From: John Nestoriak <jnestoriak@telecnnct.com> Subject: Re: BUFFY: What's My Line Pt 2
> A question ..Kendra's parent's knew she was destined to be a Slayer when
> she was a child? And knew who to send her to? So..what happened to Buffy's
> parents... why didn't *they* know?
Kendra is apparently from a culture where people are fully aware of the vampires and the slayer/watcher thing. They'd be likely to be willing to respond to a person knocking on the door and saying "Hey, your daughter is a potential slayer. Send her away to slayer boarding school." Can you see Giles convincing Joyce that her 2 year old Buffy is a potential slayer of vampires and should be taken away to be trained? Can you say "wicked axe of fury"? I knew you could.
My take is that there are a loose collection of watchers around the globe. Under normal circumstances each would find a potential slayer and train her. Buffy is not a normal case. When the existing slayer dies one of the slayer's in waiting is supernaturally chosen and given the ability. I'm guessing that the slayers in waiting are only good for a certain length of time. In other words if Buffy lives to a ripe old age there would be potential slayers that would never make it to the big leagues. Buffy was probably chosen more for her proximity to the HM than anything else.
- --
John Nestoriak * "It's the non-relationship drink Software Engineer * of choice. It's not a date, it's The Telephone Connection * a caffeinated beverage." jnestoriak@telecnnct.com * - Willow on Coffee
I have to say that I did not like this episode. I found it scattered and disorganized. The fight scene in the church looked particualrily bad. The bug man was not nearly as dangerous as they made him appear and Kendra and Buffy becoming friends like that seemed predictable and forced.
Just my two cents
Bruce
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 13:05:51 -0500 (EST) From: NinAVs@aol.com
Subject: BUFFY: Re: buffy-digest V1 #466
heyllo fellow slayers :
i just have one thing to say.. WHAT THE HELL IS THIS KENYA GIRL DOING ON THE SHOW? i think Michelle was doing fine without her ! Oh! and to think she can go ahead and Kill Angel! i tape all my buffy episodes so i haven't seen what the out come is but i just gotta say that i think it was a big mistake to add that KENYA chick to the show! okay.... also i want Buffy and Angel to be happy... it would be sooo kewl if they were really BOYFRIEND and GIRLFRIEND... : O) i also LOVE DRUSILLA... they gotta trash Spike though... okay.... that's all from me...
" sUgAr qUeen "
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 13:11:59 -0500 (EST) From: tan3@cornell.edu
Subject: BUFFY: Slayer's Marks?
Someone asked:
> A question ..Kendra's parent's knew she was destined to be a Slayer when
> she was a child? And knew who to send her to? So..what happened to Buffy's
> parents... why didn't *they* know?
As I recall (from the movie), there was a birthmark that defined slayers. Buffy (again, in the movie) had hers removed. Now, does this cross over from movie to show, or not? That would explain how Kendra's parents recognized her destiny, at least, assuming that they knew what it meant.
However, this brings up a contradiction: Kendra keeps insisting on secrecy, right? However, if the slayer has this brithmark, then anyone who sees it (who understands what it means) will know that this girl is the (or a potential) slayer. So, kendra's parents know, if she's from a really small town, then the whole town knows....not very secret, no?
The secret is actually easier to keep in the jaded American society that doesn't believe in vampires to begin with. This also explains why Buffy has problems combining her "normal" life with a slayer's duties: Possibly, other slayers have not had to put up the pretense of a "normal" life, since their existance is generally (though not specifically) known.
Oh yeah....it seems that a long lasting question has finally been resolved once and for all, right from the horse's (no offense :) ) mouth... There are many slayer-possibles alive at any given time, but only one is "activated". Now the question arises, How does the activation process take place? How/why is one girl chosen over another?
Anyway, thoughts for the gristmill...
Tracey
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 12:42:45 -0600
From: Mia_McDavid@em.fcnbd.com
Subject: Re: BUFFY: Angel - breath
Angel seems to breathe, but said he has no breath. What to think???
My theory (I usually have one <g>) is that he, being undead, has no
breath in the sense of having life to share. Xander could "breathe
life" into Buffy because he was already *alive*. But if breath equals
life, Angel's got none.
Mia
GASP-er -- Keeper of Giles Cold and Cruel Kick Ass Side
I *LOVE* this show!
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 14:34:01 -0400
From: Jesse Jou <jjou@mail.med.cornell.edu> Subject: BUFFY: Re: WMLII So many things!
At 1:31 PM -0500 11/25/97, Heather L. Markle wrote:
>Excellent point: but again, (the fact that Buffy has a support team) shows
>how Buffy's differences >make her a better slayer. Not to say that she
>doesn't do some truly brain dead things
>now & then, (the whole RB incident comes to mind) But she is unique and
>that is the strenght of the show.
Agreed. I think this notion of teamwork was nicely demonstrated by the partner switch at the end of WML 2. From a tactical standpoint it makes sense: Buffy's fought Spike before and probably is better able to take his measure than Kendra (who was looking like she was taking her lumps).
Perhaps Buffy would have felt bad if Spike had killed Kendra?
Couple of more things occurred to me:
1) Kind of heartwarming at the beginning when Kendra tells Buffy that if she dies then it won't matter because another will come to continue her work. Nice sense of continuity. Also kind of chilling because it sounds just like what the Order of Taraka does. Maybe Spike and Dru should be very worried?
2) In a way, it makes sense that one Watcher doesn't know what the others are doing: I'd imagine they'd want to keep these girls as protected as possible until they're needed and all it would take would be one loose-tongued Watcher who knew too much to jeopardize all of them (similar thing happened on Highlander, doncha know.)
3) It makes me think that all these girls who are being trained to be major hosses should get together and form a Vampire Slaying Drill Team.
Think of the possibilities. They could attack en masse, and if the Head Slayer gets killed then another is chosen immediately and she's already there in the thick of things. Pretty efficient, eh?
JJ
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 14:44:51 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Hickerson <mhickers@USIT.NET> Subject: Re: BUFFY: Buffy: WML Part2
I have to agree that overall, part two wasn't exactly what I was looking for. I think the biggest grip I had was there were so many things going on at once that it felt as if the pacing were off. Looking back, I wish they'd saved some of the Xander/Cordelia stuff for a later episode when it could have gotten more attention. I also didn't like the way they kissed. It just didn't seem right for some reason. I think it was the fact that it reminded me a bit of the way Fleishman and O'Connell got together on Northern Exposure, with an angry argument, followed by a passionate kiss. I just didn't buy it here.
The other problem I had was that I wished that Kendra had been introduced about halfway through last week so we had more time to get to her know her as a character rather than just being thisi "opposite of Buffy" character. It might have been fun to see her bonding with Giles a bit more, etc. I think she would have been less annoying this way.
What I did like was the fact that Spike and Dru aren't dead. And who doesn't think that Dru is gonna have quite a bone to pick with Angel now? My question is--was she restored? And if so, did she complete the ritual by draining Spike? If so, that will be interesting. Or are they both strong again?
Guess we'll have to wait and see!
Michael
*************************************************************** *Michael Hickerson mhickers@usit.net* *************************************************************** *"Just look behind your own soul and the person that you'll * * see just might remind you of me." --Colin Raye * ***************************************************************
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 15:05:41 -0500 (EST) From: Londres20@aol.com
Subject: BUFFY: Slayer Discrepancy
Ok, if another slayer is called when one slayer dies, how did Kendra's parents know that she would have to train to be the slayer? Does that make any sense? Did I miss something? I didn't think that Buffy knew she was the chosen one when she was little. How did Kendra's parents know?
I need a copy of this episode. WGN did not have sound on Monday, and I watched with CC, but it isn't the same. I will pay for the video and shipping. LMK if you can help me out.
Beth
pppbeth@hotmail.com
______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I thought I'd let everyone know this tid bit. Today in my directing class we a guest speaker who was an old student of my professor. She works in L.A. and I during my spiel of questions...which of course everyone laughed when I mentioned Buffy...she sees SMG alot so I know have 1 degree from her and 2 from everyone else on the show.
OhBuffy: One thing I loved about Part II is that they remembered to make sure Angel had the tattoo on his back when he left the church with his shirt off...although I thought it was kinda small.
missile
Founder and President of the Buffy Crew
http://www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/7427/ Delta Sigma Phi Sargent at Arms
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 15:46:48 -0500 (EST) From: TknoPagan@aol.com
Subject: Re: BUFFY: Buffy's Face =P~~ (wml ptII)
In a message dated 97-11-25 10:50:09 EST, you write:
<< No, no! They were playing good-cop, bad-cop. Kendra wanted to beat him with a stick until candy came spilling out, but Buffy just wanted answers. She got them.
"Have either of you ever considered modelling?" Hee hee. :-) >>
The modeling bit? I was not expecting that at all. The WB I guess is realizing that us adults are watching and not the kiddies! Hehahah
Jason Martinez
TknoPagan@aol.com
Keeper of Buffy's Little Wooden Stake
Keeper of Willow's Computer
Keeper of the Annointed One's Cage
Keeper of Spike's Boots
Member of the Alyson Hannigan Fan Club
"Does it come with a shirt? Because that would be cool"....Willow on the Slayer Handbook
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 17:15:18 -0400 (AST) From: Jennifer McDonnell <q7t4@unb.ca>
Subject: BUFFY: Xander's "pad" comment in WML2
Someone had mentioned earlier that when Xander and Cordelia were in the basement, Xander said something like "isn't it about time to change your pad?" Actually, I think what he really said was more along the lines of: "isn't it about time to change your pace?" Even Xander wouldn't be that rude.
- -Jen
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 16:47:02 -0500 (EST) From: OXanderO@aol.com
Subject: Re: BUFFY:SPOILERS For What's My Line Part II---The Kiss
I would just like to make it known that I have been predicting that Xander abd Cordy would get together ever since the 3rd episode of the season
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 17:00:56 -0500 (EST) From: KitiaraL@aol.com
Subject: BUFFY: WML pt.2
I have to say that I absolutely LOVED this episode. I'm fairly new to this list, also, but y'all have some very interesting conversations, and I think I'm going to like it here <G> I'm one of the supporters of an eventual relationship between Willow and Xander, but Cordy and Oz have both really grown on me and they're fine for now. Cordy and Xander especially have a very interesting relationship, and it should be fun to watch that grow into something more or see where it ends up anyway. Oh, and I loved Oz's whole explanation of the animal crackers and the monkey's pants to Willow, that was hilarious. I was slightly disappointed though, when there was nothing more than carrying Angel out of the church at the end of the ep after all the talk of messing with Buffy's boyfriend. Dru and Spike were great as usual, glad that the PTB didn't kill 'em off. On the topic of Kendra, though, I really agree with Buffy here. I'm near her age, and jealousy is SUCH an issue right now. I mean, I get upset when my friends score higher on Algebra tests. If I thought I was the only one to do something in the world, and all of the sudden someone else showed up who could do the same thing, maybe even better than I could, you'd bet that I'd be jealous. Buffy was actually really mature to work with Kendra, I don't know if I could in her situation. Then again, it just might be me. Either way, it was a great ep, and I can't wait 'till reruns are over.
Kelanna
Keeper of Angel's good taste in Art
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 13:49:19 -0600
From: Harold Hutchison <HHUTCHISON@cornell-iowa.edu> Subject: RE: Fwd: BUFFY: WML2 (don't read if you haven't seen)
>Kendra's remarks about Buffy dying were also very good. I think Kendra is
>goign to be very thorough...But if she keeps going by the book she is going
>to buy it bigtime.
I don't think she will purchase a large amount of agricultural real estate any time soon. Buffy has taught her to improvise at times. But the point is well-taken.
Tom Clancy had it good in his latest novel, when the bad guys are using the old Russian operational style. "It was a good playbook, but they'd read it, too."
Harold Hutchison
P.S. Yes, Power Rangers did get a new Pink Ranger. Almost as cute as the first two.
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 16:28:28 -0600
From: "joy v. cantrelle" <azia@bellsouth.net> Subject: BUFFY: spoiler:angel
SPOILER SPACE
i'm respond to a comment made, by i don't remember who, that said she heard from a friend that angel might possibly become human. angel is 200 and somethings years old.
if he is turned back into a human he while hurl over and die.
it would never work. i think the whole "vampire in love with a slayer" and vice versa thing is what keeps their relationship interesting.
After viewing these episodes I have several questions and comments:
*) Which one is the slayer? Because Buffy "died" Kendra was called forth as the slayer. But Buffy isn't dead, so she's still the slayer, and apparently Kendra retains her power, so who's the slayer? Are they both the slayer? Doesn't that contradict the traditional "only one per generation" theory?
*) I'm glad they gave us a semi-rational explanation on why Kendra was able to hold her own against Buffy. At the end of part 1 I was wondering how this new slayer could fight well enough to take Buffy on as an equal.
And now we know that Kendra has been in training for most of her life and even Buffy said that her technique was very good.
*) Kendra knew from childhood that she would eventually be called as the next slayer. I'm going to put away my disbelief that this is possible and why couldn't they figure out that Buffy was the slayer *before* she was called. Even though Kendra has been in training for most of her life, it has just been training. Buffy has on-the-job experience and that makes her more qualified than Kendra any day of the week. Sure, eventually Kendra would become Buffy's equal and maybe even better because of her discipline, but she still needs to learn how to improvise, how to use her imagination and how to think for herself.
*) As far as the slayer handbook goes, didn't Buffy have a watcher before Giles? Why didn't he give her the handbook or even a mention that one existed? So, following that thought, we have two separate watchers who both decided individually that Buffy was just too unorthodox to do things the way they've been done for (hundreds, thousands?) many years?
*) Was I the only one that suspected that at the root of Kendra's disapproval of Buffy was a jealousy that Buffy got to ocassionally have a life and was still doing the slayer bit rather well when Kendra had to give everything up? It was hilarious when the crossbow went off and Kendra was trying soooo hard to look like miss perfect and just ruined it.
*) Were Buffy's claws showing here or what? For someone who didn't want the gig in the first place, she sure was territorial. She wanted Kendra gone and forgotten as soon as possible. And even when she speculated on giving it up and letting Kendra take over, it wasn't a permanent situation she had in mind, more like a vacation.
*) How many of you think that Kendra, with her all-or-nothing mentality and her do-things-by-the-book attitude would have been offed by the Master very quickly? At least that's my thought.
*) Is it me or did Dru look especially alluring in this episode? I had never noticed how truly beautiful she was until WML2. The way she looked when she was torturing Angel was truly dark and I could see how he could become obsessed with her.
*) Go Willow! Her smile when she was trying to thank Oz was so sweet and I was glad that he mentioned it. It's about time this girl got her due.
And wasn't she awesome during the fight scene when she was helping Giles take out that vampire? Talk about a change, the Willow at the beginning of the first season was afraid of her own shadow and now she's offing demons and other things that go bump in the night.
*) Now we now why Spike was so surprised that Buffy had friends and family. Until Kendra showed up I really didn't understand how isolated the slayers usually were. That's probably why Buffy has been so effective and so hard to kill. And it's also one of the things that makes the show so good.
*) The Xander/Cordelia kiss -- it was about time! It was getting pretty boring watching those two spar and nothing happening. Everyone knew that it was bound to happen, and the fact that we got two kisses was just too much. I wonder if they're going to 'fess up to the others?
*) The Buffy/Angel relationship seems to have developed nicely. The amount of affection those two show each other is leaps forward from where they were in "When she was bad" (to be seen next week).
*) I hope they bring back Kendra for another appearance. She and Buffy seemed to have bonded enough that they might actually get along next time.
And I can't wait to see what Dru's coming out party is going to be about.
_________________________________________________
sandra fern=E1ndez
mailto:SFernandez@uh.edu
personal website <http://www.uh.edu/~sfernand>
"I'd rather have 30 minutes of wonderful than
a lifetime of nothing special."
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 17:45:14 -0500 (EST) From: Sparky Dawntreader <mat0536@is2.nyu.edu> Subject: BUFFY: WML Part 2 nitpickers...
A lot of nits have been picked about this episode, but the most obvious one (to me at least, or my roommate, rather) hasn't come up - how is it that Drusilla was able to sprinkle the hold water on Angel with her bare hands? If it burns him, it should burn her.
As for the ritual, Angel was awfully weak at the end. It was probably stopped just in time, and Drusilla had gotten enough of his blood to be better.
I guess I'm in the minority here but I don't like the Xander & Cordelia thing. It's funny, but it just strikes a wrong note with me. As I said before, I like their relationship as it is (Was?) - bitter and argumentatively sociable. Yeah.
If it's going to be a rerun, why couldn't it be the original premiere?
Truly, this episode was, IMO, one of the best so far. It was so good, in fact, that it has lured me out of my cupboard, to actually post something!
bandr@impulse.net wrote:
> > Xander and Cordelia. Ugh. Make it go away!
>
> That was goofy. They're shouting in each other's face one second and kissing
I disagree. I laughed myself into stitches during Xander's and Cordy's clinch in the basement - it was too hilarious for words. The cheesy orchestral music, as someone so aptly put it, was the perfect touch.
True, sexual tension is good, although I personally prefer the scenes with Buffy and Angel <G>
Someone had mentioned this: How come Dru was wearing black at the end of the episode? I thought dramatic license, although if you wanted to be practical, you could say soot.
And the scenes of Angel shirtless(!) - be still, my heart! And that's all I'm going to say on that :-)
Some responses:
From: Jesse Jou <jjou@mail.med.cornell.edu> Kendra's intense focus and ascetic lifestyle is very interesting to me because it seems so self-sacrificing in nature, as if her duty were to
From: TknoPagan@aol.com
Kendra-It was .... what is right and not knowing what some of the most valuable things in life are because she has to be a Slayer and takes her training to the extreme.
The underlying premise of the show is, I think, duty. And perhaps that is the most important and valuable thing of all. Life isn't fair, and nobody ever said it was. While I perfectly understand Buffy's constant rants about wanting a normal life and perhaps even sympathise, Kendra's attitude certainly strikes a chord in me. Maybe this is the difference in cultures? Buffy's and Kendra's culture? Buffy is a fairly(?) typical American teenager, while Kendra is an African or Jamaican/Carribean teenager. Surely that has some impact on her attitude to life and her destiny? I think Kendra accepts the existence of bad things and evil monsters more easily than did Buffy before she accepted her destiny. And she has accepted her destiny, despite her ranting and raving about wanting a "normal" life. That's the most ironic thing of all. So here's to Buffy!
What are the most valuable things in life? Everyone has a different list. Kendra's ascetic lifestyle and dedication to her duty, is admirable. I guess the point I'm trying to make is, there are people out there who take their duty seriously, whatever it may be, and think nothing of self sacrifice. And so, here's to Kendra!
And now I'll go back to wherever lurkers lurk.
Dee
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 15:21:27 -0800 (PST) From: elizabeth yeung <hbunc010@email.csun.edu> Subject: BUFFY: SMG's character name in Scream 2
There's some debate about SMG's character name in Scream 2. In one of the magazines I got (the same one that I had mention before on the list) had an interview with SMG and it mention her character from IKWYDLS and Scream 2. This is not the complete article. Here is only one paragraph from the article (since the article is VERY LONG.)
Drama-Logue
Oct.23-29, 1997 issue
"I Know What You Did Last Summer: The New Kids on the Blotter" Written by Tom Provenzano
Of course following her opening in Last Summer, Gellar will be seen starring in the eagerly awaited Scream 2. She grimaces as she's asked about her character in that film. "We're not allowed to say verly much, but she's different for me. Buffy is really spunky and offbeat, in Last Summer Helen is this vain thing who doesn't know much beyond her looks.
Then C.C., the character in Scream 2, is really a spitfire. She has a bit of an edge." But we'll have to wait for that film for more information on the character.
[End of article]
So, there we go. Right from SMG's own words. If the article is correct (and I'm pretty sure that it is), then I guess that her character in Scream 2 in C.C. (or is it Cici??) Guess we'll find out the truth in a few weeks.
THE WB Multi-Mkt. Top 10 Top 3 Markets Overnight Mkt. Rtgs. Average Mkt. Avg.
Rtg/Sh Rtg/Sh NY LA CH - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 9:00pm Buffy 5.1/7 6.0/8 8.3/11 6.9/10 6.7/10 Last wk Buffy 5.1/7 6.1/9 7.0/10 8.7/12 7.3/11
9:30pm Buffy 5.5/8 6.7/10 9.3/13 8.3/12 8.8/13 Last wk Buffy 5.3/8 6.2/9 7.4/11 8.3/12 8.1/11 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
8-10pm Average 5.5/8 6.1/9 7.2/10 7.9/11 6.8/11 Last wk 5.9/9 6.5/9 7.0/10 9.0/13 7.2/11
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 20:16:38 -0500
From: Charles Molnar <cmolnar@intercall.com> Subject: BUFFY: Access Hollywood Tonight
I just finished watching Access Hollywood and they did a review of Scream2 and again no mention off SMG. It is as if she is not in the film at all. They did all sorts of running and screaming short takes of every person except our Buffy. I am led to beleive that it is intentional, for what reason I do not know. I got out my copy of Entertainment Weekly, issue # 407 November 28, 1997, and there is SMG's picture with three other actresses from Scream2. Every add for the picture I see on TV, they show SMG. Maybe her part is so short or small in the movie, and thats the reason they left her name out. If someone knows, please tell me.
Charlie Molnar cmolnar@intercall.com
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 18:30:54 -0500
From: samantha.martin@juno.com (Samantha Martin) Subject: BUFFY: A little bit of Buffy in Willow (or even reversed)
I was rewatching WML part 2 and I caught something I didn't recognize the first time and I thought I'd bring it up.
Did anybody else catch the line from Buffy -
"Are you going to help me, or are you going to get out of my way?"
That line just reminded me of Willow's line in DA.
"If you're not with me 110%, then get the hell out of my library."
Is that just FREEKY or what?
Just ramblin on.
Samantha / Xanfreek
"Love makes you do the wacky" - Willow in SAR
Keeper of : Xander's Love of Chocolate, Willow's temporary dreaminess of Malcolm Morloch the Corrupter's binding book, L. Willow's teethingl 'mouse' for all her baby 'bytes'
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 20:17:56 -0500
From: jjswbt@huskynet.com
Subject: Re: BUFFY: Re: WML -2 - Some Thoughts
>Someone had mentioned this: How come Dru was wearing black at the end of
>the episode? I thought dramatic license, although if you wanted to be
>practical, you could say soot.
The dress didn't "mysteriously" change from white to black... she had the black dress on when the ritual started. She is wearing white while torturing Angel... so she obviously changed clothes before the ritual started. Spike calls her his ..what "dark evil" ..something like that.
Maybe she needed to be dressed in black for the ritual to work?
Wendy
jjswbt@huskynet.com
jjswbt@aol.com
http://members.aol.com/JJSWBT/wendy.html
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 20:04:46 -0600
From: "Jeff A. Harrell" <jeff@rivatech.com> Subject: Re: BUFFY: WML2 (don't read if you haven't seen)
John Nestoriak wrote:
> Dru is one sick puppy isn't she? She's rapidly becoming one of my
> favorite characters. I loved the whole "Grrr. Bad dog." reply to Angel.
Okay, the whole sick-evil-dead-demon-sucking-blood-insane-girl thing aside, Dru can nibble on my neck any time. :-)
RIVA Technologies, Inc. we were pretty much doomed."
jeff@rivatech.com -- Scott Adams
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 19:07:19 -0700
From: David Simpson <simpsond@utah-inter.net> Subject: BUFFY: SPOILER (Dec. 8 new episode)
The following spoiler comes from the WPIX-TV site for the Dec. 8 episode, which is a new one.
Spoiler countdown
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Spoiler starts-->
Monday, December 8, 1997 at 9:00 p.m.
Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Ted: Buffy is suspicious of her mom's new boyfriend (John Ritter).
(TVPG)
<--Spoiler ends
Not much of a spoiler, but at least we only have one rerun to get through before another new episode. (Although I really liked WSWB, especially the Buffy dance. Woo-hoo!!)
David Simpson
mailto:simpsond@utah-inter.net
Giles: What's your plan?
Buffy: Well, they split up to hold us here, so I'm gonna take 'em
one on one. Set 'em up ... and knock 'em down.
-- School Hard (BtVS) --
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 21:07:03 -0500
From: Brian Taylor <net_jedi@geocities.com> Subject: BUFFY: Oz under the sea
I was watching SeaQuest on Sci Fi (nothing else on, and me BuffyTapes are on loan to my cable-less friends). Oz (who plays him Again?) was a hacker. His handle...Wolfman
Possible
Spoiler
Space
Since Oz is rumored to be a werewolf, is this mere coincidence, or something more sinister?
Brian
Keeper of Willow's Vamp fighting ability, Tadpole Dream, and her uncanny ability to come up with strange comments
http://www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/7427/ Delta Sigma Phi Sargent at Arms
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 20:22:47 -0600
From: "Jeff A. Harrell" <jeff@rivatech.com> Subject: X & C: Again with the speculation (was Re: BUFFY: WML pt.2)
KitiaraL@aol.com wrote:
> ... I'm one of the supporters of an eventual
> relationship between Willow and Xander, but Cordy and Oz have both really
> grown on me and they're fine for now. Cordy and Xander especially have a very
> interesting relationship, and it should be fun to watch that grow into
> something more or see where it ends up anyway.
You know, I was thinking about something today. Either I'm reading too much into things (no!), or there have ALWAYS been little hints that Xander and Cordy might have a little sparkin'.
Obviously, every guy who's ever been to fourth grade knows that when another guy picks on another girl, he's secretly interested in her. And Xander has spent a LOT of time over the past year picking on Cordy. We all know this.
But, you know, Cordy's had a few Xander-moments, as well. Right now I'm thinking specifically of the very beginning of "Angel" (way, way back there) when Xander was dancing at the Bronze. He bumped in Cordelia.
CORDELIA Ouch! Would you please get your extreme
oafishness off my two hundred dollar shoes!
XANDER Sorry, I was just, uh...
CORDELIA Trying to get off the dance floor before
Annie Vega's boyfriend squashes you like a
bug?
XANDER Oh, so you noticed.
CORDELIA Mmm-hmm.
XANDER Well, thanks for being so understanding.
CORDELIA Sure.
XANDER By the way, I don't know what everybody's
talking about. That dress doesn't make you
look like a hooker.
Is it just me, or does it seem like Cordelia was just a little TOO aware of Xander? She's dancing with her escort-du-jour, and he bumped into her FROM BEHIND, and she still knew exactly where he was and what he was doing the whole time.
RIVA Technologies, Inc. we were pretty much doomed."
jeff@rivatech.com -- Scott Adams
- -
------------------------------
End of buffy-digest V1 #468
***************************
To subscribe to buffy or buffy-digest, send the command
subscribe buffy-digest
or
subscribe buffy
to majordomo@xmission.com. You will need to go through a confirmation process, and the listowners have to manually approve your subscription request, so it may take some time.
Back issues of this digest can be found at:
ftp://ftp.xmission.com/pub/lists/buffy/archive/
For help, contact Jill Kirby (jtkirby@mcs.com) or sah (romana@mindspring.com)
