home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: mail2news.demon.co.uk!dookie.demon.co.uk
- From: Jonathan Belson <jon@dookie.demon.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
- Subject: Re: NetBSD vs. 68060
- Date: Sat, 30 Mar 96 15:25:15 GMT
- Organization: a Graveyard of Empty Bottles
- Message-ID: <9603301525.AA001yq@dookie.demon.co.uk>
- References: <4j90id$h34@ole.uninett.no> <Dp0Lzu.36r@metapro.DIALix.oz.au>
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: dookie.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: TIN [AMIGA 1.3 950726BETA PL0]
- X-Mail2News-Path: relay-4.mail.demon.net!post.demon.co.uk!dookie.demon.co.uk
-
- Bernd Felsche (bernie@metapro.DIALix.oz.au) wrote:
- : >Do NetBSD have a problem with 68060 processors. I have equiped my A1200 with a Blizzard 1260 and 16
- : >Mb RAM but when I use "loadbsd -b netbsd" it gives my an error. Where is the problem?
- :
- : "Processor too expensive"
- :
- : There. I've always wanted to be the first to state that. :-)
- :
- : The `060 is somewhat different to the `040 and hence incompatible
- : at the kernel level... at this stage.
-
- Is it an MMU thing or a missing instruction thing? I'm going to be
- upgrading my 4000/030 soon and I'd really like to able to run UNIX on it...
-
- Will we have to wait for someone to develop an '060 compatible compiler?
-
- C-YA
- Jon
-