home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!csus.edu!beach.csulb.edu!smittie
- From: smittie@beach.csulb.edu (Smittie)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
- Subject: Re: TouchBase vs. Dynodex
- Message-ID: <SMITTIE.92Aug17095458@lark.csulb.edu>
- Date: 17 Aug 92 16:55:02 GMT
- References: <a_6m36p.derek@netcom.com>
- Sender: news@beach.csulb.edu (News Administration/Rumor Bureau)
- Organization: Cal State Long Beach
- Lines: 12
- In-Reply-To: derek@netcom.com's message of Fri, 14 Aug 92 02:06:19 GMT
-
- I have not used Dynodex. I do use TouchBASE and am really happy with it. The
- sort routine is powerful and the print capabilities would accomodate your
- requirements. TouchBASE is very powerful and it seems a natural add on for you
- to get DateBook as well. It also accomodates printing for DayRunners and can
- share data very cleanly and easily with TouchBASE. They're a really nice pair.
-
- smittie
- --
- ___________________________________________________________________________
- GEnie, MCI, AOL:Smittie | If all of us were as smart as we think we are the
- smittie@beach.csulb.edu | current world problems would be yesterday's news.
- ________________________|___________________________________________________
-