home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: comma.rhein.de!serpens!not-for-mail
- From: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van Elst)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: Messages vs. Semaphores for external clocking
- Date: 11 Apr 1996 11:20:09 +0200
- Organization: dis-
- Message-ID: <4kiis9$jha@serpens.rhein.de>
- References: <4ju349$r1e@sparky.navsea.navy.mil> <4jvrqs$hk0@btmpjg.god.bel.alcatel.be> <heinz.17rm@hwg.muc.de> <4kfmes$lle@btmpjg.god.bel.alcatel.be> <4kfuhb$ahh@serpens.rhein.de> <4kg2qq$58l@btmpjg.god.bel.alcatel.be> <4kghki$bog@serpens.rhein.de> <4ki9gr$bfl@btmpjg.god.bel.alcatel.be>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: serpens.rhein.de
-
- barnhoorn@nlev00 () writes:
-
- >.aaahh!!! When you are going to do more then just these few
- >assembly-instructions between a Forbid()/Permit(), then you MUST
- >use some other method, OF COURSE!!!
-
- I feared that wasn't clear :)
-
- But since Semaphores aren't significantly slower you could still use
- them.
-
- --
- Michael van Elst
-
- Internet: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de
- "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
-