home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT2041>
- <title>
- Aug. 07, 1989: The Case For Safer Seats
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Aug. 07, 1989 Diane Sawyer:Is She Worth It?
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 20
- The Case for Safer Seats
- </hdr><body>
- <p> More survivors might have walked away from the latest DC-10
- disasters had they been sitting in safer seats required by the
- Federal Aviation Administration in all new aircraft. About half
- of all passenger injuries in survivable accidents result from
- the seat either slamming down on its occupant or breaking loose.
- The new seat can tolerate velocity changes of up to 16Gs, or a
- force of 16 times the occupant's body weight, an improvement
- from the current level of 9Gs. The agency will soon propose that
- older planes be refitted with these new seats by 1995.
- </p>
- <p> No matter how safe the seat, it cannot help a youngster
- sitting on an adult's lap. "A small child sitting unrestrained
- on a plane becomes a little missile when the aircraft hits
- severe turbulence," observes Northwest Airlines spokesman Bob
- Gibbons. Turbulence of the kind that recently jolted a
- Miami-bound American Airlines jet and injured 45 people poses
- more of a hazard to the average traveler than does the
- possibility of a crash.
- </p>
- <p> Since 1982, the FAA has allowed passengers with children to
- bring their own federally approved infant car seats onto
- planes, but it rejected a consumer request that safety seats be
- required. Airlines discourage children's seats by failing to
- tell parents that they are allowed. Many families would probably
- pass them up anyway, since guaranteeing another seat would mean
- buying another ticket.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-