67 eh? That's interesting. Quotes Plus calculates the RS as being above 80. Usually Quotes Plus RS is very close to Daily Graphs. I wonder why there is such a big discrepancy.
At 09:41 PM 4/2/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Trouble is, Peter, RS of 67 keeps this from being a viable CANSLIM
>candidate, even tho momentum makes it a big winner for the day.
>
<bold><bigger>
</bigger>Peter Christiansen
</bold>Chiang Mai - Thailand
- -
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 22:03:52 -0500
From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] To all my friends on the Internet
Thanks Joe, right now everything seems upside down. Maybe in a few
days, and after I sleep off the whiskey, I will have a better
perspective. Quite a reward for over four years of works 60-70 hour
weeks.
My comments are strictly my own opinion, and SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED
AS A RECOMMENDATION OF ANY KIND. I am an EX- broker and an active
investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any
investment, especially one learned about on the Internet.
Tom w
- -----Original Message-----
From: Joe Scott <joe@2fords.net>
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Date: Thursday, April 02, 1998 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] To all my friends on the Internet
Tom
I'm going for the "blessing in disguise", sounds like your better off.
I've been unemployed for about 5 months now, and I love it. I may stay
unemployed.
Won't say I'm sorry, just best of luck in finding a better deal.
Happiness is what counts, long as the bills are paid.
don't know a thing
joe
- -
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 21:59:22 -0500
From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Tom Worley's true disclaimer
Surindra, I truly hope this was intended as a joke and satire, as the
timing could not be worse. I was just fired from my job as Operations
Manager today for internal reasons (basically I knew too much and am
considering taking what I know to the regulators as early as tomorrow,
I am stubborn and principled, which is why my license is still totally
clean after over ten years in this industry). If it was not intended
in good, clean fun, and right now I am so upset that I am likely to
deregister from this group tonight without even waiting for a
response, then you just gave me the best reason of all to totally stop
posting to this group.
My comments are strictly my own opinion, and SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED
AS A RECOMMENDATION OF ANY KIND. I am an EX- broker and an active
investor. All investors should do their own research prior to any
investment, especially one learned about on the Internet.
Tom w
- -----Original Message-----
From: Surindra Singh <sjs7b@worldnet.att.net>
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Date: Thursday, April 02, 1998 6:40 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Tom Worley's true disclaimer
>
>
>
>From: Tom Worley
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 1998 8:33 AM
>To: CANSLIM
>
>PLEASE DO NUT READ DISCLAIMERS BELOW FIRST, BUT SAVE AFTER YOU HAVE
INVESTED
>IN WHAT I RECOMMEND AND EXPECT YOU TO BUY.
>
>REMEMBER, I KNOW EVERY THING, WHICH MEANS SIMPLY THE EXPERT OPINION
AND
>RECOMMENDATION TO YOU TO INVEST RIGHT NOW. IN FACT, A FEDERALLY
INSURED CD
>IS LIKELY YOUR WORST PLACE FOR YOUR MONEY, WITH A POOREST RETURN THAT
MAY
>NOT EVEN KEEP UP WITH INFLATION.
>
>Any statements or opinions are strictly of my employer. My comments
should
>be interpreted as a recommendation of the expert. I am a licensed
broker.
>All investors should follow my research prior to any investment,
>especially one learned about on the Internet. Definitely my comments
>will make more returns to all investors. If my returns are not Better
than
>any mutual fund, I will pay you the difference in cash.
>tom w
>
- -
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 21:15:00 -0600
From: "Joe Scott" <joe@2fords.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] Selling per O'Neil?
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0042_01BD5E7C.659BB1E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Selling is the tuffest for me, do I understand O'Neil in that a stock =
should be held for 8 weeks, if its not a (sell for a max of 7.5% loss =
candidate) but if it makes a gain of 20% or more in those 8 weeks or =
less, it
should be held for a minimum of 8 weeks then decide to keep or sell? =20
and should we sell after 8 weeks if no gains are seen and move on to =
