home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.nsw.CSIRO.AU!metro!metro!news
- From: accolyte@wr.com.au (Accolyte)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: Demo/game to OS frien
- Date: 9 Feb 1996 00:36:23 GMT
- Organization: Information Services, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Distribution: inet
- Message-ID: <496.6613T693T2143@wr.com.au>
- References: <4e8h9j$mp5@sinsen.sn.no> <4e8pk2$ntm@serpens.rhein.de><3873.6603T379T952@wr.com.au><PETERM.96Jan31172831@tui.maths.irl.cri.nz>
- <3274.6607T382T680@wr.com.au> <PETERM.96Feb5143139@tui.maths.irl.cri.nz> <Y2W2y*Poa@aargh.incubus.sub.org>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup13.wr.com.au
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
-
- >> Unless we're getting thousands of interrupts per second (which
- >> indicates we're probably using the wrong algorithm), no-one will
- >> notice the difference.
-
- > One of my hw projects causes 4000-10000 hipri ints per second, all of which
- > are handled by the OS. No problem at all.
-
- I don't understand - I *has* do make a difference. At the very least it's
- like executing 4000 rte's per second, right? And probably much more for
- storing and retrieving registers, etc, especially with the OS.
-
-
-