home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: munnari.OZ.AU!metro!metro!news
- From: accolyte@wr.com.au (Accolyte)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: need help on A1200/030 board programming
- Date: 21 Feb 1996 12:13:48 GMT
- Organization: Information Services, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Distribution: inet
- Message-ID: <406.6625T1215T1219@wr.com.au>
- References: <2133.6613T901T923@wr.com.au> <4ft9ga$1fh@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
- <1596.6622T138T1200@wr.com.au> <38232524@kone.fipnet.fi>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup33.wr.com.au
- X-Newsreader:
-
- >> Still, even ignoring caches; A copy loop from one chip buffer to another
- >> chip buffer, is slower on my accelerated 1200 than it is without the
- >> card installed. That bites.. <sigh>
-
- > Why the hell you must force source to CHIP-ram?!?
-
- That's not the point! This whole point is to show the speed difference.
- The problem would still be there if the source was in fast, but it
- wouldn't be as obvious.
-
-
-