home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: comma.rhein.de!serpens!not-for-mail
- From: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van Elst)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: Ceck out this bug. What the *** is SASC/6.56 doing?
- Date: 13 Mar 1996 08:53:18 +0100
- Organization: dis-
- Message-ID: <4i5ute$8o3@serpens.rhein.de>
- References: <1120.6643T91T406@login.eunet.no> <4hvk1f$o0c@zeus.central.ntua.gr> <874.6644T381T2315@login.eunet.no> <4i17ga$doo@btmpjg.god.bel.alcatel.be> <885.6646T9T693@login.eunet.no>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: serpens.rhein.de
-
- patrick.hanevold@login.eunet.no (Patrick Hanevold) writes:
-
- >OpenScreenTags() doesnt crash. exit(0) does.
- >I guess it maby could mess up so exit(0) would crash.
-
- Obviously.
-
- >Stach check should be smart enough to fail if there was too litle stack left.
- >I would guess none of the OS calls would need more then 4K since thats the
- >default stack size.
-
- None of the OS calls needs more than 1K, except for dos.library which needs
- another 1.5k (for the BCPL stack). But with more than 3K used and 4K total
- you lose.
-
- --
- Michael van Elst
-
- Internet: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de
- "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
-