home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: comma.rhein.de!serpens!not-for-mail
- From: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van Elst)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: PPC compilers
- Date: 4 Jan 1996 16:31:33 +0100
- Organization: dis-
- Message-ID: <4cgrsl$rce@serpens.rhein.de>
- References: <john.hendrikx.40ka@grafix.xs4all.nl> <4b77tq$htp@serpens.rhein.de> <MQAQx*XOe@yaps.rhein.de> <4bqhnf$6g5@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <jasonb.820051107@cs.uwa.edu.au> <4c9i2l$h3i@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <4carca$793@serpens.rhein.de> <4cgj4c$b8n@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: serpens.rhein.de
-
- fischerj@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Juergen "Rally" Fischer) writes:
-
- >_exept_ ones for example putting the array contents to 0xdff180+,
- >there the .w really cares.
-
- Obviously you neither put an array at absolute addresses nor do you
- use an array for the hardware at all. Instead you use a data structure
- that represents the hardware _correctly_. Using a wrong definition
- is like using a wrong size suffix for an assembly instruction except
- that you can err easily on every assembly instruction while it is
- more difficult to use the wrong symbolic name for a register.
-
- >: Fortunately you have more information from the C code, unless you
- >: are a c00l c0d3r.
-
- >I only get the part after the "," ;)
-
- Yeah. Show your ignorance... we all love it.
-
- >"I have more information from the C code". even if I don't know if it's
- >.w or .l ? if I look only at the single instruction, the asm version
- >gives more information.
-
- Nope. You have no idea wether the .w or .l is correct. So where is
- the information ?
-
- --
- Michael van Elst
-
- Internet: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de
- "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
-