ftp.xmission.com/2014.06.ftp.xmission.com.tar/ftp.xmission.com/pub/lists/canslim/archive/v02.n148

Internet Message Format | 1998-03-15 | 14KB

From: [e-mail] (canslim-digest)
To: [e-mail]
Subject: canslim-digest V2 #148
Reply-To: canslim
Sender: [e-mail]
Errors-To: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes

canslim-digest         Monday, March 16 1998         Volume 02 : Number 148



In this issue:

       [CANSLIM] Changing your canslim subscription
       [CANSLIM] 9000 or 7000
       [CANSLIM] Re: HDWY
       [CANSLIM] EPIQ
       RE: [CANSLIM] Fw: English (off topic)
       Re: [CANSLIM] 9000 or 7000
       [CANSLIM] NASDAQ Proposal - a professional suggestion
       [CANSLIM] EESI
       [CANSLIM] EPIQ - Who bought today?
       [CANSLIM] WCOM

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 08:00:05 -0700
From: [e-mail] (Jeff Salisbury)
Subject: [CANSLIM] Changing your canslim subscription

This is a monthly posting to the CANLSLIM group.

Frequently, people sign up for the canslim list and then are overwhelmed by
the volume of the email.  There are two remedies for this problem: 1) You
can leave our group, or 2) you can switch to the digest version which
"conglomerates" many canslim messages into one large message.

To change your configuration, email a message to:

    [e-mail]

The remove yourself from the canslim list, write in the body of the email:

    unsubscribe canslim

To add yourself to the digest version of the canslim list, write in the
body of the email:

    subscribe canslim-digest

For general help with majordomo commands, write in the body of the email:

    help

If you need further clarification, write me directly at:

    [e-mail]

Best Regards,

Jeff Salisbury - CANSLIM list admin / owner


- -

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 08:35:30 -0900
From: Dale Pelzer <[e-mail]>
Subject: [CANSLIM] 9000 or 7000

hiya tom w,

your comment about possible numbers for the dow from 9000 to 7000 are of
interest to me.  does your 7000 number mean 7001 or 7999?  7000 is about
22% down from here.  or 7999 and just 7.5% down from where we are now.   i
don't see the dow getting back to the low 7000's again for a while,
although i did put some profit away last week just in case.

dale

- -

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 15:23:25 -0500
From: Peter Newell <[e-mail]>
Subject: [CANSLIM] Re: HDWY

FYI, I doing a little consulting with Headway and they seem to be in growth
mode.  Definitely acquiring other co's and expanding.
>Two I am in now are THNK and HDWY.


- -

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 15:54:35 -0500
From: Jeffry White <"[e-mail]"@sover.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] EPIQ

Tom, you wrote:

> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 13:09:09 -0500
> From: "Tom Worley" <[e-mail]>
> Subject: [CANSLIM] EPIQ
>
> For those that have asked me about Electronic Processing, but haven't been
> following the chart on a daily basis, take a look at the current chart
> (preferably DG Online or paper version). The stock has formed a nice wedge,
> volume has dried up, it just about back on its 10dma, and I am watching for
> vol to come back into it. If anyone can see a negative (aside from A/D
> dropping from A to B), please let me know as I can't find a reason right now
> not to buy it if it makes a breakout signal again (yeah, I know, it's more
> than 25% off its high, 27% to be exact, but I said all along it got way
> ahead of itself so not giving this detail that much weight).
>
> Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer.
> My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am
> a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do
> their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on
> the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all
> investors.
> tom w
>
>
Watch Connie Mack's 3/7/10 EMA and slow stochastics on EPIQ and see if
they give you some confirmation for a move up.  As of Friday, no signal.
But take a look at OATS, which was mentioned, using those indicators.
Looks like a buy to me, but I cheated and saw that 300k block cross on
Friday and took a chunk at 32 3/4.  Will take some in the money Calls,
three to six months out, on a move above the pivot on Monday.

Great indicators on volume dry outs following breakouts or significant
moves, I think.  Once again, thanks to Connie Mack.

Jeffry

- -

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 22:54:40 -0500
From: "Surindra Singh" <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fw: English (off topic)

Great langage though.

We park on the driveway and drive on the parkway. Hoooo.

|-----Original Message-----
|From: [e-mail]
|[mailto:[e-mail]]On Behalf Of Tom Worley
|Sent: Saturday, March 14, 1998 12:59 PM
|To: CANSLIM
|Subject: [CANSLIM] Fw: English (off topic)
|
|
|
|Whenever I'm on the Internet and communicating with people all over the
|globe, I constantly marvel at the ease that language translators have made
|it, as well as the vast irregularity of the English language. Got this
|amusing gem in this weekend, totally unrelated to the stock mkt, but still
|thought provoking.
|tom w
|
|
|Let's face it --
| English is a crazy language. There is no egg in eggplant
| nor ham in hamburger; neither apple nor pine in
| pineapple. English muffins weren't invented in England nor
| French fries in France. Sweetmeats are candies while
| sweetbreads, which aren't sweet, are meat.
|
| We take English for granted. But if we explore its
| paradoxes, we find that quicksand can work slowly, boxing
| rings are square and a guinea pig is neither from Guinea
| nor is it a pig.
|
| And why is it that writers write but fingers don't fing,
| grocers don't groce and hammers don't ham? If the plural
| of tooth is teeth, why isn't the plural of booth beeth?
| One goose, 2 geese. So one moose, 2 meese?
|
| One index, 2 indices?
|
| Doesn't it seem crazy that you can make amends but not one
| amend, that you comb through annals of history but not a
|single annal? If you have a bunch of odds and ends and get
|rid of all but one of them, what do you call it?
|
|If teachers taught, why didn't preacher praught? If a
|vegetarian eats vegetables, what does a humanitarian eat?
|If you wrote a letter, perhaps you bote your tongue?
|
|Sometimes I think all the English speakers should be
|committed to an asylum for the verbally insane. In what
|language do people recite at a play and play at a recital?
|Ship by truck and send cargo by ship? Have noses that run
|and feet that smell? Park on driveways and drive on
|parkways?
|
|How can a slim chance and a fat chance be the same, while
|a wise man and wise guy are opposites? How can overlook
|and oversee be opposites, while quite a lot and quite a
|few are alike?
|
|Have you noticed that we talk about certain things only
|when they are absent? Have you ever seen a horseful
|carriage or a strapful gown? Met a sung hero or
|experienced requited love? Have you ever run into someone
|who was combobulated, gruntled, ruly or peccable? And
|where are all those people who ARE spring chickens or who
|would ACTUALLY hurt a fly?
|
|You have to marvel at the unique lunacy of a language in
|which your house can burn up as it burns down, in which
|you fill in a form by filling it out and in which an alarm
|clock goes off by going on.
|
|English was invented by people, not computers, and it
|reflects the creativity of the human race (which, of
|course, isn't a race at all). That is why, when the stars
|are out, they are visible, but when the lights are out,
|they are invisible. And why, when I wind up my watch, I
|start it, but when I wind up this essay, I end it.
| >>
|
|
|
|-
|

- -

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 23:30:13 -0500
From: "Tom Worley" <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] 9000 or 7000

I was simply using the nrs from the original post, which was from some
market forecasters comments. If I was an odds maker, I would say there is a
very high probability that the Dow 30 would drop under 8000 sometime in the
next 9.5 months. The odds of dropping as low as 7000 are somewhat less, but
I wouldn't rule that out as impossible. With the continued potential for
economic or currency crises throughout Asia as well as Latin America, as
well as the lingering possibility of a MidEast military crises in Iraq,
Iran, Israel, Palestine, etc, And of course let's not overlook the
"confidence factor" should Slick Willy be impeached or forced to resign
office. Losing Hillary would undoubtedly unsettle the financial mkts. As so
many have already suggested, Buddy is not the primary one for castration.

Technically speaking, I don't see the Dow 30 dropping that far below 7600,
maybe a very brief dip around 7400 at worst. To do this would likely take
news events, I don't think the ongoing slump in earnings forecast for the
biggest cos can do it.



Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer.
My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am
a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do
their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on
the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all
investors.
tom w
- -----Original Message-----
From: Dale Pelzer <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Date: Sunday, March 15, 1998 1:36 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] 9000 or 7000


>hiya tom w,
>
>your comment about possible numbers for the dow from 9000 to 7000 are of
>interest to me.  does your 7000 number mean 7001 or 7999?  7000 is about
>22% down from here.  or 7999 and just 7.5% down from where we are now.   i
>don't see the dow getting back to the low 7000's again for a while,
>although i did put some profit away last week just in case.
>
>dale
>
>-
>


- -

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 23:39:00 -0500
From: "Tom Worley" <[e-mail]>
Subject: [CANSLIM] NASDAQ Proposal - a professional suggestion

For those that have not recently visited the Nasdaq site, I want to make you
aware that NASDAQ has submitted a proposal to the SEC that would enhance the
odds of a buy limit order and a sell limit order, where the limits are the
same, getting matched and executed in the marketplace. It adds to the
improvements achieved from the new Order Display rules, and would take us a
step closer to the floor specialist, auction style market.

Frankly, I expect the major wire houses to oppose this idea. The more
comments the SEC receives on it, the more attention, and possible approval,
it will get. I suggest all who trade OTC stocks visit the site at
www.nasdaq.com and register your comments in an email to the SEC (the option
button is there).

Any statements or opinions are strictly my own and not that of my employer.
My comments should not be interpreted as a recommendation of any kind. I am
a licensed (inactive) broker and an active investor. All investors should do
their own research prior to any investment, especially one learned about on
the Internet. Hopefully my comments will better inform and educate all
investors.
tom w


- -

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 09:54:29 EST
From: DCSquires <[e-mail]>
Subject: [CANSLIM] EESI

Hi all,

EESI is a stock I own that appears to be coming out of a nice long base today.
This stock is in the pollution control group, which has purked up with the
recent consolidation.

DSquires

- -

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 10:35:25 -0500
From: "Bud Barton" <[e-mail]>
Subject: [CANSLIM] EPIQ - Who bought today?

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01BD50C7.3B6DAF80
Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

up 1 1/4 @ 9:45=20

- ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01BD50C7.3B6DAF80
Content-Type: text/html;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 =
HTML//EN">
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>up 1 1/4 @ 9:45 =
</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_000E_01BD50C7.3B6DAF80--


- -

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 09:58:30 -0800
From: "Robert Venchiarutti" <[e-mail]>
Subject: [CANSLIM] WCOM

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01BD50C2.128AB680
Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

WCOM is breaking out as I right this on two times ADV.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01BD50C2.128AB680
Content-Type: text/html;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.71.1712.3"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3DArial size=3D2>WCOM is breaking out as =
I right this=20
on two times ADV.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01BD50C2.128AB680--


- -

------------------------------

End of canslim-digest V2 #148
*****************************

 To unsubscribe to canslim-digest, send an email to "[e-mail]"
 with "unsubscribe canslim-digest" in the body of the message.
 For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
 "help" to the same address.  Do not use quotes in your message.