home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!sdcc12!icogsci1!cg18ffl
- From: cg18ffl@icogsci1.ucsd.edu (Spumoni...)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
- Subject: Re: Don't let the Amiga Die (Part II)!!!
- Message-ID: <42919@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>
- Date: 29 Dec 92 23:18:18 GMT
- References: <jbickers.0m9p@templar.actrix.gen.nz> <1992Dec29.160521.4069@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>
- Sender: news@sdcc12.ucsd.edu
- Organization: University of California, San Diego
- Lines: 27
- Nntp-Posting-Host: icogsci1.ucsd.edu
-
- In article <1992Dec29.160521.4069@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> jerry@msi.com (Jerry Shekhel) writes:
- John Bickers (jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz) wrote:
- :
- : > So is your claim that a 512K Amiga can run "current feature level"
- : > applications. So my analogy holds perfectly, while you're just whining.
- :
- : Absurd. A 512KB Amiga can and does run such applications.
- :
-
- -Right. You think a 512KB Amiga (with no virtual memory, of course), could
- -ever run something like Word? FrameMaker? Quicken? Improv? Paradox?
- -Falcon 3? Ultima Underworld? Think again, denizen.
-
- I've a very personal question for you.
-
- Do you have gas?
-
-
-
- ------------------------------------------------------
- ---nverenin@sdcc13.ucsd.edu
-
-
-
-
-
-
-