hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 23:23:22 -0500
From: John Kramer <kramer@kramerize.com>
Subject: Re: MtMan-List: Patriot! w/ 2 detours and 411 request
T'was a nobler age when you could give such rapscallions the choice of=20
pistols or swords at dawn.
John...
At 05:17 PM 7/3/00 -0400, you wrote:
> Do you think it's wrong to use more than civil requests on the uncivil=
and
>hostile
> members in society?
>
>***********************
John T. Kramer, maker of:=A0
Kramer's Best Antique Improver
>>>It makes wood wonderful<<<
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 >>>As good as old!<<<
<http://www.kramerize.com/>
mail to: <kramer@kramerize.com>
- ----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 04:13:25 EDT
From: Hawkengun@aol.com
Subject: Re: MtMan-List: When dit it end?
But the purpose of my post was to question the long-held idea espoused by
Hafen, Chittenden and others that the fur-trade era "ended" in the 1840s. It
sounds like scholars such as James Hanson have also been questioning that
long-held assumption, and I figured it might be interesting to hear what some
or you all think about it.
I figured that some would confuse the concept of the "historical era" with
the period chosen for reenacting. And that is understandable since this is a
reenactors' list.
What most historians try to keep in sight is the idea that eras are always
(ultimately) arbitrary and subject to question. Thought that the notion of
the "fur-trade era" is due for some reassessment, although I'm not arguing
that your reenactment criteria should change.
jr sweet
- ----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
------------------------------
Date: 4 Jul 2000 06:49:39 -0700
From: Buck Conner <buck.conner@uswestmail.net>
Subject: Re: MtMan-List: Flint doubles
On Sun, 02 July 2000, John Kramer wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, 30 June 2000, Concho Smith wrote:
> > > John,
> > > Not only does Buck have a nice original flint side by side made by TWIGG in 16ga., he has a nice repro of a West Richards flint side by side in 20ga. I........
The two side by side flinters that Concho mentioned are keepers for now (you know how that goes), just picked up another side by side flint, Russ Hamn locks, 20ga., walnut wood, pretty plain - no checkering, very good to excellent cond. - good working gun. Before considering anything would like to take it out and see what it will do, pattern, etc. I'll let you know what I decide.
Over the years I've had "real keepers", that where traded for other "really good keepers", and somehow they just slipped away - like horse tradin'.