home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!sgi!wdl1!bard
- From: bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com (J H Woodyatt)
- Subject: This MemberOfSpeciesHomoSapiens at Conception Thang
- Message-ID: <1992Sep16.034910.26746@wdl.loral.com>
- Sender: news@wdl.loral.com
- Reply-To: bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com
- Organization: Abiogenesis 4 Less
- References: <Sep14.180310.83928@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> <1992Sep14.204915.22713@bmw.mayo.edu> <Sep16.004627.72907@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1992 03:49:10 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- sa114984@longs.lance.colostate.edu (Steven Arnold) writes:
- # BTW, my challenge is still open if you dispute the fact
- # that a new member of the species homo sapiens is created at
- # conception: find me a doctor who will contradict this statement.
- # If you're so darned sure you're right, it shouldn't be any trouble.
-
- I don't see a need to challenge your statement, but one thing does
- make me curious--
-
- why does it matter?
-
- I don't think it matters one whit in the debate over abortion rights
- whether the zygote is or is not a `member of the species homo
- sapiens.'
-
- Why are you even chewing on this bone?
-
-
- --
- J H Woodyatt (a.k.a. Dr. Strychnine)
- Space Systems/Loral
-
- "there's a lot going on that you miss. nothing soft about THESE
- machines. mean, timeless, mean, purposeful, crammed with meaning."
- -- Andrew Palfreyman
-