home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- STU:The Biblical Calendar of History by Harold Camping
-
- A Chronological Record of Events According to the Holy Bible
-
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
-
- <0> Introduction
- <1> The Clue Phrase "Called His Name'
- <2> An Ancient Calendar
- <3> Calendar Confirmation from Egypt
- <4> Aaron's was the Fourth Generation
- <5> The First Civilization
- <6> The Confusion of Tongues
- <7> Egypt Becomes a Great Civilization
- <8> Writing and the Tower of Babel
- <9> Conclusion
- <10> A Calendar of Events in Biblical History Events The Chronological
- Sequence During the Egyptian Sojourn Historical Timetable of Pharaohs
- and Dynasties Chronology of the Judges Israel Chronology Note on
- Oppression by Heathen Power Chronological Table of the Kings of the
- Divided Kingdom
- <11> References
-
- Introduction
-
- Chapters 5 and 11 of the book of Genesis have long been a seemingly
- insurmountable obstacle to students of the Bible. Inasmuch as they
- begin with Adam and end with Abraham, they have their roots in creation
- and their outreach into the era of the great civilizations of Babylon
- and Egypt, which flourished during Abraham's day. They therefore
- tantalize the scholar who is trying to reconstruct past history.
- Unfortunately, because a solution to an understanding of these chapters
- has not been forthcoming, the events embraced within their scope --
- creation, the fall of man, the Noachian flood -- are likewise often
- looked upon as accounts impervious to clear understanding.
-
- Bishop Ussher's attempt to understand these chronological notices
- has only worsened matters. His conclusions that Adam's date was 4004
- B.C., the flood date was 2349 B.C. and that the Israelites spent 215
- years in Egypt, agree neither with the Biblical nor the secular
- evidence.
-
- But these chapters of Genesis are a part of the Word of God, and
- therefore they must be true and dependable. The question is, can they
- be rightly understood? I would be so presumptuous as to suggest a
- solution to these chronologies. This solution will be compared with
- some of the pertinent archaeological evidence.
-
- The Clue Phrase "Called His Name"
-
- In Genesis 4 and 5 we read of the birth of Enoch to Seth. Why did
- God use different language in describing this event in Genesis 4 than
- in Genesis 5? In Genesis 4 "Seth called his name Enoch" (Gen. 4:26).
- But in Chapter 5 the Bible says," Seth begat Enoch" (Gen.5:6). Why did
- God use the phrase "called his name" (ASV) in connection with Enoch's
- birth in Genesis 4 when He did not in Genesis 5? It is obvious that the
- phrase "Seth begat Enoch, " or "Methuselah begat Lamech," did not
- insure that Enoch was the immediate son of Seth or Lamech or
- Methuselah. Many instances can be found where a father-son relationship
- appears to be indicated and yet other Scriptural evidence points to
- more distant ancestry. Matthew 1:1,, where Jesus is referred to as the
- son David, and David, the son Abraham, is illustrative.
-
- A more careful examination of the Scriptures reveals why the phrase
- "called his name" which is the Hebrew qara', was used. In every place
- where this phrase is employed, there can be no doubt of the existing
- relationship: invariably it is indicative of parent and child. Thus the
- Bible says, for example, "Abraham called the name of his son...Isaac"
- (Gen. 21:3), "...so they called his name Esau" (Gen. 25:25), "a virgin
- shall conceive and shall call his name Immanuel" (Isa. 7:14). In every
- instance where this "clue" phrase appears one may be certain that an
- immediate son is being described and not a more remote descendant.
-
- God's use of this "clue" phrase thus assures one that Seth was the
- immediate son of Adam (Gen. 4:24), Enoch of Seth (Gen. 4:26), and Noah
- of his father, Lamech (Gen. 5:29).
-
- But what about the rest of the names appearing in these genealogies
- under discussion? Two are decipherable. Other Biblical evidence shows
- clearly that Shem was the immediate son of Noah, even though the phrase
- "called his name" is not used.(1) The Bible shows, too, by other
- information that when Terah was 130 he became the father of Abram.(2)
- But in the case of all of the other names listed in these chapters
- there is no Biblical evidence of any kind that points to an immediate
- father-son relationship. In fact, there is internal evidence within
- these accounts that points to other than immediate father-son
- relationships.(3)
-
- An Ancient Calendar
-
- In further reflection upon this situation, two Biblical notices
- should be examined. The first is that of Genesis 7 and 8, where the
- dates of the flood events are referenced to the age of Noah. Thus Gen.
- 8:13 records, "in the six hundred and first year, in the first month,
- the first day of the month, the waters....," etc. Gen. 7:6 indicates to
- us that the six hundred years was the age of Noah when the flood came.
- Could the calendars of ancient peoples have been tied to the life spans
- of certain individuals?
-
- The second notice is that of the New Testament where Christ declared
- "this generation will not pass away until all these things take place"
- (Matt. 24:34). In this reference Christ is speaking of events that
- would take place just before His return. He is therefore insisting
- "this generation" would continue at least for almost two thousand
- years, for this much time has now elapsed, and all of the events of
- which he was prophesying in Matthew 24 have not yet happened. As a
- matter of fact, this is the generation of Jesus Christ. This is 1981
- A.D. -- the year of our Lord. The events of today are dated exactly as
- they were in Noah's day, by reference to the birth day of a person.
-
- Since this method of dating events was practiced in Noah's day, was
- suggested by Jesus Himself, and is actually the practice use today,
- could not this have been the method described in Genesis 5 and 11?
- Isn't it possible that these accounts are a calendar giving the name of
- the patriarch whose life span was the reference point at his period or
- generation in history? This would make abundant sense, for this would
- provide for continuity and clarity in historical reckoning.
-
- Calendar Confirmation from Egypt
-
- God gives additional evidence to support this reasoning. In Exodus 6
- God gives genealogical information concerning some of the descendants
- of Jacob. The information given does not appear very meaningful to our
- present day and age. But hidden amongst these verses are three numbers.
- The first is found in verse 16 where it is stated that Levi's three
- sons were Gershon, Kohath and Merari, and the years of Levi's life were
- 137. The second is in the next verse, where it says Kohath's four sons
- were Amram, Ighar, Hebron and Uzziel, and the years of Kohath's life
- were 133. The third is in verse 20, where it says Amram was married to
- Jochebed and she bore him Moses and Aaron, and the years of Amram's
- life were 137. At first reading, it appears that Levi was the great
- grandfather, Kohath the grandfather, Amram the father, and Moses and
- Aaron the sons. But is this so? There is no other Biblical evidence
- that indicates this is the case, and there is no use anywhere in the
- Bible of the phrase "called his name" in reference to these men which
- would point to a immediate father-son relationship. But why would God
- give the life spans of only three individuals amongst so many?
-
- To solve this puzzle, let us assume God is giving us the calendar
- for the Israelitish sojourn in Egypt. One might recall that Jacob came
- to Egypt with his sons including Levi, and that the Israelites went out
- of Egypt under the leadership of Moses and Aaron. Both Levi and Aaron
- are mentioned in Exodus 6 and the age of Aaron at the time of Israel's
- departure from Egypt is given as 83 (Exodus 7:7). It can be shown from
- the Biblical references that when Levi entered Egypt he was 60+3 years
- of age, with the burden of the evidence pointing to 60 years. Since he
- died at the age of 137, he lived 77 years in Egypt. If this is a
- calendar giving the names of the reference patriarchs or generations,
- we would expect that Kohath was a descendant of Levi and was born the
- year of Levi's death: that Amram was a descendant of Kohath, and that
- he was born the year of Kohath's death. Aaron in turn was born the year
- of Amram's death, and was descended from Amram. Let us add these time
- spans together:
-
- Levi 77 years in Egypt Kohath 137 years in Egypt Amram 133 years in
- Egypt Aaron 83 years in Egypt 430 years -- Total Time
-
- Turning now to the Biblical record, we discover the following
- interesting information. "Now the time that the children of Israel
- dwelt in Egypt was four hundred and thirty years. And it came to pass
- at the end of four hundred and thirty years, even the selfsame day it
- came to pass, that all the hosts of Jehovah went out from the land of
- Egypt" (Ex. 12:40,41).
-
- God thus shows us clearly that the calendar used to record the
- passage of time during the Egyptian sojourn was based on the lives of
- Levi and his descendants, Kohath, Amram and Aaron. This explains too
- the prophecy given to Abraham in Gen. 15:13-16, where he is told his
- descendants would be oppressed 400 years in a land that was not theirs,
- and that they would return to their own land in the fourth generation.
-
- The Confusion of Tongues
-
- The next bit of history that should be interesting to investigate is
- the event of the tower of Babel. Is there any secular evidence that
- relates to the account of this confusion of tongues as set forth in
- Genesis 11? There is, indeed.
-
- It might first of all be noted that the account of Genesis 11
- indicates that prior to this time in history all men spoke one
- language. Moreover, the leading civilization was that of these people
- who dwelt in the plains of Shinar or Sumer. Their desire to be the one
- great civilization of the world prompted the building of this great
- tower, which in turn brought on God's interference with their plans so
- that they were forced to separate into various nations.
-
- As has already been shown, the first great civilization of the world
- as revealed by secular evidence was that which sprang forth in the
- Mesopotamia Valley. The time of the beginning of the second important
- civilization of antiquity could be of real significance. Presumably, it
- would have begun very shortly after the tower of Babel. The event of
- the tower of Babel can be known to have occurred during the generation
- of Peleg, for in his days the earth was divided (Gen.10:25). Peleg's
- generation was dated 3153 B.C. to 2914 B.C. Therefore one would expect
- no important civilizations other than Babylonia to have an antiquity
- greater than about 3150 B.C.
-
- Egypt Becomes A Great Civilization
-
- All archaeological evidence points to Egypt as the second great
- civilization to appear. While there was a primitive culture in Egypt
- prior to the First Dynasty, the uniting of all of Egypt under Pharaoh
- Menes to form the First Dynasty was the signal for a major burst in the
- arts of civilization. Albright writes:(13)
-
- It is now certain that the level of Egyptian culture remained
- considerably below that of Mesopotamia until the First Dynasty, when
- under strong indirect influence from the Euphrates Valley, it forged
- ahead of the latter in a breathtaking spurt.
-
- Interestingly, the new civilization of Egypt beginning with the
- First Dynasty was patterned after the Babylonia (Mesopotamia) culture.
- Albright continues:(14)
-
- The close of the predynastic Age and the beginning of the Thinite
- (period of first two centuries) period witnessed a sudden burst in the
- arts of civilization. This seems to have been connected in some way
- with an increase of cultural influence from Asia, since there are
- numerous exact parallels between Mesopotamia and Egyptian culture at
- this time, the former being demonstrably older and more original in
- nearly every instance.
-
- The date of the beginning of the First Dynasty under Menes is
- calculated to be somewhere between 2800 B.C. and 3100 B.C. The early
- archaeologists such as Breasted dated his reign at about 3400 B.C. As
- new archaeological evidence was uncovered this date was moved forward
- to about 3000 B.C. Albright believes 2850 B.C. is a good estimate.(15)
- William C. Hayes suggest 3100 B.C. is the best date presently
- available.(16)
-
- Considering the above information, one is struck by the fact that
- prior to about 3100 B.C. to 2850 B.C. only one civilization of
- consequence existed in the world. That was the nation of Babylonia on
- the plains of Shinar. Then at that time, in a sudden burst of progress,
- Egypt grew to become a second great civilization, a civilization
- patterned after the first. And these dates are in almost exact
- agreement with the Biblical date for the Tower of Babel. Surely the
- confusion of tongues as recorded in Genesis 11 sent thousands of people
- skilled in all the arts and crafts of Mesopotamia to Egypt and
- elsewhere. Thus accord can be seen between the sacred and the secular
- records by this indirect evidence of the timetable of the civilizations
- of antiquity.
-
- Writing and the Tower of Babel
-
- It might be noted too that writing had its beginning in Mesopotamia
- and may be related to the confusion of tongues. Sir Leonard Wooley
- writes:(17) "All the archaeological evidence seems to prove that true
- writing was first developed in southern Mesopotamia." The timing for
- this event is given as 3500 to 3000 B.C. Gelb concludes:(18) "the date
- of the earliest Sumerian writing should be set tentatively at about
- 3100 B.C."
-
- The confusion of tongues in Sumer some time in the period between
- 3150-2900 B.C. could well have been the catalyst that produced writing.
- Before this dramatic civilization-splitting event all was secure. Only
- one language was spoken in all the world. Verbal communication was
- adequate and dependable. But then came this fearful event that shook
- the very foundations of this great civilization. Men could no longer
- understand each other. There must be a better way. The application of
- the spoken word to clay tablets would provide insurance that this kind
- of a happening would never totally destroy a culture again. The clay
- tablets would always prove to be the reference point. One surely can
- see the possibility if not the probability of this connection between
- writing and the Tower of Babel.
-
- Conclusion
-
- We thus see that the chronology of history established by Biblical
- reckoning agrees rather satisfactorily with the archaeological evidence
- of the earliest civilizations. The Biblical timetable is of course the
- most reliable, for it is God's Word. If we have properly interpreted
- it, it should make possible a far more definitive analysis of the
- secular evidence than ever before. It should also provide a dependable
- framework in which to understand dating evidence such as that offered
- by radiometric isotopes like carbon 14.
-
- Hopefully, a perspective of history has been set forth that shows
- that answers are potentially forthcoming when we begin with the
- Biblical framework. The concept of a 13,000 year old world, which began
- to be repopulated again after the flood some 7,000 years ago, and which
- 1,500 years later had grown to a point which allowed the spawning of
- the first great cities, surely makes much more sense than that of
- mankind being around for hundreds or even thousands of millenniums, and
- then becoming a cohesive city civilization only in the last 5,500
- years. Furthermore, the apparent possibility of the end of the age
- occurring in our time also accords far better with the shorter
- timetable.
-
- Admittedly, the first purpose of the Bible is not to be a textbook
- of science or history. It is fundamentally a presentation of God's
- grace revealed through Jesus Christ. But when the Bible does speak in
- any field of learning, it does so with great care, accuracy and
- authority. Three reasons might be advanced for this: l. These subjects
- are often an integral part of the plan of salvation; 2. they are part
- of God's message to man; and 3. by reason of His very nature God is
- accurate when He speaks. Therefore, it possibly has much more to offer
- than many have supposed. I hope that others will be encouraged to build
- upon the suggestions offered in this presentation.
-
- A CALENDAR OF EVENTS IN BIBLICAL HISTORY
-
- Events B.C.
-
- CREATION. (about 13,000 years ago)...........................11013
- CREATION OF ADAM.............................................11013
- BIRTH OF SETH.
- Adam was 130 when Seth was born (Gen. 5:6)...................10883
- BIRTH OF ENOCH.
- Seth was 105 when Enoch was born (Gen.5:6)...................10778
- END OF ENOCH'S PERIOD
- 905 years after his birth (Gen. 5:11) which is the year Kenan was
- born and which began his period...............................9873
- END OF KENAN'S PERIOD
- 910 years after his birth (Gen. 5:14). This is the year Mahalaleel
- was born and beginning of his period..........................8963
- END OF MAHALALEEL'S PERIOD
- 895 years after his birth (Gen.5:17). This is the year Jared was born
- and beginning of his period...................................8068
- END OF JARED'S PERIOD
- 962 years after his birth (Gen.5:20). This is the year Enoch was born
- and beginning of his period...................................7106
- END OF ENOCH'S PERIOD
- 365 years after his birth (Gen. 5:23). This is the year Methuselah
- was born and beginning of his period..........................6741
- END OF METHUSELAH'S PERIOD
- 969 years after his birth (Gen. 5:27). This is the year Lamech was
- born and beginning of his period..............................5772
- BIRTH OF NOAH. Lamech was 182 when Noah was born
- (Gen. 5:28,29)................................................5590
- THE FLOOD (about 7,000 years ago).
- Noah was 600 when the flood came (Gen. 7:6)...................4990
- DEATH OF SHEM
- 502 years after the flood (Gen. 11:10,11). This is the year Arpachshad
- was born and beginning of his period..........................4488
- END OF ARPACHSHAD'S PERIOD
- 438 years after his birth (Gen. 11:12,13). This is the year Shelah
- was born and beginning of his period..........................4050
- END OF SHELAH'S PERIOD
- 433 years after his birth (Gen. 11:14,15). This is the year Eber was
- born and beginning of his period..............................3617
- END OF EBER'S PERIOD
- 464 years after his birth (Gen. 11:16,17). This is the year Peleg was
- born and beginning of his period..............................3153
- TOWER OF BABEL
- During Peleg's patriarchal period the division of the continents
- occurred. The Tower of Babel must have occurred between these dates
- (Gen. 10:25).............................................3153-2914
- END OF PELEG'S PERIOD
- 239 years after his birth (Gen. 11:18,19). This is the year Reu was
- born and beginning of his period..............................2914
- END OF REU'S PERIOD
- 239 years after his birth (Gen. 11:20,21). This is the year Serug was
- born and beginning of his period..............................2675
- END OF SERUG'S PERIOD
- 230 years after his birth (Gen. 11:22,23). This is the year Nahor was
- born and beginning of his period..............................2445
- END OF NAHOR'S PERIOD
- 148 years after his birth (Gen. 11:24,25). This is the year Terah was
- born and beginning of his period..............................2297
- BIRTH OF ABRAM TO TERAH.
- Terah was 130 years old at birth of Abram.....................2167
- ABRAM ENTERED CANAAN..........................................2092
- CIRCUMCISION OF ABRAHAM when he was 99 years of age...........2068
- BIRTH OF ISAAC.
- Abraham was 100 years old at birth of Isaac (Gen. 21:5).......2067
- BIRTH OF JACOB.
- Isaac was 60 years old at birth of Jacob (Gen. 25:26).........2007
-
- 1. Jacob arrives in Haran at the age of...............................60
- 2. He works seven years for Rachel and is then married to Rachel and Leah.
- He is then.........................................................67
- 3. Reuben is born to Leah the following year when Jacob is............68
- 4. Simeon is born next to Leah when Jacob is..........................69
- 5. Levi is born next to Leah when Jacob is............................70
- 6. Jacob finishes his second seven year contract for Rachel when he is74
- 7. He works for wages for 20 years. In the 17th year of this period Joseph
- is born. Jacob is..................................................91
- 8. At end of the 20 year period Joseph is weaned and Jacob wishes to
- leave Haran. He is.................................................94
- 9. He works six years longer for his flocks and leaves Haran at age..100
-
- JACOB'S FAMILY ARRIVES IN EGYPT when Jacob is 130 (Gen. 47:9) 1877
-
- The Chronological Sequence During the Egyptian Sojourn
-
- Remembering that the death year of one patriarch coincides with the
- birth year of the next, the result must look like this:
-
- Levi's Time in Egypt (137 minus 60)................77 Years
- Kohath's Period of Patriarchal Leadership.........133 Years
- Amram's Period of Patriarchal Leadership..........137 Years
- Aaron's Age at the Time of the Exodus (Exod. 7:7)..83 Years
- Total.............................................430 Years
-
- Historical Timetable of Pharaohs and Dynasties
-
- 1888 B.C. - Sesostris III became Pharaoh. He was part of the Middle
- Kingdom or 12th Dynasty of Egypt. His father, Sesostris II, probably
- had reigned during the previous 19 years and possibly came to an
- untimely death.
- 1886 B.C. - Joseph became Prime Minister or Grand Vizier of Egypt under
- Sesostris III.
- 1877 B.C. - The family of Joseph came to Egypt and took up residence in
- the land of Goshen. The city of Avaris (Zoan in the Bible), which later
- was called Tanis or Qantir, was their capital.
- 1850 B.C. - Sesostris III died after an exceedingly successful reign of
- 38 years. He was succeeded by another great 12th Dynasty Pharaoh named
- Amenemhet III. Under his reign Joseph continued as Prime Minister. A
- canal bearing Joseph's name was constructed at this time.
- 1806 B.C. - Joseph died.
- 1802 B.C. - Amenemhet III died after a 48 year reign. During his reign
- Egypt was prosperous, tranquil and productive. He was succeeded by
- Amenemhet IV who reigned for the brief period of 9 years. During his
- reign there was much internal strife for royal supremacy.
- 1791 B.C. - Amenemhet IV died and was succeeded by the last Pharaoh of
- the 12th Dynasty, Sebeknefrure.
- 1787 B.C. - Sebeknefrure's brief reign of 4 years ended and with it ended
- the 12th Dynasty. The 13th Dynasty began. The reigns of succeeding
- Pharaohs were short and the empire began to dissolve. The Israelites,
- who no doubt are the "Hyksos" of Archaeological fame, took advantage of
- the internal struggles to acquire a strong hand in the Egyptian
- government and indeed some of them may have reigned as Pharaohs during
- this period.
- 1580 B.C. (approx.) - Several dynasties have ruled over Egypt since 1787 B.C.
- At this time Ahmose I began to reign as the first king of the 18th Dynasty.
- He forcibly began to remove the Israelites (Hyksos) from political power.
- The most war-like Israelites were driven from the land and the Israelitish
- nation began to be severely oppressed. Either this Pharaoh or a closely
- succeeding Pharaoh such as Thutmose I could well have been the king who
- "did not know Joseph" (Exod. 1:8).
- 1560 B.C. (approx.) - Ahmose I was followed by his son Amenhotep I who
- consolidated the gains of his father.
- 1540-1535 B.C. (approx.) - Thutmose I began to reign as king. He too was a
- continuation of the 18th Dynasty. He continued and probably intensified
- the oppressive measures against the Israelites, for he was ruling when
- Moses was born. His animosity toward the Israelites was probably
- heightened by his troubles with Palestine and Syria. His reign was
- followed by that of his son Thutmose II.
- 1527 B.C. - Moses was born at a time when a royal edict condemned all the
- boy babies to be destroyed. Princess Hatshepsut, a daughter of the king,
- found him in the bulrushes and raised him as her son.
- 1501 B.C. - Thutmose III began to reign as the greatest king of the 18th
- Dynasty. For approximately the first 25 years of his reign he was co-regent
- with Princess Hatshepsut. She regarded herself as a king and was the
- dominant ruler during this co-regency.
- 1487 B.C. - Moses fled from Egypt. King Hatshepsut, who had raised him to
- be her son, sought to kill him because of his evident loyalty for the
- Israelites.
- 1481 B.C. (approx.) - King Hatshepsut died and Thutmose III continued to
- reign until the time of the exodus.
-
- Israel went out of Egypt (Thutmose III)........1447 B.C.
- Israel entered into Canaan.....................1407 B.C.
-
- EXODUS FROM EGYPT
- 430 years later (Exod. 12:40)..................1447 B.C.
- ENTRANCE INTO CANAAN 40 years later............1407 B.C.
-
- Chronology of the Judges B.C. Israel Chronology Years The Exodus
- 1447 Entrance into Canaan 1407 Initial 40 year Period in 1407-1367 Land
- had rest 40 Canaan. During this period the conquest of Land had rest 80
- Canaan occurred under Joshua and Othniel de- livered Israel. Next 80
- Year Period in 1367-1287 Canaan. During this Period Ehud and Shamgar
- deliver Israel Land had rest 40 Next 40 year Period in 1287-1247
- Canaan. Deborah and Land had rest 40 Barak were deliverers Abimelech
- rules 3 during this period Gideon judged 1247-1207 Tola judged 23
- Abimelech rules 1207-1204 Jair judged 22 Tola judged 1204-1181 Jair
- judged 1181-1159 Jephthah judged 1159-1153 Jephthah judged 6 Ibzan
- judged 1153-1146 Ibzan judged 7 Elon judged 1146-1136 Elon judged 10
- Abon judged 1136-1128 Abon judged 8 Samson judged 1128-1108 Samson
- judged 20 Eli judged 1108-1068 Eli judged 40 Ark in Philistines' Hands
- 1068-1067 Ark captured 1 Samuel judged 1067-1047 Final period of Saul
- reigned as king 1047-1007 Samuel 20 David reigned 1007- 967 360 Solomon
- reigned 971- 931 Foundation of temple laid in fourth year of Solomon's
- reign 967
-
- Note on Oppression By Heathen Power
-
- Israel served Cushanrishathaim 8 years Judges 3:8 3:11
- Israel served Eglon 18 years 3:14 3:30
- Israel oppressed by Jabin 20 years 4:3 5:31
- Israel in hand of Midian 7 years 6:1 8:28 9:22 10:2 10:3
- Philistines oppressed Israel 18 years 10:8 12:7 12:9 12:11 12:14
- Israel in hand of Philistines 40 years 13:1 15:20 I Samuel 4:18 6:1
- 111 years
-
- Events Date
- Saul king 1047 B.C. (about 3,000 years ago)
- David 1007 B.C.
- Solomon 971 B.C.
- Temple Foundation laid 967 B.C.
- Solomon's temple con- 967 B.C. struction began 480 years after exodus
- (I Ki. 6:1)
- Division of kingdom at 931 B.C. death of Solomon 36 years later
-
- Chronological Table of the Kings of the Divided Kingdom
-
- JUDAH (2 Tribes) King Reign Character
-
- 1. Rehoboam 931-913 B.C. (17yrs ) Bad
- 2. Abijah 913-911 ( 3 yrs.) Bad
- 3. Asa 911-870 (41 yrs.) Good
- 4. Jehoshaphat 873-848* (25 yrs.) Good
- 5. Jehoram 853-841* ( 8 yrs.) Bad
- 6. Ahaziah 841 ( 1 yr. ) Bad
- 7. Athaliah 841-835 ( 6 yrs.) Bad
- 8. Joash 835-796 (40 yrs.) Good
- 9. Amaziah 796-767 (29 yrs.) Good
- 10.Azariah 792-740* (52 yrs.) Good (or Uzziah)
- 11.Jotham 750-732* (16 yrs.) Good
- 12.Ahaz 735-716 (16 yrs.) Bad
- 13.Hezekiah 716-687 (29 yrs.) Good
- 14.Manasseh 697-643 Bad
- 15.Amon 643-641 ( 2 yrs.) Bad
- 16.Josiah 641-609 (31 yrs.) Good
- 17.Jehoahaz 609 ( 3 mo. ) Bad
- 18.Jehoiakim 609-598 (11 yrs.) Bad (or Eliakim)
- 19.Jehoiachin 608-597* Bad (or Coniah, Jeconiah)
- 20.Zedekiah 597-587 Bad (or Mattaniah)
-
- (Destruction of Jerusalem and captivity of Judah) * Co-regency
-
- ISRAEL (10 Tribes) King Reign Character
-
- 1. Jeroboam I 931-910 B.C. (22 yrs.) Bad
- 2. Nadab 910-909 (2 yrs.) Bad
- 3. Baasha 909-886 (24 yrs.) Bad
- 4. Elah 886-885 ( 2 yrs.) Bad
- 5. Zimri 885 ( 7 days) Bad
- 6. Tibni 885-880
- 7. Omri 885-874* (12 yrs.) Bad
- 8. Ahab 874-853 (22 yrs.) Bad
- 9. Ahaziah 853-852 ( 2 yrs.) Bad
- 10.Joram 852-841 (12 yrs.) Bad
- 11.Jehu 841-814 (28 yrs.) Bad
- 12.Jehoahaz 814-798 (17 yrs.) Bad
- 13.Jehoash 798-782 (16 yrs.) Bad
- 14.Jeroboam II 793-753* (41 yrs.) Bad
- 15.Zechariah 753-752 ( 6 mo. ) Bad
- 16.Shallum 752 ( l mo. ) Bad
- 17.Menahem 752-742 (10 yrs.) Bad
- 18.Pekahiah 742-740 ( 2 yrs,) Bad
- 19.Pekah 752-732* (20 yrs.) Bad
- 20.Hoshea 732-722 ( 9 yrs.) Bad
- (Capture of Samaria and captivity of Israel)
-
- Remnants of these 10 tribes joined with nation of Judah, which is
- then called Israel. * Co-regency
-
- Israel (10 tribes) destroyed 722 B.C.
- Israel (Judah augmented by remnants from 10 tribes) subdued by Egypt 609 B.C.
- Israel taken in to Babylonian captivity and temple destroyed 587 B.C.
- Babylonia conquered by Cyrus, king of Medes and Persians (under Cyrus
- first contingent of Jews returns to Jerusalem) 539 B.C.
- Temple partially rebuilt and rededicated 515 B.C.
- Ezra returned to Jerusalem to reestablish law 458 B.C.
- Rebuilding of wall by Nehemiah 445 B.C.
-
- SILENCE
-
- Christ was born 7 B.C. Christ was baptized 29 A.D. Christ died on
- cross 33 A.D. Jerusalem destroyed by Romans 70 A.D.
-
- REFERENCES
-
- (1) Compare Genesis 7:13, 9:18 and I Peter 3:20
- (2) Compare Genesis 11:27 ff, Genesis 12:4 and Acts 7:4
- (3) For example, Genesis 10:21 describes Shem as "the father of all
- children of Eber," though Eber is removed from Shem by several generations
- (cf. Genesis 11:10-16)
- (4) The fact that Jesus was born a few years earlier (probably 7 B.C.)
- does not diminish the force of this argument, for 1981 A.D. is in principle
- related only to Christ's birth date and not to any other.
- (5) Camping, Harold. Adam When? Ch. 3
- (6) Ibid., ch. 6
- (7) Thiele, Edwin R., The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings, Eerdmans,
- Rev. edition 1965, pg. 53,54. Much additional support can be given to the
- accuracy of this date from the reigns of three of the greatest of the
- Egyptian Pharaohs - Sesostris III, Tuthmosis III and Rameses II. A
- discussion of this is of course beyond the scope of this article.
- (8) Camping, Harold; ch. 5
- (9) Albright, William Foxwell; From the Stone Age to Christianity,
- Doubleday & Co., Inc. 1957, pg. 32
- (10) Rowton, M. B., in The Cambridge Ancient History, Cambridge University
- Press, 1964, pg. 57,58
- (11) Camping, Harold, ch. 7
- (12) Rawlinson, George, Egypt and Babylon, John W. Lovell Co., pg. 9
- (13) Albright, pg. 142
- (14) Ibid., pg. 157
- (15) Ibid.
- (16) Hayes, William C., The Cambridge Ancient History, 1964, pg. 4
- (17) Wooley, Sir Leonard, The Beginnings of Civilization, The New York
- American Library, 1965, pg. 364
- (18) Gelb, A Study of Writing, pg. 63
-