home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.physics:14486 sci.astro:9615
- Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!rigel.tamu.edu!dwr2560
- From: dwr2560@rigel.tamu.edu (RING, DAVID WAYNE)
- Subject: Re: VLBI (was: My son would like to know about photons...)
- Message-ID: <11SEP199212441159@rigel.tamu.edu>
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
- Keywords: photon,size
- Sender: news@tamsun.tamu.edu (Read News)
- Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
- References: <10506@sun13.scri.fsu.edu> <BttFE8.AK7@nntp-sc.Intel.COM> <mcirvin.715917614@husc8> <8SEP199214444432@zeus.tamu.edu> <1992Sep10.125235.8511@ll.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 17:44:00 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- ryba@ll.mit.edu (Marty Ryba) writes...
- >|> I think I understand this explanation, except that I don't see why separate
- >|> photons should be correlated since in cases of interest the measured
- >|> radiation is thermal.
- >
- > Thermal or nonthermal is no matter - a collection of accelerating charges -
- >a classical time-varying current - will radiate a whole mess of photons
- >*coherently* creating a spherical plane wave *at a given frequency*. Thermal
- >noise means that the phases of each frequency are uncorrelated, and the
- >amplitudes follow some statistical distribution. Since
-
- Things are getting clearer, but I'm not there yet :-) I don't see where
- the "collection of accelerating charges - a classical time-varying current"
- comes in when we are essentially looking at just a hot gas. Or maybe that's
- the point of radio astronomy, that we are looking at the currents?
-
- Dave Ring
- dwr2560@zeus.tamu.edu
-
-