<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"><HTML><HEAD><BR>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, March 28, 2001 11:39 PM</DIV><BR>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [CANSLIM] How could we be more efficient?</DIV><BR>
<DIV><BR></DIV>One problem I see is the delay on posting to this<BR>group. I often post about 11:00 - midnight and don't<BR>see it arrive in my mail till mid day. ( am sending<BR>this at 11:38 PM Wednesday 3-28-2001. Check your time<BR>stamp for comparison.)<BR><BR>I guess we could each make an email list of<BR>participants, but some mail clients restrict the<BR>number of addresses you can send to at one time.<BR><BR>I would like to be a part of the group. My Job ends in<BR>a month, so I don't know what my schedule will be.<BR><BR>Regards<BR>Kent Norman<BR><BR><snip> then given to volunteers, for instance, people<BR>who can watch the stocks during the day could keep an<BR>eye for breakouts, then post email messages asap with<BR>buy points idientified, etc.. <BR><BR>__________________________________________________<BR>Do You Yahoo!?<BR>Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. <BR><A href="http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text">http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text</A><BR><BR>-<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Bob Raible<br>Sunny San Jose,CA<p><br><hr size=1><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>
<a href="http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=mailiyfoot">Yahoo! Mail Personal Address</a> -
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
- --0-929839492-985901150=:51747--
- -
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:36:32 -0600
From: canslim <canslim@twopointfive.com>
Subject: [CANSLIM] Relative Strength Rating
Does anyone know if there are any other sites that list a stocks relative
strength besides IBD's. I would love to find a free one while I'm just
learning. I had a subscription to IBD but didn't bother to read a single
one (I'm stubborn that way) because of the M. Now it's expired and I can't
see spending the loot on it if i'm just going to keep paper trading for
awhile.
bj downes
- -
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:02:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Kent Norman <kent_norman@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Impressive Followthrus?
My mistake, sorry
Kent
- --- Tim Fisher <tim@orerockon.com> wrote:
> You are thinking of Level 3 Communications, LVLT I
> think, not LLL...
>
> At 06:20 AM 3/29/2001 -0800, you wrote:
> >I work for an ISP and we use level 3 for network
> >traffic. I was surprised to learn that most of
> their
> >revenue comes from coal (the black burning rock!).
> It
> >set me back until I recalled that Enron (a pipeline
> >company) is doing networking by running fiber
> cables
> >through abandoned pipeline. Sort of makes you
> wonder
> >how to classify the industry group!
> >
> >Old economy is becoming new!
> >
> >Wish you well
> >Kent Norman
> >
> >--- DougC <dzc@qwest.net> wrote:
> > > Earl
> > >
> > > Just looked at the chart of LLL back to middle
> of 98
> > > up to the present. I
> > > can see how it would
> > > have been difficult to hold through that entire
> time
> > > period. Even during
> > > the up trend
> > > from 00 to present looks like there were some
> > > serious shakeouts. From my
> > > point of view,
> > > only looking at the fundies and the chart and
> not
> > > even having read any
> > > analysis of its business
> > > it looks like a company with some more stock
> > > appreciation potential. the
> > > only negative I see
> > > on what DGO is showing me is the quarter ending
> > > March 31,2000 where it's
> > > earnings decreased
> > > 48% over the same quarter the previous year. But
> '00
> > > annual earnings were
> > > still 20% greater
> > > than '99 and the est. for '01 is 35% increase.
> As
> > > far as fund participation
> > > is concerned it looks
> > > like that only really started around Nov of '00.
> > > This is leading me to
> > > believe that if this stock
> > > can develop a decent cup as a base and go
> through
> > > the process of developing
> > > a handle right
> > > around when the market starts trending up for
> real
> > > that it could be one of
> > > the leaders out of the
> > > gate. But of course whatever earnings LLL comes
> out
> > > with around 4/25 will
> > > be very important.
> > > They only have to beat .12. If the earnings stay
> on
> > > the current sequential
> > > trend and come out
> > > at around 1.10 I wonder what affect that will
> have
> > > on institutional
> > > interest in this stock.
> > >
> > > At 07:33 PM 3/28/01 -0700, you wrote:
> > > >Hmm, maybe I should say something here. FWIW,
> I
> > > work for LLL and got in
> > > >for some shares on the IPO at $22. I also got
> OUT
> > > of these in the
> > > >mid-to-high $40s a while back. It languished
> for a
> > > while, but moved up
> > > >nicely as the rest of the market faltered this
> > > year. I own almost none at
> > > >this point, preferring another investment
> approach
> > > in my 401K. It
> > > >definitely was an opportunity missed in 2000.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >At 07:55 PM 3/27/01 -0700, you wrote:
> > > > >This weekend I scanned through the 2850+
> stocks
> > > in the Daily Graph Index
> > > > >and came up with
> > > > >only 9 with fundamentals that met my
> criteria
> > > for the long side. The two I
> > > > >liked the most
> > > > >are LLL and TRR. Both have already had strong
> > > runs and over the past 10
> > > > >days have been
> > > > >in correction phase.
> > > > >Another with great fundamentals is SKX but is
> > > also breaking down after
> > > > >already having had
> > > > >a great run.
> > > > >There are two I like in the bank or finance
> > > groups, AHMH and NYCB, that
> > > > >have great
> > > > >fundamentals but I'm not sure their bases are
> > > worth buying off of.
> > > > >I recently started scanning for
> > > > >potential shorts...I've got a list of those
> I'm
> > > having a hard time trimming
> > > > >to under 50.
> > > > >I haven't tried shorting stocks yet and not
> sure
> > > I will in the near future.
> > > > >I just want to
> > > > >get a feel for how many are out there at any
> one
> > > time and what their bases
> > > > >look like before they
> > > > >break down further. With these long/short
> lists
> > > I'm not confident
> > > > >the recent strength in the markets will last
