home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- 001:Subject: comp.std.unix Volume 19
- 002:Subject: Archives of comp.std.unix and std-unix@uunet.uu.net
- 003:Subject: Calendar of UNIX-related Events
- 004:Subject: Access to UNIX User Groups
- 005:Subject: Access to UNIX-Related Publications
- 006:Subject: Access to UNIX-Related Standards
- 007:Subject: Re: Calendar of UNIX-related Events
- 008:Subject: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.12: Inter-Process Communication
- 009:Subject: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.11: Transaction Processing
- 010:Subject: 8859 vs. 646
- 011:Subject: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
- 012:Subject: UNIX Press (ISBN 0-13-877598-2)
- 013:Subject: POSIX alias expansion bugs (in bash 1.05)
- 014:Subject: request for information: p1003.2(?) Bills of Materials
- 015:Subject: Re: 8859 vs. 646
- 016:Subject: Re: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
- 017:Subject: Re: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
- 018:Subject: Re: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
- 019:Subject: Re: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
- 020:Subject: Control characters in the shell
- 021:Subject: Re: 8859 vs. 646
- 022:Subject: Re: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
- 023:Subject: Re: Control characters in the shell
- 024:Subject: Re: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
- 025:Subject: Any public C validation suites planned?
- 026:Subject: Re: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
- 027:Subject: Re: request for information: p1003.2(?) Bills of Materials
- 028:Subject: Re: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
- 029:Subject: shell functions -- satisfying chet ramey yet simplifying find...
- 030:Subject: Another posting...
- 031:Subject: Re: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
- 032:Subject: Re: Posix 1003.4 vs. volatile.
- 033:Subject: Internationalization in UNIX and X
- 034:Subject: Standards Update, IEEE 1201: User Interface
- 035:Subject: Re: Internationalization in UNIX and X
- 036:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1201: User Interface
- 037:Subject: Re: Internationalization in UNIX and X
- 038:Subject: Re: Internationalization in UNIX and X
- 038.a:Subject: Re: Internationalization in UNIX and X
- 038.b:Subject: 1003.6 documents wanted
- 039:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1201: User Interface
- 040:Subject: Re: P1202 Standards Update Report
- 041:Subject: Re: Internationalization in UNIX and X
- 042:Subject: Re: Posix 1003.4 vs. volatile.
- 043:Subject: Re: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
- 044:Subject: Re: Internationalization in UNIX and X
- 045:Subject: Re: Posix 1003.4 vs. volatile.
- 046:Subject: Re: Internationalization in UNIX and X
- 047:Subject: Re: Re: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
- 048:Subject: Re: Re: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
- 049:Subject: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.1: System services interface
- 050:Subject: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.2: Shell and tools
- 051:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.1: System services interface
- 052:Subject: Re: Posix 1003.4 vs. volatile.
- 053:Subject: Re: Internationalization in UNIX and X
- 054:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.1: System services interface
- 055:Subject: Latest Groups within IEEE Posix Committee?
- 056:Subject: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.0: POSIX Guide
- 057:Subject: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.3: Test Methods
- 058:Subject: Re: 8859 vs. 646
- 059:Subject: Re: Posix 1003.4 vs. volatile.
- 060:Subject: UI and OSF break off talks
- 061:Subject: OSF 1990 Technical Seminar Series
- 062:Subject: Sendmail and international character sets (was Re: 8859 vs. 646)
- 063:Subject: Requiring 1003.1 to be POSIX-compliant
- 064:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.3: Test Methods
- 065:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.0: POSIX Guide
- 066:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.0: POSIX Guide
- 067:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.3: Test Methods
- 068:Subject: guest moderator
- 069:Subject: no subject (file transmission)
- 070:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.1: System services interface
- 071:Subject: Re: Internationalization in UNIX and X
- 072:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.1: System services interface
- 073:Subject: Re: { and } with for in /bin/sh
- 077:Subject: Standards Update, USENIX Standards Watchdog Committee
- 078:Subject: Standards Update, Recent Standards Activities
- 080:Subject: Re: Access to UNIX-Related Publications
- 081:Subject: setlocale()
- 082:Subject: IEEE standards groups list
- 083:Subject: Re: Sendmail and international character sets (was Re: 8859 vs. 646)
- 084:Subject: What does POSIX stand for?
- 085:Subject: Re: Standards Update, USENIX Standards Watchdog Committee
- 086:Subject: Re: Standards Update, USENIX Standards Watchdog Committee
- 087:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.0: POSIX Guide
- 088:Subject: Re: Standards Update, USENIX Standards Watchdog Committee
- 089:Subject: Re: Standards Update, USENIX Standards Watchdog Committee
- 090:Subject: Re: Standards Update, USENIX Standards Watchdog Committee
- 091:Subject: Re: setlocale()
- 092:Subject: Re: Sendmail and international character sets
- 093:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.0: POSIX Guide
- 094:Subject: Answer to "what does POSIX stand for?"
- 095:Subject: Re: Sendmail and international character sets (was Re: 8859 vs. 646)
- 096:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.0: POSIX Guide
- 097:Subject: PAR approval critiera adopted at April IEEE/CS TCOS SEC meeting
- 098:Subject: Re: Answer to "what does POSIX stand for?"
- 099:Subject: Re: Standards Update, USENIX Standards Watchdog Committee
- 100:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.0: POSIX Guide
- 101:Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1201: User Interface
- 102:Subject: X FIPS announcement
- 103:Subject: Re: Answer to "what does POSIX stand for?"
- 104:Subject: Re: Answer to "what does POSIX stand for?"
- 105:Subject: Standards committees & partys
- 106:Subject: Re: Re: Standards Update, USENIX Standards Watchdog Committee
- 107:Subject: Advantages of SCCS?
- 108:Subject: Wanted - Ansi C & POSIX conformance test suites
- 109:Subject: Re: Re: Standards Update, USENIX Standards Watchdog Committee
- 110:Subject: Re: Advantages of SCCS?
- 111:Subject: Re: Advantages of SCCS?
- 112:Subject: Re: Advantages of SCCS?
- 113:Subject: Re: Answer to "what does POSIX stand for?"
- 114:Subject: Re: Advantages of SCCS?
- 115:Subject: POSIX 1003.7 - Has it slipped the track?
- 116:Subject: Re: Advantages of SCCS?
- 117:Subject: Standards BOF at Summer USENIX
- 118:Subject: PARs being submitted to IEEE Stds Board
- 119:Subject: list of PARs going to IEEE (and some not going!)
- 120:Subject: RCS and makefiles (Was Re: Advantages of SCCS?)
- 121:Subject: 1003.6 secretary
- 122:Subject: Re: Standards BOF at Summer USENIX
- 123:Subject: Retraction
- 124:Subject: Common Reference Ballot
- 125:Subject: End of Volume 19 of comp.std.unix
-