home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
The California Collection
/
TheCaliforniaCollection.cdr
/
his059
/
bbb0590z.lzh
/
BBB0590Z.TXT
Wrap
Text File
|
1991-06-30
|
3KB
|
50 lines
BBB:Alexandria forever
The opponents of the King James Bible--those who make a living by
using it without believing it--are consistent in one thing, and that is
their lack of originality. All the mail we receive from people engaged
in the controversy have the same odor and the same flavor. Every Bible
correcting, apostate, fundamentalist in America evidently thinks the
same way, and writes the same way. When they talk about Ruckman being a
"date setter," they insist that Ruckman said Christ had to come back in
1989, which is desperate lying of the worst sort. When they are faced
with the issue of Final Authority they duck out and begin to talk about
"reliable translations," which is desperate hypocrisy. When faced with
case after case, after case, where we have found revelations in the
King James' text which none of their teachers could find in any Hebrew
or Greek text, they refuse to discuss the matter and say that it is
merely "a claim," and ignore forty-two cases given. When they discuss
the fact, time and time again, we have used the King James text to
correct any English text produced from any Greek text, and have done it
scores of times, they simply say that "Ruckman claims the King James
Version is superior to the Greek text from which it was translated."
Absolutely typical. We don't "teach" or "claim" such things or "use"
such things or "prefer" such things, we demonstrate them. Anybody who
has the slightest doubt about what is going on, should buy a copy of
the Bible Believer's Commentary on Hebrews, and The Pastoral Epistles,
and he will see things demonstrated. The thing is, the apostates know
that the average person is not going to take time to buy the
publications and read them. So on they go with their bunk. What they
have done is taken a couple of lines out of a couple of articles, or a
couple of lines out of the book Manuscript Evidence (printed back in
1970) and use these to scare the Christian into thinking that a heresy
is being taught, whereas the truth of both teachings has been
demonstrated so many times, that when I say forty or fifty times I am
probably underestimating the case. If anybody wants to know how the
English text corrects any Greek text, he can find out in a hurry. If
anybody wants to find forty revelations in a King James text that no
Hebrew or Greek scholar could find in any original, he doesn't have to
go to the moon to find them. All he has to do is buy a copy of the
Bible Believer's Commentary on Genesis, Job, and Hebrews, and there it
will be right in front of his face. But the Alexandrians never change.
They write like Catholics write. They make a shocking statement
based on the ignorance of the reader and trust it to carry him through
to the preordained conclusion they have set up. When the apostate says,
"Ruckman claims that there are advanced revelations in the King James
Bible that cannot be found in the Hebrew or Greek text," the truth of
the matter is that Ruckman has found them and printed them, and you can
read them. The trouble is the fellows who bet their souls on the Greek
and Hebrew text couldn't find them. Jealousy is the rage of man.