home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de!tubsibr!duening
- From: duening@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (Lars Duening)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: What I want from new Workbench
- Date: 19 Mar 1996 21:23:30 GMT
- Organization: TU Braunschweig, Informatik (Bueltenweg), Germany
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <4in8ki$ioq@ra.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
- References: <621.6645T1322T65@actcom.co.il>
- Reply-To: duening@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (Lars Duening)
- NNTP-Posting-Host: kastor.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
-
- humpty@TOMATE.TNG.OCHE.DE (Andreas Mixich) writes:
- >arielmag@actcom.co.il wrote about "Re: What I want from new Workbench" on
- >"16-Mar-1996 18:31:28" at zer.COMP.SYS.AMIGA.PROGRAMMER:
-
- >> >So that every lamer can hack them? No... that makes no sense.
- >>
- >> Lamer ? ?? ??? ??? ?? So that every USER can TRANSLATE them to his own
- >> language and writes WHATEVER he likes.
- >> For insance there are no hebrew catalougs and as i am not a programmer
- >> (yet) i cant translate programs!.
- >> Any anycase ever y lamer or user can hack the catalogs as he likes.
- >> could be nice and friendly to the user.
- >
- >There are tools on Aminet, that read in either a catalog, a translation or
- >a catalog description and show the text. So *anyone* can translate them,
- >even without programming skills. IMO catalogs should be compiled. There is
- >no need for ASCII files, there are tools, that allow one, who is
- >interested, to do so.
-
- Why clutter one's disk with bazillions of tools if one text editor
- would be sufficient?
- If speed is an issue, then the Right Thing(tm) is to accept both plain
- and compiled catalogs.
- --
- Lars Duening; duening@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
-