home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: comma.rhein.de!serpens!not-for-mail
- From: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van Elst)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: FindTask() VERY IMPORTANT
- Date: 17 Mar 1996 16:40:07 +0100
- Organization: dis-
- Message-ID: <4ihbon$ea8@serpens.rhein.de>
- References: <4hp3cv$cqe@serpens.rhein.de> <4i64pk$ia1@news.xs4all.nl> <4i74pb$b4f@serpens.rhein.de> <4ib9h0$i23@news.xs4all.nl> <4ibjo0$qbp@serpens.rhein.de> <dBYfy*Rdg@yaps.rhein.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: serpens.rhein.de
-
- arno@yaps.rhein.de (Arno Eigenwillig) writes:
-
- >After all, even Laire is going to support reading from ThisTask for
- >old code, so I assume he considers ThisTask being readable an ill-
- >designed but nevertheless existing feature of the current OS, not a
- >false assumption.
-
- It obviously becomes a false assumption as soon as you have several
- CPUs with several tasks being physically executing at the same time.
- And if you wanted to kludge "support" for people that cannot write
- reasonable code you had to copy the whole exec data structures and
- you probably like the design of MS Windows too.
-
- --
- Michael van Elst
-
- Internet: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de
- "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
-