home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: apg.lahn.de!sweetdreams!sysop
- From: sysop@sweetdreams.lahn.de (Matthias Bethke)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: Processors
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 02:20:56 +0000
- Organization: Sweet Dreams BBS
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <sysop.02x1@sweetdreams.lahn.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: netserv.lahn.de
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- X-Gateway: ZCONNECT XX apg.lahn.de [UNIX/Connect v0.71],
- RFC1036/822 XX apg.lahn.de [UNIX/Connect v0.71]
-
- On Mon 25-Mar-1996 18:37 Stephan Schaem wrote:
-
- SS> The 6800 != 68000 and the 68000 is more like a x286 then a 8088.
- SS> Even the 286 sux compare to the 16 32bit register of the 68000
- SS> and its overall inst set and design. But I dunno how a 25mhz 68000
- SS> compare in speed with a 25mhz 286 at running 32bit code.
-
- The 286 can't run 32bit code, at least not what is called 32bit in today's
- PCs. That's code for 386 and up. The 286's programming system really sux, but
- AFAIK there ain't a 25MHz 68000, so the fastest 286 is probably faster than
- the fastest 68000. Per MHz the 68000 is a little faster in real-world
- programs, but not much. In pure integer maths a 286 beats the 68000.
-
- ttyl!
- Matthias
-
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Matthias Bethke | Usenet: postmaster@sweetdreams.lahn.de |God is perfect
- Giessener Str. 31 | AmigaNet: lunkwill@39:176/208.0 |man is not
- 35457 Lollar | HamRadio: DH9FAD |man made beer
- Germany | W3: hhtp://wwwstud.uni-giessen.de/~s1089/ |god made pot!
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-