Danny Amor's Online Library/Danny Amor's Online Library - Volume 1.iso/html/faqs/faq/unix-faq/shell.zsh

Text File | 1995-07-25 | 38.7 KB | 851 lines

Subject: Z-shell Frequently-Asked Questions
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.answers,news.answers
From: [e-mail] (Peter Stephenson)
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 1994 11:39:46 GMT

Archive-Name: unix-faq/shell/zsh
Last-Modified: 1994/9/25
Submitted-By: [e-mail] (Peter Stephenson)
Version: $Id: zsh.FAQ,v 1.30 1994/10/25 11:26:39 pws Exp $
Frequency: Monthly

This document contains a list of frequently-asked (or otherwise
significant) questions concerning the Z-shell, a command interpreter for
many UNIX systems which is freely available to anyone with FTP access.
Zsh is more powerful than every other common shell (sh, ksh, csh, tcsh
and bash) put together.

Information on zsh is now available via the World Wide Web.  The
address is in transition, but you can currently use
"http://mal9000.bevc.blacksburg.va.us/zsh/zsh_home.shtml".  The server
provides this FAQ and much else (thanks to Mark Borges for this).

If you have never heard of `sh', `csh' or `ksh', then you are probably
better off to start by reading a general introduction to UNIX rather
than this document.

Another useful source of information is the collection of FAQ articles
posted frequently to the Usenet news groups comp.unix.questions,
comp.unix.shells and comp.answers with answers to general questions
about UNIX.  The fifth of the seven articles deals with shells,
including zsh, with a brief description of differences.  (This article
also talks about shell startup files which would otherwise rate a
mention here.)

If you just want to know how to get your hands on the latest version,
skip to question 4); if you want to know what to do with insoluble
problems, go to 23).

To encourage you to read on, if you don't know about zsh but are
familiar with other UNIX shells, here are some things that zsh is
particularly good at.  No claim of exclusivity is made, especially as
shells copy one another, though in the areas of command line editing and
globbing zsh is well ahead of the competition.  I am not aware of a
major feature in any other freely-available shell which zsh does not
also have.
  Command line editing:
    programmable completion: incorporates the ability to use
      the full power of zsh globbing (compctl -g),
    multi-line commands editable as a single buffer (even files!),
    variable editing (vared),
    command buffer stack,
    print text straight into the buffer for immediate editing (print -z),
    execution of unbound commands,
    menu completion,
    variable, editing function and option name completion,
    inline expansion of variables, history commands.
  Globbing --- extremely powerful, including:
    recursive globbing (cf. find),
    file attribute qualifiers (size, type, etc. also cf. find),
    full alternation and negation of patterns.
  Handling of multiple redirections (simpler than tee).
  Large number of options for tailoring.
  Path expansion (=foo -> /usr/bin/foo).
  Adaptable messages for spelling, watch, time as well as prompt
    (now including conditional expressions).
  Named directories.
  Comprehensive integer arithmetic.
  Manipulation of arrays (including reverse subscripting).
  Spelling correction.

Notation: Quotes `like this' are ordinary textual quotation
marks.  Other uses of quotation marks are input to the shell.

If you are reading this file with GNU Emacs 19 and have my
cross-referencing package xref.el (available from
suna.amtp.liv.ac.uk:/pub/pws), I can supply a suitable set of
cross-references to make reading the file easier.

Contents:
1) What is it?
2) On what machines will it run?
3) What's the latest version?
4) Where do I get it?
5) How does zsh differ from sh, ksh, csh, tcsh, bash?
6) Why do my csh aliases not work?  (Plus other alias pitfalls.)
7) How do I turn off spelling correction for an individual command?
8) How do I get the meta key to work on my xterm?
9) Why does my terminal act funny in way x?
10) Why does `$var' where var="foo bar" not do what I expect?
11) Why do my autoloaded functions not autoload [the first time]?
12) How does base arithmetic work?
13) How do I get a newline in my prompt?
14) Why does `bindkey ^a command-name' or 'stty intr ^-' do something funny?
15) Why can't I bind \C-s and \C-q any more?
16) How do I execute command `foo' within function `foo'?
17) Why can't I get zsh to work with SGI's `userenv'?
18) Why do history substitutions with single bangs do something funny?
19) Why does zsh kill off all my background jobs when I logout?
20) I don't have root access: how do I make zsh my login shell?
21) Shouldn't zsh be more/less like ksh/(t)csh?
22) What bugs are currently known and unfixed?
23) Where do I report bugs, get more info / who's working on zsh?
24) What's on the wish-list?
--- End of Contents ---


1) What is it?

  Zsh is a UNIX command interpreter (shell) which of the standard shells
  most resembles the Korn shell (ksh), although it is not completely
  compatible.  It includes enhancements of many types, notably in the
  command-line editor, options for customising its behaviour, filename
  globbing, features to make C-shell (csh) users feel more at home and
  extra features drawn from tcsh (another `custom' shell).

  It was written by Paul Falstad when a student at Princeton; however,
  Paul doesn't maintain it any more and enquiries should be sent to
  the mailing list (see question 23).  It is freely available to
  anyone under unrestrictive conditions.

  For more information, the files doc/intro.txt or doc/intro.troff
  included with the source distribution are highly recommended.  A list
  of features is given in FEATURES, also with the source.


2) On what machines will it run?

  Zsh was written for machines of the Berkeley UNIX family; most such
  machines (and all the most popular) will run it without major surgery.
  Modifications have been made so that it should work under SYSVR4-based
  operating systems such as Solaris 2.x and OSF/1.  This best thing is
  to suck it and see.  You may not have to change too much: if you do
  change anything, arrange for the shell script `buildzsh' to set the
  necessary #define's, etc., without human intervention.  Recent
  additions include Convex, Unicos and Linux support; there is a project
  to allow POSIX.1 compilation (but note that that zsh is not itself
  particularly POSIX-compliant at the moment).  Success has been
  obtained on older SYSVR3 systems, but you may need to modify the code.

  If you add support for a new machine, it would be appreciated if you
  could alter buildzsh to configure zsh automatically and send the
  required context diffs to the list (see question 23).


3) What's the latest version?

  Zsh 2.5.0 has just been released; the final form is 2.5.03.  Many
  bugs have been fixed since 2.3.1, which was the last major release,
  and there are many new features, notably programmable completion.
  This version is known to have a bug with pipelines inside other
  shell structures (now fixed in 2.6).

  Work has now started on 2.6; note that even numbered minor versions
  are not released.  Development of zsh is usually patch by patch,
  with each intermediate version publicly available.  Note that this
  `open' development system does mean bugs are sometimes introduced
  into the most recent archived version.  These are usually fixed
  quickly.  Note also that as the shell changes, it may become
  incompatible with older versions; see the end of question 21 for a
  partial list.


4) Where do I get it?

  Richard Coleman ([e-mail]) is in charge of the archive.
  There are various mirrors:
      ftp.math.gatech.edu:/pub/zsh
    ftp.sterling.com:/zsh
    ftp.cenatls.cena.dgac.fr:/pub/shells/zsh
    mrrl.lut.ac.uk:/zsh
  The latest full release is in zsh-2.5.03.tar.gz in these
  directories.  Note that this is in gzip format: you will need GNU
  gzip from your nearest GNU archive to unpack it.  The
  up-to-the-minute development version is in zsh-2.6-alpha4.tar.gz.
  There is also a version under RCS control which may be more suitable
  for source hackers.


5) How does zsh differ from sh, ksh, csh, tcsh, bash?

  As has already been mentioned, zsh is most similar to ksh, while many
  of the additions are to please csh users.

  i) ksh:

  Most features of ksh (and hence also of sh) are implemented in zsh;
  problems can arise because the implementation is slightly different.
  Note also that not all ksh's are the same either.  I have based this
  on the 11/16/88f version of ksh.

  Various options can be turned on which will increase ksh
  compatibility, though decrease zsh's abilities: see the manual
  entries for GLOB_SUBST, IGNORE_BRACES (though brace expansion occurs
  in some versions of ksh), KSH_OPTION_PRINT, NO_BANG_HIST, NO_EQUALS,
  NO_HUP, NO_RCS, NO_SHORT_LOOPS, PROMPT_SUBST, RM_STAR_SILENT,
  SH_WORD_SPLIT (see question 10) and SINGLE_LINE_ZLE.  Note that you
  can also disable any built-in commands which get in your way.  If
  invoked as `ksh', the shell will try and set suitable options.

  Here are some differences from ksh which might prove significant for
  ksh programmers, some of which may be interpreted as bugs; there must
  be more.  Note that this list is deliberately rather full and that
  most of the items are fairly minor.  Those marked `*' perform in a
  ksh-like manner if the shell is invoked with the name `ksh'.

  Syntax:
  * Shell word splitting: see question 10).  (This is particularly
      frequently asked about.)
    Arrays are more csh-like than ksh-like:
      subscripts start at 1, not 0; array[0] refers to array[1];
      `$array' refers to the whole array, not $array[0];
      braces are unnecessary: $a[1] == ${a[1]}, etc.
    Coprocesses are established by `coproc'; `|&' behaves like csh.
    Opening for both input and output via <> is not yet supported.
  Command line substitutions, globbing etc.:
  * The results of parameter substitutions are treated as plain text:
      `foo="*"; print $foo' prints all files in ksh but * in zsh.
      (The GLOB_SUBST option has just been added to fix this.)
    The $((...)) version of numeric evaluation is not implemented; use $[...].
    Treatment of backslashes within backquotes is subtly different.
    $PSn do not do parameter substitution by default (use PROMPT_SUBST
      option).
    Globbing does not allow ksh-style `pattern-lists'.  Equivalents:
      -------------------------------------------------------------------
             ksh             zsh          Meaning
            -----           -----        ---------
           !(foo)            ^foo        Anything but foo.
                      or   foo1~foo2     Anything matching foo1 but foo2.
      @(foo1|foo2|...)  (foo1|foo2|...)  One of foo1 or foo2 or ...
           ?(foo)           (foo|)       Zero or one occurrences of foo.
           *(foo)           (foo)#       Zero or more occurrences of foo.
           +(foo)           (foo)##      One or more occurrences of foo.
      -------------------------------------------------------------------
      The last two (with `#') require the EXTENDED_GLOB option.
    Unquoted assignments do file expansion after ':'s (intended for PATHs).
    `integer' does not allow -i; integers in bases other than 10 do not
      have "base#" prefixed to them when printed.
  Command execution:
  * There is no ENV variable (use /etc/zshrc, ~/.zshrc; note also ZDOTDIR).
    The PATH is not searched for commands specified at invocation without -c.
  Aliases and functions:
    The order in which aliases and functions are defined is significant
      (function definitions with () expand aliases -- see question 6).
    Aliases and functions cannot be exported.
    There are no tracked aliases: command hashing replaces these.
    The use of aliases for key bindings is replaced by `bindkey'.
  Traps and signals:
    By default, background jobs are killed when you log out:  see 19).
    Traps and options are not local to functions; traps are not reset
      automatically when called; traps are called as functions themselves
      (this is a bug for the `trap "..." NAL' form of trap setting).
    TRAPERR has become TRAPZERR (this was forced by UNICOS which has SIGERR).
  Editing:
    The options emacs, gmacs, trackall, viraw are not supported.
      Use bindkey to change the editing behaviour: `set -o {emacs,vi}'
      become `bindkey -{e,v}'; for gmacs, go to emacs mode and use
      `bindkey \^t gosmacs-transpose-characters'.  `Trackall' is replaced
      by `hashcmds'.
    The `keyword' option does not exist and -k is instead interactivecomments.
      (`keyword' will not be in the next ksh release either.)
    Management of histories in multiple shells is different:
      the history list is not saved and restored after each command.
    \ does not escape editing chars (use ^V).
    Not all ksh bindings are set (e.g. `<ESC>#'; try <ESC>q).
  * # in an interactive shell is not treated as a comment by default.
  Built-in commands:
    Some built-ins (r, autoload, history, integer ...) were aliases in ksh.
    There is no built-in command newgrp: use e.g. `alias newgrp="exec newgrp"'
    `jobs' has no `-n' flag.
    `read' has no `-s' flag.
    In `let "i = foo"', foo is evaluated as a number, not an expression
      (although in `let "i = $foo"' it is treated as an expression).
  Other idiosyncrasies:
    `select' always redisplays the list of selections on each loop.

  ii) csh:

  Although certain features aim to ease the withdrawal symptoms of csh
  (ab)users, the syntax is in general rather different and you should
  certainly not try to run scripts without modification.  The c2z script
  is provided with the source (in scripts/c2z) to help convert .cshrc
  and .login files; see also the next question concerning aliases,
  particularly those with arguments.

  Csh-compatibility additions include:
    Logout, rehash, source, (un)limit built-in commands.
    *rc file for interactive shells.
    Directory stacks.
    Cshjunkie*, ignoreeof options.
    The nonomatch option.
    >&, |& etc. redirection.
    foreach ... loops; alternative syntax for other loops.
    Alternative syntax `if ( ... ) ...' (also `for', `which'; this now
      requires the CSH_JUNKIE_PAREN option).
    $PROMPT as well as $PS1, $status as well as $?, $#argv as well as $#, ....
    Escape sequences via % for prompts.
    Special array variables $PATH etc. are colon-separated, $path are arrays.
    !-type history (which may be turned off via `setopt nobanghist').
    Arrays have csh-like features (see i)).

  iii) tcsh:

  (The previous section applies too, of course.)  Certain features have
  been borrowed from tcsh, including $watch, run-help, $savehist,
  $histlit, periodic commands etc., extended prompts, sched and
  which/where built-ins.  Programmable completion was inspired by, but
  is entirely different to, tcsh's `complete'. (There is a perl script
  called lete2ctl in the scripts directory of the source distribution to
  convert `complete' to `compctl' statements.)  This list is not
  definitive: some features have gone in the other direction.

  If you're missing the editor function run-fg-editor, try something
  with bindkey -s (which binds a string to a keystroke), e.g.
    bindkey -s '^z' '\eqfg %$EDITOR:t\n'
  which pushes the current line onto the stack and tries to bring a job
  with the basename of your editor into the foreground.  Bindkey -s
  allows limitless possibilities along these lines.

  iv) bash:

  Zsh has almost all the features that bash has (and much more); in
  addition it is about twice as fast, though this is less impressive
  than it sounds.  With the new malloc by Sven Wischnowsky (only used if
  you arranged for USE_ZSH_MALLOC to be defined in config.h when
  compiling zsh), zsh uses about the same amount of heap memory as bash,
  which was previously the biggest gripe.  The only feature I am aware
  of that zsh doesn't have is setting a numerical value for ignoreeof
  --- it's always 10 --- but of course I don't use bash :-).

  However, zsh has no claims towards Posix compliancy and will not use
  GNU readline (zle is more powerful).  In fact, bash is intended more
  as an enhanced sh than a ksh work-alike; it doesn't handle [[ ... ]],
  for example.


6) Why do my csh aliases not work?  (Plus other alias pitfalls.)

  First of all, check you are using the syntax
    alias newcmd='list of commands'
  and not
    alias newcmd 'list of commands'
  which won't work. (It tells you if `newcmd' and `list of commands' are
  already defined as aliases.)

  Otherwise, your aliases probably contain references to the command
  line of the form `\!*', etc.  Zsh does not handle this behaviour as it
  has shell functions which provide a way of solving this problem more
  consistent with other forms of argument handling.  For example, the
  csh alias
    alias cd 'cd \!*; echo $cwd'
  can be replaced by the zsh function,
    cd() { builtin cd $*; echo $PWD; }
  (the `builtin' tells zsh to use its own `cd', avoiding an infinite loop)
  or, perhaps better,
    cd() { builtin cd $*; print -D $PWD; }
  (which converts your home directory to a ~).  In fact, this problem is
  better solved by defining the special function chpwd() (see the manual).
  Note also that the `;' at the end of the function is optional in zsh,
  but not in ksh or sh (for sh's where it exists).

  Here is Bart Schaefer's guide to converting csh aliases for zsh.

    1.  If the csh alias references "parameters" (\!:1 \!* etc.),
        then in zsh you need a function (referencing $1 $* etc.).
        Otherwise, you can use a zsh alias.

    2.  If you use a zsh function, you need to refer _at_least_ to
        $* in the body (inside the { }).  Parameters don't magically
        appear inside the { } the way they get appended to an alias.

    3.  If the csh alias references its own name (alias rm "rm -i"),
        then in a zsh function you need the "command" keyword
        (function rm() { command rm -i $* }), but in a zsh alias
        you don't (alias rm="rm -i").

    4.  If you have aliases that refer to each other (alias ls "ls -C";
        alias lf "ls -F" ==> lf == ls -C -F) then you must either:
        a.  convert all of them to zsh functions; or
        b.  after converting, be sure your .zshrc defines all of your
            aliases before it defines any of your functions.

    Those first four are all you really need, but here are four more for
    heavy csh alias junkies:

    5.  Mapping from csh alias "parameter referencing" into zsh function
        (assuming shwordsplit is NOT set in zsh):
             csh                   zsh
            =====               ==========
            \!*                 $*              (or $argv)
            \!^                 $1              (or $argv[1])
            \!:1                $1
            \!:2                $2              (or $argv[2], etc.)
            \!$                 $*[$#]          (or $argv[$#], or $*[-1])
            \!:1-4              $*[1,4]
            \!:1-               $*[1,$#-1]      (or $*[1,-2])
            \!^-                $*[1,$#-1]
            \!*:q               "$@"            ($*:q doesn't work (yet))
            \!*:x               $=*             ($*:x doesn't work (yet))

    6.  Remember that it is NOT a syntax error in a zsh function to
        refer to a position ($1, $2, etc.) greater than the number of
        parameters. (E.g., in a csh alias, a reference to \!:5 will
        cause an error if 4 or fewer arguments are given; in a zsh
    function, $5 is the empty string if there are 4 or fewer
    parameters.)

    7.  To begin a zsh alias with a - (dash, hyphen) character, use
        "alias --":
                 csh                            zsh
            ===============             ==================
            alias - "fg %-"             alias -- -="fg %-"

    8.  Stay away from "alias -g" in zsh until you REALLY know what
        you're doing.

  There is one other serious problem with aliases: consider
        alias l='/bin/ls -F'
        l() { /bin/ls -la $* | more }
  `l' in the function definition is in command position and is expanded
  as an alias, defining `/bin/ls' and `-F' as functions which call
  `/bin/ls', which gets a bit recursive.  This can be avoided if you use
  `function' to define a function, which doesn't expand aliases.  It is
  possible to argue for extra warnings somewhere in this mess.  Luckily,
  it is not possible to define `function' as an alias.


7) How do I turn off spelling correction for an individual command?

  You presumably have `setopt correctall' in an initialisation file, so
  that zsh checks the spelling of each word in the command line.  You
  probably do not want this behaviour for commands which do not operate
  on existing files.

  The answer is to alias the offending command to itself with
  `nocorrect' stuck on the front, e.g.
       alias mkdir='nocorrect mkdir'


8) How do I get the meta key to work on my xterm?

  As stated in the manual, zsh needs to be told about the meta key by
  using `bindkey -me' or `bindkey -mv' in your .zshrc or on the command
  line.  You probably also need to tell the terminal driver to allow the
  `meta' bit of the character through; `stty pass8' is the usual
  incantation.  Sample .zshrc entry:
    [[ $TERM = "xterm" ]] && stty pass8 && bindkey -me
  or, on SYSVR4-ish systems without pass8,
    [[ $TERM = "xterm" ]] && stty -parenb -istrip cs8 && bindkey -me
  (disable parity detection, don't strip high bit, use 8-bit characters).
  Make sure this comes *before* any bindkey entries in your .zshrc which
  redefine keys normally defined in the emacs/vi keymap.


9) Why does my terminal act funny in way x?

  If you are using an OpenWindows cmdtool as your terminal, any
  escape sequences (such as those produced by cursor keys) will be
  swallowed up and never reach zsh.  Either use shelltool or avoid
  commands with escape sequences.  You can also disable scrolling from
  the cmdtool pane menu (which effectively turns it into a shelltool).
  If you still want scrolling, try using an xterm with the scrollbar
  activated.

  If that's not the problem, and you are using stty to change some tty
  settings, make sure you haven't asked zsh to freeze the tty settings:
  type
    ttyctl -u
  before any stty commands you use.

  On the other hand, if you aren't using stty and have problems you may
  need the opposite:  `ttyctl -f' freezes the terminal to protect it
  from hiccups introduced by other programmes (kermit has been known to
  do this).

  If _that's_ not the problem, and you are having difficulties with
  external commands (not part of zsh), and you think some terminal
  setting is wrong (e.g. ^V is getting interpreted as `literal next
  character' when you don't want it to be), try
    ttyctl -u
    STTY='lnext "^-"' commandname
  (in this example), or just export STTY for all commands to see.  Note
  that zsh doesn't reset the terminal completely afterwards: just the
  modes it uses itself and a number of special processing characters
  (see the stty(1) manual page).

  After the release of version 2.5, there is likely to be an overhaul
  which allows the terminal modes used by the shell to be modified
  separately from those seen by external programmes.  This is partially
  implemented already:  in 2.5, the shell will be less susceptible to
  mode changes inherited from programmes.


10) Why does `$var' where var="foo bar" not do what I expect?

  In most Bourne-shell derivatives, multi-word variables such as
    var="foo bar"
  are split into words when passed to a command or used in a `for foo in
  $var' loop.  By default, zsh does not have that behaviour: the
  variable remains intact.  (This is not a bug!  See below.)  An option
  (shwordsplit) exists to provide compatibility.

  For example, defining the function args to show the number of its
  arguments:
    args() { echo $#; }
  and with our definition of vble,
    args $vble
  produces the output `1'.  After
    setopt shwordsplit
  the same function produces the output `2', as with sh and ksh.

  Unless you need strict sh/ksh compatibility, you should ask yourself
  whether you really want this behaviour, as it can produce unexpected
  effects for variables with entirely innocuous embedded spaces.  The
  natural way to produce word-splitting behaviour in zsh is via arrays.
  For example,
    set -A array one two three twenty
  (or
        array=(one two three twenty)
  if you prefer), followed by
    args $array
  produces the output `4', regardless of the setting of shwordsplit.
  Arrays are also much more versatile than single strings.

  Note also the "$@" method of word splitting is always available in zsh
  functions and scripts (though strictly this does array splitting, not
  word splitting), also the substitution ${=foo} to turn on word
  splitting on variable `foo'.

  Shwordsplit is set when zsh is invoked with the name `ksh'.


11) Why do my autoloaded functions not autoload [the first time]?

  When you put a shell function in an autoload directory (i.e. one
  mentioned in $FPATH), it should be written just as if it were a
  shell script.  In other words, there should be no line at the
  beginning saying `function foo {' or `foo () {', and consequently no
  matching '}' at the end.  If you include those, then when zsh loads
  and run the function the first time you try to use it, the whole
  file is run --- in other words, zsh simply defines the function and
  does nothing else.

  As a concrete example, if you have a function which you would define
  on the command line as `xhead () { print -n "\033]2;$*\a"; }' and
  your have assigned `FPATH=~/fns', then your .zshrc should contain
  `autoload xhead' and the file ~/fns/xhead should contain only
  `print -n "\033]2;$*\a"'.


12) How does base arithmetic work?

  The ksh syntax is now understood, i.e.
        let 'foo = 16#ff'
  or equivalently
        (( foo = 16#ff ))
  or even
        foo=$[16#ff]
  (note that `foo=$((16#ff))' is not yet supported).
  The original syntax was
    (( foo = [16]ff ))
  --- this was based on a misunderstanding of the ksh manual page.  It
  still works but its use is deprecated.
  Then
    echo $foo
  gives the answer `255'.  It is possible to declare variables explicitly
  to be integers, via
    typeset -i foo
  which has a different effect: namely the base used in the first
  assignment (hexadecimal in the example) is subsequently used whenever
  `foo' is displayed (although the internal representation is unchanged).
  To ensure foo is always displayed in decimal, declare it as
    typeset -i 10 foo
  which requests base 10 for output.  You can change the output base of an
  existing variable in this fashion.  Using the `$[ ... ]' method will
  always display in decimal.


13) How do I get a newline in my prompt?

  You can place a literal newline in quotes, i.e.
    PROMPT="Hi Joe,
    what now?%# "
  If you have the bad taste to set the option cshjunkiequotes, which
  inhibits such behaviour, you will have to bracket this with
  `unsetopt cshjunkiequotes' and `setopt cshjunkiequotes', or put it in
  your .zshrc before the option is set.

  Arguably the prompt code should handle `print'-like escapes.  Feel
  free to write this :-).


14) Why does `bindkey ^a command-name' or 'stty intr ^-' do something funny?

  You probably have the extendedglob option set in which case ^ and #
  are metacharacters.  ^a matches any file except one called a, so the
  line is interpreted as bindkey followed by a list of files.  Quote the
  ^ with a backslash or put quotation marks around ^a.


15) Why can't I bind \C-s and \C-q any more?

  The control-s and control-q keys now do flow control by default,
  unless you have turned this off with `stty -ixon' or redefined the
  keys which control it with `stty start' or `stty stop'.  (This is
  done by the system, not zsh; the shell simply respects these
  settings.)  In other words, \C-s stops all output to the terminal,
  while \C-q resumes it.

  There is an option NO_FLOW_CONTROL to stop zsh from allowing flow
  control and hence restoring the use of the keys: put `setopt
  noflowcontrol' in .zshrc.


16) How do I execute command `foo' within function `foo'?

  The command `command foo' does just that.  You don't need this with
  aliases, but you do with functions.  Note that error messages like
        zsh: job table full or recursion limit exceeded
  are a good sign that you tried calling `foo' in function `foo' without
  using `command'.


f17) Why can't I get zsh to work with SGI's `userenv'?

  It seems the Silicon Graphics `userenv' command interacts weirdly with
  the line editor (zsh is not unique in this respect).  Add this line to
  the top of your .zshenv file:
        if [[ "${ENVONLY:-0}" -eq 1 ]]; then unsetopt zle; fi
  --- which will turn the line editor off if it sees a `userenv' coming.
  Don't turn zle back on with setopt until [[ $ENVONLY -ne 1 ]].


18) Why do history substitutions with single bangs do something funny?

  If you have a command like "echo !-2:$ !$", the first history
  substitution then sets a default to which later history substitutions
  with single unqualified bangs refer, so that !$ becomes equivalent to
  !-2:$.  The option CSH_JUNKIE_HISTORY makes all single bangs refer
  to the last command.


19) Why does zsh kill off all my background jobs when I logout?

  Simple answer: you haven't asked it not to.  Zsh (unlike [t]csh) gives
  you the option of having background jobs killed or not: the `nohup'
  option exists if you don't want them killed.  Note that you can always
  run programs with `nohup' in front of the pipeline whether or not the
  option is set, which will prevent that job from being killed on
  logout.  (Nohup is actually an external command.)

  The `disown' builtin is very useful in this respect: if zsh informs
  you that you have background jobs when you try to logout, you can
  `disown' all the ones you don't want killed when you exit.  This is
  also a good way of making jobs you don't need the shell to know about
  (such as commands which create new windows) invisible to the shell.


20) I don't have root access: how do I make zsh my login shell?

  Unfortunately, on many machines you can't use `chsh' to change your
  shell unless the name of the shell is contained in /etc/shells, so if
  you have your own copy of zsh you need some sleight-of-hand to use it
  when you log on.  (Simply typing `zsh' is not really a solution since
  you still have your original login shell waiting for when you exit.)

  The basic idea is to use `exec <zsh-path>' to replace the current
  shell with zsh.  Often you can do this in a login file such as
  .profile (if your shell is sh or ksh) or .login (if it's csh).  Make
  sure you have some way of altering the file (e.g. via FTP) before you
  try this as `exec' is often rather unforgiving.

  If you have zsh in a subdirectory `bin' of your home directory,
  put this in .profile:
    [ -f $HOME/bin/zsh ] && exec $HOME/bin/zsh -l
  or if your login shell is csh or tcsh, put this in .login:
    if ( -f ~/bin/zsh ) exec ~/bin/zsh -l
  (in each case the -l tells zsh it is a login shell).

  It's not a good idea to put this (even without the -l) into .cshrc, at
  least without some tests on what the csh is supposed to be doing, as
  that will cause _every_ instance of csh to turn into a zsh and will
  cause csh scripts (yes, unfortunately some people write these) which
  do not call `csh -f' to fail.  If you want to tell xterm to run zsh,
  change the SHELL environment variable to the full path of zsh at the
  same time as you exec zsh.  If you have to exec zsh from your .cshrc,
  a minimum safety check is `if ($?prompt) exec zsh'.

  If you like your login shell to appear in the process list as '-zsh',
  you can link zsh to -zsh (e.g. by `ln -s ~/bin/zsh ~/bin/-zsh') and
  change the exec to `exec -zsh'.  (Make sure -zsh is in your path.)
  This has the same effect as the `-l' option.

  Footnote: if you DO have root access, make sure zsh goes in
  /etc/shells on all appropriate machines, including NIS clients, or you
  may have problems with FTP to that machine.


21) Shouldn't zsh be more/less like ksh/(t)csh?

  People often ask why zsh has all these `unnecessary' csh-like features,
  or alternatively why zsh doesn't understand more csh syntax.  This is
  far from a definitive answer and the debate will no doubt continue.

  Paul's object in writing zsh was to produce a ksh-like shell which
  would have features familiar to csh users.  For a long time, csh was
  the preferred interactive shell and there is a strong resistance to
  changing to something unfamiliar, hence the additional syntax and
  CSH_JUNKIE options.  This argument still holds.  On the other hand,
  the arguments for having what is close to a plug-in replacement for ksh
  are, if anything, even more powerful:  the deficiencies of csh as a
  programming language are well known (look in any Usenet FAQ archive, e.g.
    rtfm.mit.edu:pub/usenet-by-group/news.answers/unix-faq/shell/csh-whynot
  if you are in any doubt) and zsh is able to run many standard scripts
  such as /etc/rc.

  Of course, this makes zsh rather large and quite messy so that it
  seems to appeal mainly to hackers.  The only answer, perhaps not
  entirely satisfactory, is that you have to ignore the bits you don't
  want.


22) What bugs are currently known and unfixed?

  Here are some of the more well-known ones, very roughly in decreasing
  order of significance.  Many of these can also be counted against
  differences from ksh in question 5); note that this applies to the
  latest beta version and that simple bugs are often fixed quite
  quickly.  There is a file BUGS in the source distribution with more
  detail.

  Certain built-ins won't allow the `VAR=value command ...' assignment.
    N.B.: `exec foo=bar command' is a workaround for exec.  Also, from 2.6
    builtins should correctly unset VAR after the command, except
    for special variables (bug) and typeset/export commands (deliberate).
  The `histlit' option adds newlines to lines in the history (and is
    broken in several other ways, e.g. !:x word selection; it may be
    removed).
  `time' is ignored with builtins and can't be used with {...} or (...);
    in shells with no job control the command name is blank.
  `set -x' (`setopt xtrace') still has a few glitches.
  The :q modifier doesn't split words and -q and -x don't work for variables.
  In vi mode, `u' can go past the original modification point.
  Autocd won't use globbed filenames.
  The singlelinezle option has problems with prompts containing escapes.
  Builtins at the end of a pipeline lose their status to previous commands.
  The `r' command does not work inside $(...) or `...` expansions.

  Note that a few recent changes introduce incompatibilities (these
  are not bugs):
  An option CSH_JUNKIE_PAREN has proved necessary for the syntax `if (
    <condition> ) <code>' and for similar `for' and `while' (but not
    `foreach') commands.  This is because it is valid Bourne/Korn shell
    syntax to have a subshell command immediately after if, and the
    default syntax should be compliant with that.
  You also need CSH_JUNKIE_PAREN if you want to use the syntax
    `if [[ ... ]] command'; this was mainly here for csh compatibility.
    Remember you can use `[[ ... ]] && command' to do the same thing.
  Assignment of `...` and $(...) to variables in the form `foo=$(...)'
    is now always scalar; previously the command output was split and
    array assignment performed if more than one word resulted.  You
    can still generate an array vie `foo=($(...))', which was always
    the safe way of doing it.  Again, this is for Bourne/Korn compliance.
  The -h option to compctl has been removed (use `-k hosts' for the
    same effect); automatic handling of hosts after '@' has been removed
    (use e.g. `compctl -u -x "n[-1,@]" -k hosts -- finger').
  Handling of backslashes in `echo' and `print' has changed.
  umask's behaviour with respect to symbolic operators has reversed
    (and is now ksh-compatible).
  The option CSH_JUNKIE_TILDE has been upgraded to GLOB_SUBST: instead
    of just ~'s and ='s, all characters become eligible for file
    expansion and globbing when the option is set.  (The option was
    not present in 2.3 at all.)

  There is at least one common bug which is not due to zsh.  If you have
  abnormal behaviour with file descriptor 4, it's because your password
  database is being read from the Network Information System and
  getpwent() left this fd open.


23) Where do I report bugs, get more info / who's working on zsh?

  The shell is being maintained by various (entirely self-appointed)
  subscribers to the mailing list,
    [e-mail] so any suggestions, complaints,
  questions and matters for discussion should be sent there.  If you
  want someone to mail you directly, say so.  Most patches to zsh appear
  there first.

  A lower-volume list,
    [e-mail]
  exists for announcements of new features and proposed changes
  requiring some decisions.

  Both lists are handled by an automated server.  The instructions for
  zsh-announce are the same as for zsh-list: just change zsh-list to
  zsh-announce everywhere in the following.

  To join zsh-list, send email to
    [e-mail]
  containing
    subscribe zsh-list <optional-address>
  where <optional-address> can be blank if you want to subscribe from
  your current email address.  Send the message `help' to the same
  address for help on the list server; `unsubscribe zsh-list' also
  works. (Don't send this to the list!) The list manager, Rick Ohnemus,
  can be reached at
    [e-mail]
  (or `rick' at the same adress).

  The list (everything since May 1992) is archived in
    ftp.sterling.com:zsh/zsh-list/YY-MM
  where YY-MM are the year and month in digits.

  Of course, you can also post zsh queries to the Usenet group
  comp.unix.shell; if all else fails, you could even e-mail me.


24) What's on the wish-list?

  Ksh/sh compatibility could be improved if required.  This would
    be a useful long term goal.
  Option for glob qualifiers to follow perl syntax.
  Option to quote !-history lexically via '' but not "".
  Binding of shell functions (or commands?) to key strokes --
    requires some way of accessing the editing buffer from functions
    and probably of executing zle functions as a command.
  trap '...' FOO should be eval'd rather than called as a function.
  `PATH=' should clear the PATH:  it inserts `.'; use `unset PATH' or
    `path=()' for the time being.  This is not really a bug as the .
    would be used internally in any case (cf. ksh).
  Users should be able to create their own foopath/FOOPATH array/path
    combinations.


Acknowledgments:

Thanks to zsh-list, in particular Bart Schaefer, for suggestions
regarding this document; thanks to Jim Mattson, Bas de Bakker and now
Richard Coleman for their hard work as archivists, and to Peter Gray
for maintaining the mailing list, without which zsh might easily have
died, and to the latest list maintainer, Rick Ohnemus.  The world is
eternally in the debt of Paul Falstad for inventing zsh in the first
place (though the wizzo extended completion is by Sven Wishnowsky).

--
Peter Stephenson <[e-mail]> or <PWS@UKACRL> (BITNET)
Department of Physics, University of Wales, Swansea
Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, U.K.
Tel. [phone] extn. 4461