home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Path: ftel.co.uk!delcam!news
- From: maw@delcam.com (Michael Wiedmer)
- Subject: Re: Which editor for programming?
- In-Reply-To: humpty@TOMATE.TNG.OCHE.DE's message of Tue, 13 Feb 96 11:47:46 GMT
- Message-ID: <MAW.96Feb21153114@dx5.delcam.com>
- Sender: news@delcam.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: dx5
- Organization: Delcam International PLC
- References: <4fl2b8$1aq@brasil.frmug.fr.net> <68771537@0humpty.tomate.tng.oche.de>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 15:31:12 GMT
-
- >>> "AM" == Andreas Mixich <humpty@TOMATE.TNG.OCHE.DE> writes:
- In article <68771537@0humpty.tomate.tng.oche.de> humpty@TOMATE.TNG.OCHE.DE (Andreas Mixich) writes:
-
-
- AM> daniel@brasil.brainstorm.cnam.fr wrote about "Re: Which editor
- AM> for programming?" on "11-Feb-1996 15:35:04" at
- AM> zer.COMP.SYS.AMIGA.PROGRAMMER:
-
-
- >> You need real tabs at least in GNU makefiles, and also in some
- >> configure scripts (gnuish again) that carry embedded tabs. Saving
- >> these kinds of files with GoldEd is equivalent to trashing them,
- >> which I think is not acceptable for a general purpose editor.
-
- AM> I see. This is sad, I agree.
- And completely wrong. GoldED IS able to save the first tabs of a line as TABs.
-
- Michael
-
-