home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: (fractint) FOTD 01-12-01 (Fractal Activity [6]) Date: 01 Dec 2001 10:01:36 EST FOTD -- December 01, 2001 (Rating 6) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: The hectic activity that fills today's image inspires the name "Fractal Activity". Fragments of all shape and size swirl about in a hazy atmosphere, with a small mis-shapen midget at the center holding it all together. Several long, thin elements lend a vaguely sinister air to the whole scene. The formula Z^1.65+C generates the parent fractal, which at a level 130.5 turns up the logarithmic spiral, generates a roughly Mandeloid-shaped bay with a large area of extended chaos on the south shore, a large irregular bud on the north shore, and a smaller bud on the east shore. Today's scene is located in the north valley of the smaller east bud. The overall bluish cast of the color palette creates the hazy atmospheric effect of the scene, which rates an above average 6, though it falls short of the exceptional quality that would rate a 7 or above. The render time of 22 minutes is a bit slow, but the resulting impatience can be eliminated by downloading the completed GIF image file from the W.W.Web at the URL: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> or at: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> But give Paul and Scott a chance to render and post the image before going for the download. The fractal weather Friday here at Fractal Central was once again unpleasant for cats who like to romp outdoors in warm dry conditions. With a temperature of 71F 21.5C, it was warm enough, but the heavy clouds and occasional light rain made it just too wet for outdoor comfort for cats. We've come to the end of another FOTD, and once again I failed to philosophize. I've got a little work to finish and lots of philosophizing to do before I settle down to search for the next fractal -- the fractal that will appear as the FOTD for December 2. So until the next time arrives, take lots of care, and what ever happened to Jay Hill and Doctor J? Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ Fractal_Activity { ; time=0:22:32.42--SF5 on a p200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotBC1 function=floor passes=b center-mag=+0.65286110698497920/-0.024041329736378\ 53/130712.4/1/-82.5/3.26681515172566606e-010 params=1.65/0/130.5/0 float=y maxiter=30000 inside=255 logmap=485 colors=000C1QC1QGATLDXPJ_TMaYPdaTgfXjj`modpskrvqsz\ uuzxvzzxzyxzxyzvzxvzsszoozjlzdiz`fzXazS_zOXzJVzFTz\ GRzGQyIPyIOyJNyJMyLLyLKyLKyLKyLKyLKyLKyLKyLKyLKyLK\ yLKxLKwLKvLKuLKtLKsIKqGKoDKmCKk9Ki7Kg6Ke4Kc1Ka0K_0\ KY0KW0KU0JS0GQ0DQ0IQ6LSDOUMS0TV0aY0i`0gY0gV0fS0fP0\ fM3dJ6dG9cDCcAFc7Ia4La1Oa0Pc6VdC_fGdgMiiQojXslaymf\ zolzojzzcovgQvgPvgOvgMvgLvgJygIxgGzfFxdDviCumAspAo\ oFjmJglOclS`jXXi`SgdPgiLfmIdrDcvAcyDfyGgyJiyMjyOly\ QoyTpyXry_sy`uycxyfyyizylzymzyyzizzTzzSxxQrvQlsPdp\ O_oOTlMOjMQiQTiTXiX_i_aicdifgiiiillgpogsrgvugyxgzz\ gzzgzzgzvjzmlzdozXpzOszFuz6xz0yz1vz3sz6pz7oyAlvCis\ DgpIirLjsPjuSlvXlv_mxcmyfozjozmpzrpzurzyrzzszzszzu\ zzuzzuyzuvyvuxvrxvovvluvisxgsxdrxapx_pxYLxX0xX0ya0\ zg0zl0zr0zv3zz4zz3zz3zz3zy3zv3zu1zr1zp1zm1zj1zi0zf\ 0zd0za0z`0zY0zXczvizxmzyszzxzzzzozzczzSzzIzzJxzJsz\ LpzLlzLvzyozvizsczpYzo000 } frm:MandelbrotBC1 { ; by several Fractint users e=p1, a=imag(p2)+100 p=real(p2)+PI q=2*PI*fn1(p/(2*PI)) r=real(p2)-q Z=C=Pixel: Z=log(Z) IF(imag(Z)>r) Z=Z+flip(2*PI) ENDIF Z=exp(e*(Z+flip(q)))+C |Z|<a } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: (fractint) FOTD 02-12-01 (Mandelbrot Billows [5]) Date: 02 Dec 2001 09:44:37 EST FOTD -- December 02, 2001 (Rating 5) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: For today's fractal we once again break out the MandelbrotBC1 formula. This time we draw the Z^1.6+C Mandeloid fractal as it appears 131 levels up the logarithmic spiral. At this lofty height the fractal appears as a large open area broken by several spectacular discontinuities. Many small protobuds line the southern shore, which is marked by an area of chaos that extends far inland, constantly trying to organize itself into well-defined filaments as it dies out, but never quite succeeding. Many tiny midgets lie in this chaotic area. Today's scene, with its even tinier midget, lies in the suburbs of one of these tiny midgets. When I first saw today's image, I didn't know quite what to make of it. Eventually, the impression of billowing clouds of smoke came to mind, and I named it "Mandelbrot Billows". I'm not quite satisfied with the colors. Dark blue would give a better impression of billowing smoke clouds than the present dark green. Yet the image has a kind of uniqueness that made me decide to leave it untouched. As a result, I can rate the image at no more than a 5, a rating that is average. But don't be disappointed -- even an average fractal is well worth a look. To have that look at today's fractal, one may run the attached parameter file and wait 25 minutes, or give Paul and Scott a chance to render and post the image and download it from one of their web sites. The URL of Paul's site is: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> Scott's site can be found at: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> The fractal weather Saturday featured sunny skies, light winds, and a balmy temperature of 73F 23C. It was absolutely perfect for the fractal cats, who were in and out all day. But since we normally see ice at this time of year, some local cold weather lovers are beginning to ask where winter is. And of course, those who enjoy having something to worry about are once again fearful that it is the beginning of the global warming that will eventually end life on earth. As for myself -- I see nothing more apocalyptic than an unusually warm and pleasant Autumn in the local area. Regardless of the import of the mildness, it's another perfect day, it's not yet 10am, and the cats are already worrying me to let them out. When the fractal cats want to be outdoors, they had better be let out, or else they become most annoying. So I'm off to open the door. Until next time, take care, and what ever happened to the 'nuclear winter' crisis? Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ Mandelbrot_Billows { ; time=0:25:21.65--SF5 on a P200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotBC1 function=floor passes=1 center-mag=+0.29929135794286550/-1.244993106283451\ 00/1039074/1/-142.5/2.06540170383240351e-009 params=1.6/0/131/0 float=y maxiter=10000 inside=0 logmap=-655 colors=000725825A47B58D7AE8BDADBBEADG8EH7GI5HK4HK2\ HK1IK0IK0II0II0KI0KI0KI0KH0LH0LH0LH0LH0LH0NI0OK0OK\ 0QL0RL0RN1TN4VO7VO8WQBYREYRHZTI`TL`VOaVQcWTcWWdYYd\ YdcVjaTraRx`QzZOzZNzorzlpzioxgmudlrcjo`imZgjWegVdd\ RcaQaZN`YLZVIYRHWOEVLDTIARH8QGBOGENEHNEKLENKDQKDTI\ DWHBZHBaGBcGAeEAiD8lD8oB8rA7uA7x87z75z75z55z5Gz4Qz\ 2Zz1iz0rz0pz0oz0oz0mz0lz0lz0jz0iz0iz0gz0ez0ez0dz0c\ z0cz0az0`z0`z0Zz0Zz0`z0`z2`z7`zB`zGazKazOazTazYaza\ czeczjczocztczwczwczwaztazpazm`zj`zg`zdZzaZzZZzWYz\ TYzQYzNYzKHzl1zzDzzNzzYzugzorzjtzguzduzawzZwzWxzTx\ zQzzNzzKzzHzzGzzDzzAzz7zz4zz1zz0zz0zz0zz0zz0zz0zz0\ zz0xz0uz0rz0pz0mz0jz0iz0ez0cz1`z2Zz2Wz4Tz5Rz5Oz7Lz\ 8Kz8HzAEzBDzBNzGWzIdzNmzQlzRjzTjzTizVgzWgzWezYezZd\ zZcz`czaazaazc`zdZzdZzeYzgYzgazdezajzZmzWrzTwzQzzN\ zzLzzOzzRzzVzzYzzZzzazzdzzgzzizzlzzozzrzztzzwzzzzz\ zzzzzzzzzwzzrzzo2zt4zo5zl } frm:MandelbrotBC1 { ; by several Fractint users e=p1, a=imag(p2)+100 p=real(p2)+PI q=2*PI*fn1(p/(2*PI)) r=real(p2)-q Z=C=Pixel: Z=log(Z) IF(imag(Z)>r) Z=Z+flip(2*PI) ENDIF Z=exp(e*(Z+flip(q)))+C |Z|<a } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "George Priest" <geopriest@raincity.com> Subject: (fractint) fractint documentation Date: 02 Dec 2001 16:18:51 -0800 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C17B4D.0799C220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi: Can anyone tell me what format is used for the fractint.doc file. Is is = MS Word format? If so, what version -- Word 6, 7, 97?? The reason I = ask is because I am having difficulty getting a printable form of = fractint.doc. Thanks George Priest geopriest@raincity.com "But why is it mere talk? Because, my friend, beauty, purity, = respectability, religion, morality, art, patriotism, bravery, and the = rest are nothing but words which I or anyone else can turn inside out = like a glove." GBS, Man & Superman. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C17B4D.0799C220 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3314.2100" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi:</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Can anyone tell me what format is used = for the=20 fractint.doc file. Is is MS Word format? If so, what version = -- Word=20 6, 7, 97?? The reason I ask is because I am having difficulty = getting a=20 printable form of fractint.doc.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><BR>George Priest<BR><A=20 href=3D"mailto:geopriest@raincity.com">geopriest@raincity.com</A></FONT><= /DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>"But why is it mere talk? = Because, my=20 friend, beauty, purity, respectability, religion, morality, art,=20 patriotism, bravery, and the rest are nothing but words which I or = anyone else=20 can turn inside out like a glove." GBS, Man &=20 Superman.<BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C17B4D.0799C220-- Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Paul N. Lee" <Paul.N.Lee@Worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) fractint documentation Date: 02 Dec 2001 23:21:42 -0600 George Priest wrote: > > Can anyone tell me what format is used > for the fractint.doc file. Plain Text. Just use Wordpad or similar document viewer. But if you want the page breaks to be correct, then use MS-Word and edit the file by modifying every occurance of: " Fractint Version 20.02 Page" with the following: "^m Fractint Version 20.02 Page" Sincerely, P.N.L. http://www.fractalus.com/cgi-bin/theway?ring=fractals&id=43&go Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Mark Christenson <mchris@value.net> Subject: (fractint) Web gallery Date: 02 Dec 2001 23:53:00 -0800 After almost eight months in limbo, I am resurrecting the site. Bud's Fractal Pages went off the air in late April because of a change in policy after one in a series of ISP buyouts that left me with only 5 MB of storage. Since I have yet to arrange a new home for my site, I have decided to display one gallery at my current location. It contains 20 new images. You are invited to view them at http://veenet.value.net/~mchris/fractals.htm For the IFL and others, please don't bother to update your links just yet. Now that I have new content, I don't think it will be too long before I take the plunge into a bigger pool. Regards, Bud Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Jim Muth <jamth@mindspring.com> Subject: (fractint) FOTD 03-12-01 (A Vision of Sylphs [3]) Date: 03 Dec 2001 10:41:19 -0500 (EST) FOTD -- December 03, 2001 (Rating 3) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: Today's rather slow image rates only a lowly 3. If I worked on the colors, I could raise it to a 5 or 6, but due to the world news, I just don't have the enthusiasm necessary to work with fractals. I named today's image "A Vision of Sylphs". A sylph is an elemental nature spirit that dwells (or is supposed to dwell) in the air. Having never seen a sylph, I have no idea of their appearance, but some of the elements in today's image give the impression of a swirling dance of atmosphere. This is reason enough to justify the name. The formula of the image is Z^1.55+C, sliced 97 levels up the logarithmic spiral. The render time of 43 minutes is far too long for such a disappointing image. A far better way to see the sylphs is to download the GIF image from the W.W.Web at: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> or at: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> But give Paul and Scott a chance to render and post the image before visiting their sites. The fractal weather Sunday here at Fractal Central turned cloudy and chilly. No rain fell, but the temperature of 52F 11C and lack of warm sun limited the fractal cats' time outdoors to less than an hour. When they can't go out, the cats get hungry, so they spent most of the afternoon indoors, worrying me for more food. Right now I'm worried about some work that should be finished but is not. The best way to finish it is to start. And though I don't feel like doing so, that's what I'm about to do. Until next time, take care, and what is wrong with humanity?. Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ A_Vision_of_Sylphs { ; time=0:43:47.53--SF5 on a P200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotBC1 function=floor passes=1 center-mag=-0.41721734187317930/+0.615018610809023\ 00/31759.23/1/130/4.21363777203254131e-011 params=1.55/0/-97/0 float=y maxiter=10000 inside=0 logmap=575 colors=000NLKLKLILNHLOENQDNR9NQBQRDRTETVGVWHWYIYZK\ Z`L`aOacQadRafTahVaiWakYalZanacoccqdcsfcthcvicxkcy\ lczoczqczscztczvczxczyczzazzczzdzzfzzfzzhzziyzivzk\ tylqyloynlyokyohyqdyscyt`ytZxvWxxVxxRxyOxzNxzKxzIx\ zGyzDxzExzExzGxzGvzGvzHvyHvyHvxItxItvKtvKttKttLssL\ ssLsqNsqNsoOqoOqnOqnQqlQonRqlQqkQskQsiQsiQthQthQtf\ QvdQvdQxcQxcQxaQyaQy`Qy`QzZQzYQzYQzWQzWQzVQzVQzTQz\ RQzRQzQQzQQzOQzOQzNQzLRzNQzOOzQOzRNzTLxTLvVKsWIqYI\ oZHl`Gk`GhaEfcDddDafB`hAYf9ZhAZhA`iA`iA`kAakBalBcl\ BcnBcnBdoDdoDdqDfqDfsDhsEhtEhtEivEivEkxGkxGkyGlyGl\ zGqzAlzGivKfoQckVZd`W`dTViQQoLItIBzGIzEQzDYzBdzAlz\ Atz9tz7tz6tz6tz4tz2tz2tz1tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0t\ z0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0tz0sz1\ qz2oz4oz6nz6nz7nz7nz7lz9lz9lzAlzAkzAkzBkzBkzDkzDiz\ DizEizEizEhzGhzGhzHhzHhzHfzIfzIfzKfzKdzKdzLdzLdzId\ zLdzLdzLdzLdzLdzLdzLdzLdz } frm:MandelbrotBC1 { ; by several Fractint users e=p1, a=imag(p2)+100 p=real(p2)+PI q=2*PI*fn1(p/(2*PI)) r=real(p2)-q Z=C=Pixel: Z=log(Z) IF(imag(Z)>r) Z=Z+flip(2*PI) ENDIF Z=exp(e*(Z+flip(q)))+C |Z|<a } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Guy Hammer <guyh@aracnet.com> Subject: Re: (fractint) fractint documentation Date: 03 Dec 2001 11:27:09 -0800 (PST) On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Paul N. Lee wrote: > But if you want the page breaks to be correct, then use MS-Word and edit > the file by modifying every occurance of: > > " Fractint Version 20.02 Page" > > with the following: > > "^m Fractint Version 20.02 Page" Hmm, my fractinit.doc file (from xfractint) already has the form feed charactors... -- Guy Hammer, guyh@aracnet.com http://www.aracnet.com/~guyh -- 11:23am up 27 days, 14:10, 7 users, load average: 1.00, 1.02, 1.00 Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Programmer Dude <cjsonnack@mmm.com> Subject: Re: (fractint) fractint documentation Date: 03 Dec 2001 13:37:15 -0600 > On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Paul N. Lee wrote: >> with the following: >> >> "^m Fractint Version 20.02 Page" Would ^L be better or are the pages really just one line off? p.s. Some printers treat a single ^M as *just* a Carriage Return, and do not advance the paper, so in some cases ^M might not even work.... -- |_ CJSonnack <Chris@Sonnack.com> _____________| How's my programming? | |_ http://www.Sonnack.com/ ___________________| Call: 1-800-DEV-NULL | |_____________________________________________|_______________________| Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Paul N. Lee" <Paul.N.Lee@Worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) fractint documentation Date: 03 Dec 2001 14:55:08 -0600 Guy Hammer wrote: > > Hmm, my fractinit.doc file (from xfractint) > already has the form feed charactors... > I had used another text editor on mine and it seems to have eliminated the manual page break character x'0C', and left only the line-feed/carriage-return characters x'0D0A' within the file. After running the "makedoc" again, I see they are back to normal. Programmer Dude wrote: > > Would ^L be better or are the pages really > just one line off? > > p.s. > Some printers treat a single ^M as *just* a > Carriage Return, and do not advance the paper, > so in some cases ^M might not even work.... If using MS-Word, the ^l (lowercase "L") is normally for a manual line break when doing a replace, and the ^m is for a manual page break. Try doing a replace option in MS-Word, select the MORE button and choose the SPECIAL drop down list. You will notice all the characters available. Those "special" characters are only representations for the actual hexadecimal value which will be used. Sincerely, P.N.L. http://www.fractalus.com/cgi-bin/theway?ring=fractals&id=43&go Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Programmer Dude <cjsonnack@mmm.com> Subject: Re: (fractint) fractint documentation Date: 03 Dec 2001 15:10:50 -0600 "Paul N. Lee" wrote: > Try doing a replace option in MS-Word, select the MORE button and > choose the SPECIAL drop down list. You will notice all the characters > available. Heh! Cool!! I learned somethin', Thanks!!! Apparently you can use them as *search* patterns, too. THAT's gonna come in handy.... -- |_ CJSonnack <Chris@Sonnack.com> _____________| How's my programming? | |_ http://www.Sonnack.com/ ___________________| Call: 1-800-DEV-NULL | |_____________________________________________|_______________________| Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: (fractint) FOTD 04-12-01 (A Make-good Fractal [8]) Date: 04 Dec 2001 11:07:08 EST FOTD -- December 04, 2001 (Rating 8) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: Today's fractal is named "A Makegood Fractal". I felt that I needed to make good the abysmal fractal that passed for the FOTD of December 3. Today, I atone for yesterday's 3-rated let-down by presenting a fractal that rates a lofty 8. The formula takes 0.03 parts of Z^13, adds 0.03 parts of Z^(-23) and then adds (1/C). This formula draws a narrow ring of lakes with many places to explore for midgets. For today's scene, I chose a rudimentary valley along the negative X-axis. Today's image has been colored with the outside-fmod option, with the proximity factor set to 1.5. I rendered it with the passes set to 'b'. This is not only the fastest option with this particular scene, it also eliminates several unwanted holes. Running the parameter file by the fastest rendering option is actually irrelevant, since all methods render within a few seconds of one minute on my machine. The render time will be less than one minute on anything faster than 200mhz. Those who still wish to download the GIF image can find it at: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> and at: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> The fractal weather Monday at Fractal Central blossomed sunny and mild with light winds. The 59F 15C temperature must have been just what the cats wanted, because they passed the afternoon resting on the porch and exploring remote parts of the yard. When the grey cat that lives up the street approached, Tippy quickly chased it away. Thomas checked Tippy carefully when he returned to the yard, then they both settled down for the rest of the afternoon. The dynamic duo is still settled this morning, so I'd best get the day's tasks started before they wake up and become a distraction. Until next time and next fractal, take care, and maybe cats will succeed where we fail. Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ A_Makegood_Fractal { ; time=0:01:03.82--SF5 on a p200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotMix4 function=recip passes=b center-mag=-0.95974698691728890/-0.017561398477024\ 36/61456.73/1/-72.5/-2.99989533214528592e-010 params=0.03/13/0.03/-23/0/0 float=y maxiter=600 inside=120 proximity=1.5 outside=fmod colors=000CRJCQJDPJDOKENKEMKFLKFKKGJKHILHHLIGLIFLJ\ ELJDLKCMKBMLAML9MM8MM7MLALLDLLFKLIKLKKLNJLPJKSIKVI\ KXIK_HKaHKdHKfGJiGJlFJnFJqFJsEJvEJxEKvGKtILrKLpLMn\ NMlPMjQNhSNgUOeVOcXPaZP__PYaQWcQUeRSfRRhSPjSNkSLmT\ JoTHpUFrUDtUCuVAtV9sV7sV6rW5qW3qW2pW1pU4mS7jRAhPDe\ OGcMJ`LMZJPWHSTGVREYOD`MBcJAfHCdIEbJG`JI_KKYKMWLOU\ LSTMWRN_PNcNOgMOkKPoIPsGQwFQrEOmDMhDKcCJZBHUBFRAEO\ 9CM9AJ88G77D75B63962A83B94CA5CB5DC6ED7FE7FF8GG9HIA\ IJAIKBJLCKMCLNDLOEMPENQFOSGOTHPUHQVIRWJRXJSYKTZLT_\ LWYJYWI`VGbTFeRDgQCiOAlM9nL7qJ6sH4uG3rJ8pMDmOIkRNh\ USfWXcZaaafZckXfpVhtWfsXesXcsYbrZ`rZ_r_Zq`Xq`WqaUp\ bTpbRpcQpdPodNoeMofKnfJngHnhGmhFmiDmjCljAlk9lk8lgB\ mdDn`GoYIoULpRNqNQqKSrGVsDXsEYtEZtF_tF`tGauGbuHcuH\ duIeuIfvJgvJhvKivKjvKkwLlwLmwMnwMoxNpxNqxOrxOsxPty\ PuyQvyQwyQxyPwxPvwOuwOtvNsuNruNqtMpsMosLnrLmqLlqKk\ pKjoJioJhnJgnKfmKemKdmKdm } frm:MandelbrotMix4 {; Jim Muth a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2), g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(-a*b*g*h)^j, k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel): z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c, |z| < l } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: John Lewis <jlewis@clara.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) FOTD 04-12-01 (A Make-good Fractal [8]) Date: 04 Dec 2001 19:12:35 +0000 On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:07:08 EST, JimMuth@aol.com wrote: FOTD -- December 04, 2001 (Rating 8) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: Today's fractal is named "A Makegood Fractal". I felt that I= needed to make good the abysmal fractal that passed for the FOTD of= December 3. I rather liked that one, too! Best wishes John -- John Lewis, jlewis@clara.net on 12/04/2001 Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: (fractint) FOTD 05-12-01 (Half-Half-Shells [8]) Date: 05 Dec 2001 10:59:03 EST FOTD -- December 05, 2001 (Rating 8) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: (It is widely believed that good things, [and bad things also], come in groups of three. Today we have the second 8-rated image in a row. Hopefully, the saying is right and tomorrow's FOTD will also rate an 8.) Many things come on a half-shell. Oysters and Venuses are just two of them. And as today's image shows, fractals also can come on the half-shell. Today's image shows a scene in fractal-land, where a midget is surrounded by half-shells. And some of the half-shells are only half there, which makes them quarter-shells or "Half-Half-Shells", which explains the name I gave the image. The formula of the image is totally whimsical, as can be confirmed by checking the parameters. These random parameters draw a parent fractal shaped like an oversized figure 8, which needs an outzoom before it fits on the screen. This figure-8 fractal is actually a grossly distorted Mandeloid rotated 180 degrees, with East Valley on the west side of the main bay. Today's scene is located rather deep in the chaos of the southern shore of this valley. The coloring makes more of the scene than it is actually worth. The rating of 8 owes about 3 points to the colors, which are due more to chance than any effort on my part. The parameter file runs in 1/2 hour on my old machine. This is slow, but not too much work for such a highly rated image. The simplest way to see the image is to download it from one of the FOTD web sites. Those sites can be found at: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> and at: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> It was summer in December here at Fractal Central on Tuesday. And to make matters even worse, this is the northern hemisphere, where Summer is expected in June, July, August and September. The warm sun, light winds and temperature of 68F 20C pleased the cats, who were reasonably quiet as they enjoyed the unusual conditions. The local ski resort operators are not so happy however. It is difficult to have snow with a temperature like summer. Hopefully, Winter will arrive by the holidays. It is even more difficult for Santa sleighs to be used when the ground is bare. That's the news from Fractal Central for today. I'll return in 24 hours or so with another fractal, a bit more news, and if I find the inspiration, some philosophy. Until then, take care, and find inspiration in your fractals. Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ Half-Half-shells { ; time=0:31:25.81--SF5 on a p200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotMix4 function=recip passes=1 center-mag=-2.53776950877348200/-0.014009024142595\ 28/12424.62/1/-67.5/-8.6408921684544282e-011 params=1.636/-0.401/0.547/1.337/0/0 float=y maxiter=30000 inside=0 logmap=269 colors=000POfPOfQPgRQhSRiTSjUTkVUlWVmXWnYXoZYp_Zq`\ _ra`scatebugcvidwkexlfyngzoizpkzrnztoztpzoozkozgnv\ cnp_llXlfSkaPkYQiXSiXSiXTiXTiVViVXiVXiVYiVYiT_iT`i\ T`iTaiTagScgScgSdgSfgSfgQggQggQigQkgQkgPlgPlgPngPn\ gPpgPrfHtf7wg4xg4wi3wi3wk3wk3vl1vn1vn1to0to0tp0tp0\ rr0rt0rt0pv0pv0pw0pw0ox0oz0oz0nz0nz0nz0oz0nz0nz0nw\ 0nt0np0nn0nk1ng3nd3na4n_6lX7iT7gQ9fNAdKCcHCaED`CE_\ 9GY6GX3HV0JT0KS0KQEJPKKNSKSTMXVM_XMcYNg_Nl`PoaPtcP\ xdQzfQzgQzfPzdPzdPzcNzcNzaNxaMx`Mw`Mw_KvYKvYKtXJrX\ JrVJpVHpTHoTHnSGnSGlQGlPEkPEkNEiNDgMDgMDfKCfKCdJCf\ HCdJCcJCaKC`KC_MCYMCYMCXNCVNCTPCSPCQQCPQCPQCNSDMSG\ PTJSTMVVPYVS`VVcXYfX`iYclYfo_ir_lv_ov`rv`vvaxvazvc\ zvczvczvdzvdzvfzvfzvfzvfzvfzvfzvfzvfzvfzvfzvfzvfzv\ fzwfzxfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfz\ zfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzf\ zzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfzzfz } frm:MandelbrotMix4 {; Jim Muth a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2), g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(-a*b*g*h)^j, k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel): z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c, |z| < l } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Tim Wegner <twegner@swbell.net> Subject: (fractint) Possible change in the fractint list Date: 05 Dec 2001 16:35:23 -0600 I have been having some problems with majordomo in administering the fractint and fractdev lists. The kind xmission folks who host this list are suggesting that I move to different (newer) software - mailman. If this happens, I may be able to just move the list members to the new software, or I may just ask members to sign on to the new list when it comes on line. This is just a heads up. I am not sure what the timing will be. I may consider other hosts also if I am making a change, though I must say that the xmission relationship has worked very well for us, with only a few problems, so staying with them is fine with me as long as they will have us. If anyone has any thoughts on majordomo vs mailman or other list software or hosts, I suggest we declare this "on topic" for this list for a short while. Tim Wegner fractint/fractdev list administrator Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Tim Wegner <twegner@swbell.net> Subject: (fractint) Possible change in the fractint list Date: 05 Dec 2001 16:41:04 -0600 I have been having some problems with majordomo in administering the fractint and fractdev lists. The kind xmission folks who host this list are suggesting that I move to different (newer) software - mailman. If this happens, I may be able to just move the list members to the new software, or I may just ask members to sign on to the new list when it comes on line. This is just a heads up. I am not sure what the timing will be. I may consider other hosts also if I am making a change, though I must say that the xmission relationship has worked very well for us, with only a few problems, so staying with them is fine with me as long as they will have us. If anyone has any thoughts on majordomo vs mailman or other list software or hosts, I suggest we declare this "on topic" for this list for a short while. Tim Wegner fractint/fractdev list administrator Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: (fractint) FOTD 06-12-01 (Honeycombed Midget [7]) Date: 06 Dec 2001 10:13:05 EST FOTD -- December 06, 2001 (Rating 7) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: I'm a bit busier today than I would prefer to be, so the discussion will have to be relatively short. Well, we don't have the third FOTD in a row that rates an 8, but today's rating of 7 comes pretty close. The formula takes Z^(-12.5), adds 10 times as much Z^(-1.25), then adds (1/C), to create a fractal with more convolutions than a government bureaucracy. This parent fractal is indescribable, but contains many bays and valleys. Today's midget is located on the shoreline of one of these valleys, in an area with elements that resemble those of a Julia set. This area would never be expected to hold midgets. I looked there only because I often look for midgets where none are expected. The unusual appearance of today's image is a result of setting both the inside and outside to <fmod>, with a proximity of 1. The name, "Honeycombed Midget" has little relevance to the image. The name was given to an earlier version, and carried over to the present version because I like the sound of the name. The parameter file renders in 8 minutes on my outdated machine. The already rendered image downloads in less time from: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> or from: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> The fractal weather Wednesday here at Fractal Central was like mid-summer, with blue skies, fluffy white cumulus clouds, and a temperature of 75F 24C. The fractal cats, who enjoy summer, were happy all afternoon, even in the shade of the holly trees. Their only irritation came when the day ended early, but these are the shortest days of the year here at latitude 39N, and the sun is gone by 4:30pm. And I had better get going on the day's work if I hope to have it finished by the time this shortened day ends. Until next FOTD, take care, and what will tomorrow bring? Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com jimmuth@aol.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ Honeycombed_Midget { ; time=0:07:55.82--SF5 on a P200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotMix4 function=recip passes=1 center-mag=+1.87898498897471100/+0.564898033124445\ 90/10315.45/1/32.5/2.26459337393514204e-011 params=1/-12.5/10/-1.25/0/525 float=y maxiter=1200 inside=fmod proximity=1 outside=fmod colors=000tKCtJCtHCsGCsEEqGCqGEpGEpGFnGGnGGmGHmGJl\ HJlHKkHLjJEhKFgLGfMHdOJcPKbQLaSN_TOZUPYWRWXSVYTT_V\ S`WR`YP`ZO`_O`aO`bO`cO`dO`fP_gO`hO`jO_kO_lOYlNYkNX\ kNXkNWjNWjNUjLUhLThLThLSgLSgLQgKQfKPfKPfKOdKOdJMcJ\ McJMbKMbKMaKM_LM_LMZLMYNMYNMWNMVOMVOMTPMSPMSPMRRMP\ ROPROOSONSONSOLTOKTOKTOJVOHVOHWOGWOFWOFYOEYOCYOCZO\ BZO9ZP9_P8_P7_P7aP5aP4bP4bP3bP1cP1cP0cP0dP0dP0dP0f\ P0fP0gQ0fP0dO0dO0cM0bL0bL0aK0_J0_J0ZH0YG0YG0WE0WE0\ VD0TC0TC0SA0R90R90P81O61O61N51L53O61O61P81P81R91R9\ 1SA1SA1TC1TC1VD1VD1WE1WE1YF1YF1YF1ZF1ZF1_F5_FAaFFa\ FKbFPbFUcFZcFceFceFcfFcfFcfFcgFchFciFciFcjFcjGckHc\ kIclJclKcmLcmMcnNcoOcpPcpQcpRcqScrTcsUcsVctWctXcuY\ cuZcv_cw`cxacxbcyccxdcyeczfczgczhazi_zjYzkWzlUzmSz\ nQzoOzpMzqKzrIzrUzrEzqCzpAzo5zn3zm4zl4zk4zj4zi4zh5\ zg5zf5ye5yd5xc7xb7wa7w`7v_7vZ8uY8tX8sW8rV8qU9pT9oS\ 9nR9mQ9lPBkOBjNBiMBhLBgKC } frm:MandelbrotMix4 {; Jim Muth a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2), g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(-a*b*g*h)^j, k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel): z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c, |z| < l } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: (fractint) FOTD 07-12-01 (Golden Chrysanthemum [6]) Date: 07 Dec 2001 09:21:57 EST FOTD -- December 07, 2001 (Rating 6) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: Life is filled with disappointments. I still remember the disappointment I felt as a child, when I discovered that professional wrestling is a performing art rather than a competitive sport. I felt the same disappointment when I realized that baseball is more about making money than having fun playing a game. I never really believed in the Easter bunny or Santa Claus, but I did believe Ripley. Perhaps the biggest let-down of all came when I realized that some of Ripley's impossible "Believe it or Not" wonders were in fact untrue. All these let-downs were justified in the late 1980's however, when I discovered fractals. Life has never been the same since. Today's slightly above average fractal image reminds me of a golden chrysanthemum, so that's what I named it. The image is actually a scene lying in the suburbs of a larger midget, which is located near a still larger midget, which lies north and west of an indescribable parent. The scene is disconnected from its parent. This disconnection is reflected in the golden rings surrounding the midget, which form concentric circles in no way joined to each other or to the midget they surround. The whole assemblage resembles a flower such as a chrysanthemum or aster, and makes a pleasant enough picture to rate a 6. The parameter file runs in three minutes; the completed GIF image downloads from: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> or from: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> in even less time. The weather Thursday here at Fractal Central was once again summer-like, with blue skies, gentle breezes, and a temperature of 73F 23C. Cats of the fractal variety enjoy such conditions, and Thomas and Tippy are no exception. The dynamic duo passed the afternoon sleeping in their chairs on the porch, opening their eyes occasionally to be sure that no unwanted cats were intruding. Since it's the last day of the work week and there's still work to be done, I had best get busy. But I'll return with more goodies in 24 hours. Until then, take care, and accentuate the fractal positive. Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com jimmuth@aol.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ Gold_Chrysanthemum { ; time=0:03:18.50--SF5 on a P200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotMix4 function=recip passes=1 center-mag=-0.47904926844684050/+2.689928561895989\ 00/7.255801e+011/1/45.0104028392414861/-0.01121875\ 11152195482 params=1/-12.5/10/-1.25/0/525 float=y maxiter=550 inside=0 logmap=63 colors=00087aA8`BBZDDYEGWGHVHKTILRKOQLQONTNOVLQYKR\ ZITaHRcEReBVg8Yj7`l5co4dp2gt1ju0mx0pz0rz0uz0xz0zz0\ zz0zz0zz0wz0rz1oz5jzAezEazIZzLVzQQzVLzZIzcEzgAzl5z\ p2zt7wrBtpGppKmoOjmRgmWdl`aldZjiWilTipQguNezKezHdz\ EdzGezHizIlzIoxKrwOuuTxmYzeazZezRezKezDdz5cw4ar4`o\ 4`l2Zi2Ye2Wa2VZ1TW1RT1QQ1QN4NR7LW8I`BHdDEiGDmHArK8\ wL7zNEtOKlQQdRYYTcQViIWpBYw4Zz0Zz0OzVGzzNzzTzzZwzd\ uzjuzpuzmuzjuzguzeuzcuz`uzYuxWuxTuwQuuNutLutIurGup\ EupDurBurAur8ut7ut5ut4uu2uu2uu7utBurEurIupLupQuoTu\ mYum`uldulgujluiouitugwugzuizuizuizuizuizuizumpuri\ uu`uzRuzKuzLuzNuwOurOumQugRucRuZTuVVuOVuKWuGYuBYu7\ IuV4up0uz0uz7uzGuzOuxNuwNuwLuuLuuKuuKutKutIutIurHu\ rHurGupGupGupEulDugBucBuZAuV8wQ8zL7zH5zD5z84z42z02\ z0Iz0Zz0oz0xz8zzKzzVazc2zj1zl0zm0zo0zo0zp0zr0zt0zt\ 0zu0zw0zx0zx0zz0zz0zz0zz0zx0zt4zoAzjEzgKzcQzZVzV`z\ QdzNjzIpzEDzrHztLztOztTzt } frm:MandelbrotMix4 {; Jim Muth a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2), g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(-a*b*g*h)^j, k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel): z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c, |z| < l } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: bmc1@airmail.net Subject: Re: (fractint) FOTD 07-12-01 (Golden Chrysanthemum [6]) Date: 07 Dec 2001 11:41:17 -0600 The site screams for a sight of: "the dynamic duo"; "Cats of the fractal variety . . . . ." D. Freed JimMuth@aol.com wrote: > FOTD -- December 07, 2001 (Rating 6) > > Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: > > Life is filled with disappointments. I still remember the > disappointment I felt as a child, when I discovered that > professional wrestling is a performing art rather than a > competitive sport. I felt the same disappointment when I > realized that baseball is more about making money than having > fun playing a game. I never really believed in the Easter bunny > or Santa Claus, but I did believe Ripley. Perhaps the biggest > let-down of all came when I realized that some of Ripley's > impossible "Believe it or Not" wonders were in fact untrue. > > All these let-downs were justified in the late 1980's however, > when I discovered fractals. Life has never been the same since. > > Today's slightly above average fractal image reminds me of a > golden chrysanthemum, so that's what I named it. The image is > actually a scene lying in the suburbs of a larger midget, which > is located near a still larger midget, which lies north and west > of an indescribable parent. > > The scene is disconnected from its parent. This disconnection > is reflected in the golden rings surrounding the midget, which > form concentric circles in no way joined to each other or to the > midget they surround. The whole assemblage resembles a flower > such as a chrysanthemum or aster, and makes a pleasant enough > picture to rate a 6. > > The parameter file runs in three minutes; the completed GIF > image downloads from: > > <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> > > or from: > > <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> > > in even less time. > > The weather Thursday here at Fractal Central was once again > summer-like, with blue skies, gentle breezes, and a temperature > of 73F 23C. Cats of the fractal variety enjoy such conditions, > and Thomas and Tippy are no exception. The dynamic duo passed > the afternoon sleeping in their chairs on the porch, opening > their eyes occasionally to be sure that no unwanted cats were > intruding. > > Since it's the last day of the work week and there's still work > to be done, I had best get busy. But I'll return with more > goodies in 24 hours. Until then, take care, and accentuate the > fractal positive. > > Jim Muth > jamth@mindspring.com > jimmuth@aol.com > > START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ > > Gold_Chrysanthemum { ; time=0:03:18.50--SF5 on a P200 > reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm > formulaname=MandelbrotMix4 function=recip passes=1 > center-mag=-0.47904926844684050/+2.689928561895989\ > 00/7.255801e+011/1/45.0104028392414861/-0.01121875\ > 11152195482 params=1/-12.5/10/-1.25/0/525 float=y > maxiter=550 inside=0 logmap=63 > colors=00087aA8`BBZDDYEGWGHVHKTILRKOQLQONTNOVLQYKR\ > ZITaHRcEReBVg8Yj7`l5co4dp2gt1ju0mx0pz0rz0uz0xz0zz0\ > zz0zz0zz0wz0rz1oz5jzAezEazIZzLVzQQzVLzZIzcEzgAzl5z\ > p2zt7wrBtpGppKmoOjmRgmWdl`aldZjiWilTipQguNezKezHdz\ > EdzGezHizIlzIoxKrwOuuTxmYzeazZezRezKezDdz5cw4ar4`o\ > 4`l2Zi2Ye2Wa2VZ1TW1RT1QQ1QN4NR7LW8I`BHdDEiGDmHArK8\ > wL7zNEtOKlQQdRYYTcQViIWpBYw4Zz0Zz0OzVGzzNzzTzzZwzd\ > uzjuzpuzmuzjuzguzeuzcuz`uzYuxWuxTuwQuuNutLutIurGup\ > EupDurBurAur8ut7ut5ut4uu2uu2uu7utBurEurIupLupQuoTu\ > mYum`uldulgujluiouitugwugzuizuizuizuizuizuizumpuri\ > uu`uzRuzKuzLuzNuwOurOumQugRucRuZTuVVuOVuKWuGYuBYu7\ > IuV4up0uz0uz7uzGuzOuxNuwNuwLuuLuuKuuKutKutIutIurHu\ > rHurGupGupGupEulDugBucBuZAuV8wQ8zL7zH5zD5z84z42z02\ > z0Iz0Zz0oz0xz8zzKzzVazc2zj1zl0zm0zo0zo0zp0zr0zt0zt\ > 0zu0zw0zx0zx0zz0zz0zz0zz0zx0zt4zoAzjEzgKzcQzZVzV`z\ > QdzNjzIpzEDzrHztLztOztTzt > } > > frm:MandelbrotMix4 {; Jim Muth > a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2), > g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(-a*b*g*h)^j, > k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel): > z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c, > |z| < l > } > > END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List > Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com > Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" > Administrator: twegner@fractint.org > Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Paul N. Lee" <Paul.N.Lee@Worldnet.att.net> Subject: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 07 Dec 2001 20:56:09 -0600 There has been talk from the Developer section of possibly modifying FractInt to the point it might mean saved PAR files would not generate the same image as it did when the parameters were saved. This would put the issue of backwards compatability at stake. Apparently not enough individuals have demonstrated a public interest to show the Developers that old PAR files are worth keeping. Any "artists" out there concerned about their past works?? Sincerely, P.N.L. http://www.fractalus.com/cgi-bin/theway?ring=fractals&id=43&go Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Mike Traynor <lmtraynor@sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 07 Dec 2001 22:12:38 -0500 Paul > There has been talk from the Developer section of possibly modifying > FractInt to the point it might mean saved PAR files would not generate > the same image as it did when the parameters were saved. This would put > the issue of backwards compatability at stake. > > Apparently not enough individuals have demonstrated a public interest to > show the Developers that old PAR files are worth keeping. Any "artists" > out there concerned about their past works?? If you open it up to enthusiastic Fractint users who don't have delusions of being artists, I'd be dismayed to see all the par files I have rendered incompatible with future versions of Fractint. That said, if they were convertible by manipulation of the text files, it would alleviate my concern. Mike Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: fractals@hiddendimension.com Subject: RE: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 07 Dec 2001 22:27:26 -0500 Hi Paul, I have a HUGE collection of pars, both my own, which go back to about 1990 and many, many others. A few of my pars generate "correctly" only with Fraction 17.3 or earlier, so I have archived the old version just to be able to regenerate the images. I can understand the old change, which was because of a bug, but I would be very unhappy if a new version of Fractint would force me to archive another version just so I could continue to regenerate the old images. Tim, is the rumor true?? Ron Barnett -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-fractint@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Paul N. Lee Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 9:56 PM There has been talk from the Developer section of possibly modifying FractInt to the point it might mean saved PAR files would not generate the same image as it did when the parameters were saved. This would put the issue of backwards compatability at stake. Apparently not enough individuals have demonstrated a public interest to show the Developers that old PAR files are worth keeping. Any "artists" out there concerned about their past works?? Sincerely, P.N.L. http://www.fractalus.com/cgi-bin/theway?ring=fractals&id=43&go Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: RENRAD1@aol.com Subject: Re: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 07 Dec 2001 22:36:00 EST As one who'd like to sell some images and resell some older ones, I'd hope that a par will generate the same image in each version of Fractint. I shudder to think of all my old parfile being lost to me. If the old par files could be made usable through batch-able text corrections utility that would be good, too. If they can't i'll be hanging onto my old version and hoping that it will still be archived against the need to correctly render my old stuff. ~renrad Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Tim Wegner <twegner@swbell.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 07 Dec 2001 21:52:30 -0600 Paul wrote: > "Vicious Rumor..." Geesh Paul, calm down! <grin!> > There has been talk from the Developer section of possibly modifying > FractInt to the point it might mean saved PAR files would not generate > the same image as it did when the parameters were saved. This would put > the issue of backwards compatability at stake. This is a somewhat (!) melodramatic exaggeration of what we were talking about. What we were talking about was a peculiarity Jonathan rediscovered in the Julia algorithm. A way to see it is to compare MarksJulia with parameters .3, .6 to the default Julia. This should be the same as the default Julia, but one color ring is missing and all the other colors off by one color. This is a idiosyncracy of Fractint's original Mandelbrot algorthm as coded by Bert Tyler. If we "fix" this sort of thing it might break exact backward compatability. A way we have dealt with this in the past is to key off the version number stored in PAR files. All PAR files start with reset=<version>. We have generally gone to a lot of trouble to make old PARs render correctly. Jonathan could tell you a lot about this. We look at the version stored in the PAR file, and use the old version's algorithm when rendering an old PAR. The price we pay is that we have to code both the old and the new algorithm. > Apparently not enough individuals have demonstrated a public interest to > show the Developers that old PAR files are worth keeping. Any "artists" > out there concerned about their past works?? The exact quote of what I wrote is: BEGIN QUOTE In the past, we would be very loath to change something like this because our artists would go nuts wanting to protect their legacy images. But since we don't hear from them anymore, I'm not sure it matters. But while fractint is no longer a dominant program, it still does have a following. Let me pose a question to this list. Is Fractint backward compatability still an issue for you? Do you mind if we eliminate quirks and make the program more uniform, or are you concerned that legacy images render the same. Hmmm - upon reflection, since we have things like Jim's "fractal of the day", there still are accumulating libraries of PAR files. Maybe it is important that we keep backward compatibility so as much as possible fractint renders old PAR files the way it used to. END QUOTE As you see I was thinking out loud, and raised a question, then gave my own answer. The "vicious rumor" was actually a question to see what folks think, not a statement. (I actually forgot which list I was in and thought I was asking folks in this list.) So much for the vicious rumor <grin!> At this stage in Fractint's life cycle we certainly would not do anything rash to break backwards compatability. My suggestion for Jonathan's original query would be to try to emulate Fractint's idiosyncracies in Xfractint (except for integer math, that's a lost cause.) Tim Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Tim Wegner <twegner@swbell.net> Subject: (fractint) non vicious non-rumors and humor <g!> Date: 07 Dec 2001 22:54:35 -0600 I was trying to figure out whether to chatise Paul for his "vicious rumor" post or not. My first thought was to take umbrage that he read a post I had made on the developer's list then posted a somewhat hysterical misrepresentation of it here. This thought lasted about 3 seconds, maybe five seconds max. :-) However I decided to applaud Paul instead for livening up this sorta dead list with some juicy stuff. If I had a payroll I would have to put him on it to make posts like that <grin!> It sure did bring out some passionate replies in defense of new versions rendering people's PAR collections accurately. Paul is totally and absolutely forgiven <says Tim with saintly smile!> Maybe we should have a contest to find other weirdnesses of Fractint. Can anybody state in clear mathematical language EXACTLY what fractint is doing with the default mandelbrot and julia algorithms? This is amusing really, because Bert Tyler never claimed to be a theorist, mathematician, or to have a deep knowlefdge of fractals. He was an expert programmer in assembler. He liked "stylish blue" for the background, so he didn't start with color 0 (black) but with color 1 (blue in the default palette). As you can see, an initial iteration gets skipped because as a programmer Bert saw that 0*0 + c = c, so he decided to just start with z(0) = c rather than z(0) = 0, and save one cycle. Bert's motivation was speed pure and simple. This consternation about backward compatibility makes me chuckle. In a few feverish nights of work in 1987 Bert coded the Mandelbrot and Julia algorithm. Today, in 2001, 14 years later, the default image is exactly the same as it was then. But the there are quite a number of different routines in Fractint that all do the default mandelbrot. 1. Bert's original 386 32 bit integer math mandelbrot/Julia code. I think it has been modified a little over the years by some people who found ways to speed it up slightly. 2. 16 bit integer math. When you are calculating the default Mandelbrot and low zoom ratios, Fractint actually abandons Bert's code and uses 16 bit integer math! Fractint seamlessly "shifts" to 32 bit integer math when the 16 bit precision limits is reached. 3. Floating point math coded in C. I probably wrote this originally. (Don't try coding the Mandelbrot algorithm in C at home, it's hard, remember, I really am a rocket scientist <g!>) 4. Floating point math coded in assembler with floating point coprocessor calls. Jonathan knows about this. 5. Finally, arbitrary precision code that allows you to zoom all the way to 10^1500 power. (There are actually several versions of this in Fractint, if memory severs, so maybe this is 5. and 6.) Should probably add the formular parser which itself has integer math, C language floating point math, and floating point assembler. That would make alternative codings 6., 7., and 8. I haven't checked in an awfully long time, but I believe it is easy to code up a mandelbrot and julia that look exactlyt like Fractint's mandel and julai images, complete with Bert's idiosyncracies. With various fractint command line options you can render the default Mandelbrot with ALL these various coding schemes, and they all work nearly identically with the default Mandelbrot/Julia, with virtually every pixel the same color. (I say "virtually" because undoubtedly there is a pixel or two that gets color differently). Here's an assignment for Fractint lovers. Can somebody make a PAR file that makes the default mandelbrot using ALL the different code options I have mentioned? You'll have to dig out debugflag.doc. How many entries in the PAR file are there? Variations of parser formulas don't count - you are allowed one parser formula but you can use different fractint options to force the use ofd different code. So the image Bert generated with his idiosyncratic Mandelbrot/Julia implementation that he ran on an early model 386 (I had to argue with him to get him to add 286 support, because my machine was a 286) is the same image you get with today's fractint, even though the computer is totally different, and most of the code is totally different than the code he wrote. Now to complete the story, in December 2001 Jonathan Osuch notices the peculiarities of Bert's 1987 code, we have a brief email exchange that discusses backward's compatibility, then EXTRA EXTRA READ ALL ABOUT IT! VICIOUS RUMOR - FRACTINT TEAM THREATENS TO CHANGE BERT TYLER'S RENDERING OF THE MANDELBROT AND JULIA IN FRACTINT!!! Goodnight Folks! Tim As he heads to bed having spent a happy evening ROTFL :-) Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: harry <harrybissell@prodigy.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 08 Dec 2001 00:44:19 -0500 <lurk mode off> Hmmm... I'd just archive the 'old' software to support my old files if that were the case... <resume lurk> H^) harry bissell "Paul N. Lee" wrote: > There has been talk from the Developer section of possibly modifying > FractInt to the point it might mean saved PAR files would not generate > the same image as it did when the parameters were saved. This would put > the issue of backwards compatability at stake. > > Apparently not enough individuals have demonstrated a public interest to > show the Developers that old PAR files are worth keeping. Any "artists" > out there concerned about their past works?? > > Sincerely, > P.N.L. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > http://www.fractalus.com/cgi-bin/theway?ring=fractals&id=43&go > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List > Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com > Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" > Administrator: twegner@fractint.org > Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" -- Jihad Terrorism Conspiracy New World Order Revolution Black Helicopters Freedom of Speech First Amendment Rights: Carnivore Bait go ahead and READ my e-mail I have nothing to hide... how about YOU ??? Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Paul N. Lee" <Paul.N.Lee@Worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) non vicious non-rumors and humor <g!> Date: 07 Dec 2001 23:52:19 -0600 Tim Wegner wrote: > > I was trying to figure out whether to > chatise Paul for his "vicious rumor" > post or not. I do not mind, my skin has become quite tough from such in various other Lists and Forums. ;-} > > However I decided to applaud Paul instead > for livening up this sorta dead list with > some juicy stuff. That was my intention. Plus that Subject line does state it as a "rumor". ;-} > > EXTRA EXTRA READ ALL ABOUT IT! > > As he heads to bed having spent a happy evening ROTFL :-) They say one sleeps much better after having a good laugh before going to bed. :-) Sincerely, P.N.L. http://www.fractalus.com/cgi-bin/theway?ring=fractals&id=43&go Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Jonathan Osuch" <osuchj@avalon.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 08 Dec 2001 08:12:22 -0600 > At this stage in Fractint's life cycle we certainly would not do > anything rash to break backwards compatibility. My suggestion for > Jonathan's original query would be to try to emulate Fractint's > idiosyncracies in Xfractint (except for integer math, that's a lost > cause.) That would be why the developer's version is at 20.2. Some time ago, I don't recall who or when, it was pointed out to me that the julia fractal was incorrect. The green ring around the default image should extend beyond the border of the image. At the time, I verified that it had always been like that and concluded that it must be correct. This was probably during the era of "The Bad Head Day". Bad_Head_Day? { ; Ever had one of those days? ; By Jonathan Osuch ; This is a slow one. ; Version 1921 Patchlevel 22 reset=1921 type=manlam(fn||fn) function=sqrt/cos passes=1 center-mag=+2.96853387542126300/+0.00038114232461102/26547.1 params=0/0/0.5 float=y maxiter=10000 bailoutest=real inside=0 logmap=11 colors=00e000L00<13>z00<2>p00l00h00d00a00<9>000<15>zX0<15>000<15>ut0<15>\ 000GA4<12>2v10z00w0<14>000<15>00z<3>00i00a<8>000<16>z0Xv0Vr0Tp0Sn0R<12>0\ 00<15>p0w<15>000<15>zzz<14>444 } So, this last weekend, I took the pentium mandelbrot code and ported it over to nasm to drop into the Xfractint code. That worked just fine until I started to compare the images generated with the Xfractint C code and what I had just ported over. There were problems with outside options and the julia images seemed wrong. I recalled that I had earlier fixed a problem with the julia code in Xfractint by moving the location of a decrement instruction (we decrement from maxit instead of increment from 0). This was to remove the black border around the image. Since I couldn't compare the image created by Fractint and the image created by Xfractint at the same time, I concluded I had fixed the problem. Being a slow learner, it wasn't until I compared the images generated by the two versions of the code on Monday or Tuesday that I concluded that something was seriously wrong. At present, I still consider the Xfractint code to be unstable and have not added backwards compatibility when I correct problems. The DOS version is the base version and I do add backwards compatibility when I have to when a fix changes how images are generated. Understand that this invariably causes a speed hit. In the future, the base code will have to be changed to Xfractint as more people get XP'd. Which, in all probability, Fractint in its current form will not run under. The Xfractint code needs to be ported to the djgpp compiler. In combination with incorporation of a graphics manipulation package such as Allegro, this will allow a pseudo windows version to run on the dreaded XP. This is a big project. If there is interest, I'll discuss this in more detail. Jonathan Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: (fractint) FOTD 08-12-01 (Fractal Saturday [5]) Date: 08 Dec 2001 10:30:13 EST FOTD -- December 08, 2001 (Rating 5) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: Now that we've safely weathered the impending Fractint backward incompatibility crisis, it's time for the ubiquitous FOTD. Due to the holiday decorating that must be done today, I have little time for a lengthy discussion, and the fractal itself rates only a 5, but the image is still worth at least a quick glance. The parent fractal, which combines portions of Z^(-1.87) and Z^(-18.7), is indescribable, as nearly all fractals are. One of its features is a prominent bud cut off by a single-and-double valley. Today's scene is located at the edge of one branch of the double half of the valley. I used the <fmod> coloring option on both the inside and outside of today's image. The resulting terraced effect is impressive around the fringes of the image, but closer to the midget the terraces break down into a not-very-attractive area of chaos. This chaos can be reduced but not eliminated by rendering at a higher resolution than the standard 640x480. Unable to think of a descriptive name, I settled on "Fractal Saturday", which like a name such as "Symphony No. 25", merely catalogs the image. (Of course, the comparison is not exact. Creating a symphony requires much more effort than finding a fractal.) The 11-minute render time is a bit too slow for a merely average image. In today's case, the wiser choice is to download the completed GIF image from: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> or from: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> The fractal weather Friday was a big come-down from the day before. Cloudy skies and a temperature of 63F 17C are not ideal for cats, especially when combined with a chilly north breeze. Meeting with such imperfect conditions beyond the first door, the cats checked every other door, found the same conditions beyond all doors, then spent the day indoors, sulking. It took a treat of tuna to lighten their sullen spirits. And BTW, don't be surprised if the dynamic cat duo have their pictures posted in the not-too-distant future. Well, today is the day to begin the holiday decorations here at Fractal Central. And that's what I'm just about ready to do. Until next time, take care, and fractals are the art of God. Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ Fractal_Saturday { ; time=0:11:19.10--SF5 on a P200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotMix4 function=recip passes=1 center-mag=+1.51526872992240000/-0.074015609556275\ 80/43489.18/1/155/-6.50101500410116273e-011 params=1.5/-1.87/1/-18.7/0/525 float=y maxiter=2500 inside=fmod proximity=3 outside=fmod logmap=yes colors=000NHnMGmLFlKEkIDjHCiGBhFAfE9eD8dC7cB6bA5a9\ 5`96V97P98J99D9A79B1OLjPMhPMgPNfPNePOcQNbQPaQN`QN_\ QOYQMXRMWRKVRITRJSRKRRMQSOPSQNSRMSTLSUKSWJUYMV_OWa\ RXbTYdWZfY_h``jbblecngdpjerlftogvqhytizvgusftpesmd\ rjcqhaoe`nb_m_ZlXYkVWiSVhPUgMTfJSeHP`NMXTJTZGOdDKj\ AGp8CuFGnMKgSNaZRVeVOkYIfZKbZMZZOVZQQ_SM_UI_WE_YA_\ _BYYCXWDWUEVSETQFSOGRMHQKHOIINGJMEKLCKKADIAQJRbJgn\ JxlNsjRohVkgYgKJUZ53Y87XBAXDDWGGZ0zVLMR4xL5m5FAF5b\ A6S46HZ0zLj8F`7AQ74G6AKc4DNtvcehVSWNDJELWjZ0zAJQ4C\ Gf4jS5XD6JCX57O63F6kTndPgYMaRJVKFPDCI69CYW6PP6GJ67\ C6NabJWXFRSZ0zZGzZBzsm`Z0zZ0zLNIAEC9xi7maZ0z3SMPH0\ b6SJ6HNDiJCcGBYCAS99N58H27BKlc9RNM0iJ1dG2_D3VA3Q74\ L45G16BDIB9F96C82970X20S30O40J40F50A6j`P9Xr4JUHy80\ 360460460560560560660660bC0UA0M90E7GmQ_ktUelP_eKUZ\ EOR9IK4CDazHIYBiRjbOdWLZPITJFNCCH59Bd9C0uBH787fa5X\ U3OM1FK02v03o03h04bPJqOIp } frm:MandelbrotMix4 {; Jim Muth a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2), g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(-a*b*g*h)^j, k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel): z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c, |z| < l } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: Re: (fractint) FOTD 07-12-01 (Golden Chrysanthemum [6]) Date: 08 Dec 2001 10:36:11 EST D. Freed wrote: >The [FOTD] site screams for a sight of: >"the dynamic duo"; "Cats of the fractal variety . . . . ." Your wish may soon be granted, along with a picture of . . . . . myself, no less! Jim M. Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Mark Christenson <mchris@value.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 08 Dec 2001 07:41:49 -0800 At 08:56 PM 12/7/01 -0600, you wrote: >There has been talk from the Developer section of possibly modifying >FractInt to the point it might mean saved PAR files would not generate >the same image as it did when the parameters were saved. This would put >the issue of backwards compatability at stake. > >Apparently not enough individuals have demonstrated a public interest to >show the Developers that old PAR files are worth keeping. Any "artists" >out there concerned about their past works?? After reading all of the posts, it's still not clear to me exactly what would be affected. PARs are my only method of archiving image data (it used to be the case only for development work and layered images, but I have recently started stripping the data from GIFs I display on the Web). Thousands of images and thousands of hours of work would be lost, and this is certainly a grave concern. It would be all but impossible to go back though my PAR files and annotate which images work with which version of Fractint. Bud Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: bmc1@airmail.net Subject: Re: (fractint) FOTD 07-12-01 (Golden Chrysanthemum [6]) Date: 08 Dec 2001 10:04:49 -0600 The fractal racoons in my back yard in Dallas have asked me to express their gratitude. Freed/ racoons JimMuth@aol.com wrote: > D. Freed wrote: > > >The [FOTD] site screams for a sight of: > > >"the dynamic duo"; "Cats of the fractal variety . . . . ." > > Your wish may soon be granted, along with a picture of > . . . . . myself, no less! > > Jim M. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List > Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com > Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" > Administrator: twegner@fractint.org > Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Tim Wegner <twegner@swbell.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 08 Dec 2001 10:46:27 -0600 Mark asked: > After reading all of the posts, it's still not clear to me exactly > what would be affected. PARs are my only method of archiving > image data (it used to be the case only for development work > and layered images, but I have recently started stripping the > data from GIFs I display on the Web). Thousands of images > and thousands of hours of work would be lost, and this is > certainly a grave concern. It would be all but impossible to > go back though my PAR files and annotate which images > work with which version of Fractint. 1. The reset=1961 line in the PAR tells fractint (and you) what version created the PAR. 2. You can always save the current version of Fractint which renders correctly the vast majority of PAR files. Having said that, let me also say that we will never break backwards compatability in any future DOS versions. Future platforms are another matter, no one can say. 3. By now I should have made it clear that there is no special problem all of a sudden with backward compatability. It looks to me like Paul was having fun at everyone's expense with his "vicious rumor" post, and you all bit :-) Jonathan and I have been working together for a very long time, and the conversation that triggered this is little different than similar conversations we previously had in 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996, ..., the beginning of time :-) On a serious note, there was an article a few years back in the Scientific American on technological obsolescence. The article listed 50 years as the period of time after which it is practically impossible to read media. So much for getting your high school yearbook on a CD! Software ages very much faster. That's the real concern. Tim Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: owner-fractint@lists.xmission.com Date: 08 Dec 2001 10:08:01 -0700 (EST) Message-ID: <200112080252_MC3-E9D4-E3B7@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-fractint@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: fractint Hi all, I got the following message, maybe you can help: >>I got those parameter sets from Bob, but I've lost >>touch with him over the last year, and I need to contact him again. I tried >>his genealogy1 address @ aol, but I never got a response. Have you >>corresponded with him recently, and if so, does he have a new address? >>Regards, >>Erik Reckase --Jochen Weber-- http://joweber.de Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Mark Christenson <mchris@value.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 08 Dec 2001 10:23:16 -0800 At 10:46 AM 12/8/01 -0600, Tim wrote: >... >On a serious note, there was an article a few years back in the >Scientific American on technological obsolescence. The article listed >50 years as the period of time after which it is practically >impossible to read media. So much for getting your high school >yearbook on a CD! Thank God it hasn't been 50 years since high school quite yet! ;-) Speaking of technical obsolescence, you can call me Stegosaurus. I'm still running Win 3.1 and DOS 6.0 on an AMD 80486 DX2/80. I'm also sending this via Eudora Light ver 1.5.2 (1995) and Trumpet Winsock 2.0 Rev B (1994) and a 56K dial-up modem. Hey, it all still works, and my ISP can't provide software that will work with my system. At least I'm running the most current version of Fractint! ;-) I guess *that* demonstrates where my priorities lie... Aloha, Bud Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "David Jones" <gnome@hawaii.rr.com> Subject: Re: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 08 Dec 2001 08:48:06 -1000 On 8 Dec 01 at 10:23, Mark Christenson wrote: > Speaking of technical obsolescence, you can call me > Stegosaurus. I'm still running Win 3.1 and DOS 6.0 on an > AMD 80486 DX2/80. I'm also sending this via Eudora Light > ver 1.5.2 (1995) and Trumpet Winsock 2.0 Rev B (1994) > and a 56K dial-up modem. Hey, it all still works, and > my ISP can't provide software that will work with my > system. I've got a 25MHz AMD 80386 box sitting around here. Maybe I should set it up to grind away at deep zooms, and maybe check it once a month or so for progress? ;-) David gnome@hawaii.rr.com Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: harry <harrybissell@prodigy.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) FOTD 07-12-01 (Golden Chrysanthemum [6]) Date: 08 Dec 2001 13:57:04 -0500 How long will you take to render ?... or should we just download the gif file.... ??? ;^P H^) harry bissell JimMuth@aol.com wrote: > D. Freed wrote: > > >The [FOTD] site screams for a sight of: > > >"the dynamic duo"; "Cats of the fractal variety . . . . ." > > Your wish may soon be granted, along with a picture of > . . . . . myself, no less! > > Jim M. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List > Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com > Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" > Administrator: twegner@fractint.org > Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" -- Jihad Terrorism Conspiracy New World Order Revolution Black Helicopters Freedom of Speech First Amendment Rights: Carnivore Bait go ahead and READ my e-mail I have nothing to hide... how about YOU ??? Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: Re: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 08 Dec 2001 15:45:03 EST Mark Christenson wrote: >Speaking of technical obsolescence, you can call me Stegosaurus. >I'm still running Win 3.1 and DOS 6.0 on an AMD 80486 DX2/80. >I'm also sending this via Eudora Light ver 1.5.2 (1995) and Trumpet >Winsock 2.0 Rev B (1994) and a 56K dial-up modem. Hey, it all >still works, and my ISP can't provide software that will work with >my system. If you're a stegosaurus, then I must be a Trilobite. I write the FOTD every day, using WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS (circa 1990). Jim M. Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Scott D. Boyd" <sdboyd56@swbell.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 08 Dec 2001 18:01:46 -0600 On Saturday 08 December 2001 12:23, Mark Christenson wrote: > Thank God it hasn't been 50 years since high school quite yet! ;-) > And it hasn't been 50 years for Tim, either! > Speaking of technical obsolescence, you can call me Stegosaurus. > I'm still running Win 3.1 and DOS 6.0 on an AMD 80486 DX2/80. I bet your setup runs really fast on that '486, right? You don't have all that multi-threading overhead and resource-hogging bulk of Windows 9x to bog you down. 8-) Scott Boyd Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: bmc1@airmail.net Subject: Re: (fractint) non vicious non-rumors and humor <g!> Date: 08 Dec 2001 21:51:21 -0600 What an excellent post for us late-comers. History, person's names, all kinds of interesting material here that would have otherwise vaproized in time. Any chance there could be a "Historical" section added to the Archives, to which this post be added???? IMHO, Fractint has long since had a life of its own, and is likely to outlive us all; its anecdotal history should be preserved: as educational for newcomers, informational for latecomers such as myself, as archival material for our kids/the kids who are its latest devotees. D. Freed + Dallas Fractal Racoon Society (membership = 4) Tim Wegner wrote: > I was trying to figure out whether to chatise Paul for his "vicious > rumor" post or not. > > My first thought was to take umbrage that he read a post I had made > on the developer's list then posted a somewhat hysterical > misrepresentation of it here. This thought lasted about 3 seconds, > maybe five seconds max. :-) > > However I decided to applaud Paul instead for livening up this sorta > dead list with some juicy stuff. If I had a payroll I would have to > put him on it to make posts like that <grin!> It sure did bring out > some passionate replies in defense of new versions rendering people's > PAR collections accurately. > > Paul is totally and absolutely forgiven <says Tim with saintly > smile!> > > Maybe we should have a contest to find other weirdnesses of Fractint. > Can anybody state in clear mathematical language EXACTLY what > fractint is doing with the default mandelbrot and julia algorithms? > > This is amusing really, because Bert Tyler never claimed to be a > theorist, mathematician, or to have a deep knowlefdge of fractals. He > was an expert programmer in assembler. He liked "stylish blue" for > the background, so he didn't start with color 0 (black) but with > color 1 (blue in the default palette). As you can see, an initial > iteration gets skipped because as a programmer Bert saw that > 0*0 + c = c, so he decided to just start with z(0) = c rather than > z(0) = 0, and save one cycle. Bert's motivation was speed pure and > simple. > > This consternation about backward compatibility makes me chuckle. In > a few feverish nights of work in 1987 Bert coded the Mandelbrot and > Julia algorithm. Today, in 2001, 14 years later, the default image is > exactly the same as it was then. But the there are quite a number of > different routines in Fractint that all do the default mandelbrot. > > 1. Bert's original 386 32 bit integer math mandelbrot/Julia code. I > think it has been modified a little over the years by some people who > found ways to speed it up slightly. > > 2. 16 bit integer math. When you are calculating the default > Mandelbrot and low zoom ratios, Fractint actually abandons Bert's > code and uses 16 bit integer math! Fractint seamlessly "shifts" to > 32 bit integer math when the 16 bit precision limits is reached. > > 3. Floating point math coded in C. I probably wrote this originally. > (Don't try coding the Mandelbrot algorithm in C at home, it's hard, > remember, I really am a rocket scientist <g!>) > > 4. Floating point math coded in assembler with floating point > coprocessor calls. Jonathan knows about this. > > 5. Finally, arbitrary precision code that allows you to zoom all the > way to 10^1500 power. (There are actually several versions of this in > Fractint, if memory severs, so maybe this is 5. and 6.) > > Should probably add the formular parser which itself has integer > math, C language floating point math, and floating point assembler. > That would make alternative codings 6., 7., and 8. I haven't checked > in an awfully long time, but I believe it is easy to code up a > mandelbrot and julia that look exactlyt like Fractint's mandel and > julai images, complete with Bert's idiosyncracies. > > With various fractint command line options you can render the default > Mandelbrot with ALL these various coding schemes, and they all work > nearly identically with the default Mandelbrot/Julia, with virtually > every pixel the same color. (I say "virtually" because undoubtedly > there is a pixel or two that gets color differently). > > Here's an assignment for Fractint lovers. Can somebody make a PAR > file that makes the default mandelbrot using ALL the different code > options I have mentioned? You'll have to dig out debugflag.doc. How > many entries in the PAR file are there? Variations of parser formulas > don't count - you are allowed one parser formula but you can use > different fractint options to force the use ofd different code. > > So the image Bert generated with his idiosyncratic Mandelbrot/Julia > implementation that he ran on an early model 386 (I had to argue with > him to get him to add 286 support, because my machine was a 286) is > the same image you get with today's fractint, even though the > computer is totally different, and most of the code is totally > different than the code he wrote. > > Now to complete the story, in December 2001 Jonathan Osuch notices > the peculiarities of Bert's 1987 code, we have a brief email exchange > that discusses backward's compatibility, then > > EXTRA EXTRA READ ALL ABOUT IT! > > VICIOUS RUMOR - FRACTINT TEAM THREATENS TO CHANGE BERT TYLER'S > RENDERING OF THE MANDELBROT AND JULIA IN FRACTINT!!! > > Goodnight Folks! > > Tim > > As he heads to bed having spent a happy evening ROTFL :-) > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List > Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com > Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" > Administrator: twegner@fractint.org > Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "David Jones" <gnome@hawaii.rr.com> Subject: Re: (fractint) Vicious Rumor... Date: 08 Dec 2001 18:44:31 -1000 On 8 Dec 01 at 15:45, JimMuth@aol.com wrote: > If you're a stegosaurus, then I must be a Trilobite. I > write the FOTD every day, using WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS > (circa 1990). Fastest wordprocessor on the planet. David who still has a copy of WordPerfect Executive gnome@hawaii.rr.com Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: (fractint) FOTD 09-12-01 (Spokes [5]) Date: 09 Dec 2001 09:26:40 EST FOTD -- December 09, 2001 (Rating 5) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: I named today's fractal image "Spokes". The name was inspired by the four straight arms radiating from the traditional midget at the center. The arms are not workable spokes however, for they are an illusion, no more than infinitely divided fractal debris arranged into roughly straight lines. The parent fractal was created by adding 3 parts of Z^4 to Z^2. Because the formula was iterated with 1/C rather than C, the fractal is inverted -- an island in an infinite ocean, rather than a lake in an infinite continent. But the island is lined with the expected Mandelbrot buds along its shoreline, and two very distorted Mandelbrot midgets lie in the marsh-lands near the western shore. Today's image lies in a valley of one of these midgets. Studying the image, I could find nothing outstanding in it. Yet it's not really a below-average image. Undecided, I rated it an average 5. The image takes 46 minutes to render on my squeaky old Pentium 200mhz machine with the fan that needs to be nudged with a toothpick before it starts turning. Waiting this long a time is a rather heavy effort for such a mediocre result, but frustration may be avoided by letting Paul and Scott do the work and downloading the completed image from one of their FOTD web sites. Paul's site is at: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> and Scott's is at: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> The fractal weather Saturday featured a raw wind and steady cold rain from morning until dusk, eventually totalling around 1/2 inch (13mm). The fractal cats hate rain, they hate wind, and they hate cold temperatures such as the 39F 4C, which was all we could reach today. Needless to say, the dynamic duo were most unhappy, and sulked most all afternoon. A treat of warm tuna followed by a turkey treat was necessary to lift their spirits. My spirits are reasonably high now that the hard part of the seasonal decoration is finished. They are high enough in fact, that I might go searching for one of those elusive fractals. If I find one, it will appear as tomorrow's FOTD. Until then, take care, and be serene in an un-serene world. Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ Spokes { ; time=0:46:20.55--SF5 on a P200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotMix4 function=recip passes=1 center-mag=-1.881330206915339/+0.4805578993509941/\ 843933.2/1/40/1.76137477478355287e-007 params=1/2/\ 3/4/0/0 float=y maxiter=12000 inside=0 logmap=500 colors=000JHhJHiJHiJIjJIkKJkKJlKKmKKmKJnKJoLIoLIpL\ JqLKqLLrLMqKNpKOoKOnKOmKOlKOkKOjKOiKOhKOgKOfKOeKOd\ KOcFOeBOg7Oi3Ok4Oh4Nf5Md5Lb6J`6IZ7HX7GV8ET8DR9CP9B\ N77M9ALBCKCEKEGJFIIHKIIMHKOGMQGNSFPUEQWESYDT_DVaCW\ cBYeB_gA`i9bk9cm8eo7fq7hs6iu6ht7ht8hs8hs9gsAgrAgrB\ gqBfqCfqDfpDfpEeoEeoFeoGenGdnHdnIdmIdmJclJclKclLck\ LbkMbjMbjNbjOaiOaiPaiQahQ`hR`gR`gS`gT_fT_fU_eU_eVZ\ eWZdWZdXZdXccRccLccFcc9cc4cc5cc5ac6Xc6Nc7Ha7H`6H`5\ H_4H_3H_2HZ1HZ0HZ0K_1P`2U`2Za3ca4hb4rb5sc6wg6zh7ug\ 7pe8hf9cf9ZgAUgBPhBKhCKiDKiDKjEKjEPkBUl8Um6Um3Um1U\ m0Um0Ul9Th8Sd7Ra6RY6QU5PR4ON3OK3QI5RG6SG7UH8VI9WJA\ XKBYLDZMFZNH_OI`PK`QMaRObSPbTRcUTcVUdWWeXYeY_fZ`g_\ bg`dhafibgicijdkjelgfhdge`hbai_cjWekTglQimNknJmoGo\ pDqqAsrTusSwtRyuRzvQzwPzxOzyOzzNzzMzzLzzJzzLzzMzzO\ zzPzzRzzSzzUzzVzzXzzYzz_zz_zz`zz`zz`zz`zz`zzazzbzz\ bzzczzdzzdzzezzfzzfzzgzzh } frm:MandelbrotMix4 {; Jim Muth a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2), g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(-a*b*g*h)^j, k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel): z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c, |z| < l } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Andrew Coppin" <orphi69@hotmail.com> Subject: (fractint) Jim's FotD Date: 10 Dec 2001 14:41:15 +0000 To all those who display Jim's Fractals... In the beginning, Jim's FotD didn't HAVE a rating... Then someone asked that each day's fractal be given a rating, so folk could decide whether to bother viewing it. Jim kindly obliged, but no website that I know of actually displays the fractal's rating until you are actually viewing the fractal! What is really needed is for this information to be on the main index pages... (Although I appriciate that this is NOT as simple to do as it might sound ;-) Thanks guys. Andrew. "But nothing can do EVERYTHING!" "Hey, this 'nothing' stuff sounds great - we should be using it!" _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Scott D. Boyd" <sdboyd56@swbell.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) Jim's FotD Date: 10 Dec 2001 09:08:22 -0600 On Monday 10 December 2001 08:41, Andrew Coppin wrote: > To all those who display Jim's Fractals... > > In the beginning, Jim's FotD didn't HAVE a rating... Then someone asked > that each day's fractal be given a rating, so folk could decide whether to > bother viewing it. Jim kindly obliged, but no website that I know of > actually displays the fractal's rating until you are actually viewing the > fractal! What is really needed is for this information to be on the main > index pages... (Although I appriciate that this is NOT as simple to do as > it might sound ;-) > That sounds like a good idea Andrew! Wouldn't be all that difficult. I'll look into modifying my script to do that. I think it would be better if I added in the rating on the index page starting in the new year. For Paul it would probably be even easier, because he does his daily page manually. Later, Scott Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Jim Muth <jamth@mindspring.com> Subject: (fractint) FOTD 10-12-01 (Fractopod Undulatus [5]) Date: 10 Dec 2001 10:01:33 -0500 (EST) FOTD -- December 10, 2001 (Rating 5) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: Having watched a lot of prehistoric animals with their incomprehensible scientific names on TV last evening, I decided to give today's image an incomprehensible name. I named it "Fractopod Undulatus", which I suppose translates roughly as "Fractal-footed undulating creature". Actually, it's a scene in a remote part of the infinite spiral of the Z^1.71+C Mandeloid. This simple formula draws a distorted but unexpectedly recognizable fractal, which resembles the classic Mandelbrot set rotated 135 degrees CW. Today's scene lies in a secondary valley of a tiny bud in the East Valley area of the parent, which in this case would more properly be called the Southwest Valley area. The thing about the image that strikes me first is the subtlety of the discontinuities. Usually, the midgets in fractals of fractional powers are torn apart by the unavoidable discontinuities, but in today's image, these breaks are located in places where they are barely noticeable. The image is filled with tiny yellow dots, which sparkle like stars throughout. Each of these tiny dots enlarges to a complex of elements similar to the one that surrounds today's midget. Undoubtedly, more midgets lie in these smaller complexes, though these midgets are almost certainly beyond resolution. Because the image looks so much like so many that we have seen so many times before, I could rate it no higher than an average rating of 5. But it's still worth at least a glance, even if not quite worth the 1/2 hour required to render it from the parameter file. The hassle of running the parameter file can be avoided by letting Paul and Scott handle the hassle, and downloading the completed GIF image from their web sites at: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> and at: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> The sun returned to Fractal Central Sunday, but the winds remained brisk and the temperature barely touched 50F 10C. Fractal cats, unlike their feral cousins, find such conditions too unpleasant to endure for longer than a few minutes. The dynamic duo grew sulky as the afternoon progressed, but forgot their troubles when the tuna appeared around sunset. And I'll forget *my* troubles when the day's work is finished. Unfortunately, the only way I know to finish work is to start it and keep going until nothing remains undone. So while I'm working, I'll say take care, and do flying birds ever get struck by lightning? Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ FractopodUndulatus { ; time=0:31:27.57--SF5 on a P200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotBC1 function=recip passes=1 center-mag=-0.441558671869633/-0.306673097759865/6\ 756444/1/-7.5/-1.33158752357864785e-008 params=1.7\ 1/0/-40/0 float=y maxiter=4800 inside=0 logmap=780 colors=00003C13C33C43E53E73F83F93GB3GC3IE3IF3JG3JI\ 3KJ3KI3JG3JF3JG4II4IJ4IK4IK4GM5GN5GO5GO5FQ5FR7FS7F\ S7EU7EV7EX8EX8CY8CZ8C`8C`9Ba9Bb9Bd9Bd89d9Bd9Bd9Bd9\ Cd9Cd9Cd9EdBEdBEdBFdBFdBFdBGdBGdBGdCIdCIdCIdCJdCJd\ CJdCKdEKdEKdEMdEMdEMdENdENeCMdENbEOaFQaFQ`GRZGSYGU\ YIUXIVVJXUJYUJYSKZRK`QMaQMaOMbNNdMNeMOeKOfJOhIQiIQ\ iGRjFRlERmESmCSnBUp9UqBVs9Uq9Sq9Rq9Qq9Oq9Np8Mp8Kp8\ Jp8Ip8Gn8Fn7En7Cn7Bn79m78m77m55m54m53l51l50l50l50l\ 80iB3fE4eG7bI8aKBZNCYQFVSISUJRXMOZNNaQKbRJaUKaVKaY\ KaZKa`K`bK`dK`eK`hK`iKZlKZmKZnKZqKZsKbtKhtEmt8st3w\ t0zw0yt0ws0uq0qn0nm0ml0ji0ih0hf0ed0db0ba0`Z0ZY0YX0\ VU0US0SR0RQ0QR0OR1NR1MR3KR3JR4IS5JR4JR4JQ3KO3KM1KK\ 1KK1MI0MI0MG0MF0NE0NC0NC0O90O90O70O50Q30Q30Q30Q10R\ 30R40R50S70R80Q90OB0OE0NG0MJ0MM0KO0JR0JS0IU1GX3FY4\ FZ4E`5Cb7Cd8Be99f99iB8jC7lE7mE7nG7pJ7qM7sO7tR7uU7w\ X7xZ7ya7zd7zf7zi8zl9znBzq } frm:MandelbrotBC1 { ; by several Fractint users e=p1, a=imag(p2)+100 p=real(p2)+PI q=2*PI*fn1(p/(2*PI)) r=real(p2)-q Z=C=Pixel: Z=log(Z) IF(imag(Z)>r) Z=Z+flip(2*PI) ENDIF Z=exp(e*(Z+flip(q)))+C |Z|<a } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Paul N. Lee" <Paul.N.Lee@Worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) Jim's FotD Date: 10 Dec 2001 09:27:18 -0600 Andrew Coppin wrote: > > To all those who display Jim's Fractals... > Actually, it is pretty simple to do for either Scott or I. But since most of those that people viewing the images are on the FractInt List, they receive the email long before the web pages are even built, so they should know the rating ahead of time. Like you do and anyone else reading this reply or your initial comment. :-) And then there is the other issue, how many times others have disagreed with what Jim feels the "rating" to be and what they think it should be. If the rating showed, would that influence your decision on whether you wanted to view the image from the website/s?? Or would you view them anyway?? I suspect that the regular viewers will look at each daily image no matter what the rating shows. And if someone is not going to view one strictly based upon what Jim thinks it rates (at the moment he picks a number), then they can stop the download before all of the image gets there, since that is the first part of Jim's posting (images are always slower). I have another question, Andrew, is there somebody that you know who basis there decision on what to view using the rating system?? Sincerely, P.N.L. http://www.fractalus.com/cgi-bin/theway?ring=fractals&id=43&go Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Andrew Coppin" <orphi69@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: (fractint) Jim's FotD Date: 10 Dec 2001 15:37:23 +0000 >From: "Paul N. Lee" <Paul.N.Lee@Worldnet.att.net> >Reply-To: fractint@lists.xmission.com >To: fractint@lists.xmission.com >Subject: Re: (fractint) Jim's FotD >Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:27:18 -0600 > >I have another question, Andrew, is there somebody that you know who >basis there decision on what to view using the rating system?? OK, will go crawl back under the stone from wence I came... _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: the_juggernaut@juno.com Subject: (fractint) djgpp Date: 10 Dec 2001 13:32:31 -0600 I've only recently learned to program, and as I get better I would be very interested in porting Fractint to djgpp. But I'm not good yet, so I have a question: I have djgpp, and I'm trying to install the GRX graphics library. I read the instructions but I'm obviously not doing it right, because I have no graphics library yet. If anyone has any suggestions they would be much appreciated. I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one who likes DOS. Why can't microsoft just leave it alone? Why do I find myself loathing new software? Why must a step forward so often be accompanied by a step backward? It must be a new law of physics, conservation of progress. Jon K > In the future, the base code will have to be changed to Xfractint as > more > people get XP'd. Which, in all probability, Fractint in its current > form > will not run under. The Xfractint code needs to be ported to the > djgpp > compiler. In combination with incorporation of a graphics > manipulation > package such as Allegro, this will allow a pseudo windows version to > run on > the dreaded XP. This is a big project. If there is interest, I'll > discuss > this in more detail. ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Ricardo M. Forno" <rforno@tutopia.com> Subject: Re: (fractint) djgpp Date: 10 Dec 2001 21:27:09 -0300 Well, I also love DOS for its command-line facility instead of point-and-click. Windows, with its icons, is in a way a step back to ideography (Egyptian letters, Japanese and Chinese ideograms). It is good for analphabets. However, I recognize that Internet without Windows is more complicated. I use either Windows or DOS according to the task to be done. Regards. ----- Original Message ----- Cc: <fractint@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:32 PM > I've only recently learned to program, and as I get better I would be > very interested in porting Fractint to djgpp. But I'm not good yet, so I > have a question: > > I have djgpp, and I'm trying to install the GRX graphics library. I read > the instructions but I'm obviously not doing it right, because I have no > graphics library yet. If anyone has any suggestions they would be much > appreciated. > > I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one who likes DOS. Why can't > microsoft just leave it alone? Why do I find myself loathing new > software? Why must a step forward so often be accompanied by a step > backward? It must be a new law of physics, conservation of progress. > > Jon K > > > > In the future, the base code will have to be changed to Xfractint as > > more > > people get XP'd. Which, in all probability, Fractint in its current > > form > > will not run under. The Xfractint code needs to be ported to the > > djgpp > > compiler. In combination with incorporation of a graphics > > manipulation > > package such as Allegro, this will allow a pseudo windows version to > > run on > > the dreaded XP. This is a big project. If there is interest, I'll > > discuss > > this in more detail. > ________________________________________________________________ > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List > Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com > Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" > Administrator: twegner@fractint.org > Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Jim Muth <jamth@mindspring.com> Subject: (fractint) FOTD 11-12-01 (Cosmic Lyres [5]) Date: 11 Dec 2001 10:47:25 -0500 (EST) FOTD -- December 11, 2001 (Rating 3) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: In a world where every detergent cleans cleaner than every other detergent, when was the last time you heard the makers of a new product claim that their product was below average when they put it on the market? Doing so is almost unimaginable. Why then do I claim that today's FOTD is below average? The reason is that I believe in honesty in advertising. :-) Seriously, I've been thinking about the value of rating the FOTD's, as apparently others have also. I had almost no time to find a fractal, I had bad luck searching, and when I finally found a fractal, it turned out to be almost impossible to color pleasingly. As a result, today's image rates only a lowly 3. But why advertise the image's failures? I am not a self-critic. Anyone who runs the parameter file will soon notice the muddy colors and the scattered, unorganized features surrounding the midget. Maybe I'll stop rating the FOTD and let the viewers themselves rate the images. I named the picture "Cosmic Lyres", though maybe "Herring-bones" would be more appropriate. The render time of 15 minutes can be avoided by downloading the completed image from: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> or from: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> The fractal weather Monday was cloudy and cold, with a temperature of 44F 6.5C. The cats spent the day curled by their radiators, getting up occasionally to shout at me for food. I must now tend to the other work that needs to be done. But I'll return in 24 hours with another FOTD image. Hopefully, the next one will be a vast improvement. Until then, take care. Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ Cosmic_Lyres { ; time=0:15:36.15--SF5 on a P200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotMix4 function=recip passes=1 center-mag=+0.81134231972411620/-0.993186498565719\ 90/2864498/1/92.4999998551264611/-1.02795145250078\ 601e-007 params=-10/-1.3/-1/-13/0/525 float=y maxiter=2400 inside=0 logmap=209 colors=000SOcSOcSPcSPdSPdSQdRQeRReRReRRfRSfRSfRSgR\ TgRTgRUgRUhRUhRVhRViRViRWiRWjRXjRXjRXkRYkRYkRYlRZl\ RZlPYpRZlT_iV`eX`bZaZ`bWbbTdcPfdMheIjeFlfBng8ph4og\ 5of5nf5ne6me6md6ld7lc7kc7kb7jb8ja8ia8i`9h`9h_9hZ9g\ ZAgYAfYAfXBeXBeWBdWBdVCcVCcUCbUDbTDaTDaSD`SE`RE`QE\ _QF_PFZPFZOFYOGYNGXNGXMHWMHWLHVLHVKIUKIUJITJJTIJTH\ JSHJSGKRGKRFKQFLQELPELPDLODMOCMNCMNBNMBNMANL8MMANM\ CNMDOMFONGONIPNKPNLPONQOOQOQQORROTRPVRPWSPYSPZSQ`T\ QaTQcTQeURfURhURiVRkVSlURlVRlVRlWQlWQlWQlXQlXPlXPl\ YPlYOlYOlZOkZOjZNi_Nh_Ng_Mf`Me`MdaMcaLbaLbbLbbKbbK\ bcKbcKbcJbdJbdJbdIbeIbeIbeIbfHbfHbfHbgGbgGbhGchGdh\ FeiFfiFgiEgjEgjEgjEgkDgkDgkDglCglCllClmClmBlnBlnBl\ nAloAloAloAlp9lp9lp9lq8lq8lq8lr8lr7lr7ls7ls6kr7ls8\ ls9ls9lsAlsBlsBlsCmsDmsEmsEmsFmsGmsGmsHntIntJntJnt\ KntLntLntMotNotOotOotPotQotQotRpuSpuTpuTpuUpuVpuVp\ uWquXquYquYquZqu_qu_qu`rv } frm:MandelbrotMix4 {; Jim Muth a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2), g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(-a*b*g*h)^j, k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel): z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c, |z| < l } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Paul N. Lee" <Paul.N.Lee@Worldnet.att.net> Subject: (fractint) Re: FOTD 11-12-01 (Cosmic Lyres [5]) Date: 11 Dec 2001 11:14:34 -0600 Jim Muth wrote: > > ...I've been thinking about the value of > rating the FOTD's, as apparently others > have also. ...... As a result, today's > image rates only a lowly 3. Ah, but that is only your personal opinion at the moment. Your mood and state of mind have a lot to do with your rating of images. At some other time, it might just have well been rated a 2, 4 or 5 (or even 3-1/2). > > Anyone who runs the parameter file will > soon notice the muddy colors.... That is only due to the brown and ochre colors that you have chosen to use. I tried adding some of the brighter palettes to see what effect it would have, and some were really quite interesting and nice. :-) > > Maybe I'll stop rating the FOTD and let > the viewers themselves rate the images. At least they would view each image that way, as opposed to some people not doing so if the number value was not up to whatever standard they set for themselves. I notice your own personal rating, but do not consider it when viewing the image, nor when setting up the web page. To me, it is just something you have used to go along with the "title". And I feel that titles are over rated in themselves. ;-} Sincerely, P.N.L. http://www.fractalus.com/cgi-bin/theway?ring=fractals&id=43&go Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: bmc1@airmail.net Subject: (fractint) Re: Comments Re: FOTD 11-12-01 (Cosmic Lyres [5]) Date: 11 Dec 2001 18:35:27 -0600 <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html> Fellow Fractaliers of the bi-pedal and quadrupedal variety- <p>I think Jim's Titles AND (always conservative) Ratings are of value not only separately, but together: <p>1) the former giving we mere mortals and the Dynamic Duo a glimpse into what DIP switch the image flipped in Jim's associative cortex to attach words to the image (lots of psychobabble/neurophysiologic BS could be cited here re the neural networks which have been demonstrated to exist in the portion of the human visual cortex which is trained in childhood and adolescence to do the attachment of words to images), and <p>2) the latter giving we mm's and the DD a different insight into the more conscious process involved w/ assigning a number to an image. Perhaps rather than "the Titles being over-rated in themselves", as PNL suggests, the Ratings are over-titled. <p>PNL has already noted the influence of the Fractal Weather on both Jim, the Dynamic Duo and his/their ratings. We already have little enough insight into what <b>really</b> goes on deep in the Command Bunker at Fractal Central, the true role played by the DDuo and the alleged Susan, etc, why would we want LESS information from the creator of the images?? <p>I certainly don't know, nor can I imagine, anyone who - having already managed the Herculean task of lifting his/her fingers twice to get one of the sites like PNL's having pre-rendered images - would then NOT click the mouse twice more to view the image merely because Jim rated it a "3", or gave it a name the potential viewer finds peculiar without even seeing the image which fostered it. I find the names as interesting as the images, and certainly more revelatory. <p>Since Jim's 3's are better than most of my "8" 's, it's a no-brainer - or perhaps I'm the no-brainer. Nevertheless, I and the "Querulous Quatro" (my backyard 4-pack of stout fractal racoons) vote for continuation of both Names and Ratings. If viewers want to add theirs, so much the better. <p>But please . . . . . . . . since the FOTD ain't broke, let's not fix it. <p>Freed/QQ <br> <br> <br> <p>"Paul N. Lee" wrote: <blockquote TYPE=CITE>Jim Muth wrote: <br>> <br>> ...I've been thinking about the value of <br>> rating the FOTD's, as apparently others <br>> have also. ...... As a result, today's <br>> image rates only a lowly 3. <p>Ah, but that is only your personal opinion at the moment. Your mood and <br>state of mind have a lot to do with your rating of images. At some <br>other time, it might just have well been rated a 2, 4 or 5 (or even <br>3-1/2). <p>> <br>> Anyone who runs the parameter file will <br>> soon notice the muddy colors.... <p>That is only due to the brown and ochre colors that you have chosen to <br>use. I tried adding some of the brighter palettes to see what effect it <br>would have, and some were really quite interesting and nice. :-) <p>> <br>> Maybe I'll stop rating the FOTD and let <br>> the viewers themselves rate the images. <p>At least they would view each image that way, as opposed to some people <br>not doing so if the number value was not up to whatever standard they <br>set for themselves. <p>I notice your own personal rating, but do not consider it when viewing <br>the image, nor when setting up the web page. To me, it is just <br>something you have used to go along with the "title". And I feel that <br>titles are over rated in themselves. ;-} <p>Sincerely, <br>P.N.L. <br>-------------------------------------------------------------- <br><a href="http://www.fractalus.com/cgi-bin/theway?ring=fractals&id=43&go">http://www.fractalus.com/cgi-bin/theway?ring=fractals&id=43&go</a> <p>-------------------------------------------------------------- <br>Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List <br>Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com <br>Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" <br>Administrator: twegner@fractint.org <br>Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint"</blockquote> </html> Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Multiple Bogeys" <neo_1061@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: (fractint) FOTD 04-12-01 (A Make-good Fractal [8]) Date: 11 Dec 2001 21:29:46 -0500 ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C1828A.F4AA8C40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >When the grey cat that lives up the street approached, >Tippy quickly chased it away. Send in the Russian...<br clear=3Dall><hr>MSN Photos is the easiest way t= o share and print your photos: <a href=3D'http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag3_et= l_EN.asp'>Click Here</a><br> ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C1828A.F4AA8C40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <HTML><BODY STYLE=3D"font:10pt verdana; border:none;"><DIV>>When the g= rey cat that lives up the street approached,<BR>>Tippy quickly chased = it away.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Send in the Russian...</DIV></BODY>= </HTML><DIV><BR><br clear=3Dall><hr>MSN Photos is the easiest way to shar= e and print your photos: <a href=3D'http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag3_etl_EN.a= sp'>Click Here</a><br></DIV> ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C1828A.F4AA8C40-- Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: osuchj@avalon.net Subject: (fractint) Patch 2 to Fractint 20.2 Date: 11 Dec 2001 21:07:14 -0600 (CST) Folks, Patch 2 to Fractint version 20.2 is now available at www.fractint.org. This is an Xfractint patch, with Fractint changed just to keep the two sources in sync. What's new: This patch adds the assembly language version of the mandelbrot code to Xfractint. To use it, it is necessary to place the command line switch fpu=387 in your sstools.ini file. The NASM assembler was used, but if you don't have it available, not to worry, the object file is included. Modified the Xfractint C mandelbrot code to match the assembly version. Jonathan Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Katherine" <katherine@mediakwest.com> Subject: (fractint) Color Management Date: 11 Dec 2001 22:24:21 -0500 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C18292.94C72600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, folks. I, too, am a newcomer to the wide, wide world of = fractals...and I need some input, please. I have generated all of these wonderful images. The Problem is that I = want to be able to use hard copies of these images...suitable for = framing (modesty permitting). Now, of course, I can print the = things...BUT I want my printer to spit out glorious copies of my = glorious images (modesty issue, again)...not copies suitable only for = the bottom of a bird cage. In a nutshell....color management software???? I've been enjoying the newsletter! This poor math-challenged visual = artist has learned! Thanks, y'all. Katherine ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C18292.94C72600 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi, folks. I, too, am a newcomer = to the wide,=20 wide world of fractals...and I need some input, please.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have generated all of these wonderful = images. The Problem is that I want to be able to use hard copies = of these=20 images...suitable for framing (modesty permitting). Now, of = course, I can=20 print the things...BUT I want my printer to spit out glorious copies of = my=20 glorious images (modesty issue, again)...not copies suitable only for = the bottom=20 of a bird cage.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>In a nutshell....color management=20 software????</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I've been enjoying the = newsletter! This poor=20 math-challenged visual artist has learned!</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks, y'all.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C18292.94C72600-- Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Paul N. Lee" <Paul.N.Lee@Worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) Re: Comments Re: FOTD 11-12-01 (Cosmic Lyres [5]) Date: 11 Dec 2001 21:46:22 -0600 bmc1@airmail.net wrote: > > 2) the latter giving we mm's and the DD a > different insight into the more conscious > process involved w/ assigning a number to > an image. Perhaps rather than "the Titles > being over-rated in themselves", as PNL > suggests, the Ratings are over-titled. I wish to clarify my last sentence, where part of which is quoted above. This was really not meant as a personal attack or negative comment on Jim's titles. More of a comment in general on Anyone's title for something they have created. Which is why the majority of my images use file names such as UNTITLED-##, IMAGE##, or FRACT###. Having titles to images just lets the viewer see what the Artist saw when they named it, whether the artist was trying for that "scene" or named after the fact. And these titles rarely have an influence on what I see when viewing somebody's creation. (Though a few titles do cause me to try and see why they were named such.) I personally find it more interesting to see what the viewer sees in an image, than directing their viewpoint. > > ....to view the image merely because Jim > rated it a "3", or gave it a name the > potential viewer finds peculiar without > even seeing the image which fostered it. Actually, because I currently have about three years worth of Jim's FOTD postings on my web site, one particular title has caused an extreme amount of "hits" since it was made available: http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD_00-08-30.html Sincerely, P.N.L. http://www.fractalus.com/cgi-bin/theway?ring=fractals&id=43&go Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: (fractint) FOTD 12-12-01 (Diamonds in the Rough [7]) Date: 12 Dec 2001 11:00:15 EST FOTD -- December 12, 2001 (Rating 7) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: Naming the FOTD images is like taking one of those Rorschach ink blot tests that were once so faddish. To find a name, I study the FOTD images, put my mind in idle (no problem), and write the first thing I think of. The only difference between the FOTD images and ink blots is that the FOTD images are family-oriented, and contain none of the dirty pictures that the ink blots are filled with. The ink blots are supposed to reveal not only a person's personality, but his intelligence and mood as well. How well the tests work is open to dispute, since a knowledgeable taker can play games with the test-giver, and intentionally 'see' the things in the ink blots that will make him appear almost any way he wishes the giver to see him. But still, the tests are fun, and when I name the FOTD, I do it in the spirit of taking one of those tests, revealing my humble nature, saintly personality, extreme intelligence, cosmic wisdom, and totally optimistic mood for all the world to see. ;-) As for rating the images, this is also mostly for fun, and being totally subjective, actually has little real meaning. I will continue rating the FOTD images according to my mood at the moment. But at any time, I may decide to discontinue the ratings, which no two people agree on anyway. In fact, I myself cannot agree with my own past ratings. Going beyond the details of naming and rating, today's image is a pleasant little affair, well worth a look. I named it "Diamonds in the Rough" when I noticed the four sharp-angled geometric features around the central midget, which bear a vague resemblance to crystals. The rating of 7 reflects my current mood more than anything else. The render time of 37 minutes is slightly more than the image is worth, but this shortcoming can be eliminated by downloading the completed image from: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> or from: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> The fractal weather today featured a cloudy damp morning, which gave way to a sunny mild afternoon with a temperature up to 55F 13C. This was good enough for the fractal duo, who enjoyed the afternoon on the porch, watching for intruding cats and wishing a bit more sun would filter through the holly trees. It's now time to settle down and get some work done. Until tomorrow and the next FOTD, take care, and enjoy another day. Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ DiamondsInTheRough { ; time=0:51:46.97--SF5 on a P200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotMix4 function=recip passes=b center-mag=+2.07502710059632100/-0.000386966632234\ 39/7344966/1/-125/1.68879299031199359e-007 params=-10/-1.3/-1/-13/0/525 float=y maxiter=8400 inside=255 logmap=769 colors=000A3HA4IA5JA6KA7LA8MA9NAAODBPGCRJDUMEWOFZR\ GaUHcXIf_JhbKkdKnaOoZRpXUrUYtSavPexPhyUftZeocdkhdf\ mcbrcYwcVzcRzcOzYPmTPcRSUQVOPYOO_PNbQMeRKhRJjSImTH\ pUGsUFuVJqWNmXRiXVeYZaZbYZeU`dSadRbdQcdOedNfdMgdKh\ dJjdIkdGldFmdEodCpdBqdArd9qcCqcFqcHpcKpcNpcPobSobU\ obXnb_nbanbdnbfa_XQXNEVDGTEISFJQGLPHNOIOMJQLKRKKSK\ KTKKUKKVKKWKKXKKYKKZKK_KI`JHaIGbHEbGDcFCcEBbHDbKFb\ MHaPJaRLaUN`WO`ZQ``S_cU_eW_hY_jZXk`VlbTmcRnePofMoh\ KpiIqkGrlEsnCsoGtlJtjMthPtfSucVuaYu_`uYcvVfvTivRlv\ PojLqZHsNEuBAw07wAEwKKwUQwcWwmazzgzpgnigibgeXgaRgZ\ UhWXhUZiRaiOdjMfjJikHkkIjiIjhJigJifJieKhdKhcLgbLga\ Lg`Mf_MfZMfYLeVLeTKdRKdOJcMJcKIbHIbFHaDHaAG`8G`6G`\ 4MW4RR4WM4aI4fD4k84p44o8AoBGoEMnHSnLYnOcmRimUomXtY\ beJcSKdOKeKLfHLgDMh9Mi6PjASkEVlIYmM`nQcoUfpYiqalre\ msiotmquhsvcuwZwxUyyPzzKzzFzzAzz5zzBzzHzzNzzSzzYzz\ czzizznzzmzzmzzmzzmzzT000 } frm:MandelbrotMix4 {; Jim Muth a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2), g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(-a*b*g*h)^j, k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel): z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c, |z| < l } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Andrew Coppin" <orphi69@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: (fractint) Re: Comments Re: FOTD 11-12-01 (Cosmic Lyres [5]) Date: 12 Dec 2001 16:31:38 +0000 >Actually, because I currently have about three years worth of Jim's FOTD >postings on my web site, one particular title has caused an extreme >amount of "hits" since it was made available: > > http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD_00-08-30.html > >Sincerely, >P.N.L. Mmm... yes... I will never know how that particular image got that particular name... The title seems to bear no relation to the image... Oh well, it's not my problem - I just figure Jim needs to get out more often ;-) (Only kidding Jim - keep up the good work!) Thanks. Andrew. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: nick.grasso@hrads.com Subject: Re: (fractint) Color Management Date: 12 Dec 2001 19:13:06 -0500 Katherine wrote: >>>I have generated all of these wonderful images. The Problem is that I want to be able to use hard copies of these images...suitable for framing (modesty permitting). Now, of course, I can print the things...BUT I want my printer to spit out glorious copies of my glorious images (modesty issue, again)...not copies suitable only for the bottom of a bird cage.<<< I am not sure what you are asking for. Have you tried printing them and they came out poorly? First of all, don't try to print through fractint. Save them as GIFs and use a mainstream photo editting program to print, e.g., Paint Shop Pro. What kind of printer do you have? Please give more details and we'll see to it that you have glorious hard copy (or at least ones that your bird will appreciate). Nick Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Paul N. Lee" <Paul.N.Lee@Worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) Color Management Date: 12 Dec 2001 18:26:00 -0600 Katherine wrote: > > In a nutshell....color management software???? > Besides what Nick has mentioned and asked about, I would suggest generating the image at twice the resolution of what you plan to print at. Another words, if you want to print something that is 12-in. by 9-in. at 300-DPI, then render a 7200x5400 pixel image. Then resize (or resample) it down to 3600x2700 before using your graphics editor program to print from. For larger prints, you most likely will need to render to disk. Sincerely, P.N.L. http://www.fractalus.com/cgi-bin/theway?ring=fractals&id=43&go Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Multiple Bogeys" <neo_1061@hotmail.com> Subject: (fractint) Attachments Date: 12 Dec 2001 20:28:44 -0500 <html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>What's with someone posting a .scr attachment in here? It gave Hotmail/MSN Explorer fits trying to view the message or delete it. Besides, executable attachments are a bad idea -- I deleted it without running or even downloading it.</DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag1_etl_EN.asp'>Click Here</a><br></html> Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Paul N. Lee" <Paul.N.Lee@Worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) Attachments Date: 12 Dec 2001 19:53:39 -0600 Multiple Bogeys wrote: > > What's with someone posting a .scr > attachment in here? It is actually a virus, and are you sure it came through the FractInt-List?? I received a similar personal email yesterday from an individual that was replying to a FractInt posting, but have not seen anything come through the Majordomo email server. Sincerely, P.N.L. http://www.fractalus.com/cgi-bin/theway?ring=fractals&id=43&go Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: (fractint) FOTD 13-12-01 (One in a Googol [7]) Date: 13 Dec 2001 10:49:21 EST FOTD -- December 13, 2001 (Rating 7) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: The chance of any particular midget ever being found and becoming the FOTD is at best one in a googol. It is more like one in a googolplex. Yet despite the overwhelming odds against it, today's midget has reached the loftiest height to which a Mandelbrot midget can aspire. It has become the FOTD for December 13. I have named the image "One in a Googol" in recognition of the near-impossibility of this particular midget ever having been declared 'Fractal of the Day'. I must point out however that nothing unusual or supernatural is involved in the occurrence of an event with such a slim chance of happening. This is because of the immense number of similar and equally unlikely events that might have happened. I must also comment on the 'politically-incorrect' FOTD of August 30, 2000, which once again has been mentioned. Private responses to this disgustingly obscene image, which I received from several offended individuals, convinced me to keep the FOTD family oriented, and not mention certain objects that everyone already knows exist. (I was told that I was corrupting the minds of the world's youth. I replied that I doubted I had such power, and added that if the world's youth could be so easily corrupted, saving it from corruption was already a lost cause.) I am unable to understand ;-) however, why an image which raised such protests has had such a high hit rate. Maybe there's an already corrupted group that is not offended by this kind of stuff. And as Andrew pointed out, there is little in the image to justify the name, which means that the offensive material can exist only in the mind of the beholder. I guess it's kind of a quantum thing, with the observer creating the observed object. Of course, the name and discussion, which were written by me and which led the way to the obscenity, had a lot to do with the whole sordid affair . . . . I guess . . . . :-/ If I didn't already have a life, I'd go out and get one. >:-D Returning finally to today's image, we find that it rates an above-average 7, which makes it worth the 20 minutes needed to run the parameter file. Those who would rather avoid the small hassle of running the parameter file may download the completed GIF image from Paul's web site at: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> or from Scott's site at: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> The fractal weather today started sunny but turned cloudy before noon, spoiling the cats' planned afternoon in the outdoor sun. Without sun the temperature of 50F 10C was just a bit too chilly for maximum comfort. I fear the fractal cats have become terribly, terribly spoiled by their easy life at Fractal Central. It's now time for me to get busy on other things, so until next time, take maximum care, and be an optimistic pessimist. It's better than being a pessimistic optimist. Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ One_in_a_Googol { ; time=0:20:27.53--SF5 on a P200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotMix4 function=recip passes=1 center-mag=+1.74496964423013400/+0.715599540402516\ 60/911697.9/1/132.5/1.03316887684057335e-008 params=-10/-1.3/-1/-13/0/525 float=y maxiter=5000 inside=0 logmap=306 center-mag=+1.74496964423013400/+0.715599540402516\ 60/911697.9/1/132.499999999591125/1.37599577704206\ 055e-008 params=-10/-1.3/-1/-13/0/525 float=y maxiter=5000 inside=0 logmap=306 sound=off colors=0000zP0zV0zZ2zc5zi6zn8zt8zv9zxBzyCxyEzzGuzH\ zzJrzKzzMuzOzzPwzSzzUyzVxzXvzZtx_txVtrSvjOqeKsZEqU\ HoVJnXMnZOn_SpaUpcXpeZrgarictjetjixljynnzppzrtztvz\ vyzxzzyzzzzzzzzzzzzzyzxvyrpxllvgitaerV_rPXpKUnGPlB\ Kj6Hi2Eg0Bg0Ei2Hi5Ki6Oi9SiBViCZiGaiHeiKiiMjiPniSri\ UviXyiZziaziczigziizinzljziizegzaezZczV_zUZzPXzMVz\ JUzGPzEOzBMz8Kz5Jz2Gz0Ez0Cz0Bz09z08z0Cz0Hz0Mx0Sr0X\ j0aX0gZ0lO0rK0sE0z90v00z00w00z00z06z0Cx4Jr5Pl8XgBc\ aCjXGrSHyMKtHMnCPi8Sc4VZ0XV4_P6aK9cGCgBGi6Jl4Mn0Pr\ 0Ut0Xx0_y0cz0ax0_v0_t0Zp0Xn0Xl0Vi0Ug0Ue0Ua0j_0wZ0m\ V0VU0SU0MS0GP09O05M00K00J00H00G00H00J00K50MB0OJ0PP\ 0PZ0Se0Un2Vv5Xz6Zz8Zz9VzBUzBSvCOlEMgEKaGHXHGUHEPJB\ KJBHKCEME9MG6OH4PJ0PK0SM0UO0UP0VS0VU0XV0XX0XZ5Z_EZ\ aOZcX_eg_graiz_jz_nxZntZppXrlXtjVvgVxcUy_VzXZzUazS\ ezOizKlzHpzEtzBxz9zz6zz4zz0zz0zz0zz0zz0zz0zz0zz0zz\ 0zz0zzGzzGzzGzzBzzGzzKzzK } frm:MandelbrotMix4 {; Jim Muth a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2), g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(-a*b*g*h)^j, k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel): z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c, |z| < l } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Andrew Coppin" <orphi69@hotmail.com> Subject: (fractint) MandelbrotBC is not the end... Date: 14 Dec 2001 13:18:35 +0000 Hi folks. It has (just) occurred to me that the MandelbrotBC formula we all know & love (?!) does NOT in fact draw the whole hyperdimensional Mandelbrot sets for noninteger powers of Z. OK, stop. Reverse it. Forward. the function Z^N is multivalued (and hence not truely a function!) if N is anything other than a (real) positive integer. The MandelbrotBC formula addresses this by allowing one to select which part of the so-called infinite corkscrew to be drawn. Except that, while Z^N is an infinite corkscrew, as soon as you iterate it, it becomes something else! Consider, for example, the Inverse Julia map: z := sqrt(z-c). This is multivalued; in fact, for every nonzero Z, there are TWO valid answers to this. BUT, if you apply this mapping TWICE, i.e. sqrt(sqrt(z-c)-c), there are now FOUR valid values. Apply the map again, and this becomes EIGHT valid answers, etc... In short, apply the mapping n times, and there are now 2^n equally valid answers availible. This all happens because sqrt(z) has two solutions. However, Z^N has INFINITY solutions!! So, apply it twice, and there are now INFINITY SQUARED solutions!!! (Gasp!) The orbit of a point in a normal mapping (that truely IS a function, i.e. single-valued) is a linear sequence. However, for sqrt(z-c), it is a binary tree - at each point there are two alternative paths, each leading (potentially) to a different outcome. Now, the orbit of Z^N is a tree - a tree with INFINITY branches at each node. MandelbrotBC allows you to pick which branch it taken - but that same branch is taken at EVERY node. Thus, there is infinity upon infinity (infinity times over) branches that cannot ever be reached with the MandelbrotBC formula. And it looks like they ARE all different! Anyone care to comment? Thanks. Andrew. "Yes, not NOTHING can do *EVERYTHING*!" "Wow! This 'nothing' stuff sounds great - WE SHOULD BE USING IT!!!" _________________________________________________________________ Join the worldÆs largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Jim Muth <jamth@mindspring.com> Subject: (fractint) FOTD 14-12-01 (Modes of Vibration [6]) Date: 14 Dec 2001 09:53:04 -0500 (EST) FOTD -- December 14, 2001 (Rating 6) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: Today's fractal reminds me of a pattern formed by grains of sand dancing on a vibrating glass plate. I named the image, which was created with the ubiquitous MandelbrotMix4 formula, "Modes of Vibration". The parameters of the image were entered on a whim. This should be no surprise, since most of the better FOTD images are whimsical things found by lucky accident. The unusual appearance of the scene is a result of the <fmod> option that I used to render the outside of the image. This under-used <fmod> option, along with the <tdis> and <iter> options, are the three outside options that I find most useful. Don't panic when you see the color section of the parameter file. The image uses only 34 of the 256 available colors, and the unused registers are all black. Trying to rate the scene, I found myself undecided whether to give it a rating of a 5 or a 6. I finally settled on a 6, deciding to be a bit easy on myself. The render time of the parameter file is 4-1/2 minutes on my cranky but faithful machine with the newly-replaced drive, which I have dedicated to fractals. Running the parameter file is an adequate way of viewing the image, but the optimal, though not quite as much fun, way of viewing it, is to let Paul and Scott do the hard work and download it from their web sites at: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> and at: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> With a temperature of 57F 19C, the fractal weather Thursday remained cloudy and tepid. The fractal cats don't want tepid however. They want warmth. And when the cats don't get what they want, they become testy. Luckily, I escaped their wrath by picking their favorite flavor of cat-food for their afternoon meal. This was truly good luck, because knowing their favorite flavor is not as simple as it seems. What they're in the mood for is never the same more than two days in a row. I now find myself with work to do, so until next time, take care, and save the best for last. Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ Modes_of_Vibration { ; time=0:04:35.51--SF5 on a P200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotMix4 function=recip passes=1 center-mag=+2.72563459120140300/-1.058813939969673\ 00/11866.99/1/150/4.02353275696931689e-010 params=-1/-11.1/-11/-1.11/0/525 float=y maxiter=1000 inside=0 proximity=5 outside=fmod colors=000t_zqZznYzkXzhWzeVzbUu_TpXSjURdRQ_OOTLLNI\ IHFG9CE7FG7FJAGMDGPGIRJITMIVPKXSKZVL`XLbZNd`NfaNhb\ OjcPldPle00000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ 0000000000000000000000000 } frm:MandelbrotMix4 {; Jim Muth a=real(p1), b=imag(p1), d=real(p2), f=imag(p2), g=1/f, h=1/d, j=1/(f-b), z=(-a*b*g*h)^j, k=real(p3)+1, l=imag(p3)+100, c=fn1(pixel): z=k*((a*(z^b))+(d*(z^f)))+c, |z| < l } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: Re: (fractint) MandelbrotBC is not the end... Date: 14 Dec 2001 10:31:54 EST Andrew Coppin wrote: <snipped> >Now, the orbit of Z^N is a tree - a tree with INFINITY branches at each >node. MandelbrotBC allows you to pick which branch it taken - but that >same branch is taken at EVERY node. Thus, there is infinity upon infinity >(infinity times over) branches that cannot ever be reached with the >MandelbrotBC formula. And it looks like they ARE all different! I'll not quibble with infinity. Infinity is infinite. It would take eternity to explore even the lowest infinity, and even then, one would be just starting. Also, even though the branches may be infinitely infinite, there is a certain sameness to even the branches that the MandelbrotBC1 formula *does* reach, that leads me to feel that more of the same sameness is to be found in the un-reachable branches. The non-integer fractals might be infinitely infinite, but are they infinitely varied? Jim M. Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimMuth@aol.com Subject: (fractint) FOTD 15-12-01 (Galactic Black Hole [6]) Date: 15 Dec 2001 10:23:00 EST FOTD -- December 15, 2001 (Rating 6) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: Today's image so closely resembles a galaxy that I named it "Galactic Black Hole". Current astronomical thinking is that massive black holes exist at the centers of most large galaxies. It is uncertain whether these black holes are involved in the formation of the galaxy or appear later as a result of the collapse of a large number of closely-packed stars in the galaxy's center. An even greater question is where the matter and information goes when it is swallowed up by a black hole and no longer exists in this universe. At first glance, it would appear that conservation laws are being violated, though several ways around this dilemma have been worked out. My own opinion is that such questions are of little relevance to a fractal image. All that need be said is that today's subtly colored image resembles an older photograph of a spiral galaxy, one taken before they started revving up the colors. The MandelbrotBC1 formula lies behind the fractal galaxy, which is only appropriate, since the formula draws near infinite slices and space is near infinite. In fact, the latest thinking is that space has strong negative curvature, and therefore, like the branch cuts in fractional-exponent fractals, is more infinite than infinite. The rating of 6 is far less than infinite however. The render time of 11-1/2 minutes is a bit slow, but still acceptable. The download of the GIF image file is the most efficient and convenient way to see the image, though when the image is obtained this way, the fun of watching the fractal stars appear one after the other is missed. The download is available at: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> and at: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> The fractal weather Friday here at Fractal Central was damp and foggy but mild. The temperature of 61F 16C was warm enough, but the wetness kept the cats housebound. They displayed their irritation by getting into a hassle over the best resting spot. Tippy won the fight. I'm now about ready to start trying to relax for the rest of the day. I know I won't succeed, but it will be fun to see how far I can get. Until next time, which will arrive in 24 hours, take care, and watch for wandering fractals. Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ Galactic_BlackHole { ; time=0:09:53.74--SF5 on a P200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotBC1 function=floor passes=1 center-mag=+0.09144967526444459/+0.448034057458217\ 10/9.454119e+008/1/77.5/9.17393089480689206e-008 params=1.72/0/-2/0 float=y maxiter=3600 inside=0 logmap=294 colors=00000500500500500500500500500500\ 50050050050050050050050050050050050050050050050060\ 0600700700800800900911A11A22B22B33C33C44D44D55E55E\ 66F66F77G77G88H88H99I99IAAJAAJBBKBBKCCLCCLDDMDDMEE\ NEENFFOFFOGGPGGPHHQHHQIIRIIRJJSJJSKKTKKTLLULLUMMVM\ MVNNWNNWOOXOOXPPYPPYQQZQQZRR_RR_RR_SS`SS`TTaTTaUUb\ UUbVVcVVcWWdWWdXXeXXeYYfYYfZZgZZg__h__h``i``iaajaa\ jbbkbbkcclcclddmddmeeneenffoffoggpggphhqhhqiiriirj\ jsjjskktkktllullummvmmvnnwnnwooxooxppyppyqqzqqzrrz\ rrzsszsszttzttzuuzuuzvvzuuzttzttzsszsszrrzrrzqqzqq\ zppyppyooxooxnnwnnwmmvmmvllullukktkktjjsjjsiiriirh\ hqhhqggpggpffoffoeeneenddmddmcclcclbbkbblaalaan``m\ ``n__n`_oaZobZpc_pd_qe_qf_rgarhcsiesjgtkitliumivnk\ womxpoyqqzrrzsszttzuuzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzv\ vzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvz\ vvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvzvvz } frm:MandelbrotBC1 { ; by several Fractint users e=p1, a=imag(p2)+100 p=real(p2)+PI q=2*PI*fn1(p/(2*PI)) r=real(p2)-q Z=C=Pixel: Z=log(Z) IF(imag(Z)>r) Z=Z+flip(2*PI) ENDIF Z=exp(e*(Z+flip(q)))+C |Z|<a } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Ken MacLean <kmaclean@ic.net> Subject: (fractint) Query Date: 15 Dec 2001 13:31:05 -0500 OK all of you math whizzes out there: I wrote a mandelbrot generator and was working on a derivation for raising a complex base to a complex exponent. I need for someone to tell me if there is a problem with it. It seems to work when I check it on my calculator, but I may have made some incorrect assumptions: say I want to raise a complex# z to a complex power (a+bi): Let z = (x + iy). Then I wrote z = (x + iy) = e^ln(x + iy). z^(a + bi) = [e^ln(x + iy)]^(a + bi) ln(z^(a + bi)) = (a + bi) * [ln(e^ln(x + iy))] = (a + bi) * ln(x + iy) z^(a + bi) = e^[(a + bi) * ln(x + iy)] Is this right? Kenneth MacLean Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Andrew Coppin" <orphi69@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: (fractint) Query Date: 15 Dec 2001 21:31:51 +0000 >From: Ken MacLean <kmaclean@ic.net> >Reply-To: fractint@lists.xmission.com >To: fractint@lists.xmission.com >Subject: (fractint) Query >Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 13:31:05 -0500 > >OK all of you math whizzes out there: >I wrote a mandelbrot generator and was working on a derivation for >raising a complex base to a complex exponent. I need for someone to tell >me if there is a problem with it. It seems to work when I check it on my >calculator, but I may have made some incorrect assumptions: > >say I want to raise a complex# z to a complex power (a+bi): > >Let z = (x + iy). Then I wrote z = (x + iy) = e^ln(x + iy). >z^(a + bi) = [e^ln(x + iy)]^(a + bi) >ln(z^(a + bi)) = (a + bi) * [ln(e^ln(x + iy))] = (a + bi) * ln(x + iy) >z^(a + bi) = e^[(a + bi) * ln(x + iy)] > >Is this right? > >Kenneth MacLean So... you're saying that (x+yi)^(a+bi) = e^[(a+b) * ln(x+yi)]? Well, since that's mearly an extension of the rule for real numbers that x^a = e^[a * ln x] then yes, you're right. Now, if you're gonna get a computer to do this, you need to work out how to compute ln and exp with complex-valued variabled. In case you don't already know, the formulas are exp (x+yi) = (exp x) * (cos y + i sin y) [y in RADIANS!] ln z = Mag(Z) + Arg(z)*i [argument in RADIANS!] These are also shown in the FractInt online help (under "Trig Identities" IIRC) HTH. If not, email me back! Thanks. Andrew. _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Tony Parker" <tgparker@worldnet.att.net> Subject: (fractint) Fractal Printing Offer Extended Indefinitely to Members of Fractint & Ultrafractal Mailing List. Date: 15 Dec 2001 18:08:12 -0500 Tony Parker 4, Old Forge Road, Suite 3 Woodstock, NY 12498 Tel. (845)679-4990 Fax.(845)679-7122 E-mail via ISP: tgparker@worldnet.att.net A number of Franctint and Ultrafractal Mailing List members have asked me to extend my fractal printing offer. I've now printed enough of these files successfully to the satisfaction of the Artists, that I can continue this offer indefinitely in the total confidence that I can consistantly "deliver" quality work in a timely manner. My special "All in Price" is $50.00 USD. The price includes the print, the mailer, postage via Confirmed/Insured USPS Priority, and tax (wherever necessary). I have done substantial comparison shopping on the InterNet amongst a large sampling of the Service bureaus and their prices were staggering! The spread was between $89.00 USD and over $100.00! I also checked the prices at my local Artist's Supply Store & Service Bureau. They charged a base price of $60.00, but then UV ink was $$$ extra, Photgraphic Paper was $$$ extra, UV Spray Coating $$$ Extra! etc.....etc... Please make sure that you include your full contact information in your e-mail reply to me. Please include your full Postal Street Address (not P.O. Box number please), and Telephone Number. Should you decide to have me print up your fractal images, please follow my image uploading directions exactly. As previously mentioned I shall be using my HP DesignJet 3500CP Large Format Printer, HP UV Inks, and Rexam Magic MUG-7 7 Mil/170 Gram High Gloss Resin Coated Photobase Paper. I will then spray the print with Krylon Clear Acrylic Spray Paint to seal and protect the print. I have ordered some sample "Archival" quality UV oversprays, and I'll be using that on the prints as soon as it arrives. I am definitely considering special projects like printing even larger size posters, and printing on other media like Canvas, Silk, and Clear Film for later. I have ordered some sample rolls of canvas and silk to try out, so if anybody is interested in trying their art out on some exotic media, please let me know. Here is "The Offer": 1.) I will print a "poster size" print approximately 36" x 30" (net image size may vary slightly from image to image to allow a 1" to 2" border around the net print area.) from your digital image which must be uploaded as an attached file via e-mail to my secured site at: tgparker_nyc@mailnewyork.com IMPORTANT NOTICE (You must insert the word "fractal" in the subject line otherwise my server's Spambots will delete your file.) This is not my "home" email address. Please do not try to communicate with me via this address. Please send all "regular" e-mail to: tgparker@worldnet.att.net Also, please do not upload files directly to my tgparker@worldnet.att.net address. Someboady sent a virus infected file directly to my "home" e-mail address, and it destroyed my PC. It has taken me weeks to rebuild my main PC. Luckily, the PC I use to print the Fractal Images was not affected. 2.) Inspection. I will inspect your image file and contact you via e-mail as to it's suitability for enlargement via e-mail within 24 hours of receipt of the file. 3.) Image Quality. I strongly suggest you make the appropriate adjustments to your software and operating systems to guarantee the densest and sharpest image possible. No format less than 1024 x 768 should be submitted. It's been generally accepted that a pixel density of 1280 x 1024 will achieve an optimal result and should ensure a nice sharp image enlargement to approx 36" x" 30. This really a matter of personal taste. Some members of the "fractint" and "ultrafractal" mailing lists prefer using much denser, larger files. In general I agree that the larger and denser your original image file, the better quality print will be achieved. The problem is that moving 100-300 Meg files electronically is tough unless you have either a Cable (Roadrunner), DSL, ISDN, T1, or T3 InterNet Service. I've received several opinions from "fractalists" as to the best filesize and density. In my experience, the larger the file and the larger the pixel density, the more detail and the sharper the enlargement. Some folks have sent me 7200x5400 pixel and larger sized files which are more than 100 Meg! I've even received a 300+ Meg file on CD-Roms and 100+ Meg files on the 100 Meg &250 Meg Zip disks, and the results were as near perfect as perfect can get. Files that big have to be sent "snail-mail" or Fedex. Unless you have Roadrunner or a T3 ISP service, it just isn't practical to send large files like that electronically. Whatever filesize and pixel density you send me, I will use my little bag of tricks to bring out the details as best as I can, but please remember, "Garbage in gets Garbage out". A good rule of thumb is that "most" nice, clear, healthy, image files larger than 1 Meg up wiill yield good enlargement results up to 30" x 36". 4.) Color Accuracy and rendition. I will endeavor to give you the best color rendition of your fractal image that I possibly can. Please be aware that my video card and monitor and printer does not interperet and print color the same way as your video card, monitor, and printer do, so there will be variations. Due to the limitations, and purposes of this project, exact color matching is not viable due to these variables an therefore not an ironclad guarantee of my work. Only physical samples submitted via "hard copy" can provide the basis of any kind of exact color matching. There are digital methods of color matching, but they are beyond the means and capabilities of most members of the "ultrafractal" and "fractint" mailing lists. 5.) Security and copyright. I work for you. All your images will be considered as your property and as copyright material, and all your rights and priveleges under US law will be observed and protected by me. Once I have completed a print job for you, I will delete all files, and destroy all test strips, and proofs. I will not make any un-authorised copies of your original work. I will only print as many copies as you order me to print for you. I work alone in my apartment. No one has access to my computers and servers other than myself. 6.) Turn Around. I work as a computer technician in and around Woodstock. I am a kind of country doctor for the PC users in my area so I often don't get home until after 6:00 PM. I will endeavor to respond to all orders & enquiries within 24 hours. Upon payment I will endeavor to complete and ship all orders within 48-72 hours. You can call me via telephone and leave messages on my voice-mail. Let the phone ring at least 6 times and the voice-mail will answer the phone. 7.) Price & Payment. The all inclusive price is $50.00. This price includes printing, packaging, USPS Priority Confirmed Delivery & Insurance to anywhere in the continental USA. Fractalists in Alaska, Hawaii, Canada, Mexico, and the rest of the world will have to pay for the extra postage. If you want overnight delivery, then Fedex overnight service is available at an extra cost. 8.) Terms. Upon my notifying you of the suitability of your fractal image for printing, please send me payment via PayPal or Money order, Please do not send me any regular, business, or personal checks. If you send me a check I will wait the 2-3 weeks until the check has been irrevocably cleared and posted to my account before I begin printing. I like PayPal. It is easy, fast and reliable. Current PayPal users please post the $50.00 to my email adderess at: tgparker@worldnet.att.net New users to PayPal simply login to the following URL with your Web Browser: https://www.paypal.com/refer/pal=tgparker%40worldnet.att.net 9.) Guarantee & Returns. I will guarantee that my work shall be performed on a "best effort" basis, & shall be free from any manufacturing or printing defects. Color matching is not a basis for a return or refund. If you are not satisfied with the print I will redo the print for free subject to your written "hard copy" complaints, comments, and instructions accompanied by the original print in question sent back to me at your own expense. There will be no cash refunds. You will be charged for the additional postage. All complaints must be communicated to me within 7 days of receiving the print from me. Any physical damage, modifications, or changes to the print will void any waranty obligations. I hope that his covers just about everything and has placed it all on a sensible business footing. I want you all to know that I look forward to serving you in this way with a sense of excitement and pleasure, and I am confident that I will give you the best possible print that can be extracted from your Fractal Image. All the best, and thank you again for thinking about me. Tony Parker Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Ken MacLean <kmaclean@ic.net> Subject: Re: (fractint) Query Date: 15 Dec 2001 23:03:37 -0500 Andrew -- That did help thanks. If there is already a fractint trig identities page I sure as hell don't want to re-invent the wheel! I will look for an equation in there for taking a complex base to a complex power. -- Ken Andrew Coppin wrote: > >From: Ken MacLean <kmaclean@ic.net> > >Reply-To: fractint@lists.xmission.com > >To: fractint@lists.xmission.com > >Subject: (fractint) Query > >Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 13:31:05 -0500 > > > >OK all of you math whizzes out there: > >I wrote a mandelbrot generator and was working on a derivation for > >raising a complex base to a complex exponent. I need for someone to tell > >me if there is a problem with it. It seems to work when I check it on my > >calculator, but I may have made some incorrect assumptions: > > > >say I want to raise a complex# z to a complex power (a+bi): > > > >Let z = (x + iy). Then I wrote z = (x + iy) = e^ln(x + iy). > >z^(a + bi) = [e^ln(x + iy)]^(a + bi) > >ln(z^(a + bi)) = (a + bi) * [ln(e^ln(x + iy))] = (a + bi) * ln(x + iy) > >z^(a + bi) = e^[(a + bi) * ln(x + iy)] > > > >Is this right? > > > >Kenneth MacLean > > So... you're saying that (x+yi)^(a+bi) = e^[(a+b) * ln(x+yi)]? Well, since > that's mearly an extension of the rule for real numbers that x^a = e^[a * ln > x] then yes, you're right. > > Now, if you're gonna get a computer to do this, you need to work out how to > compute ln and exp with complex-valued variabled. > > In case you don't already know, the formulas are > exp (x+yi) = (exp x) * (cos y + i sin y) [y in RADIANS!] > ln z = Mag(Z) + Arg(z)*i [argument in RADIANS!] > These are also shown in the FractInt online help (under "Trig Identities" > IIRC) > > HTH. If not, email me back! > Thanks. > Andrew. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List > Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com > Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" > Administrator: twegner@fractint.org > Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Jim Muth <jamth@mindspring.com> Subject: (fractint) FOTD 16-12-01 (Typical Sub-midget [6]) Date: 16 Dec 2001 10:28:07 -0500 (EST) FOTD -- December 16, 2001 (Rating 6) Fractal visionaries and enthusiasts: Today's image is that of a midget that lies on the grossly extended and distorted stem of a larger midget that lies on one of the lightning-like filaments extending northward from one of the Z^(1.23)+C Mandeloids. (There are an infinity of such Mandeloids.) I named the image "Typical Sub-midget" to point out that low-order midgets such as today's all start to look the same after a while, featuring converging branch cuts and long broken filaments. This sameness runs throughout the world of fractals. Back in the early days, when the only fractal available in the program I used was the Z^2+C Mandelbrot set, I wondered how much richer the higher-order fractals must be. If Z^2 produced such wonders, how much more wonderful must the Z^100 or Z^1000000 fractals be? But when I finally found a program that let me examine these fractals, I suffered a fractal let-down. I discovered that as the exponent grows larger, the fractal does not grow richer, it grows boring because it all starts to look the same. My next hope was that the lower-order fractals between 1 and 2 would hold the extra richness I sought. When Fractint finally added the ability to draw the fractals with fractional exponents, I got my chance to see what was down there. Here, I was less disappointed. There are some interesting scenes to be found in these realms, but once again, the farther from Z^2 I ventured, the less interesting the fractals became. I needed to prove to myself that the Z^2 of the Mandelbrot set is truly the apex of exponents. The same thing happened when I found the MandelbrotMix4 formula. This formula does actually draw images that have features not found in the M-set, and has become my most-often-used formula. But once again, I became ambitious. If combining two powers of Z draws such a varied collection of fractals, how much more varied would the fractals be when 6, 12, or 24 powers of Z are combined, I wondered. I wrote several formulas that did just this, but I used the formulas very little, because all the fractals started to look the same, and were not worth the time required to do the exploring. In the world of fractals, as in this world, simplicity is often the best solution. Individual fractals are infinitely varied, but they are infinitely varied within limits. The secret is to explore near those limits. The rating of 6 is based on the intentionally strong colors I gave the scene. Without the coloring, the underlying image would be worth only a 5 or so. The render time of today's fiery image is a modest 10-1/2 minutes on my overworked and under-powered Pentium 200mhz machine. If this is too slow, the completed GIF image may be found posted to Paul's web site at: <http://home.att.net/~Paul.N.Lee/FotD/FotD.html> and Scott's site at: <http://sdboyd.dyndns.org/~sdboyd/fotd/index.html> The fractal weather Saturday turned out sunny enough, but the fractal cats still complained about the brisk breeze and temperature of 55F 13C, which chilled their ears when they ventured outdoors. Having had little success at taking it easy yesterday, I'm ready to try again today. Tomorrow, as always, I'll return with another fractal. Until then, take care, and give every fractal a fair chance. Jim Muth jamth@mindspring.com START 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================ Typical_Sub-midget { ; time=0:10:36.36--SF5 on a P200 reset=2002 type=formula formulafile=allinone.frm formulaname=MandelbrotBC1 function=floor passes=1 center-mag=-0.80131730206810180/+3.261171920365556\ 00/2.549835e+007/1/67.5/9.95332073081001134e-008 params=1.23/0/0/0 float=y maxiter=125000 inside=0 logmap=247 colors=000J00K00L00M00N00O00P00Q00R00S0\ 0T00U00V00W00X00Y00Z00_00`00a00b20c30d43e53e63f73f\ 83g93gA3gB3hC3hD3iE3iF3jG3jH3jI3kJ3kK3lL3lM3lN3mO3\ mP3nQ3nR3oS3oT3oU3pV3pW3qX3qY3rZ1qY3pY5pX7oX9oXBnW\ DmWEmWGlVIlVKkVMjUOjUQiURiTThTVgTXgSZfS`bI_dN`fSah\ Wbj`cledaxygpnmidsfQrdTrbVr`XrZZrY`rWbrUerSgrRirPk\ rNmrLowLwrKqnJkjIefI_bHUZGOVGJSKMQOOOSRMWTK_VHcYFg\ _DkbBodAvi9tg9sf8re8qd8pc7oa7n`6m_6kZ6jY5iW5hV5gU4\ fT4eS3dQ3cP3aO2`N2_M1ZK1YJ1XI0WH0VG0UF1WI1XK1YM1ZO\ 2_R2`T2bV2cX3d_3ea3fc3ge8dfDafIZfNWfSTfXRgaOgfLgkI\ gpFgvCitDgrDfqDdoDcnDalD`jDZiDYgDXfDVdDUbDSaDR_DPZ\ DOXDNVDLUDKSDIRDHPDFNDEMDCKDBJDAHD8FD7ED5CD4BD29D1\ 9D09D08D0EF3KG5QI7VJA`LCfMEnMDlNFkNGjNIiNJhNKgNMfO\ NeOOdOQcORbOTaOU`PV_PXZPYYPZXP`WPaWRaVPbVOcVMdVLeV\ JfVIgVGhVFiVDjVCkVAlT5nV9mXClZFl`IkaMjcPjeSigVhhWh\ iXhjMckNbkNbkNbkNbc3Wh2_f3Yd3Xb4W`4V } frm:MandelbrotBC1 { ; by several Fractint users e=p1, a=imag(p2)+100 p=real(p2)+PI q=2*PI*fn1(p/(2*PI)) r=real(p2)-q Z=C=Pixel: Z=log(Z) IF(imag(Z)>r) Z=Z+flip(2*PI) ENDIF Z=exp(e*(Z+flip(q)))+C |Z|<a } END 20.0 PAR-FORMULA FILE================================== Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Tim Wegner <twegner@swbell.net> Subject: (fractint) Migration of list to mailman Date: 16 Dec 2001 21:52:53 -0600 I am planning to migrate the fractint and fractdev lists at xmission.com from majordomo to to mailman. The new lists are already set up. See: http://mailman.xmission.com I am planning to migrate everyone tomorrow. However if you want to try it before that you can subscribe yourself by going to the above web address. If any question or comment let me know. Tim Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Tim Wegner <twegner@swbell.net> Subject: (fractint) Fractint and fractdev list migration Date: 17 Dec 2001 18:49:17 -0600 I have completed adding all the fractint and fractdev and corresponding digest members to the new mailman software at xmission. Please send all new posts to the new list (fractint@mailman.xmission.com and fractdev@mailman.xmission.com). The majordomo list will go away very soon. I am investigating options for what to do with the old archives. I'll make sure they are not lost. You should have gotten an email with the password for your list configuration web page. You can change your password, but don't re- use an important password since this password provides only mild security! One thing that is a little different is that the digests are not separate lists. Some of you subcribed to both the regular list and the digest. You can select which you want on your list configuration web page. I tried to set up previous digest members to get the digest. For a short time I hereby declare that questions about the list software and how to use it are ON topic. However if you notice particular things that need configuring, I suggest emailing me directly and not bothering the list. I have already changed the reply-to from the message poster to the list. For our list I believe it works best for most replies to go to the list. Let me know if you are having any problems. Tim Wegner Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Zawoznik" <zawoznik@mail.retina.ar> Subject: (fractint) Franktal Gallery is back ! Date: 17 Dec 2001 22:31:52 -0600 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C1874A.A01A6AA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi people, long time since my last post... Are you still there ? Or everybody moved to UltraFractal ?? ;-) This is to inform you that my Franktal Gallery is back, with new fractal pics, music PARs, ray-traced fractals, and other stuff.=20 Check it out at http://www.geocities.com/franktal2002 Best regards, it's good to be back.... Miguel Fliguer zawoznik@mail.retina.ar franktal@hotmail.com =20 ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C1874A.A01A6AA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi people, long time since my last = post... Are you=20 still there ?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Or everybody moved to UltraFractal ??=20 ;-)</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>This is to inform you </FONT><FONT = face=3DArial=20 size=3D2>that my Franktal Gallery is back, with new</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>fractal pics, music PARs, </FONT><FONT = face=3DArial=20 size=3D2>ray-traced fractals, and other stuff. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Check it out at</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20 href=3D"http://www.geocities.com/franktal2002">http://www.geocities.com/f= ranktal2002</A></FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Best regards, it's good to be = back....</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Miguel Fliguer</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20 href=3D"mailto:zawoznik@mail.retina.ar">zawoznik@mail.retina.ar</A></FONT= ></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20 href=3D"mailto:franktal@hotmail.com">franktal@hotmail.com</A></FONT></DIV= > <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C1874A.A01A6AA0-- Thanks for using Fractint, The Fractals and Fractint Discussion List Post Message: fractint@lists.xmission.com Get Commands: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "help" Administrator: twegner@fractint.org Unsubscribe: majordomo@lists.xmission.com "unsubscribe fractint"