home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990s
/
Time_Almanac_1990s_SoftKey_1994.iso
/
time
/
101590
/
1015680.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
3KB
|
64 lines
<text id=90TT2740>
<title>
Oct. 15, 1990: From The Publisher
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
Oct. 15, 1990 High Anxiety
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
FROM THE PUBLISHER, Page 6
</hdr>
<body>
<p> "This is like The Perils of Pauline," Richard Darman joked
on the phone last Friday morning, only hours after his plan for
reducing the federal deficit had gone down to a resounding
defeat in the House of Representatives. At the other end of the
line was Michael Duffy, one of TIME's two White House
correspondents, who has been following the talks and the Budget
Director's role in them since last May.
</p>
<p> Darman's lighthearted remark was exactly the kind of comment
Duffy has come to expect from the man who once donned a gorilla
suit to celebrate the President's birthday. Darman has a habit
of leavening even the darkest moments with humor. Throughout
the budget talks, Darman's spirits were often at their highest
when the odds of forging the deal seemed longest. Or, Duffy
wondered, was it merely nervous anxiety? Did Darman, the master
strategist, know how it would all turn out? Or was he making
it up as he went along?
</p>
<p> It was precisely questions of this kind that led us to focus
our reporting on Darman's role in the budget battle. To track
the negotiations behind the scenes, Duffy interviewed dozens
of officials from both the Administration and Congress, and had
several sessions with Darman in his office. Duffy found the
interviews with Darman "the most challenging of my career"
because the Budget Director relishes a thoroughgoing
exploration of every topic, rarely letting a question go by
without examining its premises in depth.
</p>
<p> Duffy's conclusion after all those discussions: "The budget
summit was a big roll of the dice for Darman. He was either
going to succeed greatly or fail greatly."
</p>
<p> For Duffy, the Darman story was a natural assignment. A
correspondent in TIME's Washington bureau for five years, he
reported on budget battles as a congressional correspondent in
1986 and 1987. When he and TIME's Dan Goodgame teamed up to
cover the White House after Bush's election, watching Bush
disentangle himself from his no-new-taxes campaign pledge
became a favorite pastime. "It was obvious that Bush would have
to reverse himself sometime," said Duffy last week, "and it was
also obvious that Darman would call the shots."
</p>
<p>-- Louis A. Weil III
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>