home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: owner-klr650-digest@lists.xmission.com (klr650-digest)
- To: klr650-digest@lists.xmission.com
- Subject: klr650-digest V1 #397
- Reply-To: klr650@lists.xmission.com
- Sender: owner-klr650-digest@lists.xmission.com
- Errors-To: owner-klr650-digest@lists.xmission.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
- klr650-digest Monday, December 7 1998 Volume 01 : Number 397
-
-
-
-
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 21:06:42 -0800
- From: phipps@bulldog.prn.bc.ca (Allan Phipps)
- Subject: (klr650) Thanks!!
-
- As a novice KLR owner, I really appreciate all the great advice you all
- have given me over the last few weeks. Thanks!!
-
- Al
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 23:05:24 EST
- From: alyef@juno.com (Alex Yefimov)
- Subject: (klr650) (KLR):Slow Speeds
-
- It seem that my KLR is very "jerky" at 25mph and below. This seems to be
- independent of the gear I am in. When I get it up to 35mph the ride
- smooths out. Is this a feature of the KLR or is there something not quite
- right? Could it be that the chain needs lubing? The bike was not ridden
- for 6 months before I bought it Friday. I have not had a chance to lube
- the chain.
-
- Alex
- A11 - San Jose
-
-
- ___________________________________________________________________
- You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
- Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
- or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 21:05:37 -0700
- From: "Kurt Simpson" <ajax@xmission.com>
- Subject: Re: (klr650) Front End stuff from archives...
-
- - -----Original Message-----
- From: LPetty4585@aol.com <LPetty4585@aol.com>
- To: ajax@xmission.com <ajax@xmission.com>; tuca@tampabay.rr.com
- <tuca@tampabay.rr.com>; klr650@lists.xmission.com <klr650@lists.xmission.com>
- Date: Monday, December 07, 1998 5:39 PM
- Subject: Re: (klr650) Front End update
-
-
- >I am doing the same upgrade, the trick is removing the inner fork leg to
- >remove and install the fork seals, finally took them to the dealer to install
- >the seals the progresive springs are a snap to install , just followed the
- >procedures posted. I have a question on spacer length, progessive states to
- >make them 4.5 inches unless you want longer, question is I am 250 lbs plus
- >gear, should I leave them at 5 inches or cut them to 4.5 inches. Enjoy the
- >list serve greatly as it has saved me from many mistakes on what or not to do.
- >Live in near South Padre Island, Texas ( Brownsville) if any one is off to
- >Mexico through here stop by for a chat. (Not many KLR's in South Texas.)
- >Larry
- >
-
- More archive posts on spacers:
- __________________________________
-
- Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 13:42:01 -0600
- From: Kurt Simpson <ajax@xmission.com>
- Subject: (klr650) Fork spacers...
-
- >While we're on the subject of forks, can someone tell me the length of the
- >preload spacers in the stock KLR forks, and the length of ones you use with
- >the Progressive springs? I
- >
- >thanks,
- >jim
-
- The stock KLR650 spacers are 5 1/2 inches and Progressive calls for 4 1/2
- inches with the install...1 inch less. BTW, They call for 5 inches on the
- KLR600 but I don't know the stock KLR600 length.
-
- Kurt
-
- ______________________
-
- Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 18:59:51 -0400
- From: "Rick Clarke" <rpclarke@pop.mindspring.com>
- Subject: Re: (klr650) Fork Spacers
-
- > A shorter spacer will reduce preload on your fork springs which (assuming
- > they are not linear springs) will make them feel softer. Using a shorter
- > spacer with the progressive spring kit simply makes up for the fact the
- > progressive springs are longer than the stock Kawasaki parts. Otherwise
- > you'd be adding an inch of preload to them that was not externally
- > adjustable making them significantly stiffer.
-
- Baloney. Shortening or lengthening the spacer changes the ride
- height, not the spring rate. Any change in stiffness will only be due
- to the different air volume at that particular height.
-
- When you get on the bike, the spring will compress the same distance
- regardless of the spacer length. You want the fork to compress about
- 3" (1/3 of the 9" travel) from full extension with the bike fully
- loaded. If it compresses further than that, make the spacer longer by
- the amount the fork is overcompressed.
-
- It's simple physics. It's surprising how many people don't understand
- it. If you are balancing on top of a spring, it doesn't matter if you
- are wearing sandals or platform shoes, the spring rate is the same.
- Keep in mind the spring preload keeps the spring compressed when the
- weight is removed from the bike. With the weight of the rider and
- bike, the suspension floats.
-
- - - -Rick
-
- R.P.Clarke (rpclarke@mindspring.com)
- "What traffic?"
- RTP, NC, USA DoD#5811
-
- ___________________________
- Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 18:08:47 -0600
- From: "Vikram Banerjee" <marbach@nucleus.com>
- Subject: Re: (klr650) Fork Spacers
-
- - - ----------
- > From: Jeffrey L. Walker <jlwalk@u.washington.edu>
- > To: Rick Clarke <rpclarke@pop.mindspring.com>; klr650@lists.xmission.com
- > Subject: Re: (klr650) Fork Spacers
- > Date: Monday, May 25, 1998 5:54 PM
- > Where I am confused is in the meaning of "progressive springs" All
- springs
- > require a progressively greater force to compress (or lengthen) them past
- > equilibrium. By progressive, do the manufacturers mean that the spring
- > constant, k, is in fact not a constant, and increases with the
- displacement
- > past equilibrium?
-
- My understanding of progressive springs are springs with more than one
- spring rate (k). The advantage is you can have a soft initial spring rate
- for comfy riding and a stiffer spring rate deeper into the compression for
- big hits. If you preload a spring like this you compress part or all of
- the soft initial spring travel resulting in a stiffer fork.
-
- I do want to clarify something. If you compress a constant rate (linear)
- spring, say 1/10 its total length, it should not feel any stiffer when you
- compress the next 1/10th or the next 1/10th as the spring rate remains
- constant. I sthis correct?
-
- Cheers,
-
- Vik
- _______________________
- Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 17:58:16 -0600
- From: "Vikram Banerjee" <marbach@nucleus.com>
- Subject: Re: (klr650) Fork Spacers
-
- - - ----------
- > From: Rick Clarke <rpclarke@pop.mindspring.com>
- > To: klr650@lists.xmission.com
- > Subject: Re: (klr650) Fork Spacers
- > Date: Monday, May 25, 1998 4:59 PM
- >
- >
- > > A shorter spacer will reduce preload on your fork springs which
- (assuming
- > > they are not linear springs) will make them feel softer. Using a
- shorter
- > > spacer with the progressive spring kit simply makes up for the fact the
- > > progressive springs are longer than the stock Kawasaki parts.
- Otherwise
- > > you'd be adding an inch of preload to them that was not externally
- > > adjustable making them significantly stiffer.
- >
- > Baloney. Shortening or lengthening the spacer changes the ride
- > height, not the spring rate. Any change in stiffness will only be due
- > to the different air volume at that particular height.
-
- If you note I said assuming the spring is not a linear spring which means
- it has to be a multi-rate spring. Typical multi-rate springs used in bikes
- have two or three spring rates each progressively stiffer than the next.
- As you apply preload to this spring you compress the softest portion. The
- result is when you get on the bike and hit a bump you have less travel from
- that soft rate spring and start compressing the next stiffer rate portion
- of the spring - the fork is less plush.
-
- If you had a linear rate spring I would agree with you. As you compress a
- linear rate spring the stiffness does not change you just shorten the
- spring length. As far as air volume goes I am not sure that makes any
- difference. I think it is the air pressure of the air in the fork that
- matters, but I am not sure about that.
-
- Now as far as baloney or other luch meats affecting the fork I suppose it
- could, but you'd have to eat an awful lot to see a real difference.
-
- _________________
- Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 16:54:03 -0700
- From: "Jeffrey L. Walker" <jlwalk@u.washington.edu>
- Subject: Re: (klr650) Fork Spacers
-
- I think that you are both partially right. The force of a spring, F, is
- equal to the minus the spring constant, k, (which is determined by the
- physical properties of the spring) times the amount that the spring is
- displaced from equilibrium, X. Thus: F = -(kX). This implies that the more
- the spring is displaced from equilibrium, i.e. using a longer spacer, the
- more force will be exerted by the spring, and thus the "stiffer" the forks
- will feel. This has a direct affect on the ride height, as the ride height
- is determined by the balance between the force of gravity acting on the bike
- and rider combined, and the force due to the fork springs upward. The act
- of the forks lengthening is due to the force of the springs. This motion is
- opposed not only my the force of gravity, but by the hydraulic mechanisms in
- the fork. These hydraulics dampen the fork's motion. Without them,
- neglecting friction, the forks would bounce up and down forever, which is
- why the oil weight and volume are so important, as these determine the
- dampening action of the forks. The volume of air in the top of the forks
- above the oil is compressible, and thus also acts like a spring, with the
- exception that the gas would expand to infinity if given the chance, in a
- vacuum. Thus pressurizing the forks will add more spring force to the
- shocks.
-
- Where I am confused is in the meaning of "progressive springs" All springs
- require a progressively greater force to compress (or lengthen) them past
- equilibrium. By progressive, do the manufacturers mean that the spring
- constant, k, is in fact not a constant, and increases with the displacement
- past equilibrium?
-
- Jeff
-
- ________________
-
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 09:18:08 EDT
- From: <K650dsn@aol.com>
- Subject: Re: (klr650) Progressive fork spring oil level
-
- In a message dated 98-06-19 03:47:38 EDT, jlwalk@u.washington.edu writes:
-
- << Or, was this
- noted, but 5.5 inches works better than 6.7 inches? If the progressive
- spring displaces more oil than the stock spring, and the manual calls for
- 6.7 inches originally, then the difference in oil volume between stock
- springs and level, and Progressive springs and 5.5 inches is quite a lot. >>
-
- I have the 5.5" level in my forks and they feel pretty good, maybe a bit on
- the stiff side. I think the answer is at least to 6.7" level but not more
- than 5.5". I will be installing the small progressive springs that replace
- the preload spacer and will report on those in a week or so.
-
- Gino
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 21:09:21 -0700
- From: "Kurt Simpson" <ajax@xmission.com>
- Subject: Re: (klr650) I'm heeeere (NKLR)
-
- ><< doesn`t know what austere means, but it sounds
- >
- > good >>
- >
- >It's either a part of human anatomy or something that goes in a carburetor. I
- >think.
- >
- >Gino
-
-
- Sorry Skip, a guy like Gino who gets a new (or used) bike about as often as I
- get a six-pack is not austere...
-
- Kurt
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 20:28:04 -0800 (PST)
- From: KLR650@webtv.net (Conall O'Brien)
- Subject: (klr650) No Cal KLR Weekend+Super TT
-
- Tough decision- SF ,CA show dec11-13 or final race of the SuperTT at
- buttonwillow Dec.13th? I'm thinking about doing both.
- http://www.motorcycleshows.com/sf.cfm
- http://members.aolcom/CW1Canet/SuperTT.html .Since Buttonwllow is about
- the half-way point between No and SoCal, think we have time to organize
- a statewide meeting in Buttonwillow on Sunday? Hiro?
-
- Conall --DIGEST
- Fremont CA.
- klr650@webtv.net
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 21:39:41 EST
- From: SFBREIZH@aol.com
- Subject: (klr650) (no subject)
-
- Yes,it"s the bike of Jim the father!!!!!!
- On the list today,Paul Christenson is talking about a listers gathering for
- the moto
- show this W.E
- What do you think????
- sfbreizh@aol.com
- guy
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 20:40:24 -0800 (PST)
- From: KLR650@webtv.net (Conall O'Brien)
- Subject: (klr650) klr650 re:Jerky under 35 mph
-
- Alex-
- Glad you finally bought a KLR!
- Check your chain tension, with the suspension loaded down with your
- normal riding weight. Sounds like the tension of the chain may not be
- right. A good lube wouldn't hurt either. I keep my chain slack 1 1/2
- inches to 2 inches peak to peak measurement while I sit on the bike.
- Dirt bikes (and KLR's ) have so much travel in the rear suspension, that
- the chain tension varies with the load on the bike.
- It is very important not to have the chain too tight,better to be on the
- loose side as long as your chain and sprockets are good.
-
- Conall --DIGEST
- Fremont CA.
- klr650@webtv.net
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 20:46:58 -0800 (PST)
- From: KLR650@webtv.net (Conall O'Brien)
- Subject: (klr650) NKLR :SuperTT URL
-
- Whoops- Correct URL is
- http://members.aol.com/CW1Canet/SuperTT.html for this weekends race.
-
- Conall --DIGEST
- Fremont CA.
- klr650@webtv.net
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 00:06:25 -0500
- From: Steve Rottenberg <tuca@tampabay.rr.com>
- Subject: Re: (klr650) Thanks!!
-
- Ehem ... that'll be $5. :)
- Please make a direct deposit at National Bank of Tampa C/O KLR SmartAss
- Listers acct 12-3456-789101112.
- Thanks a lot for your cooperation.
-
-
- Allan Phipps wrote:
- >As a novice KLR owner, I really appreciate all the great advice you all
- >have given me over the last few weeks. Thanks!!
- >
- >Al
-
- Steve in Tampa (Asking himself if his wittiness comes from the brits of
- the Bandit list also)
- 98 B12
- 95 KLR 650 A9
-
-
- Steve Rottenberg
- Tuca en IRC (Undernet)
- Email: tuca@tampabay.rr.com
- Don't take life so seriously ... it's not permanent.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 22:18:50 -0700
- From: "skip faulkner" <msfaul@digisys.net>
- Subject: Re: (klr650) no ice studs
-
- >> I might as well do something 2-wheel oriented, since I can`t ride my
- bike
- >>now, due to the #*&%*# ice all over the roads now, and my lovely SO has
- >>banned the ice studs this year (had too many close calls winter before
- last,
- >>cars slid into me on two occasions)
- >>and I was all ready to install them. So, Seattle it is.
- >>
- >> Skip (No studs for me, none for her)
- >>
- >>
- >I have been thinking of installing studs for when the roads get slick. What
- >kind of studs did you use in what tires how install etc, etc.
- >Thanks Alan Henderson, Iowa A13
-
-
- Alan,
- I`ve used two styles, depending on amount of dry asphalt you`ll be on.
- I presently use a Bridgestone TW40R rear tire and a TW39F front tire,
- from an NX650 I had. I`ve used sheetmetal screws with a 1/4" raised hex head
- that has sharp raised edges. I used to find them at hardware stores in
- high-grade steel and they held up pretty good. I see Dennis Kirk sells them
- for ATV tires . The trick is to work up to the number and spacing that is
- not to aggressive for asphalt ( rough ride) but not to few so as to rip them
- out.
- The others I`ve tried, but take longer to install, (once in, I leave them
- in the tire for good) are carbide snowcat studs. I`ve been buying them from
- Dennis Kirk, but they all have to be ground down, because they are to long
- for occasional asphalt and hard ice use. I prefer to start with 3/16" and
- periodically keep them sharp with a file. When you install them on the tire,
- place a tire patch over the backing plate of each one, it will help prevent
- the tube from being rubbed.
- Remember, depending on the number and lengths you use, you can`t drive
- like you normally do. In most cases, if you`re not careful, the traction is
- so good, you`ll spin the wheel in the tire and shear the valve stem. Stay
- away from the front brake until you get some practice in the process of
- braking. If you bottom out, you`ll either eat up your fender or your tire
- will lock up, or both.
- The main thing to remember is that you can stop much better than a car
- and take icy curves better, but the danger is that the boxes can`t stop as
- well. Winter before last, I was run into on two occasions. The first time I
- was sitting at a stop light and was rear-ended. The second, a car slid
- through a stop sign and clipped my rear tire. Both times I came out ok, but
- had I not been vigilant and aware of my vulnerability, I could have easily
- been e-mailing this from above, ( yes, I plan on taking my A9 with me when I
- go).
- So if you are going to experiment with the spikes or screws, go easy and
- be careful. You think cars don`t look for motorcycles under normal
- circumstances, wait till you`re riding in traffic with them on ice and
- snowpacked roads. When they do see you, they`ll do a double take. Doing this
- is very dangerous even under the best of conditions and I don`t recommend
- it, but if you insist on doing it, remember the odds are against you if you
- are going to share the road with a car. I recommend staying offroad with the
- spikes. It`s really a blast tooling up a trail with a foot of snow and
- you`ve got traction like a cat.
- Be safe.
-
- Skip (who`s wife thinks his life is more important than
- having fun. Gimme a break
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of klr650-digest V1 #397
- ****************************
-
-