Scenario League Design Tips - Government Switching

Design Tips Index

Scenario League

Apolyton Civ2

Government switching by Cam Hills

(March 99)

Altering governments, including how to make a government available to only particular civilizations without breaking the technology tree.

"Forbid government switching? (0)"

The decision whether to allow government switching in mid-game during a scenario is a meaningful one to address, and will almost certainly have an important effect on the likely success of tribes to achieve the scenario objective.

By allowing a selection of government forms, the player is offered an additional strategic tool in determining their own fate in the game, and this 'extra dimension' usually makes the game more intriguing.

All but the most novice of Civ2 players are familiar with the various strengths and weaknesses of the government types and the impact of

Resources from worked squares,
Corruption and waste,
Unit support,
Maximum rates of tax distribution, and
Special features.

Care must be taken when handling the advanced forms of government in scenario design (with particular recognition of the impact of Fundamentalism and Democracy on game balance). Generally, play-testing will indicate whether these are appropriate to include, too advantageous, or too unmanageable.

Due to their particular set-up, some scenarios are better off without government switching, but in most instances this is not the case, and limiting the player to a single government type for no apparent reason reduces the tactical options and curbs the likely attraction of the scenario.

Changing Government Names

One simple way of modifying your scenario to more fitting government names may be done by amending the rules.txt file that has been copied into your scenario folder. In order to change the name and / or titles of the government type, one way is to simply replace with your own name in the "governments" section. In this case, changes have been made to Monarchy;

The results of this change are apparent when implementing a new government rule;

and

Making this change alone will not alter the technology tree, and "Monarchy" will remain the requisite technology for the "Aristocracy" government. If it is considered desirable to also change this, the technology tree should be amended;

It is important to remember to provide the player with clear explanation on what the effects of these newly named forms of rule are. The player should be able to determine through mechanisms such as; consulting the 'pedia (include the file pedia.txt in your scenario package), the 'read me' file, or through a text-box event.

Providing new names for government types should be done principally to reinforce the theme of the scenario. You may consider it inappropriate to have "Communism" as a government in a Medieval Scenario, however "Agrarianism" could be a more fitting term.

You can additionally modify the title of a leader when taking into account customised government names. Indeed the default game already has plenty of examples, such as;

…where the Viking leader under Despotism rule (govt. type #1) is referred to as "Warlord", while the Spanish ruler under Fundamentalism (govt. type #4) is "Archbishop" (in each case, regardless of gender).

Quarantining Governments

There are various techniques of providing select government forms to certain tribes only. The reasons to take this selective approach may be varied also, and should be in keeping with the scenario's particular milieu.

An important factor to bear in mind is that any technology with the prerequisites "no, no" can not be traded, stolen, or researched. On the other hand, civilization advances with these technologies as prerequisites will become unavailable and will require new prerequisites (unless embarking on the advanced level development of new technology trees).

Quarantining Governments - Force

In setting up the scenario, the author has the option of selecting any government form for any tribe through the 'Cheat > Force Government' mechanism, even if that government form is not possessed as a civilization advance. Should the player initiate a revolution (or Democracy impel a revolution), the only government forms available will be Despotism and those already acquired provided the "Government switching forbidden" toggle is off.

Therefore, the author can make certain government forms available to each tribe at the game's commencement. The A.I. may quickly switch to another form (including Despotism) while the player may initiate a move out of the existing form if that is considered desirable.

Quarantining Governments - Starting Technologies

Another way the author may set up the scenario is by giving the government technologies from the outset. In order to quarantine these government forms from other tribes, they should have "no, no" as prerequisites. Even though a government type is designated "no, no", any tribe that is provided with this advance in the set-up of the game may still convert to that government form.

Quarantining Governments - Events (Fantastic Worlds or higher only)

If it is more appropriate for a tribe to research towards or indeed be granted a 'quarantined' government form in mid-game rather than be given it at the start, the 'events.txt' file can provide a "no, no" government form advance through the "give technology" mechanism. There are several triggers that may set off this event, such as a turn number or a 'unit killed'.

To illustrate with an example; if the Communism form of government were to be accessible only by the East Germans, then the following set up may be one possibility. By using the 'User Defined Tech A slot' (number ninety-one) to become "Socialism" and adjusting the prerequisites for "Communism", "Socialism" takes the place of "Communism" on the technology tree;

this is supported with the event;

"Socialism" would remain on the technology tree as an obtainable, if not tradable advance, however only the East Germans would have access to the Communist government. The event uses the receipt of "Socialism" as the trigger to provide the East Germans with the new form of government.

With this particular example pertaining to "Communism" other modifications, such as; amending Espionage, the United Nations, Marco Polo's Embassy's obsolescence, and being aware that Coliseums are affected, would also need to be borne in mind.

Conclusion

These are some of the more straightforward ways of customising governments. By amending government names and/or leader titles, you may strengthen your scenario by bringing another aspect into play that supports the theme. By quarantining governments, you may provide some tribes with particular opportunities or characteristics that give them a point of difference from their rivals. By permitting the player to select from multiple government types, they can have an increased sense of control and apply their own strategic approach to the scenario. Some scenarios benefit from, if not require that tribes are locked into a single government rule, however most scenarios don't.

Three aspects to be particularly aware of;

Theme

Do the proposed government forms fit the theme of the scenario?

Playability

Do the available forms of government make the game unbalanced?

Advances

Do customisation of governments affect other aspects of the game such as; other technology pursuits, Wonders, and city improvements?

Have a Civ2 scenario development tip you want to submit? E-mail us!

Return to the Scenario League's main page.

Go to the Apolyton's Civilization II main page.

"Forbid government switching? (0)"
	The decision whether to allow government switching in mid-game during a scenario is a meaningful one to address, and will almost certainly have an important effect on the likely success of tribes to achieve the scenario objective. By allowing a selection of government forms, the player is offered an additional strategic tool in determining their own fate in the game, and this 'extra dimension' usually makes the game more intriguing. All but the most novice of Civ2 players are familiar with the various strengths and weaknesses of the government types and the impact of Resources from worked squares, Corruption and waste, Unit support, Maximum rates of tax distribution, and Special features. Care must be taken when handling the advanced forms of government in scenario design (with particular recognition of the impact of Fundamentalism and Democracy on game balance). Generally, play-testing will indicate whether these are appropriate to include, too advantageous, or too unmanageable. Due to their particular set-up, some scenarios are better off without government switching, but in most instances this is not the case, and limiting the player to a single government type for no apparent reason reduces the tactical options and curbs the likely attraction of the scenario.
Changing Government Names
	One simple way of modifying your scenario to more fitting government names may be done by amending the rules.txt file that has been copied into your scenario folder. In order to change the name and / or titles of the government type, one way is to simply replace with your own name in the "governments" section. In this case, changes have been made to Monarchy; The results of this change are apparent when implementing a new government rule; and Making this change alone will not alter the technology tree, and "Monarchy" will remain the requisite technology for the "Aristocracy" government. If it is considered desirable to also change this, the technology tree should be amended; It is important to remember to provide the player with clear explanation on what the effects of these newly named forms of rule are. The player should be able to determine through mechanisms such as; consulting the 'pedia (include the file pedia.txt in your scenario package), the 'read me' file, or through a text-box event. Providing new names for government types should be done principally to reinforce the theme of the scenario. You may consider it inappropriate to have "Communism" as a government in a Medieval Scenario, however "Agrarianism" could be a more fitting term. You can additionally modify the title of a leader when taking into account customised government names. Indeed the default game already has plenty of examples, such as; …where the Viking leader under Despotism rule (govt. type #1) is referred to as "Warlord", while the Spanish ruler under Fundamentalism (govt. type #4) is "Archbishop" (in each case, regardless of gender).
Quarantining Governments
	There are various techniques of providing select government forms to certain tribes only. The reasons to take this selective approach may be varied also, and should be in keeping with the scenario's particular milieu. An important factor to bear in mind is that any technology with the prerequisites "no, no" can not be traded, stolen, or researched. On the other hand, civilization advances with these technologies as prerequisites will become unavailable and will require new prerequisites (unless embarking on the advanced level development of new technology trees).
Quarantining Governments - Force
	In setting up the scenario, the author has the option of selecting any government form for any tribe through the 'Cheat > Force Government' mechanism, even if that government form is not possessed as a civilization advance. Should the player initiate a revolution (or Democracy impel a revolution), the only government forms available will be Despotism and those already acquired provided the "Government switching forbidden" toggle is off. Therefore, the author can make certain government forms available to each tribe at the game's commencement. The A.I. may quickly switch to another form (including Despotism) while the player may initiate a move out of the existing form if that is considered desirable.
Quarantining Governments - Starting Technologies
	Another way the author may set up the scenario is by giving the government technologies from the outset. In order to quarantine these government forms from other tribes, they should have "no, no" as prerequisites. Even though a government type is designated "no, no", any tribe that is provided with this advance in the set-up of the game may still convert to that government form.
Quarantining Governments - Events (Fantastic Worlds or higher only)
	If it is more appropriate for a tribe to research towards or indeed be granted a 'quarantined' government form in mid-game rather than be given it at the start, the 'events.txt' file can provide a "no, no" government form advance through the "give technology" mechanism. There are several triggers that may set off this event, such as a turn number or a 'unit killed'. To illustrate with an example; if the Communism form of government were to be accessible only by the East Germans, then the following set up may be one possibility. By using the 'User Defined Tech A slot' (number ninety-one) to become "Socialism" and adjusting the prerequisites for "Communism", "Socialism" takes the place of "Communism" on the technology tree; this is supported with the event; "Socialism" would remain on the technology tree as an obtainable, if not tradable advance, however only the East Germans would have access to the Communist government. The event uses the receipt of "Socialism" as the trigger to provide the East Germans with the new form of government. With this particular example pertaining to "Communism" other modifications, such as; amending Espionage, the United Nations, Marco Polo's Embassy's obsolescence, and being aware that Coliseums are affected, would also need to be borne in mind.
Conclusion
	These are some of the more straightforward ways of customising governments. By amending government names and/or leader titles, you may strengthen your scenario by bringing another aspect into play that supports the theme. By quarantining governments, you may provide some tribes with particular opportunities or characteristics that give them a point of difference from their rivals. By permitting the player to select from multiple government types, they can have an increased sense of control and apply their own strategic approach to the scenario. Some scenarios benefit from, if not require that tribes are locked into a single government rule, however most scenarios don't. Three aspects to be particularly aware of; Theme Do the proposed government forms fit the theme of the scenario? Playability Do the available forms of government make the game unbalanced? Advances Do customisation of governments affect other aspects of the game such as; other technology pursuits, Wonders, and city improvements?