home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.whtech.com
/
ftp.whtech.com.tar
/
ftp.whtech.com
/
articles
/
limanews
/
SPELLCK.TXT
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
2006-10-19
|
4KB
|
85 lines
ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED IN LIMA NEWSLETTER MARCH 1990
USING STAND ALONE ELECTRONIC SPELL CHECKERS WITH
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^WORD PROCESSING
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^by Charles Good
^^^^^^^^^^^^^Lima Ohio User Group
I recently read in an exchange newsletter a commentary
to the effect that the lack of a good 80 column word
processor WITH built in spell checker is forcing many to
leave the TI community. The author of this article
suggested that only the appearance of PRESS will be able to
halt this stampede to other computer systems.
We of course already have in Funnelweb a first class
word processor in both 40 and 80 columns, but Funnelweb has
no built in spell checker. The problem with any spell
checker designed to be used on a TI99/4A system is that you
can't put the whole thing into memory. You are limited to
the 32K memory expansion for fast access memory, and the
spell checker dictionary has to reside on disk or ramdisk.
Using the dictionary would require alot of disk or ramdisk
access. There would be alot of input/output activity
between the CPU and the place where the dictionary is
stored. This activity slows things down and somewhat
increases the possibility of a computer lock up. The best
spell checker for the TI to date is the one that comes with
WriterEase. Using the 50000 word WriterEase dictionary off
of a disk is quite time consuming.
The price of stand alone electronic spell checkers has
come down alot in recent months. I have an 80000 word
FRANKLIN SPELLING ACE next to my computer. Today this
product can be purchased for $40 from many sources. A
couple of years ago the Triton catalog listed the SPELLING
ACE for $70. FOR LESS THAN $18 you can purchase at WalMart
an 84000 word SEIKO WP-1000 spell checker that is
functionally almost identical to the SPELLING ACE.
The differences between the two are mainly physical.
The SPELLING ACE measures 4 x 6.5 x 1 inch and has
individual chicklet keys for each letter. There is a 16
character display. You probably wouldn't want to carry the
SPELLING ACE around in your pocket, but is light, appears to
be physically quite well constructed, and is small enough to
fit almost anywhere on the computer desk. The SEIKO is
about the size and shape of a thick credit card. The
keyboard is a continuous flat membrane, and the display is
only 8 characters. If the word is longer, you can window
left and right with arrow keys, in a manner similar to that
of 40 column Funnelweb.
To check the spelling of a word with either of these
devices you press the ON button and wait about 1 second for
powerup. You then type in your work and press <ENTER>. If
the spelling is correct (common plurals and tense
varaitions, prefexes and suffexes are recognized as correct)
you are informed in about 1 second. If the spelling is
incorrect (or correct but not in the dictionary, something
that doesn't happen often with common words), the spell
checker takes a few seconds (generally about 10 seconds) to
generate a list of potential correct spellings. Here is
where the spell checkers really shine! These computers
contain built in logic for rules of spelling and phonetics.
This allows them to reasonably guess what it is you are
trying to spell. You are not, as is done with the
WriterEase dictionary, just presented with an alphabetical
listing of a part of the dictionary where your word would
fit if it were in the dictionary. The first word in the
word list is the most likely correct spelling of the word,
based on the spell checker's knowledge of the rules of
spelling and phonetics.
Now, whenever, I need to check spelling, I just reach
up to the second shelf, grab my spell checker, press ON, and
type in the word. There whole process takes only a few
seconds. Although these devices can't automatically spell
check a whole document, for single word checking I really
think these stand alone spell checkers are equal to or
better than anything that can be "built in" to a word
processor. With a price below $18 they are within the
budget of almost anyone.
.PL 1