home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: comma.rhein.de!serpens!not-for-mail
- From: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van Elst)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: Demo/game to OS friendly part II
- Date: 6 Jan 1996 23:09:58 +0100
- Organization: dis-
- Message-ID: <4cmrvm$5eq@serpens.rhein.de>
- References: <38231819@kone.fipnet.fi> <4cemaj$jas@serpens.rhein.de> <4cha65$hpf@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <4chm76$svj@serpens.rhein.de> <4cmi0c$21c@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: serpens.rhein.de
-
- fischerj@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Juergen "Rally" Fischer) writes:
-
- >the problem is: does WaitTOF still give cpu to other tasks.
-
- That's not a problem :) WaitTOF() does give the CPU to other tasks.
- Any implementation that does not is broken.
-
- >is a dummy, code maybe flickers, if WaitTOF busy waits, it slows down
- >for the case I do some controll in a hi-pri task and main calculations
- >in a lower one.
-
- Slows down ? It probably freezes the machine if the task calling
- WaitTOF() has a high enough priority.
-
-
- --
- Michael van Elst
-
- Internet: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de
- "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
-