home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1990-02-12 | 35.0 KB | 1,033 lines |
-
-
- ea 18 nor
- ************
- Topic 18 Sat Jun 22, 1991
- C128.JBEE [* Sysop *] (Forwarded)
- Sub: CS-DOS & REU C1750 & LHA & Autoexec
-
- One of the most often asked questions is how to set up the C128/C1750/
- LHA/Autoexec file to make SFX archives. The autoexec file follows...
- 106 message(s) total.
- ************
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 1 Wed Mar 03, 1993
- M.MINNIG at 04:56 EST
-
- Thanks!
- The key was the drive-letter prefix. None of the docs mentioned it, but the
- proper syntax must include it. Also, it doesn't matter whether or not you
- add
- the "arc" suffix to the filename.
-
- Next project - creating an .sfx file; any tips?
- :)
-
- Michael
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 2 Wed Mar 03, 1993
- HOWIE-CBM at 19:05 EST
-
- Michael,
-
- Easy! :)
-
- LHA -s a:filename.sfx a:file4sfx b:file4sfx c:etc
-
- And, if you want the sfx to have a custom title screen:
-
- LHA -s a:title a:filename4sfx b:etc
-
- A file with the name TITLE would then have to be in drive A. There
- is a custom title maker which I put into the library. Just do a search
- on HOWIE-CBM and it will show up.
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 3 Thu Mar 04, 1993
- CBM-MARK at 00:46 EST
-
- I'll keep my $.02 outta here this time ;D
-
- Mark
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 4 Thu Mar 04, 1993
- HOWIE-CBM at 01:58 EST
-
- Mark,
-
- Your $.02 is *always* welcome.
-
- Just don't say anything about sfx suffixes.... :)
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 5 Fri Mar 05, 1993
- CBM-MARK at 00:11 EST
-
- LOL! It's a deal ;D
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 6 Fri Mar 05, 1993
- HOWIE-CBM at 04:48 EST
-
- Hmm...
-
- Speaking of LHA....
-
- Has anyone taken a look at an LZH directory, and the date and
- time of file creation?
-
- The date seems to come out fine, but it always seems to be
- 0:01 AM. Doesn't seem to make a difference if it is an LZH
- or SFX.
-
- And, the worst part of it is that after I've run LHA, the
- cs/dos system time has been reset to 1:00 AM, which unless
- reset will get plowed into everything else.
-
- So.....
-
- What I see happening is that LHA itself is resetting the
- cs/dos system time, and then using the newly and incorrectly
- set new time.
-
- Now, this doesn't happen with ARC.
-
- What to do?
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 7 Mon Mar 08, 1993
- C128.JBEE at 15:10 EST
-
-
- lha -s, a:filename.sfx a:title a:whatever*
-
- As for date and time bugs, there are a lot of little buglets to be
- squashed ;)
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 8 Sun Apr 11, 1993
- R.HIGDON3 at 02:57 EDT
-
- Hi! Well, I think LHARC is a fine compression utility, but I have a couple of
- questions about it. The file SFX2LZH is supposed to convert a SFX archive to
- a LZH archive, but I couldn't get it to work. When I use the LHD program, the
- resulting LZH archive seems to be empty. Has anyone else had a problem using
- SFX2LZH? Also, in the file LHAV12.ARC is the source code for SFX. One of these
- files is SFX2LZH.EXE. Not having an IBM-compatible PC, would I be able to use
- a file with the EXE extension? One last quesion is since I don't have a 1750
- REU, could I still convert a LZH archive to a SFX archive? Thanks...:)
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 9 Sun Apr 11, 1993
- CBM-ED [e.g.bell] at 08:50 EDT
-
- One thing I'd like to see CS-DOS do when it is upgraded is to allow use
- of the RamLink in addition to the REU for creation of SFX/LZH files.
- Howzabout that John? ;^)
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 10 Sun Apr 11, 1993
- CMD-DOUG at 12:13 EDT
-
- I'd also like to see path support. We all know that archives coming from other
- machines may have subdirectory paths in the filenames, which right now is
- ignored by the dearchiving modules in CS-DOS. It would be a nice added bonus
- if we too could make use of those paths. :)
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 11 Mon Apr 12, 1993
- HOWIE-CBM at 12:30 EDT
-
- SFX2LZH works fine for me!
-
- All it does (as far as I know) is strip the SFX header leaving you with an
- LZH. Actully, if I remember right, it leaves your SFX intact, and writes a
- new file with the LZH extension. If you like, I will check on this.
-
- Can you give more details on what you are doing to help ID the prob?
-
- Any EXE is for running on ms/dos, so it would need "translation" before it
- could get accepted as an autoexec under cs/dos.
-
- Superb question about converting and LZH to SFX!! In fact one which I have
- been chattering about with some sysops here on line.
-
- The easiest way, is to have an SFX header, and then simply append to it any
- LZH file which you want to make into an SFX.
-
- If you'd like, I can make up a "generic GEnie" header, including title screen,
- that could be the base for an SFX, to which anyone can then append LXH's.
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 12 Mon Apr 12, 1993
- R.HIGDON3 at 21:10 EDT
-
- Well, when I use SFX2LZH, it seems to work fine. It writes the LZH archive to
- the disk (12 blocks shorter than the SFX), but when I try to display the files
- within the LZH achive using either LHD or LHX, it doesn't work. I did check
- the first sector of the resulting LZH archive using a disk editor, and it
- seems to be the same as what the SFX would be. If I remember right, it's not
- until the third sector of the resulting LZH that it begins to look identical
- to one of my good LZH archives. That's about all I can tell you.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 13 Tue Apr 13, 1993
- HOWIE-CBM at 01:35 EDT
-
- This is puzzling..... :?
-
- Only thing I can think of is that there is some variable when you run sfx2lzh
- that isn't there when I do it. But, what that mght be I do not have the
- foggiest idea...
-
- I really cannot think of anything else to suggest. Maybe someone else?
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 14 Wed Apr 14, 1993
- C128.JBEE at 06:05 EDT
-
- The PC sfx2lzh.exe is just a short PC utility to strip the SFX header
- away from the LHA archive. Almost all the PC archivers do it automatically
- now on any self extracting LHA file (PC-Amiga-Atari-Mac) so the program
- itself is pretty much obsolete because it is no longer needed. That was
- basically added by Chris as a utility to help the former Flagship staff
- that used PCs to download files. Since all I use are 128s, I don't use the
- utility :)
-
- I am still trying to duplicate that empty archive problem.
-
- >ED,
- >One thing I'd like to see CS-DOS do when it is upgraded is to allow use
- >of the RamLink in addition to the REU for creation of SFX/LZH files.
-
- YES!
-
- >Doug,
- >I'd also like to see path support.
-
- Double Yes :D
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 15 Wed May 05, 1993
- HOWIE-CBM at 02:44 EDT
-
- <<double slap upon the embarassed forehead>>
-
- Of course......
-
- The reason that LHA creates all of its SFX and LZH file contents at 1:00 AM is
- because LHA is the only compression module which reports to the user the time
- lapsed for the file creation. Therefore, it is safe to presume that LHA is
- resetting the cs/dos clock to 1:00am and figuring lapsed time from there.
-
- Prob with this present setup is that all the files then get time stamped with
- 1:00 am, and when the SFX or LZH has been created, the time is not reset, but
- left at whatever time has elapsed for file creation, plus 1:00 am, or in other
- words, usually a few minutes after 1:00.
-
- At least none of this affects LHA's use of our RL'S RTC's dates, whlich remain
- intact, and properly recorded. It is sorta nice to see a file uploaded to
- the Library, on lets say, 05/05/93, and then later observe the files
- dissolving with a creation date of 05/05/93. Maybe this is just my
- preference, but I like it.
-
- I wonder if a new LHA can have a work-around for the time prob, however? It
- is nice to have the time reported, but maybe this can get done with the time
- remaining properly set, and not unnecessarilly resetting it?
-
- Did I just get carried away or what?
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 16 Fri May 07, 1993
- C128.JBEE at 01:01 EDT
-
- Proper time/date stamping with support for CMD devices is on the bill.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 18 Sun May 23, 1993
- D.VARGO (Forwarded)
-
- Could someone please e-mail me the names of the files required to create sfx
- files for both the 64 and 128. I want to upload some files to genie, and I
- know I appreciate the convinience of sfx files, so I'd like to be able to
- create them for the other users on line here. Thanks much!
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 19 Sun May 23, 1993
- C128.JBEE at 18:02 EDT
-
- Hi :)
-
- Files needed for CS-DOS 128 to make SFX files.
-
- 7800 CS-DOC15.SFX X C.SMEETS 900218 44100 440 2
- Desc: CS-DOS/ARC128 - Part 2 of 2
- 7799 CS-DOS15.SFX X C.SMEETS 900218 50400 484 2
- Desc: CS-DOS 1.5/ARC128 - Part 1 of 2
- 8223 LHAV12.ARC X C.SMEETS 900902 152460 278 2
- Desc: Update to LHARC128 for CS-DOS
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 20 Tue Jun 29, 1993
- S.CRAIK [Steve] at 02:26 EDT
-
- Howie,
-
- re: work-around for time prob LHA etc.
-
- Wazabout a BATCH file
-
- Here is the beginings of what I've done:
-
- batchfile name: lhat ; means call on "lha" and another batchfile
- ; of updating the time from a CMD device w/RTC
-
- if "%1" = " " goto usage if "%2" = "-s" goto selfx if "%3"= " " goto usage
- echo "Starting to LHArchive %1" goto create :selfx echo "SFX function not
- implimented this Version" goto donelist echo "Starting the Create %1.sfx"
- :create lha %1 %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8 %9 goto fin :usage echo "Usage: Create
- LZH's or SFX's and adjust CSDOS from CMD with RTC's" goto done echo "Syntax:
- lhat lharchive.name <-s> pattern" :fin echo "Correcting the Time" rltime :done
- ;
-
- "rltime" is just a basic thing to fetch the time from the CMD device
- it can be a portion of the program you did where it clears the screen
- and types in the time based on the info from the CmD device.
-
- Oops I forgot to include the word TIME in the echo "Usage:" line
- and I think that I would like to change the Syntax order conforming more
- to "lha" as far as the entering/calling on "LHAT" to perform.
-
- Steve Craik
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 21 Tue Jun 29, 1993
- HOWIE-CBM at 07:29 EDT
-
- Steve,
-
- A great idea and one a lot of us will use once it is complete Thanks!!
-
- Here it is again, posted with an *SN to keep formatting, and with your
- addition:
-
- ;batchfile name: lhat
- ; means call on "lha" and another batchfile
- ;
- ; for updating the time from a CMD device w/RTC
- ;
- if "%1" = " " goto usage
- if "%2" = "-s" goto selfx
- if "%3"= " " goto usage
- echo "Starting to LHArchive %1"
- goto create
- :selfx
- echo "SFX function not implimented this Version"
- goto donelist
- echo "Starting the Create %1.sfx"
- :create
- lha %1 %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8 %9
- goto fin
- :usage
- echo "Usage: Create LZH's or SFX's and adjust CSDOS' time from a RTC"
- goto done
- echo "Syntax: lhat lharchive.name <-s> pattern"
- :fin
- echo "Correcting the Time"
- rltime
- :done
- ;
-
- A good start! :)
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 22 Sat Aug 14, 1993
- HOWIE-CBM at 06:30 EDT
-
- Rose,
-
- To answer your ? about cs/dos, a good starting point for seeing if
- you can get things running again would be to take a look at any of
- your autoexec and related files. Specifically what you are looking
- for are drive designators. Before *every* command that gets
- called from a drive be sure to have a drive designator, that
- agrees with your system setup.
-
- As an example of what I am referring to, here is an autoexec.
- Notice how every command is preceeded by its drive letter:
-
- slow
- bank15:y=peek(57094):poke 57094,y+1:poke 7136,abs(peek(57094)-y)
- z:if not errorlevel 1 z:autoexec2
- z:setram 21,3
- poke 7120,2*16+5
- poke 7119,2*16+5
- poke 7136,1
- if errorlevel 1 goto ramdisk-already-there
- z:getram z:ramdisk
- :ramdisk-already-there
- if (peek(215) and 128) then fast
- poke 7150,4:poke 7151,96
- assign b 9,0
- assign c 10,0
- assign d 11,0
- assign e 12,0
- assign i 16,0
- assign j 16,6
- assign k 16,9
- run"settimeday",u16
-
- If this doesn't fix things hollar at me.
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 24 Thu Aug 26, 1993
- R.STOLL6 at 01:43 EDT
-
- Can anyone help me with arc128? I d/l.ed cs-dos15.sfx and the doc file, and
- lhav12.arc. But I could not get arc128 to dissolve the lhav12 file. In fact,
- I can't get it to do much of anything. If I load and run it, I get a short
- list of cmds, when running cs-dos. If I'm not running cs-dos, when I run
- arc128, it breaks into the monitor. Now I have used arc230 before, and finally
- used it to dissolve the lhav12 file. So any ideas as to what is wrong?
-
- Next, I have two .lzh files from lhav12. I can get a list of what is in the
- a21.lzh file, but when I try the sfx_src.lzh, it says can't open file. What is
- going on here? One more thing, I d/l.ed them with Wizard 128, ymodem, if that
- makes any diff. Still havn't figured the cs-dos out, but I'm working on it. I
- think I'm going to love it, though.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 25 Thu Aug 26, 1993
- R.KNOP1 [Rob Knop] at 22:01 EDT
-
- Well, you don't say how you tried to use arc128 and the error you got, but I'd
- give $10 that it's the problem that nearly everyone has with arc128 (and the
- problem that stalled me on it for nearly a month way back when):
-
- The problem is the help screen. When you run arc128 without any options, it
- prints a list of help commands, which (for instance) suggest that the usage
- necesary to extract a file would be:
-
- arc/x filename.arc
-
- However, this would work if the executable were named arc. In reality, it is
- arc128, so try instead the command line:
-
- arc128/x filename.arc
-
- I predict this will clear up all of your problems.
-
- Curious, are you running arc128 from the RAMDisk, having "install"'ed it?
-
- -Rob
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 26 Sat Aug 28, 1993
- H.HERMAN1 at 04:57 EDT
-
- Supplementing Rob's explanation, LHX, or LHD should be used when manipulating
- an arc with an .lzh extension.
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 27 Sun Aug 29, 1993
- R.STOLL6 at 02:27 EDT
-
- Well I do feel kind of dum now. I d/l'ed the assist files, and arc128/x was
- in them, and it worked just fine. So, I renamed arc. And yes I'm using the
- ramdisk. Would be interested to know what the files in there do, that are not
- listed in '.txt' files. And there are several, like link? Anyway, when I
- dissolve the lhav12 file, I get a checksum error on sfx_src.lzh file. So does
- this mean I got a bad d/l? One more thing, if I put the ramdisk in the 128,
- bank 1, and use a 1700, can I still have lha use the 1700 ram pack? I have
- set the ramdisk in the 128 bank 1, and then can't reset it into the ram pack.
- I guess what I need to do is find out how to make the 1700 into a 1750. And
- thanks for the help.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 28 Mon Aug 30, 1993
- R.KNOP1 [Rob Knop] at 01:07 EDT
-
- Re: arc vs. arc128, no need to feel stupid! It's an obvious flaw in the auto-
- help of arc128, and this is one question that nearly everybody using CSDOS for
- the first time has.
-
- Re: using the 1700 for LHA even with the RAMDisk in Bank 1 on the 128, yes, I
- think it should be possible. Look at lha.txt, where it describes the poke
- necessary to use LHA, and try specifying banks 0-1 of the REU. Specifically,
- before using lha, try
-
- poke dec("1bcf"), 0*16+2
-
- Re: upgrading the REU to 512K, if you are handy with a soldering iron, this
- would probably be worth it; even if not, if you can get somebody else to do
- it, it is probably worth it. What sotware do you use? There is a lot of
- software out there that is more effective with a 512K REU than with a 128K
- REU. One such is CSDOS, so you can have the ramdisk in the REU (thus giving
- you more ramdisk space and saving the RAM1 memory), as well as space for lha.
- Also, if you use GEOS at all, a >=512K RAM unit of some sort is a virtual
- necessity.
-
- -Rob
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 30 Sat Sep 04, 1993
- C128.JBEE at 17:33 EDT
-
- When dissolving some .ARC files you will get a version error at the end
- because of xmodem padding.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 33 Mon Sep 06, 1993
- M.COLWELL1 [MattMan] at 14:46 EDT
-
- Is there a easy way to chop x-modem padding? I usually end up doing it
- manually with a sector editor.
-
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 34 Mon Sep 06, 1993
- R.KNOP1 [Rob Knop] at 16:05 EDT
-
- Sector editor is probably the safest way to do it, since you look at each file
- individually and know exactly what you did, but it is a pain in the butt.
-
- A lot of term programs will chop xmodem padding during download. What term
- program are you using? The problem is, almost none of them will chop the
- screwy version of Xmodem-1K padding that GEnie uses. (RTCM128 might chop that-
- does it Ed?)
-
- I have seen at least one program in the library that claims to remove xmodem
- padding. Do a search on the libraries for the keyword "xmodem".
-
- -Rob
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 35 Mon Sep 06, 1993
- C128.JBEE at 18:24 EDT
-
- ARC contains commands to strip XMODEM padding from an archive if you want
- to add to that archive later.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 36 Mon Sep 06, 1993
- CBM-ED [e.g.bell] at 22:31 EDT
-
- RTCM128 does strip the GEnie padding that chokes some files. This is
- something that will affect either Xmodem 1k or Ymodem, and takes things
- one step further than I think other programmers do, but it was written
- more with GEnie in mind. I have used it elsewhere too tho.
-
- I was also going to suggest ARC, but John beat me to it. heheh And as
- Rob said, a sector editor *may* be the best, tho for a program file it
- might be faster, if you are using a 128, to go into the monitor, load the
- file, find the end, and then just BSAVE @ the file back at the correct
- addresses. You would have to locate the load address. The end address
- is easily found (at least the one at the end of the load) by checking
- addresses $00ae and $00af using the 'm' command of the monitor. You can
- work back from there.
-
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 37 Tue Sep 07, 1993
- H.HERMAN1 at 02:49 EDT
-
- Mattman,
-
- If the padded file is 120k or less, BobsTermPro's buffer is an easy way to
- strip x-mo padding.
-
- For larger files....
-
- Hmm.... Would ZED handle this? Or, maybe Velvetta? (I think Velveeta
- mostly does CR/LF things, however.)
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 38 Wed Sep 08, 1993
- M.COLWELL1 [MattMan] at 22:41 EDT
-
- I used to use Novaterm 9.4, but it never seemed to chop the padding. Even
- when I told it to.
-
- Now I use my bemmer (IBM) to call. If wizard worked right, I probably use my
- commie to call... oh well..
-
- MattMan
-
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 39 Sun Sep 19, 1993
- B.ECKARD at 08:16 EDT
-
- I have two files that I d/l'd ed from Genie with (for CS-DOS9 with )
- with the .LZH extension. How t do I dissolve these program files? I
- have CS-DOS but don't see anything that supports .LZH. Can I dissolve these
- files in Cp P/M mode (I have a .LZH decompressor ion progrm am for that
- mode). I am realatively new with CS-DOS so thanks for your help and your
- patience wti ith my questions! :/ )
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 41 Wed Dec 29, 1993
- W.WIESE [WES256] at 12:29 EST
-
- Am having problem with CSDOS and specifically [D [D [D [D [D [C [ [ [Cy LHA to
- create SFX files to upload. Am using CSDOS v1.5 and LHA v1.2. After LHA loads
- in the file to the 1750, and after it creates the SFX header to the
- destination disk, it locks up. The bar graph is there for the load in to REU,
- but when it's time to write the compressed file back out to the destination
- disk, i get no drive activity. Any ideas????? Any help would be appreciated. I
- also noticed this using arc128 also if source and destination are the same
- drive. Setup is CMD HD and various floppys and expanded 1750 REU(in 1750
- mode).
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 42 Wed Dec 29, 1993
- C128.JBEE at 14:00 EST
-
- Are you using a flat C-128?
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 43 Wed Dec 29, 1993
- W.WIESE [WES256] at 23:08 EST
-
- Yes,Jim I have tried it with 2 seperate flat 128's and also tried it with
- nothing but the CMD HD on the serial bus-same results.I also had a chance to
- try lhx and it will write the first file only from the archive then lock
- up....totally befuddled on this one..... Whattya think, maybe otta go back to
- using 4 128 roms instead of 2?....I don't think that's it, cause everything
- else runs fine.... Just CS-DOS is giving me fits. :[
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 44 Mon Jan 03, 1994
- C128.JBEE at 15:23 EST
-
- > W.WIESE [WES256]
- > Am having problem with CSDOS and specifically LHA to create SFX files
- > to upload. Am using CSDOS v1.5 and LHA v1.2.
-
- If you have a 1581 disk drive, please let me know.
-
- IF you own a flat C-128, I would suggest trying to create the files by
- first turning JiffyDos off. There seems to be a timing problem on
- flat C-128s while using CS-DOS/arc, with JiffyDos enabled, that hangs
- the serial bus.
-
- I create LHA/SFX files on the CMD HD using the same (any) partition
- everyday with no problem, using my C-128Ds. But, it seems all the
- problems with the drives hanging are on flat C-128s.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 45 Mon Jan 03, 1994
- F.OGLE [Color BBS] at 21:17 EST
-
- I had problems using CSDOS on my flat 128 too ... It cleared up when I
- switched to my 128D ...
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 46 Wed Jan 05, 1994
- CBM-MARK at 08:37 EST
-
- CS-DOS seems to work just fine on my flat C128. At least I haven't noticed
- any problem, as long as I use CS-DOS correctly that is ;> The one problem
- I do have is a bad connecting REU which causes CS-DOS to fail.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 47 Sun Jan 09, 1994
- H.HERMAN1 at 03:43 EST
-
- Mark,
-
- >I do have is a bad connecting REU which causes CS-DOS to fail.
-
- And, so other software runs okey? :/
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 48 Sun Jan 09, 1994
- CBM-MARK at 20:26 EST
-
- Sure ;> Other software runs just fine, Howie, as long as I don't plug in
- the REU. If I do use the REU I have to run that Ram check program that
- came with the REU to make sure it's seating properly in the port. But that's
- not fool proof either since moving the computer can, and has, unseated the
- REU :( Strangely, I've never had problems with my swiftlink, but I'm getting
- off topic here ;)
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 49 Mon Jan 10, 1994
- CBM-ED [e.g.bell] at 05:15 EST
-
- Mark: Someone makes a pencil type thing that resilvers the contacts
- of things. Perhaps it might help with the card edge connector of
- your cart port.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 50 Mon Jan 10, 1994
- D.TUOMI [Doctor] at 07:00 EST
-
- The only problems I've had with CS-DOS is when I try to disolve a LH-ARC to a
- CMD native mode partitions. Doesn't seem to like that, it locks up everytime.
-
- Doc.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 51 Mon Jan 10, 1994
- C128.JBEE at 16:04 EST
-
- > D.TUOMI [Doctor] at 07:00 EST
- > The only problems I've had with CS-DOS is when I try to disolve a LH-ARC
- > to a CMD native mode partitions. Doesn't seem to like that, it locks up
- > everytime.
-
- What does your system consist of hardware wise?
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 52 Mon Jan 10, 1994
- D.ROHNER at 23:49 EST
-
- I have the same problem. Arc, LHA, and bvunzip, don't like the hd. They work
- fine on C= drives. I have tried the suggestions to assign the partit ns and/or
- set the output partition as default. What seems to happen is that it starts to
- disolve and doesn't close the file and move on. I have a flat 128 and the hd.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 53 Tue Jan 11, 1994
- H.HERMAN1 at 01:16 EST
-
- Doc,
-
- CS/DOS's LHA's run fine on RAMLink's native partitions.
-
- My gripe is that the LHA's use the cs/dos clock to time themselves, and then
- forget to reset the time of day when they are done. I quess I should really
- write a couple of short autoexecs to do the LHA'ing, and reset the clock at
- exit.
-
- Something else for me to do during those idle moments...
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 54 Tue Jan 11, 1994
- C128.JBEE at 02:35 EST
-
- The one common thread is flat 128s with JiffyDos. Have you tried
- creating or dissolving the archives without JiffyDos active (using
- the switch)?
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 55 Thu Jan 13, 1994
- D.TUOMI [Doctor] at 01:05 EST
-
- I'm using a 128D with 2 1571's and an FD-4000 with a 1750 REU. CS-DOS doesn't
- really seem to like the setup, I usually end up disloving onto one of the
- 1571's. A fellow sysop who runs the local user group BBS complains of the
- same problem with a 128 (flat) with CMD-HD and 1750 REU.
-
- I've not tried to disable JiffyDOS completely yet. I was hoping to not have
- to, since having JiffyDOS does improve the speed slightly. I'll give it a
- try, though.
-
- Doc.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 56 Wed Feb 02, 1994
- C128.JBEE at 06:23 EST
-
- >D.TUOMI
-
- Can I send you a disk with my setup to try?
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 60 Sat Feb 12, 1994
- W.WIESE [WES256] at 22:28 EST
-
- Well got the flat128-lha/arc disk access problem semi-solved. If jd is out and
- fast mode is in it works ok.If jd is in and fast mode is out it works ok. I
- tried this with all emulation types on my xpanded hd with the same
- results.Setup is flat128-xpanded reu-xpanded hd.The problem must be chip
- and/or software timing in the disk access routines within the csdos s/w and/or
- the jd s/w ONLY in fast mode routines tho.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 61 Wed Feb 16, 1994
- D.TUOMI [Doctor] at 04:57 EST
-
- I'm still having the problem, and would definately appreciate a copy of your
- setup disk Jbee.
-
- Doc.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 62 Wed Feb 16, 1994
- C128.JBEE at 14:38 EST
-
- D.TUOMI [Doctor],
- Okay :)
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 63 Thu Feb 17, 1994
- M.KIRBY2 at 19:43 EST
-
- Can anyone help me with CSXARC? I load in the CS-DOC shell, then CSXARC but
- when I try De-arcing a file I always get a syntax error.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 64 Fri Feb 18, 1994
- C128.JBEE at 00:10 EST
-
- csxarc/x a:filename
-
- I think you leave off the ".arc" for CSXARC because it expects any .arc
- file to have the ".arc" already appended to the file name.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 65 Fri Feb 18, 1994
- M.KIRBY2 at 03:31 EST
-
- Tried that. I get back:
-
- searching for x a:filename
-
- ?file not found error
-
- I tried the filename with and without the ARC suffix.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 66 Fri Feb 18, 1994
- H.HERMAN1 at 05:18 EST
-
- MK,
-
- Try using CSARC instead of CSXARC.
-
- CSX may (I am not sure) include some disk burst routines which will cough with
- anything except a vanilla dos. CSARC uses standard calls and should work with
- all drives and dos's, such as JiffyDos, etc.
-
- The syntax is the same.
-
- Not sure if it matters, but I *always* tell cs/dos where to do its stuff. You
- might want to do the same and include the drive designator as well:
-
- csarc/xa a:filename.arc
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 67 Fri Feb 18, 1994
- M.RANDALL2 [Maurice] at 20:02 EST
-
- Is it possible that the filename you are trying to access has lowercase ascii
- characters in it? If so, you will always get a file not found error. This is
- because you can't type a lowercase ascii character from the 64 or 128 keyboard
- unless the software supports it. From BASIC, it is impossible. CS-DOS will
- also have this problem since it operates from BASIC. If this is the case, try
- using some sort of utility to rename the file and try it again. I'd be willing
- to bet that this is the problem.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 68 Fri Feb 18, 1994
- M.KIRBY2 at 22:34 EST
-
- THat was slightly better. Nom some times it finds the file but then I says
- "loading" and the machine siezes up. At first I thought it was taking longer
- because the file is very long (1163 blocks). I can't even get a listing of
- the files in the arc. Could the fact that the File is on my RamLink be
- causing trouble.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 69 Sun Feb 20, 1994
- H.HERMAN1 at 02:40 EST
-
- MK,
-
- Just to touch on basics, have you correctly defined the REU area which
- cs/dos can use as a work area?
-
- I am referring here to the poking in the autoexec:
-
- poke 7120,2*16+5
- poke 7119,2*16+5
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 70 Mon Feb 21, 1994
- J.KIMMINAU [Doc K] at 21:50 EST
-
- MK,
- Maybe this is way off line...but I just recently started
- de-arcing with CS-DOS, too. I got the exact same problems as
- you describe for an entire night, using ARC2.41, CSARC ad
- CSXARC. Eventual solution was to realize that the instructions
- (at least my copy of the docs) didn't tell me the obvious:
- the command to arc is not "arc filename" but, for each of the
- above, "arc128 filename" or "csarc filename" or "csxarc filename".
- Actually, the docs do show the correct command for csarc and
- csxarc, but I didn't pick it up for awhile because I was locked
- into using the command "arc" after reading the arc 2.41 instr.
- One other thing I did was install all the arc programs onto
- the ramdisk, but I don't think that solves the problem you
- described.
- If it didn't help you, at least my experience may help
- another new CS user. Overall, its quite a good program.
- Doc K.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 71 Tue Feb 22, 1994
- CBM-MARK at 13:53 EST
-
- Yes, I'll bet that "ARC" vs "ARC128" threw the *majority* of new CSDOS
- ussers for a loop at first. Me Included ;)
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 72 Tue Feb 22, 1994
- CBM-ED [e.g.bell] at 14:33 EST
-
- It seems to me that you can change the name of ARC128 to just ARC,
- install it in your RAMDISK, save your RAMDISK to disk so it is loaded
- with the renamed ARDC128, then in the future, you can just use the
- old ARC/# ##### ##### type format, if you were so inclined. :)
- I do remember all the messages tho, on this problem, when Chris first
- uploaded the program.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 73 Wed Feb 23, 1994
- M.KIRBY2 at 10:31 EST
-
- All suggestions appriciated but none of them did any good.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 74 Thu Feb 24, 1994
- H.HERMAN1 at 03:31 EST
-
- MK,
-
- >All suggestions appriciated but none of them did any good.
-
- Did you provide a description of your computer set-up, and peripherals?
-
- This may help ID a problem source.
-
- Howie
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 75 Sat Feb 26, 1994
- M.KIRBY2 at 00:15 EST
-
- I have a flat C128, a RAMLink with a 1 meg simm plus a two meg REU divided
- into 3 partitions (one is set aside for REUs) device number 16, A 1571 disk
- drive
- as device 9, and an Excel 2001 (1571 compatable) as device 8. And if makes
- any diference I have a 1084 monitor, and a star NX-2420 with a G-Wiz
- interface.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 76 Sat Feb 26, 1994
- C128.JBEE at 01:23 EST
-
- Try doing a DCLEAR on each 1571 (#8 and #9) before creating the archives.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 77 Tue Jul 05, 1994
- J.STEPHENSO1 [Jimbo] at 01:16 EDT
-
- I've got a question about LHA compression. I was under the impression that it
- was the same for all platforms, but I ran into a snag last night. I
- downloaded an archive that had a bunch of SIDs that had been collected for an
- Amiga SIDplayer. After figuring out how to get past the path names (four
- deep!), I was able to use LHX to decompress them, or so I thought. I got a
- CRC error for each one, and each one turned out to be unusable in the
- SIDplayer I had lying around. Has anyone had success dissolving Amiga .LHA
- archives, and how did you do it? Thanks,
-
- Jimbo
-
-
- Oh, yeah, another question while I've got your attention. The docs for LHX
- say that I need a 1750 to make a LHArchive, but I can tell it what banks it
- can use. Can I use a 1764 and just tell it to use banks 0-3? Thanks again.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 78 Tue Jul 05, 1994
- CBM-ED [e.g.bell] at 07:29 EDT
-
- Jimbo:
- JS> Can I use a 1764
-
- When I first started I only had a 1764 and it worked, so I know that it
- can be done. I believe there may have been a poke necessary, tho, as
- you surmised. It would be in the docs for CS-DOS though.
-
- Also, as I recall, the docs say you can put an SFX header onto an LZH
- file and make it an SFX like that.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 79 Tue Jul 05, 1994
- G.RUTTER1 at 22:01 EDT
-
- Well here is another new CS-DOS user that's totally lost. I have downloaded
- the 2 CS-DOS 1.5 files and the archived help files. I cannot get CS-DOS to
- dissolve, so used O-Q to dissolve the 2nd file. It could not handle the 1st. I
- read that file 9620 is needed to update the files, but cannot find it. I then
- read that I need file 8223 to make it work, again cannot find it. I have a
- flat C128, 1571, 1750 clone & FD2000 with Jiffy DOS. What files do I need to
- dissolve archived files? Thank you :)
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 80 Wed Jul 06, 1994
- C128.JBEE at 03:35 EDT
-
- > J.STEPHENSO1
-
- If you are getting CRC errors most likely the LHA file is LHA-5, a newer
- version found mostly on Amigas. The PC compression standards you can
- handle are .arc (older versions), .zip V1.10, and the older LHA. You can
- not dissolve lha-5 or zip 2.04g.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 81 Wed Jul 06, 1994
- C128.JBEE at 03:36 EDT
-
- > G.RUTTER1
-
- If you have both CS-DOS .sfx files you just load and run them in C-128
- mode to dissolve them onto a blank disk.
- ------------
- Category 3, Topic 18
- Message 82 Thu Jul 07, 1994
- J.STEPHENSO1 [Jimbo] at 01:50 EDT
-
- JBEE - Ahhh, I see. In order to attempt to unarchive them I used LHD and
- redirected output to the printer. Now that I think about it every single one
- was LHA-5. I had no idea there were different LHAs in use. Thanks.
-
- Jimbo
-
- ------------
-
-