home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.xmission.com
/
2014.06.ftp.xmission.com.tar
/
ftp.xmission.com
/
pub
/
lists
/
canslim
/
archive
/
v02.n745
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1999-11-16
|
20KB
From: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com (canslim-digest)
To: canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com
Subject: canslim-digest V2 #745
Reply-To: canslim
Sender: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com
Errors-To: owner-canslim-digest@lists.xmission.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-No-Archive: yes
canslim-digest Wednesday, November 17 1999 Volume 02 : Number 745
In this issue:
[CANSLIM] BASE question
[CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #744
Fw: [CANSLIM] Re: DGO List - CUBE
RE: [CANSLIM] BASE question
Re: [CANSLIM] various stocks
[CANSLIM] Fed Raises rates
Re: [CANSLIM] various stocks
Re: [CANSLIM] Fed Raises rates
[CANSLIM] tlab
[CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
RE: [CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
Re: [CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
Re: [CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
[CANSLIM] Warren Buffet
Re: [CANSLIM] various stocks
Re: [CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
[CANSLIM] kide & qcom
Re: [CANSLIM] Watch List
Re: [CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 07:58:14 -0500
From: "Erik Harris" <eharris@mpinet.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] BASE question
Hi everyone,
Just want to say thanks to those who responded to the questions in my first
post.
All comments were very helpful explaining Pvt. Point, Volume Dryups, and ATR
(not ART as I mispelled, sorry).
I'm watching a few stocks that are in a base. Is there any rule as to when
one should buy into a base or is it just guess work as to whether the base
will last for 4 week or 24 weeks? Same question with a LLUR graph. Is
there no way of telling how long the upward trend will last (just hop on the
sooner the better)? :^)
Also,
I'd be interested in hearing what some of you think of CNYF (canslim #s I
believe). Its a regional bank and has been in a tight base for about a
month. Only about 4.6M shares outstanding and only 10% held by (10)
Institutions.
Thanks,
Erik
- -
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 21:53:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Raible <pscalare@yahoo.com>
Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #744
Cube is being broken up and sold and it's price will track that of it's
purchaser (HLIT): CUBE = (HLIT * .54) + (perceived value of semi mfg).
Based on the price behavior, people weren't valuing the semi operation
very highly. I bring this up since this fact will tend to limit the
upside.
> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 17:42:06 -0500
> From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
> Subject: [CANSLIM] DGO List (vacation delayed)
>
> The review this week is affected by today's performance as I
> was doing the review during the last hours of trading.
>
> For the new members, this list is culled from the DGO (Daily
> Graphs Online, a WON publication) list of stocks that are
> (1) in the DG books; (2) have both RS and EPS of 80 or
> better; and (3) were at or within 5% of their 12 month high
> during the prior week.
>
>
> Others I noted: SDLI rolling over; XLNX consolidating; TECH
> failed breakout and back to the base; POOL failed breakout;
> CUBE breaking out, still buyable; nice follow thru day on
> COHR
>
> Tom Worley
> stkguru@netside.net
> chat with me at ICQ # 5568838
> get ICQ software at http://www.icq.com/icqhomepage.html
>
>
=====
Bob Raible
Sunny San Jose,CA
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 09:36:24 -0500
From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
Subject: Fw: [CANSLIM] Re: DGO List - CUBE
Resending this as the first transmission still contained the
"no no" of 'canslim digest' in the subject line.
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
chat with me at ICQ # 5568838
get ICQ software at http://www.icq.com/icqhomepage.html
- -----Original Message-----
From: Tom Worley <stkguru@netside.net>
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #744
Good call, Bob. I was misled by the headlines indicating
that their "digital video compression unit" was being sold
to HLIT. What is odd is that based on a total merger of CUBE
into HLIT for 0.5427 shares HLIT for each share of CUBE,
CUBE should be trading much lower (around $34 instead of
47), unless I'm missing something.
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
chat with me at ICQ # 5568838
get ICQ software at http://www.icq.com/icqhomepage.html
- -----Original Message-----
From: Bob Raible <pscalare@yahoo.com>
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 9:04 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: canslim-digest V2 #744
Cube is being broken up and sold and it's price will track
that of it's
purchaser (HLIT): CUBE = (HLIT * .54) + (perceived value of
semi mfg).
Based on the price behavior, people weren't valuing the semi
operation
very highly. I bring this up since this fact will tend to
limit the
upside.
> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 17:42:06 -0500
> From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
> Subject: [CANSLIM] DGO List (vacation delayed)
>
> Others I noted:
> CUBE breaking out, still buyable;
> Tom Worley
> stkguru@netside.net
> chat with me at ICQ # 5568838
> get ICQ software at http://www.icq.com/icqhomepage.html
>
>
=====
Bob Raible
Sunny San Jose,CA
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
- -
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 08:09:39 -0700
From: "Wahl, Patrick" <PWahl@sysinn.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] BASE question
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Harris [mailto:eharris@mpinet.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 5:58 AM
> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> Subject: [CANSLIM] BASE question
>
> I'm watching a few stocks that are in a base. Is there any
> rule as to when
> one should buy into a base or is it just guess work as to
> whether the base
> will last for 4 week or 24 weeks? Same question with a LLUR
> graph. Is
> there no way of telling how long the upward trend will last
> (just hop on the
> sooner the better)? :^)
The rule is you should not buy in a base, as you say, you don't know how
long the stock will stay in the base, or even if it will ever come out of
the base. You need to buy on breakouts, which is where the pivot point you
asked about comes in.
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 12:12:26 -0800
From: "bob gibson" <bgibson@wvi.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] various stocks
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Wahl <pwahl@prodigy.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] various stocks
> Here are a few stocks I have rooted out of various sources in the
> last couple of days -
> ISCA has formed a long broad base. Not sure the business is
> ideal in this high tech market, but I guess stock car racing has
> become one of or maybe the biggest spectator sport(s) in the
> country (for some reason that is unfathomable to me).
Patrick
Stock Car racing, as a spectator sport, has been very big for many years.
The top line is the Winston Cup series which draws capacity crowds for every
race. Big sponsors are waiting in line for a chance to spend millions to
support a Winston Cup team. In the last couple of years there has been
growing interest in marketing repicla race cars and that sort of thing.
However, there does'nt seem to be much investor interest. See ACTN, eps 97
rs 5.
Bob
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:39:00 -0700
From: "Wahl, Patrick" <PWahl@sysinn.com>
Subject: [CANSLIM] Fed Raises rates
The fed raised rates a quarter point, market seems happy with that, nasdaq
is up 60 something, dow up 134 or so.
- -
------------------------------
Date: 16 Nov 1999 12:47:03 -0800
From: "Tim Fisher" <tim@OreRockOn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] various stocks
I second that - ACTN was a top CANSLIM pick in June '97, had extrordinary
numbers then. Now they're lying, cheating, and stealing to keep their price
up (see Greenberg on TSC).
On 12:12 PM 11/16/99 , bob gibson Said:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Patrick Wahl <pwahl@prodigy.net>
>Subject: [CANSLIM] various stocks
>
>
> > Here are a few stocks I have rooted out of various sources in the
> > last couple of days -
>
> > ISCA has formed a long broad base. Not sure the business is
> > ideal in this high tech market, but I guess stock car racing has
> > become one of or maybe the biggest spectator sport(s) in the
> > country (for some reason that is unfathomable to me).
>
>Patrick
>Stock Car racing, as a spectator sport, has been very big for many years.
>The top line is the Winston Cup series which draws capacity crowds for every
>race. Big sponsors are waiting in line for a chance to spend millions to
>support a Winston Cup team. In the last couple of years there has been
>growing interest in marketing repicla race cars and that sort of thing.
>However, there does'nt seem to be much investor interest. See ACTN, eps 97
>rs 5.
>
>Bob
>
>
>-
Tim Fisher
Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites
Tim@OreRockOn.com
WWW: http://OreRockOn.com
See naked fish and rocks!
- -
------------------------------
Date: 16 Nov 1999 12:51:49 -0800
From: "Tim Fisher" <tim@OreRockOn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fed Raises rates
Print out today's chart of the DOW and post it as the perfect example of a
knee-jerk reaction. It was up ZERO at 2:25 or so...(the FOMC annc. came at
2:15 NYT)
On 12:39 PM 11/16/99 , Wahl, Patrick Said:
>The fed raised rates a quarter point, market seems happy with that, nasdaq
>is up 60 something, dow up 134 or so.
Tim Fisher
Ore-Rock-On and Pacific Fishery Biologists WWW Sites
Tim@OreRockOn.com
WWW: http://OreRockOn.com
See naked fish and rocks!
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:57:10 -0700
From: "Wahl, Patrick" <PWahl@sysinn.com>
Subject: [CANSLIM] tlab
I mentioned TLAB a few days ago, looked at a chart just now, it is looking
very similar to Nokia of a few weeks ago before it broke out.
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 15:37:37 -0700
From: Jeff Salisbury <jeff.salisbury@xmission.com>
Subject: [CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
> Jeff,
>
> I'm using Microsoft exchange / Outlook running on Win NT 4.0 SP3. My
> options are set to send text only. The automatic response shows my
> message exactly as I sent it and then another copy of everything I
> sent with HTML tags added. I have not had this problem with any of my
> mail in the past. Do you have any suggestions?
>
Greetings my fellow canslim'rs,
We have a member of our group who is having problems configuring
Microsoft Outlook to send only text messages to canslim@xmission.com.
If you remember, the canslim list software is configured to reject
non-text messages such as HTML mail, binary attachments, etc.
Since I'm not an Outlook user, I can't help here. Is there someone out
there who jump in and help? If so, please reply to the group.
Regards,
Jeff - canslim admin/owner
- -
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 12:33:44 +1300
From: "John Lynch" <johlynch@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
Outlook users just need to go to:
Tools
Options
Mail Format
and select "plain text" as the send format. Its not a bad idea to adjust
the settings so that encoding is "UUENCODE" and the line wrap is at 72 - 76
characters. If you dont use UUENCODE some systems have difficulty with your
messages
Regards, John
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Jeff Salisbury
Sent: Wednesday, 17 November 1999 11:38
To: canslim@xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
> Jeff,
>
> I'm using Microsoft exchange / Outlook running on Win NT 4.0 SP3. My
> options are set to send text only. The automatic response shows my
> message exactly as I sent it and then another copy of everything I
> sent with HTML tags added. I have not had this problem with any of my
> mail in the past. Do you have any suggestions?
>
Greetings my fellow canslim'rs,
We have a member of our group who is having problems configuring
Microsoft Outlook to send only text messages to canslim@xmission.com.
If you remember, the canslim list software is configured to reject
non-text messages such as HTML mail, binary attachments, etc.
Since I'm not an Outlook user, I can't help here. Is there someone out
there who jump in and help? If so, please reply to the group.
Regards,
Jeff - canslim admin/owner
- -
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 19:24:29 -0500
From: "Joe Scott" <joscott@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
For the Outlook user..
In your Outlook tool bar, click on "tools", then click on "options",
then click the "send" tab.. You should then see at the bottom of that
tab, two buttons for sending mail in either "plain text" or HTML. Click
on "plain text" then "ok" and you should be good to go..
joe
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 18:42:34 -0600
From: "John Adair" <xjadair@brightok.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
would someone explain why we are talking html. I have never seen anything
except plain test on this board. What is HTML anyway.
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Joe Scott <joscott@mindspring.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
> For the Outlook user..
>
> In your Outlook tool bar, click on "tools", then click on "options",
> then click the "send" tab.. You should then see at the bottom of that
> tab, two buttons for sending mail in either "plain text" or HTML. Click
> on "plain text" then "ok" and you should be good to go..
>
> joe
>
>
> -
>
>
- -
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 22:43:46 -0800
From: "Patrick Wahl" <pwahl@prodigy.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] Warren Buffet
Fortune magazine had an article on the stock market written by
Warren Buffet. I only had time to skim parts of it (I'm definitely
going to read it when I get time), but I think it is worth hunting
down. Couple of things I noted in the article - investors pay out
$100 billion a year in various investing activities - bid and ask
spread, commissions, advice, etc. Buffet thinks returns over the
next 16 years are going to be far below what they have been for the
past 16 years (maybe it was 17), maybe 6% over the next 17
years, versus 19% I think it was over the past 16/17 years.
Anyway, good stuff, also good sidebar on this Bezer guy who runs
Amazon.com and his experience with Buffet. Its the edition with
Businessman of the Century (henry ford, finalists were Bill gates,
Thomas Watson, Afred Sloan, think I might have gone with
Watson) on the cover.
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 18:24:51 -0800
From: "Patrick Wahl" <pwahl@prodigy.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] various stocks
From: "bob gibson" <bgibson@wvi.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Stock Car racing, as a spectator sport, has been very big for many years.
> The top line is the Winston Cup series which draws capacity crowds for every
> race. Big sponsors are waiting in line for a chance to spend millions to
> support a Winston Cup team. In the last couple of years there has been
> growing interest in marketing repicla race cars and that sort of thing.
> However, there does'nt seem to be much investor interest. See ACTN, eps 97
> rs 5.
I get the idea that it was more regional, mostly a southern thing,
but recently has become popular around the country, bigger tv
contracts, etc. Maybe that will alter investor sentiment.
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 21:13:02 -0500
From: "Joe Scott" <joscott@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
John
HTML documents are pages formatted so they can be transmitted
electronically between computers, then displayed in their original form
by a Browser, such as Netscape, Internet Explorer, or AOL's Browser.
Web pages are written in HTML.
If you use internet explorer for a browser you can view the HTML
document that is displaying the web page you are looking at by clicking
on "view" then "source". It will display the page in notepad or other
text document.
I am certainly no expert on this, I just like many others create pages
for my website using HTML.
I don't want to clutter the list with this subject, although I can be
reached privately if anyone has questions.
Joe
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 23:11:49 -0500
From: Craig Griffin <cagriffin@mindspring.com>
Subject: [CANSLIM] kide & qcom
I have suggested both of these as POSSIBLE climax candidates. KIDE has
been through a warp-speed 50% correction (!) and may yet recover and move
higher (given todays action). QCOM has slowed its advance in an orderly
fashion as I suggested would be nice in my prior post. It may be ok (not a
climax). Only time will tell, of course, but QCOM in particular looks
better after the last 2 or 3 days.
Best Regards,
Craig
- -
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 12:00:56 +0700
From: "Peter D. Christiansen" <peterc@loxinfo.co.th>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Watch List
Earl,
I want to thank you for continuing to post this watch list. It is very
valuable to me, as I am overseas and unable to get a look at Friday's IBD.
Peter
Earl Setser wrote:
> Well, most of the stocks on this weeks list are in strong uptrends, but
> there are still some good stocks poised for moves (or should that be
> greatness?). The following list has 2 parts. The first part is stocks
> basing for at least 4 weeks. The second part is stocks that have recently
> broken out, but look like they might give a 2nd chance buy if you watch
> them closely. A couple of these just broke out Thursday or Friday.
>
> All stocks are from Friday's weekend update (85/85 or better), top 60
> industry groups, B/B/B or better ratings, and A-C sponsorship rating. Do
> your own homework, and enjoy.
>
> FORR
> BBRC
> PMCS
> THQI
> TLAB
> VARL
> KRON
> VOD
> ZOMX
> ADVS
>
> TTIL
> CGN
> LLTC
> MCRL
> DIIG
> PROX
> BTGC
> CDWC
> JMED
>
> -
- --
Peter Christiansen
Chiang Mai - Thailand
<peterc@loxinfo.co.th>
<*> <*>
- -
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 07:49:21 -0700
From: Jeff Salisbury <jeff.salisbury@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Changing MS Outlook to send text only...
John Adair wrote:
>
> would someone explain why we are talking html. I have never seen anything
> except plain test on this board.
John,
You never see anything on this board except plain text because the board
is explicitly configured to reject anything but a plain text. One of
our new members has had trouble getting his postings through because his
mail tool defaulted to HTML messages. My original posting on this
thread was a request for the members of our board to help out the
new-comer.
Regards,
Jeff - canslim admin/owner
PS Thanks to John Lynch and Joe Scott for their quick response.
- -
------------------------------
End of canslim-digest V2 #745
*****************************
To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com"
with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message.
For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.