Day 183 - 03 Nov 95 - Page 06
1 MS. STEEL: OK. Fine. I do not mind.
2
3 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I am not doing this to interrupt you. You
4 have a statement here which is simple and clear in the
5 extreme. I think you only risk muddying the water in some
6 way if you go into further detail.
7
8 MR. RAMPTON: Can I say this -- I think it will be obvious to
9 your Lordship -- assuming your Lordship accepts that
10 account of the witness as being true ---
11
12 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes.
13
14 MR. RAMPTON: -- which there is absolutely no reason why your
15 Lordship should not --- plainly this lady was badly treated
16 ---
17
18 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes.
19
20 MR. RAMPTON: -- by that Manager; it is quite clear.
21
22 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes.
23
24 MS. STEEL: I have only one question, apart from the hours, can
25 I just ask the witness to confirm that these are the
26 documents surrounding her dismissal and complaint that she
27 made? (To the witness): You see the documents that are in
28 this bundle, first, there are three payslips. Are they
29 your payslips, copies of your payslips?
30 A. Yes.
31
32 Q. Then there is a form about the circumstances in which you
33 were dismissed?
34 A. Yes.
35
36 Q. Where you set out your complaint. That is your signature?
37
38 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Quite frankly, I would not bother to go into
39 it, Ms. Steel, otherwise I will start looking in the
40 documents to see whether there is confirmation of this and
41 contradiction of that. At the moment, all I have got is a
42 statement which makes it quite clear.
43
44 MS. STEEL: I am not worried because it all tallies anyway.
45 (To the witness): The final thing, if you look at the last
46 page, this is a letter from McDonald's dated 30th September
47 1985?
48 A. That is right.
49
50 Q. "To whom it may concern: Re. Mrs. Sarah Baker.
51
52 The above named was employed by McDonald's
53 Hamburgers Limited as a crew member between 5th
54 January to 27th May" -- it should be 1985.
55 "During that time we found her to be honest and
56 trustworthy, and we know of no reason why she
57 should not be employed in a similar capacity.
58
59 Yours faithfully, Peter Sullivan,
60 Field Personnel Officer".