so. In the meantime, the 2nd thread resumes loading the remainder of the forum (stage 2). During stage 2, if you try to scroll backward in the forum, you will see the "No more appends" message (since the main thread does not yet know about previous appends). Once the 2nd thread finishes loading the entire forum, FORBROWS will let you scroll wherever you wish. There are several variations on the above scenario (sometimes the next append is not where expected, due to insertions, etc), but the previous paragraph conveys the main idea. Probably what I need to do is have a more informative message displayed rather than having the "No more appends" message performing double-duty; something like "File is still being loaded; try again in a few moments..." David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:53:22 on 92/10/23 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: OOLS Problem Ref: Append at 01:19:48 on 92/10/23 GMT (by KENIN at MARTLINK) Ken, thanks for including the pertinent parts of the host screen; it helps. I haven't seen this lately (anyone else seeing it?)... I'll do some checking today. David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:59:40 on 92/10/23 GMT (by NABL3MQ at HONE81) Subject: OOLS Problem Ref: Append at 13:53:22 on 92/10/23 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) I suspect that it has to do with messing up the header. I rebooted to clear the problem, shutting down Forbrowse doesn't seem to do it. I tested it this morning, and it is working fine. I will paly some more to see if I can repeat the error. I will append if I get a hit. It is SO NICE to have someone take an interest in these problems. I keep thinking "how would MS have handled this?" Ken Wohlferd - Fortis (&) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:45:44 on 92/10/23 GMT (by AYP1Q01 at HONE83) Subject: Forbrows Questions Ref: Append at 14:04:05 on 92/10/22 GMT (by AYP1Q01 at HONE83) David, >"Invalid path FORBROWS.EXE" error on startup Found the problem, and it's an odd one. In my program reference settings, I generally avoid placing explicit path information so that I can feel freer to move things around. I figure as long as it's in the PATH, it should run with no problems. (NOT!!) If I just use FORBROWS.EXE as the program name, I get the above error, although it doesn't seem to affect anything beyond that point. Using the explicit path - D:\PGMS\FORBROWS.EXE - clears it up. I am not aware of any other programs which require this. Any ideas or comments? BTW, I just downloaded version 3.71. Nice! I like the "Quoted Copy" and the "Start with Registered Fora". However, the above situation remains. Steve Bassler, Allegheny Power ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:46:23 on 92/10/23 GMT (by AYP1Q01 at HONE83) Subject: Forbrows Help Ref: Append at 11:51:20 on 92/10/22 GMT (by NANR6GN at OS2CUST) Cesar, I've been waiting a while before responding to this, hoping that someone could give you a better (read that: "official") answer. I had the same type of problem when I first installed FORBROWS, including having all the settings correct, missing the RNLCHARS.DLL file, and the unexplainable RC from RECEIVE. I'm not sure that this is what fixed it, which is why I'm hesitant to pass it on, but if you're still not running, it can't hurt... It has been mentioned that FORBROWS will get confused by the presence of the PMHPO versions of SEND and RECEIVE. I did not have PMHPO installed, but I did have an old copy of the DOS versions, from a PC3270 setup. They were not in the path or anything (at least not for OS/2, but PC3270 WAS in my AUTOEXEC.BAT), but when I renamed them, poof! the problems cleared up and I have not had any since. As I said, I'm not at all sure that this was the source of or the solution to the problem, but FORBROWS didn't work, and now it does, and I ain't messin' with it. Obviously, if your situation is not the same, this won't apply, but we won't have lost anything in the process. Good luck. If this works for you too, I think someone should probably look into it. Steve Bassler, Allegheny Power ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:51:31 on 92/10/23 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 Ref: Append at 10:21:26 on 92/10/23 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE83) Congratulations to Dave and his programming group for getting FORBROWS 3.71 out the door. Joseph A. Mogavero P.S. Wayne, happy would be a miracle, we can only hope.<GRIN> ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:08:19 on 92/10/23 GMT (by NAAO3IY at OS2CUST) Subject: HLLAPI error Suddenly, uploads no longer work. I am getting a HLLAPI error sending the SENDTO, which runs off the end of the input line on the IBMLink home screen. I notice that the input field is cut off about 4 bytes from the actual right margin. I'll open a FEEDBACK in case it's IBMLink's fault. John Kennedy -- Hoechst Celanese, Bridgewater, NJ (The OS/2 Hobbit) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:32:42 on 92/10/23 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 Ref: Append at 14:51:31 on 92/10/23 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) I and my "group" thank you ;-)... Actually, no more than one person at a time has ever worked on ForBrows components. The group is getting at bit smaller at the moment, since I can presently only afford to dedicate about 1/4 of my time to ForBrows. My manager keeps reminding me that I have a real job that needs more attention... David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:54:10 on 92/10/23 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: HLLAPI error Ref: Append at 15:08:19 on 92/10/23 GMT (by NAAO3IY at OS2CUST) John, what forum were you appending to when you experienced the "Sendto" failure? David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:25:11 on 92/10/23 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE83) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 Ref: Append at 15:32:42 on 92/10/23 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) >dedicate about 1/4 of my time to ForBrows. My manager keeps reminding >me that I have a real job that needs more attention... David: Does your manager read this CFORUM? If keeping customers happy (even the dreaded "Wayne Holmes" <g>) isn't a "real job" than I don't know what is. Wayne "Trying to offer some perspective from a users standpoint" Holmes ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:27:31 on 92/10/23 GMT (by NANR6GN at OS2CUST) Subject: Forbrows Help Ref: Append at 14:46:23 on 92/10/23 GMT (by AYP1Q01 at HONE83) Steve, It's worth a shot. I do not have PMHPO on my disk, but I do happen to have two versions of PC3270 for Windows, 2.0 and 3.0. Let me see what these Send/Receive programs are called, and rename them. Will let you know if this cleared up the problem. Cesar Ventura-Telesector Resources Group ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:28:43 on 92/10/23 GMT (by NAAO3IY at HONE81) Subject: HLLAPI error Ref: Append at 15:54:10 on 92/10/23 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) >John, what forum were you appending to when you experienced the "Sendto" >failure? Let's try FORBROWS and see what happens. John Kennedy, Hoechst Celanese (The OS/2 Hobbit) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:35:25 on 92/10/23 GMT (by NAAO3IY at HONE81) Subject: HLLAPI error Ref: Append at 15:54:10 on 92/10/23 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) OK, that one worked. Before, it was trying to do something like: TOOLS SENDTO .... forum CFORUM at 15:54:10 on 92 This may have been triggered by an inadvertant attempt to do a "modify current append" on someone else's append. However, when I saw that this had happened, I erased that file and tried to send again, and got this. There may perhaps have been some residual data? I notice that when it works, there is nothing to the right of CFORUM. Anyway, it seems to work now. John Kennedy, Hoechst Celanese (The OS/2 Hobbit) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:56:03 on 92/10/23 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: HLLAPI error Ref: Append at 16:28:43 on 92/10/23 GMT (by NAAO3IY at HONE81) What version of PMHPO are you useing? Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 17:50:44 on 92/10/23 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 Ref: Append at 16:25:11 on 92/10/23 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE83) Note that I said that I now can only "afford" to spend 1/4 of my time on ForBrows. In reality, I still spend more time than that. Sorry if I was being a bit disingenuous. I also don't want to leave the impression that my manager is not supportive of computer conferencing... in fact, just it's just the opposite. He's been one of the real internal champions of conferencing, and has stuck by it and vigorously defended it, even when some influential folks did not always approve. He's allowed me to spend a lot of time on the OS2BBS/Forbrows development effort, even though there was no real funding for doing so. It's just that, inside IBM, as in much of the rest of the world, OS/2 development skills are in *extremely* high demand at the moment, and we have a list of projects that need attention. As the popularity of OS2BBS increases (the TalkLink announcement should help), I expect that "official" priorities will shift back toward ForBrows. But for at least a month or so, I have to try to get caught up on some other work (which will *also* involve keeping real customers happy). David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 19:53:01 on 92/10/23 GMT (by BNYI010 at HONE86) Subject: Forum sync Ref: Append at 16:04:08 on 92/10/22 GMT (by ITC1008 at HONE85) Dave, I would appreciate an answer about download's that abort. I am not sur why they abort but I then end up with a FORUM out of sync with the LASTAPPD.dow file. One of the people here has suggested, nd I tried and it seemed to work, editing the file to put back the correct info. Put needless to say this is a bit unfriendly and require that you download updates to each forum 1 at a time and make sure they complete. As near as I can tell the download's unusally fail due to a timeout in the receive code. If a flip over to the IBMLINK screen it is still waiting to start the download. Note also my pss about line overlay when I tried to modify my own append. This would seem to be similar to the problem mention in other people append entered after mine about HLLAPI error and about failure to send with FORBROWS 3.71. What they all hint at is that it would be a good idea for FORBROWS to check out the syntax of the APPEND line a little more before trying to use it. Timothy Springer, The Bank of New York ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:56:27 on 92/10/23 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Forum sync Ref: Append at 19:53:01 on 92/10/23 GMT (by BNYI010 at HONE86) Timothy, I have not been able to reproduce your problem. There was a (somewhat) similar problem awhile back when using an older version of PMHPO. Are you using the latest PMHPO (v1.1b)? If not, it's available for download from this BBS. Anyone else experiencing similar problems? Any more details available? David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:31:38 on 92/10/23 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE83) Subject: HLLAPI error Ref: Append at 15:54:10 on 92/10/23 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) David, >John, what forum were you appending to when you experienced the "Sendto" >failure? I know I'm not John, but I had a send to failure last night sending a message to this forum. I was actually telling you have I like the quote feature, thanks a bunch for adding that. Some readers put a line above the quote that says, "at 15:54:10 on 92/10/23, David Slauson said", not sure if you want to add that. It helps at times when trying to figure out when/who the quote came from. Most of the offline readers have ability to add a tagline to the message. Is it possible to implement something of this ? Have a combo box pop down and allow the user to append their own tagline after their name, or in between their name...(ala Wayne "" Holmes as people refer to). CI$ people have been doing this for quite a long time and other BBS systems as well. Have an ASCII file that gets read to append the tag of choice by the user, and allow them to add, edit, detlete tags... That way we could steal all of Wayne's tags...roar! I think I would rather tag the message after the signature though, something like I'll put on this one... Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ¢ForBrows 3.71| Who would steal Wayne's tags anyway...? ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 09:43:17 on 92/10/24 GMT (by IL48722 at HONE85) Subject: A couple of suggestions David, Thanks for the new FORBROWS! It does seem considerably more "bulletproof" here. bα∙C I do have a couple of suggestions, however, for future releases: 1. I would considerably increase the timeout delays in FORADOWN and FORAUP. I noticed earlier today that when IBMLink (and likely IIN) were busy, FORADOWN was giving up just about the time the IND$FILE started running. A small aside: Is there some good way to abort IND$FILE execution without killing off the session? I note that there is a 4-character input line left at the lower right of the screen, and things typed in disappear. But none of the obvious choices ("STOP", "QUIT", "HALT", etc.) seem to do anything useful. Eventually it gives up, but it always seems to take forever. Sometimes it's just easier to call the IBMLink ARU and get forced off. d things typed in disappear. But none of the obvious choices ("STOP", "QUIT", "HALT", etc.) seem to 2. On the FORADOWN menu, would it be possible to differentiate fora which I have never downloaded from those that are up to date? "Forum up to date" or suchlike? typed in disappear. But none of the obvious choices ("STOP", "QUIT", "HALT", etc.) seem to Thanks again! Robert J. Beilstein, Manugistics, Inc. (315) 458-0723 ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 09:58:00 on 92/10/24 GMT (by IL48722 at HONE85) Subject: A couple of suggestions Ref: Append at 09:43:17 on 92/10/24 GMT (by IL48722 at HONE85) When I go back and read the append I just submitted, I wonder what the heck went wrong! The formatting is impossible, and there are pieces of text missing. Anyway, on the FORADOWN suggestion, I don't think I was very clear. What I was suggesting was for the "Download not required" or "Forum is up to date" message to appear in lieu of leaving the forum out of the list. I had a downloading problem that left a "hole" in the middle of the OS2MISC file. I wanted to refresh the forum, but I had to wait until there had been an append, so the file showed up on the menu, before I could do so. I realize that I could likely have gone in and manually modified files to accomplish this, but that seems too much like work. Robert J. Beilstein, Manugistics, Inc. (315) 458-0723 IBMMAIL(USSH14GB) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 00:09:33 on 92/10/25 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Subject: ForBrowse 3.71 Ref: Append at 16:38:19 on 92/10/24 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE85) John, >I am a little behind on my reading, you and your "group" have done a great >job with FORBROWS. I see (look at OS2BBS forum) that the new TalkLink with >be accessabel with FORBROWS. This means alot more demand for features and >function, where are you going to get the time. Actually this note is for the >powers that be above you, FORBROWS needs to become a regular offering. With >TalkLink (and its $18 per month access charge), OS2BBS may take a lot of >people off CIS, attract new people not on a BBS, and when NSC BBS move >attract a lot of single users. I agree with all of this completly. Can any joe-blow off the street get on TalkLink for $18 a month ? Is so, I agree that it will become a good means of support for a lot of different stuff. The fact is that it is cheaper than CI$ and if it was available for $18 a month (prodigy was about $10 a month when it started), it would be a wise investment. Since I already access the OS2BBS, what do I get for my $18 a month ? (ANYBODY feel to jump in on this one from IBM) There are some things I that would like to see in ForBrows and I am mentioning some of them to David so he can implement those (if he has time). Is TalkLink available to WorldWide DAP ? Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 00:50:44 on 92/10/25 GMT (by NANR6GN at HONE84) Subject: Forbrows Help Ref: Append at 16:27:31 on 92/10/23 GMT (by NANR6GN at OS2CUST) Steve, That seemed to help. I at least got the Forum list to update. Still having problems though. When I select a forum to download I get thrown out of IBMLink, all the way back to the IIN product selection Screen. I then have to wait about 3 to 5 minutes for Forbrows to time out. Cesar Ventura - Telesector Resources Group ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:25:48 on 92/10/26 GMT (by ROK2070 at HONE81) Subject: IBMLink abend Using ForBrows version 3.71, I started downloading a few entire forums. The first one went fine, when it started on the second, I got an abend in IBMLink: 12:11:41 ^C MSG FROM ROK2070 : Re-IPLing due to storage ABEND. Clear screen to continue. ^C IBMLink VM/SP REL 5 10/20/92 12:50 C Ready; C C ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:49:37 on 92/10/26 GMT (by NAAO3IY at HONE83) Subject: HLLAPI error Ref: Append at 16:56:03 on 92/10/23 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Not PMHPO. Communications Manager. John Kennedy, Hoechst Celanese (The OS/2 Hobbit) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:06:02 on 92/10/26 GMT (by NAAO3IY at HONE83) Subject: IBMLink Note on Append Ref: Append at 15:10:47 on 92/10/26 GMT (by IL48722 at HONE81) >"Fora" is the plural form of "forum". It's hardly a new term. Alas, I must make two notes upon that text. 1) "Forum" is not a simple case of a 2nd-declension neuter Latin noun. There is some doubt whether it even has a plural. (To be fair, though, if there were native speakers of Latin today, they would probably use "fora" as the plural of "forum". That's the kind of thing that happens with languages. In any case, there is no doubt that "fora" has become the accepted term ever since CompuServe renamed every "Special Interest Group" ("SIG"), "Forum". 2) Much to my amazement and horror, I have spotted several appearances of the dreaded "foras" ìsic┘ rearing its ugly head. John Kennedy, Hoechst Celanese (The OS/2 Hobbit) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:21:04 on 92/10/26 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: HLLAPI error Ref: Append at 21:49:37 on 92/10/26 GMT (by NAAO3IY at HONE83) O.K. Joseph. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 12:46:24 on 92/10/27 GMT (by TANG050 at OS2CUST) Subject: Storage Abend when downloading I just downloaded forabrow 3.71 and configured it to work with OS/2 comm mgr. I got the list of forums downloaded properly, but when I attempt to download a forum I get the CMS message MSG FROM userid:REIPLING DUE TO STORAGE ABEND; CLEAR SCREEN TO CONTINUE I have tried both yesterday and today and still get the same CMS error. Is there some configuration parameter I need to set to get this to work or is this a CMS problem? Any help would be appreciated.. Steve Kuekes/Tangram Systems ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:07:46 on 92/10/27 GMT (by NANR6GN at OS2CUST) Subject: ForBrows and CM Hello out there! I still experiencing problems trying to download the Forums, using Comm Manager. Here briefly is what's going on. 1. I have 3270 session B logged on to IBMLink main menu. 2. Start Forbrows, and select Conference/Download Fora or files from host. 3. Click on list. Everything is OK. I get the list of Fora (not yet downloaded). 4. Select a fora to download. 5. Things look like they are working. Then I get the following. 06:41:43 MSG FROM NANR6GN : Re-IPLing due to storage ABEND. Clear screen to continue. IBMLink VM/SP REL 5 10/20/92 12:50 Ready; =====> Bottom right hand HOLDING HONE84 6. Hit the Clear key. and get the following on the screen ________________________________________________________ | | | Copyright (C) 1992, IBM Corp. | | | | Download error; RC=78; Please | | check the host screen. | | _____ | | |OK | | |______________________________________________________| After clicking on the OK button the foradown box shows up and says. Timeout waiting for DDTGETDL results. Host screen is sitting on the IBMLink Mainmenu. Now this doesn't happen all the time, at other times I get sent all the way back to the IIN product selection screen. As I stated on an earlier post, I don't have any problems downloading any programs. Hellllllllp!!!!!! Cesar Ventura - Telesector Resources Group ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:23:45 on 92/10/27 GMT (by UNCS018 at HONE83) Subject: FORBROWS/OS2BBS Suggestions Ref: Append at 04:25:04 on 92/09/27 GMT (by PNWB016 at HONE82) >- Have FORBROWS remember the 3270 session used. I second this Idea, but have a question, why can't FORBROWS decide which session has IBMLINK and use that as the default. Leonard "Thought you were not busy enough" Campbell ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:55:24 on 92/10/27 GMT (by IL26761 at OS2CUST) Subject: Storage Abend when downloading Ref: Append at 12:46:24 on 92/10/27 GMT (by TANG050 at OS2CUST) Steve, What forum were you trying to download? If it was either OS2MISC or FORBROWS, it maybe that they have gotten too large for your VM machine to handle. I had left a post somewhere else asking that those 2 be pruned. Jack Hiatt MARC-Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 14:57:48 on 92/10/27 GMT (by IL26761 at OS2CUST) Subject: ForBrows and CM Ref: Append at 14:07:46 on 92/10/27 GMT (by NANR6GN at OS2CUST) Cesar, Which forms are you trying to download? I think that the OS2MISC and FORBROWS fora have gotten to large for the VM machine to handle again. Jack Hiatt MARC-Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:45:09 on 92/10/27 GMT (by TANG050 at OS2CUST) Subject: Storage Abend when downloading Ref: Append at 14:55:24 on 92/10/27 GMT (by IL26761 at OS2CUST) Thanks Jack. I was attempting to download OS2MISC forum....I'll try another.. I second the request to prune these forums so that they can be downloaded. Steve Kuekes/Tangram Systems ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 18:28:23 on 92/10/27 GMT (by NANR6GN at OS2CUST) Subject: ForBrows and CM Ref: Append at 14:57:48 on 92/10/27 GMT (by IL26761 at OS2CUST) Jack - I was trying to download Forbrows. I'll Try a smaller one. Cesar Ventura - Telesector Resources Group ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 20:28:14 on 92/10/27 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84) Subject: ForBrows and CM Ref: Append at 18:28:23 on 92/10/27 GMT (by NANR6GN at OS2CUST) Steve/Cesar, Thought they were over sized, but apparently that wasn't the problem as I was able to download this afternoon. Wonder if it was the old long line gimmick again? Jack Hiatt Mgr. Technical Support Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:57:36 on 92/10/27 GMT (by NANR6GN at HONE81) Subject: ForBrows and CM Ref: Append at 20:28:14 on 92/10/27 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84) Jack, Well I tried to download BBSBROWS, which seems to be small I got sent back to the IIN screen, couldn't cancel Foradown. Had to wait till about 5 minutes for OS2 to come back and say that it could not communicate with Forbrows. No data will be saved. So I pressed the enter box and Foradown ended. At least I can get it from home with a modem, but I would still like to be able to use it with COMM Manager. Cesar Ventura - Telesector Resources Group ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 23:56:17 on 92/10/27 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE83) Subject: ForBrows and CM Ref: Append at 22:57:36 on 92/10/27 GMT (by NANR6GN at HONE81) Cesar, There were some posts here earlier about using FORBROWS with CM, seems like some files had to be renamed or something. Didn't realize you were under CM and there are some difference, but when I tried to download the two largest fora got that re-ipl msg which I had seen when the file was too large, or when someone had sent an append will an extremely long line in it. Good luck hope you get it straightened out. Jack Hiatt Mgr. Technical Support Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 00:38:46 on 92/10/28 GMT (by DABY13S at HONE84) ..... FORBROWS CFORUM modified at 16:11:58 on 92/10/28 GMT (by HNDERSON at AUSVM8) Subject: FORBROWS 3.71 Download Failures I have just downloaded the new versions of PMHPO (1.1b) and FORBROWS (3.71). My third download failed at 4800 baud. I had been using 4800 baud mostly sucessfully using the prior versions (98% sucess rate). The prior versions failed at 9600 baud, as reported by many others here. The symptom of the failure is just what had occurred before: a download was requested: FORADOWN started a RECEIVE on another process, the pop-up window came up to indicate the number of bytes transferred, and then nothing further occurred for about 2 many minutes. Eventually, a pop-up displayed indicating that the download failed (RC=79, I think) and the PMHPO screen was blanked. Hitting <ESC> 6 or 7 times restored the IBMLINK main screen. Subsequent downloads occured properly. I was hoping for some relief from this problem so that I could go back to 9600 baud. My system is fairly generic: AMI Enterprise II 486/50, 16550 UARTS, ... I am using the 2210 COM.SYS driver under the 6/17/92 OS2KRNL. Is there any diagnostic information I can gather to help solve this problem? Eugene Dale Tyler, Ultimate Corp. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 06:17:23 on 92/10/28 GMT (by IL14761 at OS2CUST) Subject: Forbrows 3.71 update I have a couple of questions. 1. I just downloaded 3.71, iRC=1 on START /PMpecial to do in order not to C:\APPS\UTILS\OS2\MISC\EDIT.EXEy initial C:\APPS\TELECOMM\FORBROWS\OS2BBS\9210281.149. The filename changes for each Append I try to create. 3. Is there any hope that due to your slow/no_work_available<g> schedule, that you might port (re-write) ForBrowse so that it will work as an offline reader for the NSC BBS? I realize this is doubtful, but I still have to ask. Thanx, Eric Brunsen Eastern New Mexcio University ForBrows settings, yet when I try to do an append, I get an ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 19:02:04 on 92/10/28 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: FORBROWS 3.71 Download Failures Ref: Append at 00:38:46 on 92/10/28 GMT (by DABY13S at HONE84) Some of these problems (downloading at 9600Bps) are fixed and these fixes will be in the next release of PMHPO. Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:51:31 on 92/10/28 GMT (by DABY13S at HONE84) Subject: FORBROWS 3.71 Download Failures Ref: Append at 19:02:04 on 92/10/28 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Is there any release date for the next (3.72?) release? I would be pleased to test PCthis for you, as the problem is absolutely repeatable at 9600 baud. It seems that 3.71 may be slightly worse in doing 4800 baud downloads than the prior (3.70?) version. I have not tried 9600 baud with 3.71. Eugene Dale Tyler, Ultimate Corp. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:54:44 on 92/10/29 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: Forbrows 3.71 update Ref: Append at 06:17:23 on 92/10/28 GMT (by IL14761 at OS2CUST) Right now, it is pretty doubtful... David Slauson CORE Development IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:57:07 on 92/10/29 GMT (by SLAUSON at WATSON) Subject: FORBROWS 3.71 Download Failures Ref: Append at 22:51:31 on 92/10/28 GMT (by DABY13S at HONE84) Eugene, you're more likely to be helped by a new version of PMHPO than by a new version of FORBROWS. Since the PMHPO developers monitor this program, perhaps they can try to get you a beta copy of the upcoming PMHPO... David Slauson IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY From: slauson@c-food.watson.ibm.com ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:24:52 on 92/10/29 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: FORBROWS 3.71 Download Failures Ref: Append at 22:51:31 on 92/10/28 GMT (by DABY13S at HONE84) This would the next release of PMHPO not FORBROWS. Joseph. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 15:29:46 on 92/10/29 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE83) Subject: PMHPO locks up on (recalled) Service Pack PMHPO supporters: I installed the Service Pack released on 10-20-92 to IBM internal folks on my L40SX previously running GA 2.0. I even went BACK through the selective install to add the 32-bit (VGA) display driver. Everything looked good until the first time I tried to get into OS2BBS from IBMLink (usually, I just log on to IBMLink and use ForBrows). Well, yesterday (10-28-92) they had some form about a new signon that wanted my real name. That form would paint about 1/2 way and lock up PM (I have a dynamic CPU chart that even froze). It required a big (actually little) white (not red) power switch to get my machine back. I called right back and got the same behavior going into OS2BBS. Well, now they have eliminated the offending screen and I can get into OS2BBS and browse around. However, if I elect to download anything, I get the header and part of the first line of the session selection screen and its back to the same lockup (power down to recover). I have the "official" "final?" Service Pak coming tomorrow from my SE and will give it another try then, but I suspect I will see the same behavior (I just hope I don't have to go back to GA to re-apply it). Also, on my L40, PMHPO seems to chew 100% of the CPU just pulling down screens at 2400 baud! Anything to be done about that? I get MUCH faster response at home with only about a 25% cpu drain (also at 2400 baud, but on a 33 Mhz 486 clone). Just my observations and I hope PMHPO isn't broken on the new service pak (especially on L40's). Lynn Deffenbaugh, Computer Task Group/ISI, Melbourne FL ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 16:54:59 on 92/10/29 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: PMHPO locks up on (recalled) Service Pack Ref: Append at 15:29:46 on 92/10/29 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE83) What version of PMHPO are you using? There are problems if you are running below version 1.1b. I hope this helps. Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 17:15:32 on 92/10/29 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE81) Subject: PMHPO locks up on (recalled) Service Pack Ref: Append at 15:29:46 on 92/10/29 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE83) Lynn: How do you rate so high? You can get the SP from your Se with no problems but I am being told that to get it through the local SE's would cost me over $800. By the way I have the same problems with mt 16Mhz 8580. I was told to buy a faster machine. You should be ashamed of youself for ask IBM to do what they promised. You are supposed to go out and buy a ThinkPad. J.M.Schaeffer ('John' AIMS, Sandy Utah) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:38:18 on 92/10/29 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Subject: FORBROWS 3.71 Download Failures Ref: Append at 19:02:04 on 92/10/28 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Joseph, >Some of these problems (downloading at 9600Bps) are fixed and these >fixes will be in the next release of PMHPO. When is this release going to be put up. I have been having problems at 9600 and would like to get it fixed if possible. I was thinking that I needed to add some settings to my .DAT file for the modem I'm using. I have an HST at work (dual standard) and an Intel 14.4ex at home, both work to download kind of, but lock up... Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 21:39:09 on 92/10/29 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Subject: PMHPO locks up on (recalled) Service Pack Ref: Append at 17:15:32 on 92/10/29 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE81) John, >By the way I have the same problems with mt 16Mhz 8580. I was told to buy a >faster machine. You should be ashamed of youself for ask IBM to do what they >promised. You are supposed to go out and buy a ThinkPad. I have a 20mhz 80-161 at home and PMHPO just about pulls it down. At work I have a model 95 and it is MUCH better about PMHPO, it just appears to need a lot of horsepower, like everything else in the world...<g> Alan DuBoff - Bunker Hill Software ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:09:55 on 92/10/29 GMT (by IL41468 at HONE84) Subject: PMHPO locks up on (recalled) Service Pack Ref: Append at 21:39:09 on 92/10/29 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Alan: I have IBM assurances that a 16Mhz 8580 is enough to run OS/2 and multiple tasks. If it isn't IBM should state so now and not continue this nonsense. My campaign is direct and honest: IBM either make OS/2 with appplication such as PMHPO fubctional a the level advertised quickly or admit a higher level box is needed. For those of us who have been taken in by the low level promise, IBM should do something to up grade us. I have been told by selected IBM people to buy a more powerful box. More money in IBM's pocket. MS scam is to get people to buy fixes for software, is this IBM equivalent? J.M.Schaeffer ('John' AIMS, Sandy Utah) ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 22:31:03 on 92/10/29 GMT (by CONC7L02 at DALVM41B) Subject: FORBROWS 3.71 Download Failures Ref: Append at 21:38:18 on 92/10/29 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) Alan, This problem sounds real bad I will talk to Brent and see if we can send you out a Beta version of PMHPO. If you want it? Joseph Mogavero ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 00:00:48 on 92/10/30 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE83) Subject: PMHPO locks up on (recalled) Service Pack Ref: Append at 15:29:46 on 92/10/29 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE83) > What version of PMHPO are you using? There are problems if you are > running below version 1.1b. I hope this helps. Joseph, PMHPO reports 1.1b. I always keep an eye on the TOOLS stuff and pull the latest just to avoid such nonsense. Lynn Deffenbaugh, Computer Task Group/ISI, Melbourne FL ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 00:02:24 on 92/10/30 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE83) Subject: PMHPO locks up on (recalled) Service Pack Ref: Append at 15:29:46 on 92/10/29 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE83) > How do you rate so high? You can get the SP from your Se with no problems > but I am being told that to get it through the local SE's would cost me over > $800. John, I "rate so high" because I have a VERY good working relationship with my SE. For instance, having attended the Developer's Seminar in NYC last week, we ended up with THREE copies of the PDK CD-Rom and NO DRIVE! I called the SE and "borrowed" a drive for a day to pull it all over to magnetic media for browsing and in exchange, he gets one of the disks. A case of the barefoot shoe-maker's kids if I ever saw one. Lynn Deffenbaugh, Computer Task Group/ISI, Melbourne FL PS. We're also Business Partners with IBM and they own 20% of CTG! ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 01:34:53 on 92/10/30 GMT (by IL26761 at HONE84) Subject: Forbrows 3.71 update Ref: Append at 06:17:23 on 92/10/28 GMT (by IL14761 at OS2CUST) Eric, Did you see the .qwk reader on NSC this morning? Jack Hiatt Mgr. Technical Support Marc Life Atlanta Ga. ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 02:22:29 on 92/10/30 GMT (by PTKING at ATLVM1) Subject: FORADOWN VM Screen Message Ref: Append at 04:48:43 on 92/10/25 GMT (by IL78568 at HONE83) You should not be concerned about the skipping appends. The host CForum data base is world wide. Some time appends from IBM systems in other parts of the world might get hung in the network if a node or link happens to be down. When the append finally arrives, it is inserted in its proper place based on GMT the append was created. Foradown will skip downloading these appends but this is based on your selection on the Foradown screen. You can force it to download the entire file (Cforum) by selecting the other radio button... Hope this helps. Paul King ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 02:59:33 on 92/10/30 GMT (by BRENT at DALVM41B) Subject: PMHPO locks up on (recalled) Service Pack Ref: Append at 21:39:09 on 92/10/29 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) The current version of PMHPO does tend to eat up cycles on "smaller" machines like 20mhz SX's and such. Joseph's done a lot of work to improve this in the next version. So far, my testing results have been very good so I think you'll see a nice improvement once we complete our testing and release the code. I've been running downloads while calculating Pi to 100,000 decimal places and stuff like that on a Model 40 and other machines. PMHPO 1.1b would roll over and die (Joseph hates me.... <g>), but the test code chugs right along. There's still more things that need to be done, but we should be able to make this available fairly soon. Brent Allen - IBM LAN Systems Integration Services Southlake, TX ----- FORBROWS CFORUM appended at 13:16:27 on 92/10/30 GMT (by IL87411 at HONE84) Subject: PMHPO locks up on (recalled) Service Pack Ref: Append at 21:39:09 on 92/10/29 GMT (by DEV3543 at HONE82) > The current version of PMHPO does tend to eat up cycles on "smaller" > machines like 20mhz SX's and such. Joseph's done a lot of work to > improve this in the next version. So far, my testing results have been > Brent/Joseph, I can't wait for the next version then. I PREFER to do my CFORUM stuff here at work, but I only have the L40. At home, I program for FUN! Lynn Deffenbaugh, Computer Task Group/ISI, Melbourne FL