Internet Info 1997 December/Internet_Info_CD-ROM_Walnut_Creek_December_1997.iso/faqs/comp/answers/compilers/faq

Internet Message Format | 1997-10-02 | 32.4 KB

Path: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!cam-news-feed5.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-sea-19.sprintlink.net!news-in-west.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!205.238.207.65!iecc.com!iecc.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (John R. Levine)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers,news.answers,comp.answers
Subject: comp.compilers monthly message and Frequently Asked Questions
Supersedes: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: poster
Date: 1 Oct 1997 07:00:00 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
Lines: 662
Sender: [e-mail]
Approved: [e-mail]
Expires: 1 Nov 97 23:59:00 GMT
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ivan.iecc.com
Keywords: administrivia
Xref: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu comp.compilers:13667 news.answers:113552 comp.answers:28309

Archive-name: compilers/faq
Last-modified: 30 Apr 97

This is the comp.compilers monthly message.  Changes since last month are
indicated by the usual marks in the right margin.

Contents:

-- What is comp.compilers?
-- How do I receive it?
-- How do I submit a message?
-- What happens to submitted messages?
-- What message formats are appropriate?
-- Why wasn't my message posted?
-- How do I respond to the author of a message?
-- How do I contact the moderator?
-- Are back issues available?

-- Some Frequently Asked Questions:

* Where can I get a C or C++ grammar in yacc?
* Where can I get the Gnu C compiler?
* Are there other free C compilers?
* Where can I get a free compiler for MS Windows?
* Where can I get a Fortran grammar in yacc or a Fortran compiler?
* Where can I get Modula-2, Pascal, Ada, or SQL grammars in yacc?
* Where can I get a Cobol grammar in yacc?
* Where can I get a Basic grammar in yacc?
* Where can I get a QBasic compiler?
* Where can I get a PL/I or PL/M grammar?
* Are there free versions of yacc and lex ?
* Are there versions of yacc and lex for MS-DOS?
* Are there C++ versions of yacc and lex?
* What other compilers and tools are freely available?
* How can I get started with yacc and lex and compiler writing in general?
* Where can I FTP the sources to the programs in Holub's "Compiler
  Design in C" or Mak's "Writing Compilers and Interpreters" ?
* Where can I learn about garbage collection ?

-- What is comp.compilers?

It is a moderated usenet news group addressing the topics of compilers in
particular and programming language design and implementation in general.
It started in 1986 as a moderated mailing list, but interest quickly grew to
the point where it was promoted to a news group.  Recent topics have
included optimization techniques, language design issues, announcements of
new compiler tools, and book reviews.

Messages come from a wide variety of people ranging from undergraduate
students to well-known experts in industry and academia.  Authors live all
over the world -- there are regular messages from the U.S, Canada, Europe,
Australia, and Japan, with occasional ones from as far away as Malaysia.
I cannot tell how large the readership is, since the anarchic nature of
usenet makes it impossible to tell who reads it, but a reasonable guess is
that the total is over 100,000, which would make it by far the most widely
read medium on the topic in the world.

Unless there is specific language to the contrary, each message represents
only the personal opinion of its author.  I claim no compilation copyright on
comp.compilers.  As far as I am concerned, anyone can reproduce any message
for any purpose.  Individual authors may retain rights to their messages,
although I will not knowingly post anything that does not permit unlimited
distribution in any form.  If you find comp.compilers useful in writing a
book, producing a product, etc., I would appreciate an acknowledgement of
usenet and comp.compilers.

-- How do I receive it?

The easiest way is to read comp.compilers on a system that gets usenet news.

If you don't have access to usenet news, it's also available via E-mail via
a LISTSERV forwarder at the American University.  To subscribe a person
should send e-mail to [e-mail] with one line in the mail
message (not in the subject!)  That line should read:

                        SUBSCRIBE COMPIL-L full_name
for example:
                        SUBSCRIBE COMPIL-L Ima Hacker

To get off the list the subscriber should send e-mail to the same address
with the message:       SIGNOFF COMPIL-L

If you have problems getting on or off the list, please contact me.  In
particular, if you want to use an address other than your own personal mail
address, you have to ask me to set it up.  If I receive bounce messages for
an address on the mailing list for two days in a row, I delete it.  If this
happens to you and your address subsequently becomes reachable again, you
can resubscribe.

-- How do I submit a message?

Mail it to [e-mail].  I review messages nearly every day, usually
including weekends, and most messages are posted to the net within a day after
I receive them.  Occasionally when I go out of town there may be up to a
week's delay, though I try to send out a message when that will happen.

Most net news systems will automatically turn posted messages into mail to
compilers, but some, particularly systems running notes, don't do that
correctly.  As a result, I sometimes receive hundreds of copies of a
message, all mangled slightly differently.  Please mail your contributions
unless you're sure your posting software works correctly.

When you send a message to compilers, I understand that to mean that you
want me to post it to usenet, which means it will be sent to tens of
thousands of potential readers at thousands of computers all around the
world.  It may also appear in a printed comp.compilers annual and other
books, in printed journals, in on-line and off-line archives, CD-ROMs, and
anywhere else that some reader decides to use it.

If you don't want me to post something, send it instead to compilers-request.
(See below.)

-- What happens to submitted messages?

Barring mail problems, they arrive in a special mailbox here at iecc.  If
they're appropriate to post, I then edit them a little, remove cute
signatures, and then post them to usenet.  If I think a message needs more
editing than that but is otherwise worth posting, I return it to the author
for rewriting.  Other messages are discarded (see below.)

If I see that the automatically generated confirmation message bounced, I
discard the message.  If you want your messages to be posted, please be
sure the From: or Reply-To: line contains your correct e-mail address.

-- What message formats are appropriate?

Plain old ASCII.  No MIME, uuencoded, zipped, LaTeX, HTML, NeXTmail, RTF, GIF,
gzip, MSN Exchange, or anything else, just ASCII, because a substantial
fraction of the readership still can't handle anything else.  And keep line
lengths to between 70 and 80 characters, and don't justify lines with extra
white space nor indent the whole message with white space.  Messages received
entirely in lower case are subject to gratuitous recapitalization.  (Your
moderator has strong aesthetic opinions.)

If you want to make something non-ASCII available to the readership, put it
on an FTP or WWW server and send in a descriptive note with the URL.
Material of general interest can go on the archive server here.  Send me a
message at [e-mail] if you have something for the
archive.

-- What topics are and aren't appropriate?

Any message discussing aspects of compiler design and implementation is
appropriate.  Language design is usually OK as well insofar as it affects
compiler design, until it drifts off into theological issues like where the
semicolon goes.

Questions about particular compilers, programming languages, and systems
should go to newsgroups about the language or system.

"For sale" messages should go to one of the misc.forsale or regional
forsale groups.

I post one announcement per conference, for any conference with a topic
relevant to compilers.  I usually post student offers to share a room at a
conference, and should probably digest them as well.

Postings announcing commercial products are welcome so long as there
is substantially more technical content than hype.

``Help wanted'' and ``Position Available'' messages are collected each week
and posted in a digest every Sunday.  Resumes are discarded, since most of
them come from robots mechanically sending them out in response to every
message in misc.jobs.offered.  Jobs remaining open may be re-posted once a
month.

For technical reasons, I can't cross-post messages to other moderated groups,
except one or two like comp.parallel with whom I have an informal agreement
to allow cross-posts.

-- Why wasn't my message posted?

The main reasons I don't post a message are that it appears more appropriate
for another group, the message is too garbled to fix, it contains too much
quoted material relative to the amount of new material, or I don't understand
it.  Another possibility is that a message doesn't have a valid return e-mail
address.

When you respond to a previous article, you MUST edit down the quoted material
to the minimum needed to remind readers about the topic.  In the past I
usually did such editing myself, but with the increasing number of messages, I
just don't have time any more and discard such messages.  If you can't take
the time to edit your message, neither can I.  The mail receipt robot makes a
guess about the amount of quoted material in each message and sends a warning
in response if a message appears to have more quoted than new stuff.  Unless
it guessed wrong, please edit and resumbit your message if you want it to
appear.

I discard messages that say "reply to me because I don't read this group",
and forward spams back to the appropriate postmaster.  Messages from
anonymous or anonymized addresses are not acceptable, although I suppose I
could be persuaded to post a message with the sender's identity removed
given a persuasive enough reason.

If a message asks a simple question I sometimes answer it myself rather than
posting it.  If you ask a question answered in the FAQ, discussed to death in
the past, or appropriate for a different group, you'll get a form response.

If you send in a message and don't either see it posted or receive an
acknowledgement from the robot, it probably got lost in the mail and you
should contact me, preferably via a different mail route.

-- How do I respond to the author of a message?

I try to be sure that every message contains valid From: and Reply-To:
headers.  The automatic "reply" commands in most news readers let you send
mail to the author.  If you're replying to a message in a digest, be sure
to respond to the author of the particular message, not to the pseudo-author
of the digest.

Some obsolete news readers attempt to reply using the Path: header, but for
technical reasons the Path: header in a moderated message cannot point to the
actual author.  In fact, the Path: header in a compilers message is
deliberately a bad mail address, so if you have such a news reader you'll
have to edit the addresses in responses yourself and, I hope, encourage your
system manager to update your news and mail software.

Sometimes mail to an author bounces, either because a gateway isn't working
or because the return address is unregistered or otherwise bad.  Please don't
ask me to forward it, since my machine is no better connected than anyone
else's.  (It's just another node on the Internet.)  If you send me a message
obviously intended for the author of an item, I will discard it on the theory
that if it wasn't important enough for you to send it to the right place, it
isn't important enough for me, either.

-- How do I contact the moderator?

Send me mail at [e-mail].  I treat messages to
compilers-request as private messages to me unless they state that they are
for publication.

-- Are back issues available?

I have complete archives going back to the original mailing list in 1986.
The archives now fill over 36 megabytes, and are growing at over 700K per
month.  People with ftp access can get them from iecc.com in directory
pub/articles.  The archives contain a gzipped Unix mailbox format file for
each month, with names like 91-08.gz.  Directory pub/index contains index
files, one for each year.  You can retrieve messages by full text search or
by message number at the compilers web site at
http://www.iecc.com/compilers/.

There is now a mail server at [e-mail] that can mail you
indexes, messages, and the files mentioned below.  Send it a message
containing "help" to get started.

I have also published a printed edition of the 1990 messages grouped by
thread and topic, and with some indexes, and may publish subsequent
editions.  (If you'd be intereted in editing books for later years, let me
know.)  You can buy copies of the 1990 book directly from me; send email
to [e-mail] for details.  (Yes, we take plastic.)


-- Some Frequently Asked Questions:

NOTE: Many issues are discussed occasionally on comp.compilers, but not
frequently enought to make the FAQ list.  If you have a question but the
answer isn't in the FAQ, you may well be able to get good background by
reading the appropriate articles in the archive.  Please at least visit
the archive at http://iecc.com/compilers and do a little searching.

The various files that I mention below that I have are in the compilers
FTP archive at iecc.com, and are also available from the mail server mentioned
above.  If you can FTP them, please do so rather than using the mail
server, since the mail bandwith is limited.

* Where can I get a C or C++ grammar in yacc?

Jim Roskind's well-known C and C++ grammars are in the FTP archive, as is
a C grammar written by Jeff Lee.  Dave Jones posted a parser as message
91-09-030.  Another C grammar was posted to comp.sources.misc in June
1990, v13 i52, archive name ansi-c_su.  GCC and G++ are based on yacc
grammars, see below.

Also see ctree, which parses C code into parse trees and makes symbol
tables, described in message 95-07-114.
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~flisakow/, http://www.kagi.com/flisakow/,
ftp://ftp.kagi.com:/flisakow/ctree_04.tar.gz, or
ftp://ftp.kagi.com:/flisakow/ctree_04.zip

* Where can I get the Gnu C compiler?

GCC is a high-quality free C and C++ compiler.  (Free is not the same as
public domain, see the GCC distribution for details.)  It is available in
source from prep.ai.mit.edu.  You need an existing C compiler and
libraries to bootstrap it.

* Are there other free C compilers?

lcc is the retargetable compiler for ANSI C described in `A Retargetable C
Compiler: Design and Implementation' (Benjamin/Cummings, 1995, ISBN
0-8053-1670-1). lcc is in production use at Princeton University and AT&T
Bell Laboratories.  The current version of lcc generates code for the
SPARC, MIPS R3000 and 386 under DOS (no libraries for DOS are available
yet).  The code generator generator is available too as a icon program, and
a C version is available as of version 3.5.  There are mailing lists
lcc{,-bugs}@cs.princeton.edu, managed by [e-mail].  The
object code is not great, but the compiler is ANSI compatible and is small
and fast.  Lcc uses a hard-coded C parser because it's faster than yacc,
and now includes a preprocessor.  Lcc is available, along with docs and a
sample chapter of the bookhttp://www.CS.Princeton.EDU/software/lcc/

Thanks to Horst von Brand <[e-mail]> and
Tom Harwood <[e-mail]> for this info.

* Where can I get a free compiler for MS Windows?

A development system called "djgpp" by DJ Delorie <[e-mail]> is based
on gcc and other GNU programs, and runs on 386 or higher PCs running
MS-DOS.  DJGPP also has Pascal, FORTRAN, Ada, Bison and Flex for MS-DOS.
It also has many other GNU tools that programmers often need, like emacs,
make, fileutils, shellutils, textutils, sed, awk, perl, etc.  This is all
available from ftp://ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/gnu/djgpp/ or
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/

Another DOS version of GCC called EMX is at ftp.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
[131.159.0.198] in /pub/comp/os/os2/devtools/emx+gcc.

lcc-win32, a free C compiler system for windows 95/NT can be downloaded
from http://www.remcomp.com/lcc-win32

* Where can I get a Fortran grammar in yacc or a Fortran compiler?

I have a small subset parser in the archive at iecc.com.  The F2C
Fortran to C translator is a respectable Fortran system (so long as
you have a C compiler to compile its output and its libraries) and
contains a full F77 parser and is available in source form via FTP
from netlib.bell-labs.com and by mail from [e-mail].

* Where can I get Modula-2, Pascal, Ada, or SQL grammars in yacc?

I have one each of those, too, in the archive at iecc.com, though I
haven't tried to use any of them.

According to the comp.lang.ada FAQ, a yacc grammar for Ada 95 is available:

ftp://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/public/AdaIC/standards/95lrm_rat/grammar9x.y

and a lex grammar for Ada 95 is available:

ftp://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/public/AdaIC/standards/95lrm_rat/lexer9x.l

There's an Ada front end called GNAT for GCC, available at
ftp://cs.nyu.edu/pub/gnat/.

* Where can I get a Cobol grammar in yacc?

Nowhere for free, as far as I can tell.  This question is asked every few
months and there has never, ever, been any positive response. Perhaps some
of the interested people could get together and write one.  The commercial
PCYACC from Abraxas (see below) comes with a bunch of sample grammars
including one for Cobol-85.

Also see the Cobol FAQ posted monthly to comp.lang.misc and comp.lang.cobol.

* Where can I get a Basic grammar in yacc?

Take a look at ftp://ftp.uu.net:/usenet/comp.sources.unix/volume2/basic/ which
contains a Basic interpreter with yacc parser.

* Where can I get a QBasic compiler?

You buy it from Microsoft.  A shareware compiler ASIC is available
from simtel mirrors in /msdos/basic/asic???.zip, such as ftp.coast.net
in /SimTel/msdos/basic/asic???.zip.  It handles a large subset of Qbasic.

There's a Qbasic mailing list; send "info qbasic" to
[e-mail] for details.

* Where can I get a PL/I or PL/M grammar?

There's a PL/I source code formatting packat at vm1.velocity-software.com
in PLIFORM.ZIP.  It's all written in PL/I.

There's a PL/M in the archives at iecc.com, called plm.shar.  Also see
message 94-03-062 for a report on a PL/M to C translator.

* Are there free versions of yacc and lex ?

Vern Paxton's flex is a superior reimplementation of lex.  It is available
from the same places as Gnu sources, but is not subject to the Gnu
copyleft.  Berkeley Yacc is a quite compatible PD version of yacc by Bob
Corbett, available on ftp.cs.berkeley.edu, in ~ftp/ucb/4bsd/byacc.tar.Z. Gnu
Bison is derived from an earlier version of Corbett's work and is also
fairly compatible with yacc.  A byacc extension that displays graphically
the progress of a parse can be found in Jim Roskind's C++ grammar in the
FTP compilers archive.  (The files are too big for the mail archive,
sorry.)

* Are there versions of yacc and lex for MS-DOS?

There are several of them.  Commercial versions are MKS lex&yacc from MKS
in Waterloo Ont., [phone], http://www.mks.com or [e-mail],
and PCYACC from Abraxas Software in Portland OR, [phone].  Both
include both yacc and lex along with a lot of sample code.

The standard flex source compiles under the usual DOS compilers, although
you may want to make some of the buffers smaller.  A DOS version of Bison
is on wuarchive.wustl.edu [128.252.135.4] and other servers under
SimTel/msdos/pgmutil/bison111.zip. See message 92-07-012 for more info.

* Are there C++ versions of yacc and lex?

flexx++ and bison++ can be found at:

ftp://ftp.th-darmstadt.de/pub/programming/languages/C++/tools/flex++bison++/

* What other compilers and tools are freely available?

There is a five-part FAQ posting in comp.compilers and other groups listing
compiler tools freely available in source form, maintained by Steve
Robenalt <[e-mail]>.  It is posted monthly,
usually right after this message.  There's a nice webified version at          |
http://www.idiom.com/free-compilers, and you can retrieve the text             |
version from ftp://ftp.idiom.com/pub/compilers-list/free-compilers.  The       |
list is not updated very often; if you think it should be updated more         |
frequently, feel free to drop them a note and offer to help with the work.     |

Also visit the web page http://www.first.gmd.de/cogent/catalog/ which includes
pointers to a variety of compiler tools and resources.

* How can I get started with yacc and lex and compiler writing in general?

There are short on-line tutorials for lex and yacc at
http://www.ee.ic.ac.uk/course/advanced/intro.html.

Or read any of the many books on the topic.  Here are a few of them.
Also see message 93-01-155 which reviews many compiler textbooks.

Aho, Sethi, and Ullman, "Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools,"
Addison Wesley, 1986, ISBN 0-201-10088-6, the "dragon book".

Describes clearly and completely lexing and parsing techniques including
the ones in yacc and lex.  The authors work or have worked at Bell Labs
with Steve Johnson and Mike Lesk, the authors of Yacc and Lex.

Alan Holub, "Compiler Design in C," Prentice-Hall, 1990, ISBN
0-13-155045-4.

A large book containing the complete source code to a reimplementation of
yacc and lex and a C compiler.  Quite well written, too, though it has a
lot of errors.  The fourth printing is supposed to correct most of them.
An errata list is in message 90-06-081, and a newer on in PDF (yuck) on        |
his web site at <http://www.holub.com>.                                        |

John R. Levine (that's me), Tony Mason, and Doug Brown, ``Lex & Yacc,''
2nd Edition, O'Reilly and Associates, 1992, ISBN 1-56592-000-7, $29.95.

A concise introduction with completely worked out examples and an
extensive reference section.  The new edition is completely revised from
the earlier 1990 edition.  Source code can be FTP'ed from ftp.ora.com.

Donnely and Stallman, "The Bison Manual," part of the on-line distrubution
of the FSF's Bison, a reimplementation of yacc.  As with everything else from
the FSF, full source code is included.

Axel T. Schreiner and H. George Friedman, Jr., "Introduction to Compiler
Construction with UNIX," Prentice-Hall, 1985.

Oriented to tutorial work.  Good for beginners.  Develops a small
subset-of-C compiler through the book.  (Recommended by Eric Hughes
<[e-mail]>.)  Richard Hash <[e-mail]> comments that
the book has many typographical errors, and readers should be suspicious
of the examples until they actually try them.  Richard Y. Kim
<[e-mail]> reports that sources are available for FTP as
a.cs.uiuc.edu:pub/friedman/tar.

Bennett, J.P. "Introduction to Compiling Techniques - A First Course Using
Ansi C, Lex and Yacc," McGraw Hill Book Co, 1990, ISBN 0-07-707215-4.

It's intended for a first course in modern compiler techniques, is very
clearly written, and has a full chapter on YACC.  I found it to be a good
introductory text before getting into the 'Dragon book'.  (Recommended by
John Merlin <[e-mail]>.)  Source code is available
at ftp.bath.ac.uk.

Charles N. Fischer & Richard J. LeBlanc, "Crafting A Compiler", Benjamin
Cummings Publishing, Menlo Park, CA, 1988, ISBN 0-8053-3201-4.  There's
also a revised version as of 1990 or 1991 titled "Crafting A Compiler in
C", with all examples in C (the original used ADA/CS).  The tools are at
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~fischer/ftp/tools/

Erich Nahum <[e-mail]> writes: A key compiler reference.  We
used the original to great effect in Eliot Moss' graduate compiler
construction class here at UMass.  My feeling is that Fischer & LeBlanc is
a good tutorial, and one should use Aho, Sethi, & Ullman as a reference.

Des Watson, "High-Level Languages and Their Compilers," International
Computer Science Series, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Wokingham
England, 1989.

Adrian Howard <[e-mail]> writes: This is the kindest,
most readable introduction to compilers at the graduate level I have ever
read - an excellent example of what textbooks should all be like.

W.M. Waite and G. Goos, "Compiler Construction," Springer-Verlag, New
York, 1984.

Dick Grune <[e-mail]> writes: A theoretical approach to compiler
construction. Refreshing in that it gives a completely new view of many
subjects. Heavy reading, high information density.

J.P. Tremblay and P.G. Sorenson, "The Theory and Practice of Compiler
Writing," McGraw-Hill, 1985.

Dick Grune <[e-mail]> writes: Extensive and detailed. Heavy reading.
To be consulted when other sources fail.

James E. Hendrix, "The Small-C Compiler", 2nd ed., M&T Books, ISBN
0-934375-88-7 <Book Alone>, 1-55851-007-9 <MS-DOS Disk>, 0-934375-97-6
<Book and Disk>.

William Jhun <[e-mail]> writes: It explaines the C-language is
thorough....and explains every single aspect of the compiler. The book
compares source code to p-code to assembly. It goes over a nice set of
optimization routines, explains the parser, the back end, and even
includes source code, which the compiler on the disk can actually compile
itself. It's an extremely interesting book, check it out. (Out of print.)

Ronald Mak, "Writing Compilers and Interpreters: An Applied Approach",
1991, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-50968-X.

Andrew Tucker <[e-mail]> writes: This 512-page book presents
a strictly hands on approach, developing a Pascal interpreter and
interactive debugger, then completing with a compiler which emits 8086
assembly.  All source code is provided in print and on disk.  This book is
very low to non-existent in theoretical content, but is very practical and
readable for an introduction.  Taylor Hutt <[e-mail]>
comments that the book is a piece of junk.  The code that is contained in
the book is full of bugs, and the code that it generates will not work.

"The Art of Compiler Design", Thomas Pittman & James Peters, Prentice-Hall
International, 1992, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632, 0-13-046160-1

Franklin L. Vermeulen <[e-mail]> writes: This is a very
nicely written and straightforward text on compiler construction.  There
is a certain (unavoidable?) amount of overlap with a course on automata
(as in Aho, Sethi and Ullman).  It is based on Modula-2 and on an
experimental tool, the TAG compiler-compiler (Transformational Attribute
Grammar) which seems to be a C-independent superset of lex/yacc, because
its syntax allows you to specify all semantic actions without a single
line of C-code (or any other implementation language, for that matter).

A. Pyster, "Compiler Design and Constuction (Tools and Techniques)",
Second Ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold, ISBN: 0-442-27536-6.

Gabriela O. de Vivo <[e-mail]> writes: The book covers the
general principles of compiler design and presents a good number of
examples focusing on the building of pieceparts of compilers for C and
Pascal.  The implementation (construction) language is C.  Note that this
edition (in contrast with the previous one) is very related to the Unix
world, including the use of tools like Lex, Yacc, and standard utilities.
(Out of print.)

Thomas W. Parsons, "Introduction to compiler construction",
Computer Science Press, c1992, ISBN: 0-716782618.

Quinn Tyler Jackson <[e-mail]> writes: Provides a broad overview
of the topics of finite state automaton theory (deterministic and
non-deterministic), lexical analysis, parsing models, and target generation
and optimization strategies.  Includes appendices on lex and yacc.  Most
examples in Pascal.  (Recommended reading for the faint at heart.)

"Programming a Personal Computer" by Per Brinch Hansen
Prentice-Hall 1982 ISBN 0-13-730283-5

Joe Snyder <[e-mail]> writes:  This unfortunately-titled book
explains the design and creation of a single-user programming environment
for micros, using a Pascal-like language called Edison.  The author presents
all source code and explanations for the step-by-step implementation of an
Edison compiler and simple supporting operating system, all written in
Edison itself (except for a small supporting kernel written in a symbolic
assembler for PDP 11/23; the complete source can also be ordered for the IBM
PC).

The most interesting things about this book are:  1) its ability to
demonstrate how to create a complete, self-contained, self-maintaining,
useful compiler and operating system, and 2) the interesting discussion of
language design and specification problems and trade-offs in Chapter 2.


"Brinch Hansen on Pascal Compilers" by Per Brinch Hansen
Prentice-Hall 1985 ISBN 0-13-083098-4

Joe Snyder <[e-mail]> writes:  Another light-on-theory
heavy-on-pragmatics here's-how-to-code-it book.  The author presents the
design, implementation, and complete source code for a compiler and p-code
interpreter for Pascal- (Pascal "minus"), a Pascal subset with boolean and
integer types (but no characters, reals, subranged or enumerated types),
constant and variable definitions and array and record types (but no packed,
variant, set, pointer, nameless, renamed, or file types), expressions,
assignment statements, nested procedure definitions with value and variable
parameters, if statements, while statements, and begin-end blocks (but no
function definitions, procedural parameters, goto statements and labels,
case statements, repeat statements, for statements, and with statements).

The compiler and interpreter are written in Pascal* (Pascal "star"), a
Pascal subset extended with some Edison-style features for creating
software development systems.  A Pascal* compiler for the IBM PC is sold by
the author, but it's easy to port the book's Pascal- compiler to any
convenient Pascal platform.

This book makes the design and implementation of a compiler look easy.  I
particularly like the way the author is concerned with quality,
reliability, and testing.  The compiler and interpreter can easily be used
as the basis for a more involved language or compiler project, especially
if you're pressed to quickly get something up and running.


"A Model Implementation of Standard Pascal" by Jim Welsh & Atholl Hay
Prentice-Hall 1986 ISBN 0-13-586454-2

Joe Snyder <[e-mail]> writes:  This book is only really useful
if you need to implement a COMPLETE version of a platform-independent
Pascal, but I find it interesting because the 483 pages consist entirely of
the source code listing for the compiler and p-code interpreter, including
copious {comments} to explain the code.  The code eagerly delves into the
horrible minutiae necessary when implementing a complete language, and proves
that no language designer should be allowed to present his design until
AFTER being forced to write a complete compiler for the language.

"Writing Interactive Compilers and Interpreters" bu P.J. Brown, 1979, John
Wiley & Sons Ltd ISBN 0 471 27609 X hbk ISBN 0471 100722 pbk

Martin Rodgers <[e-mail]> writes: Brown explains
why we might wish to use an interactive compiler, and what we might mean
when we make distinctions like "compiled" and "interpreted". He uses Basic
as the example language for his book, plus a little pseudo code where
necessary. Modern Basic may be very different to what he used, but it's
easy to see how techniques that apply a line oriented language might be
extended to a larger unit of compilation. Brown discusses issues that are
specific to interactive language systems, which may be neglected in
compiler books that focus more on a batch approach and optimised
code. Still, he has a few things to say about the use of bytecodes and
native code, plus what might today be called "Just In Time" compiling. An
excellent introduction to compilers, with a few ideas for advanced
compilers, too.  (Out of print.)

If anyone sends in others, I'll be happy to add them to the list.

* Where can I FTP the sources to the programs in Holub's "Compiler
Design in C" or Mak's "Writing Compilers and Interpreters" ?

The programs inMak's second edition are at
<ftp://ftp.wiley.com/public/computer_books/Software_Development/Mak-Writing_Compilers/> |
in an odd MS-DOS only format.  Holub's code is shareware, available on         |
his web site at <http://www.holub.com>.                                        |

* Where can I learn about garbage collection ?

Garbage collection (more properly, automatic storage management) has its own
mailing list and FAQ.  Find more info at:

http://iecc.com/gclist/

To join the list, send "subscribe gclist" to [e-mail].

Regards,
John Levine, comp.compilers moderator
--
Send compilers articles to [e-mail],
meta-mail to [e-mail].