home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.xmission.com
/
2014.06.ftp.xmission.com.tar
/
ftp.xmission.com
/
pub
/
lists
/
abolition-usa
/
archive
/
v01.n488
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2001-11-18
|
45KB
From: owner-abolition-usa-digest@lists.xmission.com (abolition-usa-digest)
To: abolition-usa-digest@lists.xmission.com
Subject: abolition-usa-digest V1 #488
Reply-To: abolition-usa-digest
Sender: owner-abolition-usa-digest@lists.xmission.com
Errors-To: owner-abolition-usa-digest@lists.xmission.com
Precedence: bulk
abolition-usa-digest Monday, November 19 2001 Volume 01 : Number 488
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 01:29:34 -0500
From: Alan Haber <megiddo@umich.edu>
Subject: Re: (abolition-usa) "A call to arms control"/crawford
thank you john for forwarding this "call"=20
my own confession, as the great crawford ranch summit commences: i
lament my failure sufficiently to persevere to gather a global movement
presence there, to advance such calls for peace as this, and many
others, in the face of the masters of war, and in the eye and ear of the
so called media waiting there for news.
my attention, as others, was hijacked by the hijacking and beside
trying to keep my woodshop and work functioning and bread on the table,
the needs of a rapidly growing outreaching peace movement here and on
going campaigns like keeping space for peace, israel and palestine, and
a writing project and megiddo have over occupied my attention.=20
i am also disappointed that the organized peace and justice,
anti-nuclear, anti-militarist, pro-international law, cooperation etc.
organizations did not somehow pick up on this golden opportunity for a
humanitarian, non-governmental network effort to take the message to the
man on this occasion.=20
there should have been some funding, some process in the
movement-network-coalition-campaign to say let's go for it. and there
should be in the future for whatever some future it might be, some it
of direct action or dramatic intervention. =20
mostly i'm sorry i didn't do more to keep focused and it would have been
interesting in the current setting to try to get a message to the man.=20
as the press agents applaud massive "reductions" in nuclear weapons, the
voice for "abolition"
should be raised, that these weapons don't benefit, get rid of them all,
and don't start in their place new weapons systems, star wars weapons,
moving the money to control space to control the entire earth, bases for
a military encirclement of china, etc. give it up, go for an end of war
and a real alliance for peace and justice. people all over are
struggling for answers. many, maybe most know in their heart of hearts
that things aren't right. there is a hunger for a picture of an
alternative, a positive practical program, increasing security,
prosperity and freedom, more effective than militarism and murder,
called war. the culture of peace has been trumped by blood and
violence. armed struggle was almost a thing of the past. maybe this
grand alliance against terrorism could become a real global force for
democracy and liberation, turning on its masters as it were, and
limiting the military front, and increasing the political and diplomatic
forces. i try and keep hopeful, but it looks like hard hearted thin
lipped fascists making their move in washington, abridging rights,
ignoring freedoms, making an us or them, for us or against us division
in the world, asserting domination, chilling politics and foreboding
dark times indeed.
anyhow i thought i would write something in contributing to the great
crawford texas summit.
i prey the powers that be have a turn of heart and actually consider
what they might do for peace.=20
hoping you, and all on this list, are well. maybe our network should
have a conference call soon.=20
alan haber
John Burroughs wrote:
>=20
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Washington Times, November 12, 2001
>=20
> A CALL TO ARMS CONTROL
>=20
> Jim Wurst
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>=20
> It seems like some distant past (in fact it was July of this
> year) when the United States tied the U.N. conference on
> curbing small arms into knots by insisting it was a threat
> to the Second Amendment. That same month, the United States
> turned its back on 10 years of negotiations on a protocol on
> compliance with the ban on biological weapons, saying the
> agreement would put national security and confidential
> business information at risk. In February, during a U.N.
> debate on a proposed international conference to combat
> terrorism, the U.S. delegate said such a conference would
> have no practical benefits.
>=20
> Conservatives welcomed these and similar moves,
> including rejections of agreements on the nuclear test ban,
> global warming and the International Criminal Court, arguing
> that "parchment barriers" cannot provide real safety or
> advantage.
>=20
> The Bush administration has now discovered
> multilateralism when it comes to combating terrorism,
> working with the U.N. Security Council to create instant
> global law requiring states to suppress financing of
> terrorist operations and deny haven to terrorists. At two
> upcoming conferences, it would be a historic mistake and
> disservice to the victims of terrorism to ignore vital
> issues of arms control and disarmament.
>=20
> "It is hard to imagine how the tragedy of September 11
> could have been worse," U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan
> said during the recent debate on terrorism. "Yet the truth
> is that a single attack involving a nuclear or biological
> weapon could have killed millions. While the world was
> unable to prevent the September 11 attacks, there is much we
> can do to help prevent future terrorist acts carried out
> with weapons of mass destruction."
>=20
> One good place to start is at the Nov. 19-26
> conference in Geneva, which will review implementation of
> the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention. The treaty bans
> development and possession of the weapons but lacks any
> verification mechanisms. Most countries, including the
> United States, are parties. No doubt prompted in part by the
> anthrax incidents, the Bush administration is now proposing
> that governments adopt national legislation criminalizing
> biological weapons development with provisions for
> prosecution or extradition. It is also urging the United
> Nations to establish procedures for investigating suspicious
> outbreaks or allegations of biological weapons use and other
> treaty compliance concerns.
>=20
> These are important elements of the compliance
> protocol the United States repudiated in July. But the Bush
> administration must accept the necessity of embedding these
> requirements in a formal international agreement rather than
> in easily disregarded ad hoc arrangements, and of reviving
> other essential elements of the protocol, including regular
> inspections of pharmaceutical, "biodefense" and other
> facilities that could be put to weapons purposes.
>=20
> Another important forum is the Nov. 11-13 U.N.
> conference on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. While there
> about a dozen countries whose ratification of the treaty is
> needed for it to become legally binding, U.S. approval is
> far and away the most important. Other approvals will come
> sooner or later once the United States commits, including
> from India and Pakistan. Following a spectacularly
> abbreviated and uninformed "debate" in the fall of 1999, the
> Senate rejected ratification. Now credible concerns are
> heard concerning destabilization of nuclear-armed Pakistan
> and efforts of the al Qaeda network to obtain nuclear
> explosive materials. In this context, the insanity of the
> United States standing in the way of a global test-ban
> regime =97 equipped with seismological and other means
> capable of detecting militarily significant nuclear
> explosions anywhere in the world =97 becomes all too evident.
>=20
> While on record opposing ratification and not even
> scheduled to attend next week's conference, the
> administration says it will continue the U.S. moratorium on
> tests, and after September 11 rebuffed suggestions from the
> Energy Department that readiness for resumption of testing
> be boosted. However, the Bush administration has not even
> attempted to reconcile its opposition to the test-ban treaty
> with the U.S. promises in 1995 and 2000 to the parties to
> the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty to ratify the treaty and
> eliminate nuclear arsenals.
>=20
> At the heart of issues relating to biological and
> nuclear weapons is the simple belief that while it is
> acceptable, even desirable, that a few "responsible"
> countries possess weapons of mass destruction, everyone else
> must be shackled. This is logically, morally and legally
> unsustainable. The United States must lead the way in
> stripping the veil of legitimacy from these weapons for
> their global control and elimination to be successful.
>=20
> Jim Wurst is program director for the New York-based
> Lawyers' Committee on Nuclear Policy.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> (http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20011112-22134912.htm)
>=20
> Copyright (c) 2001 News World Communications, Inc. All
> rights reserved.
>=20
> John Burroughs, Executive Director
> Lawyers' Committee on Nuclear Policy
> 211 E. 43d St., Suite 1204
> New York, New York 10017 USA
> tel: +1 212 818 1861 fax: 818 1857
> e-mail: johnburroughs@lcnp.org
> website: www.lcnp.org
- -
To unsubscribe to abolition-usa, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com"
with "unsubscribe abolition-usa" in the body of the message.
For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:53:59 -0500
From: Thomas <prop1@prop1.org>
Subject: (abolition-usa) Americans Will Get A Chance to Quiz Putin TONIGHT 7:30 pm EST - mailto:putin@npr.org
- --=====================_266154157==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Americans Will Get A Chance to Quiz Putin
NPR's Exclusive Chat Includes a Caller Q&A
E-mail questions to Putin at mailto:putin@npr.org
By Frank Ahrens
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 14, 2001; Page C01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A24478-2001Nov13?language=printer
Vladimir Putin will grant an exclusive interview to National Public Radio
tomorrow night, hours before the visiting Russian leader concludes his summit
with President Bush and flies home.
After the one-on-one with NPR's Robert Siegel, Putin will answer telephone and
e-mail questions from listeners, following the lead of Bill Clinton, who
fielded caller questions on a Moscow radio and television talk show during his
visit last year to Russia.
"It's a great coup," said Kevin Klose, NPR president and former Moscow bureau
chief for The Washington Post from 1977 to 1981. Klose was instrumental in
closing the deal with Putin's people, which has been in the works for the past
month. "This is the first time, aside from Khrushchev's travels across the
U.S., for the serious possibility of voice-to-voice exchange" with a Russian
chief of state, Klose said. "It's amazing -- the president of the Russian
Federation being questioned directly by individual citizens of the United
States."
Klose read Putin's October speech to NATO in Brussels, in which he said the
Sept. 11 terror attacks radically shifted global politics and will bring Russia
into closer cooperation with the West. Afterward, Klose made his pitch to the
Russian Embassy in Washington.
"We told them that, if this summit is truly a waypoint on this path, then the
way to present that most seriously to the people of the U.S. is through NPR,"
Klose said. Putin sat for an interview with ABC's Barbara Walters earlier this
month at the Kremlin, but this is his only one-on-one interview during his trip
here.
The interview and listener questions should occupy about an hour, Klose said.
There are no ground rules for the interview, he added.
A call late yesterday to the Russian Embassy press office was not returned.
Veteran "All Things Considered" host Siegel -- who was NPR's first foreign
correspondent 21 years ago -- drew the assignment for the interview, which will
be held at NPR's Manhattan studios at 7:30 p.m. One interpreter will translate
questions into Russian for Putin, and another will translate Putin's answers
into English.
"They told me last Thursday, 'You're doing the interview with Putin,'" Siegel
said. "I was quite surprised and quite delighted."
Siegel is boning up by reading "First Person," a collection of interviews with
Putin; plowing through a "tremendous number of clips" and picking the brains of
former and current NPR Moscow correspondents.
The news dictates that Siegel will ask the Russian president about the
U.S.-Russian alliance in the Afghanistan campaign, the Anti-Ballistic Missile
Treaty, possible Russian membership in NATO, Putin's history as a KGB officer
and so on.
But Siegel wants to get personal, too.
"I am curious about the man," Siegel said. "He is a very controlled, smart
person, someone who seems to have navigated the bureaucracy incredibly
shrewdly. And he's a very tough guy. He's someone who's learned discipline by
fighting, by judo."
Listeners can submit e-mail questions to Putin at mailto:putin@npr.org.
- --
http://www.npr.org/ --
The first-ever U.S. meeting between Presidents George Bush and Vladimir Putin
has focused on arms reductions, anti-terrorism measures, and the two leaders'
deepening rapport. To cap his three-day visit, Putin will answer Americans'
questions in a national call-in show on NPR, Thursday Nov. 15 at 7:30pm ET,
4:30pm PT.
mailto:putin@npr.org
___________________________________________________
Today's News and Archives: http://prop1.org/nucnews/briefslv.htm
Submit URL/Article: mailto:NucNews@onelist.com
OneList Archives: http://www.onelist.com/archive/NucNews (subscribe online)
Other Excellent News-Collecting Sites -
DOE Watch - http://www.egroups.com/group/doewatch
Downwinders - http://www.egroups.com/group/downwinders
Quick Route to U.S. Congress:
http://www.senate.gov/senators/index.cfm (Senators' Websites)
http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW.html (Representatives' Websites)
http://thomas.loc.gov/ (Pending Legislation - Search)
Online Petition to Abolish Nuclear Weapons -
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/prop1/petition.html
Subscribe to NucNews Briefs: mailto:prop1@prop1.org
Distributed without payment for research and educational
purposes only, in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107.
- --=====================_266154157==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<html>
<font size=2>Americans Will Get A Chance to Quiz Putin <br>
<br>
NPR's Exclusive Chat Includes a Caller Q&A <br>
E-mail questions to Putin at
<a href="mailto:putin@npr.org" eudora="autourl">mailto:putin@npr.org</a><br>
<br>
By Frank Ahrens<br>
Washington Post Staff Writer<br>
Wednesday, November 14, 2001; Page C01 <br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A24478-2001Nov13?language=printer" eudora="autourl">http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A24478-2001Nov13?language=printer</a><br>
<br>
Vladimir Putin will grant an exclusive interview to National Public Radio
tomorrow night, hours before the visiting Russian leader concludes his
summit with President Bush and flies home.<br>
<br>
After the one-on-one with NPR's Robert Siegel, Putin will answer
telephone and e-mail questions from listeners, following the lead of Bill
Clinton, who fielded caller questions on a Moscow radio and television
talk show during his visit last year to Russia.<br>
<br>
"It's a great coup," said Kevin Klose, NPR president and former
Moscow bureau chief for The Washington Post from 1977 to 1981. Klose was
instrumental in closing the deal with Putin's people, which has been in
the works for the past month. "This is the first time, aside from
Khrushchev's travels across the U.S., for the serious possibility of
voice-to-voice exchange" with a Russian chief of state, Klose said.
"It's amazing -- the president of the Russian Federation being
questioned directly by individual citizens of the United
States."<br>
<br>
Klose read Putin's October speech to NATO in Brussels, in which he said
the Sept. 11 terror attacks radically shifted global politics and will
bring Russia into closer cooperation with the West. Afterward, Klose made
his pitch to the Russian Embassy in Washington.<br>
<br>
"We told them that, if this summit is truly a waypoint on this path,
then the way to present that most seriously to the people of the U.S. is
through NPR," Klose said. Putin sat for an interview with ABC's
Barbara Walters earlier this month at the Kremlin, but this is his only
one-on-one interview during his trip here. <br>
<br>
The interview and listener questions should occupy about an hour, Klose
said. There are no ground rules for the interview, he added.<br>
<br>
A call late yesterday to the Russian Embassy press office was not
returned.<br>
<br>
Veteran "All Things Considered" host Siegel -- who was NPR's
first foreign correspondent 21 years ago -- drew the assignment for the
interview, which will be held at NPR's Manhattan studios at 7:30 p.m. One
interpreter will translate questions into Russian for Putin, and another
will translate Putin's answers into English.<br>
<br>
"They told me last Thursday, 'You're doing the interview with
Putin,'" Siegel said. "I was quite surprised and quite
delighted."<br>
<br>
Siegel is boning up by reading "First Person," a collection of
interviews with Putin; plowing through a "tremendous number of
clips" and picking the brains of former and current NPR Moscow
correspondents.<br>
<br>
The news dictates that Siegel will ask the Russian president about the
U.S.-Russian alliance in the Afghanistan campaign, the Anti-Ballistic
Missile Treaty, possible Russian membership in NATO, Putin's history as a
KGB officer and so on. <br>
<br>
But Siegel wants to get personal, too.<br>
<br>
"I am curious about the man," Siegel said. "He is a very
controlled, smart person, someone who seems to have navigated the
bureaucracy incredibly shrewdly. And he's a very tough guy. He's someone
who's learned discipline by fighting, by judo."<br>
<br>
Listeners can submit e-mail questions to Putin at
<a href="mailto:putin@npr.org" eudora="autourl">mailto:putin@npr.org</a>.<br>
<br>
- --<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.npr.org/" eudora="autourl">http://www.npr.org/</a> --
<br>
<br>
The first-ever U.S. meeting between Presidents George Bush and Vladimir
Putin has focused on arms reductions, anti-terrorism measures, and the
two leaders' deepening rapport. To cap his three-day visit, Putin will
answer Americans' questions in a national call-in show on NPR, Thursday
Nov. 15 at 7:30pm ET, 4:30pm PT.<br>
<br>
<a href="mailto:putin@npr.org" eudora="autourl">mailto:putin@npr.org</a><br>
<br>
</font><br>
___________________________________________________<br>
<br>
<font size=2>Today's News and Archives:
<a href="http://prop1.org/nucnews/briefslv.htm" eudora="autourl">http://prop1.org/nucnews/briefslv.htm</a><br>
Submit URL/Article:
<a href="mailto:NucNews@onelist.com" eudora="autourl">mailto:NucNews@onelist.com</a><br>
OneList Archives:
<a href="http://www.onelist.com/archive/NucNews" eudora="autourl">http://www.onelist.com/archive/NucNews</a>
(subscribe online)<br>
Other Excellent News-Collecting Sites -<br>
DOE Watch - <a href="http://www.egroups.com/group/doewatch" eudora="autourl">http://www.egroups.com/group/doewatch</a><br>
Downwinders - <a href="http://www.egroups.com/group/downwinders" eudora="autourl">http://www.egroups.com/group/downwinders</a><br>
<br>
</font>Quick Route to U.S. Congress:<br>
<font size=2><a href="http://www.senate.gov/senators/index.cfm" eudora="autourl">http://www.senate.gov/senators/index.cfm</a> (Senators' Websites)<br>
<a href="http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW.html" eudora="autourl">http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW.html</a> (Representatives' Websites)<br>
<a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/" eudora="autourl">http://thomas.loc.gov/</a> (Pending Legislation - Search)<br>
<br>
</font>Online Petition to Abolish Nuclear Weapons - <a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/prop1/petition.html" eudora="autourl"><font size=2>http://www.PetitionOnline.com/prop1/petition.html</a><br>
<br>
Subscribe to NucNews Briefs: <a href="mailto:prop1@prop1.org" eudora="autourl">mailto:prop1@prop1.org</a><br>
<br>
</font> <font size=2><i>Distributed without payment for research and educational <br>
purposes only, in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107.<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></i></html>
- --=====================_266154157==_.ALT--
- -
To unsubscribe to abolition-usa, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com"
with "unsubscribe abolition-usa" in the body of the message.
For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:50:05 -0500
From: John Burroughs <johnburroughs@lcnp.org>
Subject: (abolition-usa) Acronym CTBT conference summary
High Level CTBT Meeting "Successful" despite US Boycott.
Rebecca Johnson, The Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy
The Conference on Facilitating the Entry into Force of the CTBT closed on
Tuesday November 13, 2001 after unanimously adopting its final declaration.
The declaration, which had been negotiated over many months in Vienna,
highlighted the importance of the CTBT for non-proliferation and
international security, stressing that the conduct of nuclear explosions
"constitutes a serious threat to global efforts towards nuclear disarmament
and non-proliferation". The Declaration called on all states that have not
yet signed or ratified the Treaty to do so as soon as possible. Pending
entry into force, all were enjoined to maintain the current moratoria on
nuclear testing.
The Conference (known also as the Article XIV Conference, after the
entry-into-force provision in the CTBT), was postponed from September 25.
It was opened on November 11 by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, who said
"If anyone thinks that [the CTBT and the Conference] have been overshadowed
or marginalised by the events of 11 September and their aftermath=85 those
events should have made it clear to everyone that we cannot afford further
proliferation of nuclear weapons." Annan concluded, telling the meeting "we
have a fleeting opportunity to render this troubled world a safer place,
free of the threat of nuclear weapons. We must not let it pass."=20
Ambassador Olga Pellicer, speaking on behalf of the Conference President,
Miguel Mar=EDn Bosch, Deputy Foreign Minister of Mexico, told an
end-of-conference press briefing that the meeting had been "a success,
because of high level attendance, with more than 50 Foreign Ministers, all
of whom reiterated their support for the CTBT=85 and its verification=
system."
The CTBT Conference, which ran for two and a half days, was attended by 108
states which have signed the Treaty and a small number of observers and
non-governmental organisations. Of the 80 national or group statements made
in support of the test ban treaty, 52 were made by Foreign Ministers or
equivalent senior government officials. The United States, however, was
conspicuously absent. During the three months prior to the meeting, some 13
additional states had ratified the CTBT, bringing the total number of
ratifiers to 87. On the last day of the conference, Libya, which refused to
vote in favour of the Treaty in 1996 and therefore attended the Article XIV
Conference as an observer, announced that it had decided to accede and
would be signing the Treaty forthwith.
Press coverage on Monday hooked stories about the CTBT Conference, held in
the shadow of the high level UN General Assembly debate among state
presidents and foreign ministers, the war against terrorism, and a further
plane crash in New York, on the US boycott. Ironic, therefore, that the
test ban meeting was given unexpected (but much-needed) visibility through
the actions of the United States, whose boycott had been intended to convey
its view that the CTBT is irrelevant.=20
Just a week earlier, the United States had shocked the UN First Committee
(Security and Disarmament) by forcing a vote on a simple procedural
decision to retain the CTBT on the UN General Assembly agenda next year.
Such decisions are usually treated as formalities and sent forward on the
basis of consensus, regardless of whether a government is for or against
the subject. After forcing the vote, the United States was the sole country
to oppose. A US representative explained that he asked for the vote because
his country "did not support the CTBT", a treaty that Eisenhower advocated
but failed to deliver in the 1950s, and President Clinton signed with John
F. Kennedy's pen on September 24 1996. All others voted in favour,
including India, which had previously voted against the CTBT in the UN
General Assembly when it was adopted in September 1996. =20
The United States failed to inform the UN Department for Disarmament
Affairs or the CTBT Organisation Preparatory Commission in Vienna of its
decision to boycott the Entry-into Force Conference until the last possible
moment, despite the presence of Secretary of State Colin Powell and
numerous senior officials at other meetings in the UN over the same time
period. After the CTBT Conference opened on Sunday November 11, Rick
Grenell, a US State Department Official, confirmed "We're just not going to
engage". =20
In keeping with diplomatic tradition, few statements criticised the United
States directly, though some expressed 'regret' at its deliberate absence;
privately many - most notably from the US' own allies in Europe and Asia -
were furious at this latest example of US contempt for multilateral
treaties and arms control. An earlier announcement (August 21, 2001) by
Washington that it would withhold support for, and not to participate in,
some of the activities by the CTBTO not related to the International
Monitoring System (IMS), was likewise derided as petty and unbecoming of a
major power. =20
In general, the statements emphasised the importance of the CTBT to
international security, non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament and
supported the work of the CTBTO Preparatory Commission and its Executive
Secretary, Wolfgang Hoffmann in establishing an effective verification
system. Many related the CTBT to commitments in the Treaty on the
Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), particularly the NPT agreements
of May 2000, where the United States had joined consensus. Almost all
underlined the necessity of maintaining the moratorium against nuclear
tests, currently observed by all five nuclear weapon states and, after they
each conducted a series of nuclear explosions in May 1998, by India and
Pakistan, though neither has yet signed the CTBT. Among the weapon states,
Britain, France and Russia have ratified, while the United States and China
have signed but not ratified.=20
Amongst all the positive statements about the CTBT, there appeared to be
few new or concrete proposals for facilitating entry into force. Few even
wanted to name the 13 states whose failure to sign and/or ratify now
impedes the CTBT's entry into force. The NGOs, however, in their statement
to the Conference, explicitly called on India, Pakistan and North Korea to
sign and ratify the CTBT, and urged Algeria, China, Colombia, the
Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Israel and the
United States to ratify without further delay. Like the governments, the
NGOs stressed the vital importance of preventing any future testing, for
fear of destroying the test ban norm and setting off a "dangerous
international action-reaction cycle of military and nuclear confrontation".
The NGOs proposed that the Conference "should commit its participants to
condemn any future testing and call upon governments, businesses and people
from around the world to respond to any future test by withholding military
sales, trade and other business support from the testing countries." To
ensure that the testing moratorium is maintained, it would be necessary for
potential violators to realise that the penalties and costs would be
significant.
In addition to the US Boycott, two developments were particularly=
noteworthy:
* Russia proposed additional confidence-building measures with the United
States after entry into force, referring to "the possibility to develop
additional verification measures for nuclear test ranges going far beyond
the Treaty provisions=85 [which] could include the exchange of geological
data and results of certain experiments, installation of additional
sensors, and other measures."
* On the negative side, possibly responding to the US lack of commitment
and announced withholding of funds, a few states, notably Brazil and
Argentina, raised questions about their financial contributions to the
CTBTO, particularly the "burden" of verification costs on the non-nuclear
weapon states while the treaty remained in limbo.=20
This brief, preliminary report, written as the Conference ended, will be
expanded with further analysis and published on our website and in
Disarmament Diplomacy over the next couple of weeks. See the website for
the final declaration and NGO statement. Other documents can be found at
<www.reachingcriticalwill.org>
The Acronym Institute
288 St Paul's Road
London N1 2LH,
England UK
website: <http://www.acronym.org.uk>
office tel: +44 (0) 20 7688 0450=20
(tel: Rebecca Johnson) (0) 20 7503 8857
office fax: +44 (0) 20 7688 0451
(fax: Rebecca Johnson) (0) 20 7503 9153
- -
To unsubscribe to abolition-usa, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com"
with "unsubscribe abolition-usa" in the body of the message.
For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 11:46:46 -0500
From: Ellen Thomas <prop1@prop1.org>
Subject: (abolition-usa) Please come! Louise Franklin-Ramirez Tribute December 4th, 7 PM (Washington DC)
- --=====================_11737197==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Please come! Louise Franklin-Ramirez Tribute December 4th, 7 PM
Please note two important events for December.
(1) Tribute to Louise Franklin-Ramirez,
Tuesday, December 4, 2001, 7PM,
University of the District of Columbia Auditorium
(Connecticut and Van Ness Metro and barrier-free)
(2) Welcome for Victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Wednesday, December 5, 2001, 7 PM,
La Casa, 3166 Mt. Pleasant St., Washington DC
A high level Hibakusha delegation led by Professor Saturo Konishi is visiting
the National Capital Area to voice concern about the proposed National Missile
Defense program and to demand the total abolition of nuclear weapons. They will
be visiting with Congress, the Bush Administration and Peace Activists.
==
About Louise Franklin-Ramirez: Pioneer for Peace
Louise Franklin-Ramirez, 96, is a lifelong resident of the Metropolitan
Washington area who has been active in civil rights, social justice and peace
since she was a teenager.
During World War One, at age 12, she helped raise money for the victims of the
Armenian Holocaust; in the mid-1930s she protested the sale of scrap metal to
Japan and Germany; in the 1940s she worked to desegregate the D.C. teachers
union; in the 1950s she fought against McCarthyism; in the 1960s and 70s she
was a Freedom Rider and protested the Vietnam War; and since the 1950s she
worked to abolish nuclear weapons and supported the rights of radiation
victims. She has raised consciousness about the needs of native people, and
has supported an endless variety of activists, helping to promote their various
(always nonviolent) causes.
During the 1990s Louise was arrested numerous times for her activism, most
recently in 1999 at age 94.
Co-founder of the Hiroshima-Nagasaki Peace Committee of the DC Metropolitan
Area Gray Panthers, Louise has fostered awareness of the dangers of nuclear
weapons and nuclear facilities in important ways. With her husband, John
Steinbach, Louise organizes the annual Hiroshima/Nagasaki Community
Commemoration in August at the Lincoln Memorial, and hosts annual delegations
of A-Bomb survivors to tell their story around the DC area.
Louise Franklin-Ramirez is perhaps best known for her map and database of
"Deadly Nuclear Radiation Hazards, USA"
(http://prop1.org/prop1/radiated/drh.htm), considered by many to be the most
comprehensive catalog of contaminated and potentially contaminated radioactive
sites ever published.
Born September 28, 1905, Ms. Franklin-Ramirez is a graduate of D.C. Public
Schools and received her B.A. from the University of D.C. and her M.A. from
Columbia University. She was a reading consultant for D.C. public and was the
author of the "Basal Progressive Choice Reading Program," an early phonetics
curriculum designed to teach learning disabled and dyslexic children.
Franklin-Ramirez also owned and operated Georgetown Toys and Crafts,
specializing in "developmental" toys.
Ms. Franklin-Ramirez is a founding member of "Women Strike for Peace," "Gray
Panthers," and "Unity In the Community" in Prince William County. In 1998,
she was the recipient of the Lewis Mumford Peace Award and the Prince William
County Human Rights Award, and in 1999 she received the prestigious " Courage
of Conscience Award" from the Peace Abbey in Sherborne, Mass.
The Tribute is sponsored by Gray Panthers, UDC Office of Alumni Affairs,
Proposition One Committee, and Piscataway Indian Nation
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 10:38:18 -0500
From: John Steinbach <jsteinbach@igc.org>
Edited by: Ellen Thomas <prop1@prop1.org>
- --=====================_11737197==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<html>
<font size=2>Please come! Louise Franklin-Ramirez Tribute December 4th, 7
PM <br>
<br>
Please note two important events for December.<br>
<br>
(1) Tribute to Louise Franklin-Ramirez,<br>
Tuesday, December 4, 2001, 7PM, <br>
University of the District of Columbia Auditorium<br>
(Connecticut and Van Ness Metro and barrier-free)<br>
<br>
(2) Welcome for Victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki<br>
Wednesday, December 5, 2001, 7 PM,<br>
La Casa, 3166 Mt. Pleasant St., Washington DC<br>
<br>
A high level Hibakusha delegation led by Professor Saturo Konishi is
visiting the National Capital Area to voice concern about the proposed
National Missile Defense program and to demand the total abolition of
nuclear weapons. They will be visiting with Congress, the Bush
Administration and Peace Activists.<br>
<br>
==<br>
<br>
About Louise Franklin-Ramirez: Pioneer for Peace<br>
<br>
Louise Franklin-Ramirez, 96, is a lifelong resident of the Metropolitan
Washington area who has been active in civil rights, social justice and
peace since she was a teenager.<br>
<br>
During World War One, at age 12, she helped raise money for the victims
of the Armenian Holocaust; in the mid-1930s she protested the sale of
scrap metal to Japan and Germany; in the 1940s she worked to desegregate
the D.C. teachers union; in the 1950s she fought against McCarthyism; in
the 1960s and 70s she was a Freedom Rider and protested the Vietnam War;
and since the 1950s she worked to abolish nuclear weapons and supported
the rights of radiation victims. She has raised consciousness
about the needs of native people, and has supported an endless
variety of activists, helping to promote their various (always
nonviolent) causes.<br>
<br>
During the 1990s Louise was arrested numerous times for her activism,
most recently in 1999 at age 94.<br>
<br>
Co-founder of the Hiroshima-Nagasaki Peace Committee of the DC
Metropolitan Area Gray Panthers, Louise has fostered awareness of the
dangers of nuclear weapons and nuclear facilities in important
ways. With her husband, John Steinbach, Louise organizes the annual
Hiroshima/Nagasaki Community Commemoration in August at the Lincoln
Memorial, and hosts annual delegations of A-Bomb survivors to tell their
story around the DC area.<br>
<br>
Louise Franklin-Ramirez is perhaps best known for her map and database of
"Deadly Nuclear Radiation Hazards, USA"
(<a href="http://prop1.org/prop1/radiated/drh.htm" eudora="autourl">http://prop1.org/prop1/radiated/drh.htm</a>),
considered by many to be the most comprehensive catalog of contaminated
and potentially contaminated radioactive sites ever published.
<br>
<br>
Born September 28, 1905, Ms. Franklin-Ramirez is a graduate of D.C.
Public Schools and received her B.A. from the University of D.C. and her
M.A. from Columbia University. She was a reading consultant for D.C.
public and was the author of the "Basal Progressive Choice Reading
Program," an early phonetics curriculum designed to teach learning
disabled and dyslexic children. Franklin-Ramirez also owned and operated
Georgetown Toys and Crafts, specializing in "developmental"
toys.<br>
<br>
Ms. Franklin-Ramirez is a founding member of "Women Strike for
Peace," "Gray Panthers," and "Unity In the
Community" in Prince William County. In 1998, she
was the recipient of the Lewis Mumford Peace Award and the Prince William
County Human Rights Award, and in 1999 she received the prestigious
" Courage of Conscience Award" from the Peace Abbey in
Sherborne, Mass.<br>
<br>
The Tribute is sponsored by Gray Panthers, UDC Office of Alumni Affairs,
Proposition One Committee, and Piscataway Indian Nation<br>
<br>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 10:38:18 -0500 <br>
From: John Steinbach <jsteinbach@igc.org> <br>
Edited by: Ellen Thomas <prop1@prop1.org><br>
<br>
</font></html>
- --=====================_11737197==_.ALT--
- -
To unsubscribe to abolition-usa, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com"
with "unsubscribe abolition-usa" in the body of the message.
For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 17:50:06 EST
From: ChadAmherst@aol.com
Subject: Re: (abolition-usa) Sign letter to change US bioweapons policy
can you give me Colin Powell's e-mail address. I plan to write him as well as
my Senators - Kennedy and Kerry. Chad Johnson . E-mail address:
chadamherst@aol.com
- -
To unsubscribe to abolition-usa, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com"
with "unsubscribe abolition-usa" in the body of the message.
For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:45:58 -0500
From: John Burroughs <johnburroughs@lcnp.org>
Subject: (abolition-usa) InterPress story on CTBT and Bush-Putin talks
DISARMAMENT: US Supports Weapons Cut While Opposing International Agreements
by Jim Wurst
UNITED NATIONS, 14 Nov (IPS) - The United States' two-track arms control
policy of pursuing unilateral initiatives while avoiding international
arrangements has been highlighted by its near-simultaneous rejection of an
international treaty banning nuclear test explosions and agreement on deep
cuts in its nuclear weapons arsenal.
More than one hundred nations committed to the permanent end of the testing
of nuclear weapons concluded a conference at the UN on Tuesday, calling for
all states to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), which was
completed in 1996 but still is not international law. Treaty supporters are
grappling with ways to achieve this goal in the face of the increasing
resistance of the United States. The Bush administration has always been
hostile to the CTBT, which was negotiated by the Clinton administration but
rejected by a Republican-controlled Senate in 1998.
But on the same day, President George W. Bush and President Vladimir Putin of
Russia announced that they would reduce their stocks of long- range nuclear
weapons by two-thirds within ten years. Each side has some 7,000 such
weapons; the new levels would be around 1,700 to 2,200. Bush sounded like a
dove when he said, "The current levels of our nuclear forces do not reflect
today's strategic realities." However, these cuts will not be codified in a
treaty but would instead be a series of unilateral cuts. While this may seem
immaterial, arms control advocates point out that the Pentagon and National
Security Council are filled with officials who prefer unilateral steps since
there will be no way to prove that the cuts have been made and that the
reductions can be abandoned and reversed at any time.
In contrast, the CTBT would be legally-binding and will have a vast
inspection system to verify compliance.
Not only did the US boycott the CTBT conference but also took the
unprecedented step of requesting that its nameplate be removed from its seat
in the conference room. This attempted diplomatic snub was rejected by the UN
which said since the meeting was for all signatories of the treaty seats
would be reserved for all of them.
This was the latest step by the US to distance itself from the treaty. Last
week during a General Assembly meeting on disarmament, the US was the only
country to vote against a simple procedural resolution to place the CTBT on
the GA's agenda next year. The vote was 140 to one; even other countries that
have not ratified the treaty, including India, Pakistan and Israel, do not
want to eliminate the treaty from the agenda.
Governments and NGOs argue that much is at stake in an effective test ban.
Non-nuclear states test to become nuclear weapons powers and the nations that
already have them test to modernise and make them more useable. A test ban
prevents both these developments from occurring. The threat of terrorism adds
another dimension to the debate. As a statement to the conference by more
than two dozen NGOs put it, "Failure to act may lead to a cascade of
proliferation events that will enable a future terrorist to use nuclear
weapons... The states presently resisting the CTBT are undermining their own
security as well as the security of the entire world."
Like all treaties, a set number of countries are needed for a convention to
become international law; but the CTBT is unique in that it specifies 44
states with nuclear weapons or are capable of producing them that must ratify
the treaty in order for it to enter into force. In other words, any one of
the 44 can block the treaty taking effect. Thirteen of the 44, including the
US, China, India, Pakistan, Israel, Egypt, Iran and North Korea, have not
ratified.
Clearly regional politics plays its part: Egypt wants Israel to become a
party to the CTBT and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (Israel is the
only state in the Middle East not to be a party to this treaty, thus the only
state in the region with an uninspected nuclear reactor) while Israel ties
its ratification to its "sovereign equality" in the region. But only the US
has made taken a total about face from supporting the treaty to trying to
push it off the international agenda.
There is a special irony then in the fact that the US continues to pay for
the operation of the Vienna-base agency in charge of monitoring the treaty.
In order to check against cheating, this agency is establishing a network of
more than 300 sites scattered around the world to detect nuclear explosions
underground, under water and in the air (about one-third are now
functioning). The US is home to 16 such sites. Monitoring sites also exist in
other states that have not ratified the treaty including Israel, Pakistan and
China. This apparent contradiction can be explained by the fact that all
signatories are entitled to share all data, thus the international system
becomes an extension of a state's national monitoring system. The US says it
will not pay for the more intrusive on-site inspections, but since these
inspections can not take place until the treaty enters into force, it is a
moot point.
(ENDS/IPS/JW)
- -
To unsubscribe to abolition-usa, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com"
with "unsubscribe abolition-usa" in the body of the message.
For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
------------------------------
End of abolition-usa-digest V1 #488
***********************************
-
To unsubscribe to $LIST, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com"
with "unsubscribe $LIST" in the body of the message.
For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.