home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.mountain.net!usenet
- From: gene_heskett@wvlink.mpl.com (Gene Heskett)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: PPC compilers
- Date: 8 Jan 1996 00:52:31 GMT
- Organization: MountainNet, Inc. Morgantown WV 800.444.1458
- Message-ID: <1126.6580T955T1770@wvlink.mpl.com>
- References: <4c18le$bk7@serpens.rhein.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: slip5.mpl.com
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP)
-
- MvE> john.hendrikx@grafix.xs4all.nl (John Hendrikx) writes:
-
- >>I make much less errors/bugs in Assembly than in C even though I do a lot
- >>more
- >>-typing- in ASM (the amount of executable code is ussually much less than
- >>a C program though), why doesn't your rule apply to me?
-
- MvE> Because you do not understand the rule. A particular assembly
- MvE> language programmer might produce more errors when he writes in a
- MvE> high level language. Not because the HLL doesn't save him from errors
- MvE> but because he doesn't have enough experience.
-
-
- MvE> --
- MvE> Michael van Elst
-
- MvE> Internet: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de
- MvE> "A potential Snark may lurk in every
- MvE> tree."
-
- And conversely. those who do a lot of c and a little asm will find their code
- has more errors using asm.
-
- /* Gene Heskett | These opinions are NOT to be */
- /* CE @ WDTV Weston/Clarksburg WV | confused with the official */
- /* <gene_heskett@wvlink.mpl.com> | WDTV managment views */
- #include <std.disclaimer>
-
-
-