√─┌╬─ ┐│ LaserRetrieve Version 2.4É %Thursday August 23, 1990 1:55 am │└╬─┘┌╬─┐│à :169 ILL. APP. 3D 702 ELLIOTT V. INTER-INSURANCE EXCHANGEà 1988å │├╬─F┤│ Count II alleged bad-faith conduct by defendant for failure to giveè E││ plaintiffs written consent to sue the tortfeasor and vexatious andï ││ unreasonable conduct in refusing to process their claim. Count III alleged ││ a class action against defendant on behalf of persons similarlyÄ ││ situated to plaintiffs.╢ ││à ?Defendant filed a motion to strike in lieu of answer asserting,è ││ among other things, th┌¥─┐ursuant to theè D││ policy's arbitration c│ Using Internal SearchText │defendant toî ││ answer. In August 1984└¥─┘nowledge thatï E││ the other driver was uninsured and asserting affirmative defenses,ï L││ including a policy clause that required written consent by the insurer toä E││ any lawsuit against a tortfeasor by the insured before the insurerï F││ could be bound by any resulting judgment. The arbitration clause ofè J││ the policy was also asserted as a defense. That clause provided that ifå G││ the insurer and insured do not agree concerning the claimant's legalë D││ entitlement to damages or to the amount thereof, either party mayî D││ make written demand for arbitration and the dispute shall then beî │└╬─M┘ <ESC>=HitList <ENTER>=Print <F3>&<F2>=HitWord <ALT-F6>=Internal Searchä ≥p■p≤■╬╬╬╬╬╬ùƒpÿùƒpÿùƒpÿ╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╤╦pnternal Searchä ≥p■p≤■╬
