home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: w350zrz.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE!rawneiha
- From: rawneiha@w350zrz.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE (Philipp Boerker)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: doubling pixels horizontally
- Date: 4 Mar 1996 13:36:16 GMT
- Organization: Technical University Berlin, Germany
- Message-ID: <4herkg$13h@brachio.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE>
- References: <4f4ibc$gl9@news.cs.tu-berlin.de> <591.6610T1165T2102@login.eunet.no><1045.6611T753T2256@vip.cybercity.dk><4faoe1$47@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de><2991.6612T1034T625@vip.cybercity.dk><576.6613T1070T1730@login.eunet.no><1257.6614T57T922
- <4gkknd$b1v@brachio.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE> <4h4iv1$n3s@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: w350zrz.zrz.tu-berlin.de
-
- fischerj@informatik.tu-muenchen.de (Juergen "Rally" Fischer) writes:
-
-
- >|> >Your are not using the CPU and the BLITTER at the same time in chipram are
- >|> >you??? Because that is very foolish! :) (read: SLOW!)
- >|>
- >|> No, I don't. I even toggle blitternasty-bit at the importent places...
-
- >not good. blitter parallel (default) is as fast as nasty as long as
- >cpu doesn't acess chipmem.
-
- I distrusted Commo, toggling bnasty shouldn't do any harm at least...
-
- >blitternasty was mostly good in A500 times (cpu always acesses chipmem! ever
- >tried a halt instruction ?
-
- What? Can you explain that?
-
- >should make bus free waiting for blitter...)
-
- >and blitternasty is mostly bad in AGA times (even on vanilla A1200, due to cache).
-
- What cache? CHIP isn't cached...
-
- Greets,
- Phil.
- grond/matrix
-
-