home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
- From: userabyss@aol.com (Userabyss)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: Q: C2P MUCH FASTER?
- Date: 17 Feb 1996 11:17:22 -0500
- Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
- Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
- Message-ID: <4g4v2i$sfe@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
- References: <4fvqp7$nag@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
- Reply-To: userabyss@aol.com (Userabyss)
- NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com
-
- yepps please don't reply me coz this is my test AOL account and I think
- AOL suxx big times becoz of the costs ...
-
- I think if you use 8 bitplanes superhires this will easily eat up all
- available bus cycles. just remember you've got to write the quadruple
- amount of data to chip mem to get the same resolution as lowres 2x1/2x2
- and with ql c2p's you even get goot results coz of pipelining so they
- don't take up much processor time as they are converting while processor's
- busy writing long words to chipmem...
- -bartman/abyss
-