Transsexuals of the Mind: Opening Doors
By Peta Wilson
Before I go anywhere with this piece I want to acknowledge that it
is almost certainly going to be controversial. Bear with me. I will
happily entertain correspondence, and comment and respond in time.
But please don't just write, if you write at all, and say it is
nonsense... unless you have a constructive opinion.
And the second point I need to make is who and why I have come to
these conclusions. At the time of writing I am sixty two years of
age. I have been an active crossdresser since I was ten. I am a
journalist and author by profession and my training has provided me
with the skills to undertake proper research and investigation. I
have been working on this theory for sixteen years and have spoken
with, either directly or indirectly, over three hundred crossdressers
from seven countries, from every imaginable occupation and age group,
and not once but many times, so that the evidence has been built over
a period of time. Thus, these conclusions are not spontaneous.
I believe that all dedicated crossdressers are, at the least,
transsexuals of the mind. This is to say if there were no barriers
almost all of us would prefer to live, work and play as women. The
relatively large numbers of mid-life transsexuals of the body support
this theory but there are many other pieces of evidence. These days
the categories of gender fluid people — males most commonly — have
broadened. Once, as a result of a term coined by Professor Doctor
Magnus Hirschfeld, we were all just transvestites. But to some extent
the term came into minor disrepute when the media picked up on it and
used it, most commonly, to describe gay crossdressers who dressed for
the purpose of soliciting men — straight men if they could get away
with it. As well, it is a somewhat clinical term and harsher than the
English translation from the Latin root. And, it seems, neither word
goes far enough. So we invented transgendered which seems to mean a
male person who lives as a woman but who chooses not to undertake any
form of radical surgery, or someone who simply thinks of them self
that way. But there are also such terms as ambi-sexual, gender
enhanced, ambigendered. We can call ourselves whatever we wish but I
believe we are all transsexual.
To illustrate this assertion I am going to use what I refer to as
the Doors of Opportunity Theory. This means nothing more than the
apparent reality that we, all of us, tread paths which lead...
somewhere, and along these paths we find doors and sometimes the
doors are locked and it takes a while to find the key, and sometimes
the doors are barred forever and we progress no further. But
significantly when we do find the keys we almost always continue
along these paths until we come across our own barred door; the one
which absolutely precludes further progress. Commonly, and I believe
almost without exception, we would love to find a way to unbar that
door and if we could — and/or when we do — we will progress
further.
Perhaps some examples are in order here.
As children or young teens, when most of us, for whatever reasons,
discovered the need to crossdress we were limited by the lack of
opportunity — fear of discovery, available clothing, time alone.
This is when we came upon our first locked door. Forget the timing
here because some of us found the key to that first door quite young
and for others it remained locked for quite a while. But eventually
most of us did discover the key, opened the door and progressed along
the next passageway — a very real "rite of passage." This most
usually happened when we moved out of the family home and began to
live alone, and found ways to acquire female clothes and make up and
the time to make use of these things. The next apparently locked door
is usually brought about by one of two reasons. The first is the need
to get out of the house. The second is the need to share with someone
else, a girlfriend or fiancee or wife. There are two doors here in
fact and one or the other may be breached and lead to the next, but
often the passageway between these two doors is quite short. You go
out. To somewhere safe at first and then, perhaps, somewhere a little
more adventuresome.
But there is another door which may preclude this adventure for
some and that's the door of passibility. Thousands of crossdressers
have the capacity to transform themselves, if not into attractive
women, at least into a state of acceptability. But thousands don't,
and for them it may be that the door to the outside is permanently
locked. And this will be as far as they go. They will remain closeted
to some extent. But that does not mean the need and the desire to go
further is not present. And it is agonizing.
The other, often adjacent door, is the door to exposure. It is
equally agonizing to live this double life alone. So we, most of us,
try to share it, to tell someone close and most commonly the woman we
are about marry, or have already married. The key to this door is
very meaningful. The level of acceptance of this revelation will
often mean the door becomes fully open, ajar, or permanently or
semi-permanently locked. And I say semi-permanently because in many
cases the key is discovered again when the relationship becomes
impossible and we split.
If this door is fully opened, that is to say we have found a
partner who is accepting and supportive, we will progress further
down the next hallway until... what? There will be another door. It
would seem that about 30% to 40% of wives, SOs or partners are
agreeable to some level of crossdressing activity but far, far fewer
are prepared to entertain the idea of any kind of permanent
arrangement. But does that mean the idea of a next step goes away. No
it doesn't. The majority of us will accept the imposed limitations
and keep to whatever agreement we have made, perhaps forever.
Here it is that we reach our conflict and my assertion that all —
perhaps I will say very nearly all — of us would like to open that
final door to some kind of permanent state is based on this premise.
It is of no significance, really, whether we would chose to undergo
SRS or not. What we are dealing with here is a state of mind. It us
very significant that the need to crossdress on a regular — more
regular? — basis intensifies with the aging process. What
compromises we make are far easier at, say, 30 than they are at 50,
when it seems the idea that we are running out of time becomes
relevant.
So that, even if the locked door remains barred and appears barred
forever, and we go into denial, the desire, the need, the want to
dress and live as a woman remains. Thus we are transsexuals of the
mind.
I want to cite an example, and I know it's only one, and we can't
base a hypothesis on a single case, but it is significant and the
person I am referring to is not alone.
Ms S. was closeted totally until the age of 37. Thereafter she was
closeted within a relationship until the age of 67. When her spouse
died she found the key to the final door. She has never had SRS nor
even considered it but she has not worn an item of male clothing
since she opened the door and she is now 84.
At the age of 62 the key to my final door takes three forms. One
is my relationship with my spouse who is very supportive but who
would not entertain the idea of permanency. The second is my work
which is in television where I have always been seen as male and
could not continue to work were I to transition. The third is my
family. My grandchildren would be just too confused to handle it.
But... if none of those barriers existed I would be transitioning
tomorrow. And from the many, many hours of conversations with other
crossdressers I have enjoyed, or suffered, over the past thirty
years, one hundred percent of them would be doing the same. Although
in some cases it took long time — often a few years — for them to
make this admission.
I rest my case.
|