home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!raul.nas.nasa.gov!dking
- From: dking@raul.nas.nasa.gov (Dan King)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Proposal for a moderated abortion newsgroup
- Message-ID: <1992Sep2.144754.4928@nas.nasa.gov>
- Date: 2 Sep 92 14:47:54 GMT
- References: <1992Aug20.202812.12068@ncsu.edu> <92237.190229ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> <1992Aug31.041628.25063@rotag.mi.org> <1992Sep1.014646.25115@ncsu.edu> <9bye939@Unify.Com>
- Sender: news@nas.nasa.gov (News Administrator)
- Reply-To: dking@raul.nas.nasa.gov (Dan King)
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation Facility NASA
- Lines: 29
-
-
- In article <9bye939@Unify.Com> sean@Unify.com (Sean P. Curley) writes:
-
- >I agree! I just started reading this News group and am shocked at the useless
- >ramblings - I was hoping for some rational, thought provoking discussions, not
- >a lot of clearly false opinions - on both sides of the arguments.
-
- Are you referring to rational, thought provoking discussion such as:
-
- In article <siyemop@Unify.Com> sean@Unify.com (Sean P. Curley) writes:
-
- >That is exactly what I want. I do consider it a person at conception and I
- >think murder charges should be filed against any women who gets an abortion
- >- and my wife has said the same thing...
-
- I notice no justification for your claim in this paragraph. Should we
- all just shut up and accept your beliefs? How about following this
- claim with some rational discourse on to how you want to carry this out?
- Would you allow no exceptions for the above? Would you want charges
- brought against women who endanger the fetus? Would you want to force
- a woman to take the maximum precautions to ensure the safety of the
- fetus?
-
- Don't whine about people not using this group the way you want it used,
- when so far you have failed to use it the way you want it used.
-
- >Sean P. Curley Unify Corporation
-
- Dan King
-